RERA Property Intelligence Report · Preview

Commune

Commune Properties India · Anekal · K-RERA PRM/KA/RERA/1251/308/PR/171015/000813

Report coverage

K-RERA registry & builder-record report

What this report covers

  • Official K-RERA registry facts — units, cost, land area, towers, approvals
  • Complaint / litigation & compliance history
  • Builder delivery record across their K-RERA portfolio
  • Construction trajectory & sales pace from quarterly filings

To confirm directly with the builder

  • No dimensioned unit layouts could be confidently extracted from the filed plans.
Not yet
Completion certificate
None declared
Legal status
Other RERA projects by builder

🔒 The verdict & buyer playbook · Compliance report

The paid report opens with the overall risk rating, the specific red-flag findings, exactly what I'd do as a buyer in this project, who it suits, and the questions to put to the builder before you commit.

Unlock in the ₹999 report →

384
Registered units
₹90.7 Cr
Est. construction cost
Units profiled
24
RERA documents on file

Official Registry Facts

Official project scale

RERA filing

Registration-form facts from the K-RERA detail page: use these to sanity-check the builder brochure, parking allotment, and sanctioned-plan references before relying on plan-extracted approximations.

DisclosureOfficial valueWhy it matters
Registered units384Total inventory registered with K-RERA.
Official carpet area28,134 sqmRegulator-disclosed project-level carpet area, not vision-derived room sums.
Registered land area21,650 sqmThe land area attached to this K-RERA registration.
Sanctioned FAR/FSI2Higher FAR generally means a denser vertical build, subject to site layout and open-space design.
Registered towers/wings5Official tower/wing count in the K-RERA detail page.
Parking disclosed384 total (17 open) — 1.00 spaces/unitConfirm whether your quoted unit includes an allotted parking space and where it sits.
Project start date10-10-2013

Official inventory & towers

RERA filing

K-RERA registration tables showing the project mix and tower/wing scale. Use this to sanity-check sales claims such as "only large homes", "low density", or "plenty of parking" against the filed inventory.

Registered inventory mix

TypeUnitsShareOfficial carpet area
1, 2 & 3 BHK384100%28,134 sqm

Registered tower / wing summary

Tower/wingFloorsUnitsParkingHeight
Tower-197272-
Tower 213104104-
Tower 313104104-
Tower 4135252-
Tower 5135252-

Official unit register

RERA filing

K-RERA detail-page flat rows: exact unit numbers, official carpet area, UDS, and parking lots. 384 official flat/unit rows, matching the 384 registered units disclosed above. Use this as a checklist against the specific flat number in your cost sheet and draft agreement.

By unit type

Unit typeRowsCarpet areaUDSParking lots
2BHK20867.4-69.9 sqm34.8-35.2 sqm208
3BHK104103.8-107.6 sqm52.8-53.8 sqm104
1BHK7244.6-45.0 sqm25.9 sqm72

By tower / wing

Tower/wingRowsCarpet areaUDSParking lots
Tower 210467.4-69.7 sqm34.8-35.2 sqm104
Tower 310467.7-69.9 sqm34.8-35.2 sqm104
Tower-17244.6-45.0 sqm25.9 sqm72
Tower 452103.8-105.0 sqm52.8 sqm52
Tower 552107.0-107.6 sqm53.8 sqm52
Show sample official unit rows
UnitTowerFloorTypeCarpetUDSParking
10101Tower-111BHK44.6 sqm25.9 sqm1
10102Tower-111BHK44.6 sqm25.9 sqm1
10103Tower-111BHK44.9 sqm25.9 sqm1
10104Tower-111BHK44.9 sqm25.9 sqm1
10105Tower-111BHK44.6 sqm25.9 sqm1
10106Tower-111BHK44.6 sqm25.9 sqm1

What the numbers tell you

Synthesis from the official RERA scale, unit register, and land rows — the read a sales team won't volunteer.

Unit formatAverage official carpet area is ~798 sqft — mid-format homes (2–3BHK territory), not compact stock. This is a large, multi-tower township — 384 homes across 5 towers. Carpet is the RERA-defined usable area, so compare it against the 'super built-up' a broker quotes (typically 25–35% larger).
ParkingThe project declares 384 parking spaces for 384 homes (~1.0 per home) — about one space per home — adequate but tight if you have two cars.
Your land share (UDS)Undivided land share averages ~38 sqm per home; across all 384 homes that is ~68% of the plot — on the lower side — the undivided shares sum to noticeably less than the plot, worth asking the builder why before relying on it. Low UDS relative to land can mean the builder keeps land value the flat owners think they're buying.

