K-RERA · the public record
ASTRUM GRANDVIEW MYSORE PHASE - I
· Astrum Value Homes
Know the project.
Then choose your home.
The registration, progress and filed details in one place. Go further with an independent reading of the project’s evidence.
The record · free to read
Registration read 16 Jul 2026Progress & dates
The timeline on file.
Available record
No construction trend to plot.
The records used for this page do not supply a series of construction percentages. This does not establish whether possession has been given.
declared completion
Not recorded
The registered date and a construction update answer different questions. Neither is a confirmation of possession.
K-RERA registration · read 16 Jul 2026
Inventory & scale
What this registration contains.
Filed categories, unchanged · K-RERA registration · read 16 Jul 2026
The whole registration
2.9registered acres
46.3registered units per acre
The average covers the registered land and all registered unit types. It does not describe the space, outlook or surroundings of an individual home.
From another project · Prestige Park Grove
A larger advertised area. Almost the same carpet area.
In Tower 14, E4 has 141 sq ft more saleable area than E2. Its carpet area is only 0.46 sq m larger. The report puts the two layouts side by side.
This illustrates the report format. These findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the sample report ↗
The source record
The details behind the headline.
K-RERA · PRM/KA/RERA/1268/378/PR/171019/000373
This project, on the record
The comparable facts of this project, from its own RERA registration record. Each context percentile names its exact comparison set, drawn from Quietlist’s full register store. The paid report adds drawing-read rows to this same table — what the filed plans show about the site, its edges and the unit layouts.
On the register
In context
Values as crawled from the official K-RERA record; context percentiles name their comparison population.
Official Registry Facts
Official project scale
RERA filingRegistration-form facts from the K-RERA detail page: use these to sanity-check the builder brochure, parking allotment, and sanctioned-plan references before relying on plan-extracted approximations.
| Disclosure | Official value | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Registered units | 132 | Total inventory registered with K-RERA. |
| Registered land area | 11,534 sqm | The land area attached to this K-RERA registration. |
| Sanctioned FAR/FSI | ~1.23 | Sanctioned floor-area ratio (≈14,228 sqm sanctioned FAR area ÷ 11,534 sqm land) — higher means a denser vertical build. |
| Registered tower/wing entries | 1 | Official tower/wing count in the K-RERA detail page. |
| Parking total (reconciled) | 132 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Open-parking field | 42 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Garage field | 0 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Project start date | 01-04-2013 |
Official inventory & towers
RERA filingK-RERA registration tables showing the project mix and tower/wing scale. Use this to sanity-check sales claims such as "only large homes", "low density", or "plenty of parking" against the filed inventory.
Registered tower / wing summary
| Tower/wing | Floors | Units | Parking | Height |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASTRUM GRANDVIEW MYSORE PHASE-I | 11 | 132 | 132 | - |
Official unit register
RERA filingK-RERA detail-page flat rows: exact unit numbers, official carpet area, UDS, and parking lots. 132 official flat/unit rows, matching the 132 registered units disclosed above. Use this as a checklist against the specific flat number in your cost sheet and draft agreement.
By unit type
| Unit type | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3BHK | 55 | 949.0 sqft | 600.0 sqft | 55 |
| 2+ Study | 44 | 784.0 sqft | 523.0 sqft | 44 |
| 2BHK | 33 | 677.0 sqft | 451.0 sqft | 33 |
By tower / wing
| Tower/wing | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ASTRUM GRANDVIEW MYSORE PHASE-I | 132 | 677.0-949.0 sqft | 451.0-600.0 sqft | 132 |
Show sample official unit rows
| Unit | Tower | Floor | Type | Carpet | UDS | Parking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 101 | ASTRUM GRANDVIEW MYSORE PHASE-I | 1 | 2BHK | 677.0 sqft | 451.0 sqft | 1 |
| 102 | ASTRUM GRANDVIEW MYSORE PHASE-I | 1 | 3BHK | 949.0 sqft | 600.0 sqft | 1 |
| 103 | ASTRUM GRANDVIEW MYSORE PHASE-I | 1 | 2+ Study | 784.0 sqft | 523.0 sqft | 1 |
| 104 | ASTRUM GRANDVIEW MYSORE PHASE-I | 1 | 3BHK | 949.0 sqft | 600.0 sqft | 1 |
| 105 | ASTRUM GRANDVIEW MYSORE PHASE-I | 1 | 2BHK | 677.0 sqft | 451.0 sqft | 1 |
| 106 | ASTRUM GRANDVIEW MYSORE PHASE-I | 1 | 3BHK | 949.0 sqft | 600.0 sqft | 1 |
Legal, Approvals & Project Team
Litigation & compliance
RERA filingNo litigation declared on this project's K-RERA filing.