🔒 Unit-by-unit guidance · Unit Guidance report

Which block and unit to prefer, the livability read on the filed plans, and a plan-by-plan walkthrough — the ₹2,999 guidance layer.

Unlock in the ₹2,999 report →

🔒 Full records — land title, amenities paperwork & document catalog · Compliance report

The complete land-title chain, the paperwork behind each declared amenity, and every document row on file with the regulator — the raw records the compliance read is built on.

Unlock in the ₹999 report →

Legal, Approvals & Project Team

Litigation & compliance

RERA filing

No litigation declared on this project's K-RERA filing.

All 20 standard compliance document slots have usable uploaded filings.

No completion certificate (OC) on file yet — project has not been declared complete.

⚠ Registration validity has lapsed: originally due 31 Dec 2019 — which has passed with no OC on file.

Named utility/regulatory approvals

Electricity (BESCOM/ESCOM)✓ On file (All NOCs from Authority)
Water & sewage (BWSSB/KWSSB)✓ On file (All NOCs from Authority)
Fire NOC✓ On file (All NOCs from Authority)
Pollution control (KSPCB)✓ On file (All NOCs from Authority)
Environmental clearance✓ On file (All NOCs from Authority)
Airport Authority height clearance✓ On file (All NOCs from Authority)

"Not found in catalog" can mean the approval genuinely isn't on file yet, or that it doesn't apply to this project (K-RERA doesn't tell us which). Ask the builder directly for any marked not found before relying on it.

K-RERA enforcement record (the regulator's own defaulter list & penalty orders)

⚠ Listed on K-RERA's official DEFAULTER list.

K-RERA complaint orders (34 complaints against a project of this name on K-RERA's orders register)