All 31 standard compliance document slots have usable uploaded filings.
✓ Completion certificate (OC) is on file.
Named utility/regulatory approvals
"Not found in catalog" can mean the approval genuinely isn't on file yet, or that it doesn't apply to this project (K-RERA doesn't tell us which). Ask the builder directly for any marked not found before relying on it.
K-RERA enforcement record (the regulator's own defaulter list & penalty orders)
⚠ Listed on K-RERA's official DEFAULTER list.
K-RERA complaint orders (24 complaints against a project of this name on K-RERA's orders register)
| Parties | Relief sought | Disposal | Order date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chandana J vs Astrum Value Homes Private Limited | Direct the Respondent to take necessary action to fulfil contractual obligations, assurances and promises in terms of agreement and sale deed, brochures and advertisements to provide all amenities. | AUTHORITY | 31/12/2025 |
| Nanjappa K S vs Astrum Value Homes Private Limited | Direct the Respondent to take necessary action to fulfil contractual obligations, assurances and promises in terms of agreement and sale deed, brochures and advertisements to provide all amenities. | AUTHORITY | 31/12/2025 |
| S Padmanaban vs Astrum Value Homes Private Limited | Direct the Respondent to take necessary action to fulfil contractual obligations, assurances and promises in terms of agreement and sale deed, brochures and advertisements to provide all amenities. | AUTHORITY | 31/12/2025 |
| Sreenivasa Reddy B vs Astrum Value Homes Private Limited | Direct the Respondent to take necessary action to fulfil contractual obligations, assurances and promises in terms of agreement and sale deed, brochures and advertisements to provide all amenities. | AUTHORITY | 31/12/2025 |
| B T Sravanthi vs Astrum Value Homes Private Limited | Direct the Respondent to take necessary action to fulfil contractual obligations, assurances and promises in terms of agreement and sale deed, brochures and advertisements to provide all amenities. | AUTHORITY | 31/12/2025 |
| Shaji Ranapratap vs Astrum Value Homes Private Limited | Direct the Respondent to take necessary action to fulfil contractual obligations, assurances and promises in terms of agreement and sale deed, brochures and advertisements to provide all amenities. | AUTHORITY | 31/12/2025 |
| Rajashekar N vs Astrum Value Homes Private Limited | Direct the Promoter to ensure compliance of Sec 17 of RERA Act 2016. The comliance process is already overdue. | AUTHORITY | 31/12/2025 |
| Nitin Shashikant Mayekar vs Astrum Value Homes Private Limited | Direct the promoters to ensure compliance of Sce 17 of RERA act2016. The compliance process is already overdue | AUTHORITY | 31/12/2025 |
| Raghuram N vs Astrum Value Homes Private Limited | Direct the Prmoter to enable formation of Owners Association as per Sec 17 of RERA Act 2016 | AUTHORITY | 31/12/2025 |
| SHASHIKALA N S AND NARENDRANATH H M vs Astrum Value Homes Private Limited | Direct the Promoter to ensure the compliance of Sec 17 of RERA ACT 2016 which is already overdue | AUTHORITY | 31/12/2025 |
| Aurelia Joan Dmello vs Astrum Value Homes Private Limited | Direct the Promoter to ensure compliance of Section 17 of RERA Act 2016. The compliance process is already overdue. | AUTHORITY | 31/12/2025 |
| Unnikrishnanan K M vs Astrum Value Homes Private Limited | Direct the Respondent to comply with Sec 17 of RERA Act 2016 after competing all promised amenities in the same locations within the apartment complex within 6 months from the date of your order | AUTHORITY | 31/12/2025 |
| Rana Pratap S vs Astrum Value Homes Private Limited | Direct the Promoter to ensure compliance of Sec 17 of RERA Act 2016. The comliance process is already overdue. | AUTHORITY | 31/12/2025 |
| Lipsa Vinodray Monani vs Astrum Value Homes Private Limited | Direct the Promoter to ensure compliance of Sec 17 of RERA Act 2016. The comliance process is already overdue. | AUTHORITY | 31/12/2025 |
| B T SRAVANTHI vs Astrum Value Homes Private Limited | Direct the promoter to ensure compliance of Sec 17 of RERA ACt 2016. The compliance process is already overdue. | AUTHORITY | 31/12/2025 |
| Ashita Mandanna vs Astrum Value Homes Private Limited | To direct the promoter to ensure compliance of Sec 17 of RERA Act 2016. The compliance process is already overdue. | AUTHORITY | 31/12/2025 |
| DR HEMANTH A S vs Astrum Value Homes Private Limited | please dirct billder complained with Sec 17 RERA ACT immediately | AUTHORITY | 31/12/2025 |
| N Rajashekar vs Astrum Value Homes Private Limited | Direct the Respondent to take necessary action to fulfil contractual obligations, assurances and promises in terms of agreement and sale deed, brochures and advertisements to provide all amenities . | AUTHORITY | 21/03/2024 |
| Smt Shashikala N vs Astrum Value Homes Private Limited | Direct the Respondent to take necessary action to fulfil contractual obligations, assurances and promises in terms of agreement and sale deed, brochures and advertisements to provide all amenities. | AUTHORITY | 21/03/2024 |
| N Raghuram vs Astrum Value Homes Private Limited | Direct the Respondent to take necessary action to fulfil contractual obligations, assurances and promises in terms of agreement and sale deed, brochures and advertisements to provide all amenities. | AUTHORITY | 21/03/2024 |
| Mrs Lipsa Vinodray Monani @Lipsa Khodani vs Astrum Value Homes Private Limited | Direct the Respondent to take necessary action to fulfil contractual obligations, assurances and promises in terms of agreement and sale deed, brochures and advertisements to provide all amenities. | AUTHORITY | 21/03/2024 |
| Sapna Puri vs Astrum Value Homes Private Limited | Direct the Respondent to take necessary action to fulfil contractual obligations, assurances and promises in terms of agreement and sale deed, brochures and advertisements to provide all amenities. | AUTHORITY | 21/03/2024 |
| Srinath N Kadaba vs Astrum Value Homes Private Limited | Direct the Respondent to take necessary action to fulfil contractual obligations, assurances and promises in terms of agreement and sale deed, brochures and advertisements to provide all amenities | AUTHORITY | 21/03/2024 |
| VIJENDRA S vs Astrum Value Homes Private Limited | Direct the Respondent to take necessary action to fulfil contractual obligations, assurances and promises in terms of agreement and sale deed, brochures and advertisements to provide all amenities. | AUTHORITY | 21/03/2024 |
⚠ Matched by PROJECT NAME (the orders register carries no registration number) — confirm the respondent above is this project's builder before relying on it.
Complaints on this project's K-RERA page (15 complaints listed against this promoter)
| Complaint | Subject (as filed) | Project | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| CMP/221029/0010141 29-10-2022 | Failed to provide amenities as promised and deviation from sanctioned plan | ASTRUM GRANDVIEW MYSORE PHASE - I | DISPOSED AUTHORITY FULLBENCH |
| CMP/221029/0010142 29-10-2022 | Failed to provide common amenities and facilities as promised and deviation from sanctioned plan | ASTRUM GRANDVIEW MYSORE PHASE - I:::PRM/KA/RERA/1268/378/PR/171019/000373 (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY FULLBENCH |
| CMP/221029/0010143 29-10-2022 | Failed to provide common amenities and facilities as promised and deviation from sanctioned plan | ASTRUM GRANDVIEW MYSORE PHASE - I | DISPOSED AUTHORITY FULLBENCH |
| CMP/221029/0010144 29-10-2022 | Failed to provide common amenities and facilities as promised and deviation from sanctioned plan | ASTRUM GRANDVIEW MYSORE PHASE - I:::PRM/KA/RERA/1268/378/PR/171019/000373 (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY FULLBENCH |
| CMP/221029/0010145 29-10-2022 | Failed to provide common amenities and facilities as promised and deviation from sanctioned plan | ASTRUM GRANDVIEW MYSORE PHASE - I | DISPOSED AUTHORITY FULLBENCH |
| CMP/221029/0010146 29-10-2022 | Failed to provide common amenities and facilities as promised and deviation from sanctioned plan | ASTRUM GRANDVIEW MYSORE PHASE - I:::PRM/KA/RERA/1268/378/PR/171019/000373 (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY FULLBENCH |
| CMP/221029/0010147 29-10-2022 | Failed to provide common amenities and facilities as promised and deviation from sanctioned plan | ASTRUM GRANDVIEW MYSORE PHASE - I:::PRM/KA/RERA/1268/378/PR/171019/000373 (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY FULLBENCH |
| CMP/221029/0010148 29-10-2022 | Failed to provide common amenities and facilities as promised and deviation from sanctioned plan | ASTRUM GRANDVIEW MYSORE PHASE - I | DISPOSED AUTHORITY FULLBENCH |
Listed on the project's own K-RERA detail page (registration-exact source). Rows on the promoter's other projects are track-record context — read the subject text, it is the complainant's own filed wording.
Project team & certifications
RERA filingK-RERA names 3 project professional/vendor rows across Architect, Contractor, Structural engineer. Use this to cross-check whose certificates, drawings, and contractor commitments support the filing; final reliance still belongs with your lawyer/technical reviewer.
| Role | Name | Registration / licence | Since | Locality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Architect | Ashok B Lal Architects | - | 1981 | Ram Kishore Road, Civil Lines |
| Contractor | R Karunanidhe Constructions Pvt. Ltd. | - | 1996 | Valluvar Street, Sivananda Colony |
| Structural engineer | Subrata Saha | - | - | - |
Financials & Construction Progress
Financial disclosures
RERA filingNo quarterly financial disclosures on record — expected for a project that's already received its completion certificate and stopped filing quarterly updates after handover.
Declared construction cost ÷ registered units averages to ₹31.8 lakhs per unit — the developer's own declared construction/development cost, not a sale price. K-RERA filings don't disclose what the builder is charging, so this can't tell you whether you're getting a fair deal — only you comparing your quoted price against comparable listings nearby can answer that.
RERA 70% project account is on file: ICICI Bank Kachnar Marg, DLF Phase II, Gurgaon (IFSC ICIC0006614, a/c …0101). RERA requires 70% of buyer collections to sit in this separate, project-specific account, drawn only against certified construction milestones — confirm your payments are made to THIS account (not a general builder account) and that it appears on your allotment letter.
Construction photo filings
RERA filingK-RERA has 8 project-photo uploads.
These are developer-uploaded progress photos in the official document catalog. We do not treat them as proof of current site condition; use them as a prompt to ask for newer dated photos or a site visit. Individual filings are listed in the document catalog below.
Location & Connectivity
The nearest major job hub is ~127 km away — well outside the job hubs — this is a value/space play, not a short-commute one; budget for the drive.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| Electronic City | 127 km |
| MG Road / city centre | 130 km |
| Bellandur–Marathahalli belt | 135 km |
| Outer Ring Road / Manyata | 136 km |
| Whitefield IT hub | 143 km |
| Kempegowda Int'l Airport | 155 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.