PartiesRelief soughtDisposalOrder date
RAKESH CHARAN C vs Commune Properties India Pvt LtdDirection to execute Sale Deed & compensationAUTHORITY30/06/2025
Jaya Padmanabhan vs Commune Properties India Pvt LtdCompletion and compensationAUTHORITY30/06/2025
Sudheer Madathil vs Commune Properties India Pvt LtdPromoters to pay delay compensationAUTHORITY30/06/2025
Aniruddha Aditya vs Commune Properties India Pvt Ltddelay compensationAUTHORITY30/06/2025
Nibu Jacob George vs Commune Properties India Pvt Ltda. To direct the Respondent/Promoters to pay delay compensation , To direct the Respondent/Promoter to initiate the registration process and hand-over of the flatAUTHORITY30/06/2025
Rajesh Valeri Sivasankaran Nair vs Commune Properties India Pvt LtdTo direct the Respondent/Promoters to pay delay compensation, c. To direct the Respondent/Promoter to initiate the registration process and hand-over of the flat to the ComplainantsAUTHORITY30/06/2025
Rajmohan Rao Udiawar vs Commune Properties India Pvt LtdTo direct the Respondent/Promoters to pay delay compensation , To direct the Respondent/Promoter to initiate the registration process and hand-over of the flatAUTHORITY30/06/2025
Havard Valerian DSilva vs Commune Properties India Pvt LtdTo direct the Respondent/Promoters to pay delay compensation, d. To direct the Respondent/Promoter to initiate the registration process and hand-over of the flatAUTHORITY30/06/2025
Hadlee Raymond DSilva vs Commune Properties India Pvt LtdTo direct the Respondent/Promoters to pay delay compensation, To direct the Respondent/Promoters to reimburse the Pre-EMI , To direct the Respondent/Promoter to initiate the registration process anAUTHORITY30/06/2025
Biny Balan vs Commune Properties India Pvt LtdTo direct the Respondent/Promoters to pay delay compensation, To direct the Respondent/Promoter to initiate the registration process and hand-over of the flat to the ComplainantsAUTHORITY30/06/2025
Sandeep Kandyan Thundyan vs Commune Properties India Pvt LtdTo direct the Respondent/Promoters to pay delay compensation, To direct the Respondent/Promoter to initiate the registration process and hand-over of the flat to the ComplainantsAUTHORITY30/06/2025
Pajimannu Vijayalakshmana Mundur vs Commune Properties India Pvt LtdTo direct the Respondent/Promoters to pay delay compensation, To direct the Respondent/Promoter to initiate the registration process and hand-over of the flat to the ComplainantsAUTHORITY30/06/2025
Sajesh Nittoor vs Commune Properties India Pvt LtdTo direct the Respondent/Promoters to pay delay compensation along with future interest, To direct the Respondent/Promoters to pay compensation for loss and/or damages and/ or mental agony caused,AUTHORITY30/06/2025
Nitin Gaikwad vs Commune Properties India Pvt LtdTo direct the Respondent/Promoters to pay delay compensation, To direct the Respondent/Promoter to initiate the registration process and hand-over of the flat to the Complainants without any furtAUTHORITY30/06/2025
Ivan Robert Dias vs Commune Properties India Pvt LtdTo direct the Respondent/Promoters to pay delay compensation , To direct the Respondent/Promoters to reimburse the Pre-EMI paid by the Complainant,AUTHORITY30/06/2025
Rahul Sharma vs Commune Properties India Pvt LtdRefund and CompensationAUTHORITY30/06/2025
Saravanan E vs Commune Properties India Pvt LtdDelay compensationAUTHORITY30/06/2025
Shraddha Vijaykumar Maske vs Commune Properties India Pvt LtdDelay compensationAUTHORITY30/06/2025
Shobhit Verma vs Commune Properties India Pvt LtdDelay compensationAUTHORITY30/06/2025
George Thomas P C vs Commune Properties India Pvt LtdDelay CompensationAUTHORITY30/06/2025
Johar Das vs Commune Properties India Pvt Ltd1. Finishing of Apartment. 2. Reimbursement of Rs. 350000. 3. Refund of illegal fee. 4. Penalty u/s 62 of RERA Act.AUTHORITY30/06/2025
SHWETA SETHI vs COMMUNE PROPERTIES INDIA PVT. LTD.,I want builder to return the maount I have invested =22,36,635 paid to builder till date + 7.5 lacs interest on bank loan=30 Lacs to be returned by builderAUTHORITY28/11/2024
L S MUKUND vs COMMUNE PROPERTIES INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED(1) Refund of sale consideration amount of Rs.15,30,189/- with interest, (2) Rs.3,33,638/- as interest paid on the loan availed, (3) Rs.3,30,162/- as outstanding principal-loan amount & legal feeAUTHORITY25/08/2022
Swetha Sethi vs Commune Properties India Pvt LtdComplaint for delay compensationAUTHORITY23/06/2025
Anandgouda Patil vs Commune Properties India Pvt LtdDelay CompensationAUTHORITY22/04/2026
Krishnakumari Ramesh vs Commune Properties India Pvt LtdCompensation for the delayAUTHORITY22/04/2026
Sushil Tejas Soans vs Commune Properties India Pvt LtdDelay period interestAUTHORITY22/04/2026
Venkateswaran Taruvai Guruswamy vs Commune Properties India Pvt LtdInterest on delay periodAUTHORITY22/04/2026
Channabasappa Kolar vs Commune Properties India Pvt LtdInterest on delay periodAUTHORITY22/04/2026
Sachin Utage vs Commune Properties India Pvt Ltdinterest on delay periodAUTHORITY22/04/2026
Sanjay Sharma vs Commune Properties India Pvt LtdInterest on delay periodAUTHORITY22/04/2026
Lionel Andrade vs Commune Properties India Pvt Ltdinterest on delay periodAUTHORITY22/04/2026
Commune Buyers Welfare Association vs Commune Properties Indisa Pvt Ltd.,Initiate actions against the promoter for creating Illegal mortgage and grant such other relief as prayed forAUTHORITY17/05/2024
COMMUNE ONE OWNERS COOPERATIVE SOCIETY LIMITED vs Commune Properties Indisa Pvt Ltd.,facilitate takeover of the project by recovering the missused fund by the promoterAUTHORITY17/05/2024

⚠ Matched by PROJECT NAME (the orders register carries no registration number) — confirm the respondent above is this project's builder before relying on it.

Complaints on this project's K-RERA page (26 complaints listed against this promoter)

ComplaintSubject (as filed)ProjectStatus
CMP/190824/0003999
24-08-2019
BREACH OF AGREEMENTCommuneDISPOSED AO
CMP/190426/0002780
26-04-2019
Compensation for the Delay in completing the project even after collecting 95 Percent of sale consideration amountsCommuneDISPOSED AO
CMP/191106/0004636
06-11-2019
Booking advance given to promoter but unit not alloted by promoterCommuneDISPOSED AO
CMP/211116/0008578
16-11-2021
Promoter has caused great hardship and financial burden to the Complainant by delaying the completion of the projectCommuneDISPOSED AUTHORITY FULLBENCH
CMP/221116/0010348
16-11-2022
Takeover of the project by the allottees due to the illegal activities conducted by the promoterCommuneDISPOSED AUTHORITY FULLBENCH
CMP/221104/0010180
04-11-2022
Complainant for delay compensationCommuneDISPOSED AUTHORITY FULLBENCH
CMP/221123/0010391
23-11-2022
Complainant for delay compensationCommuneDISPOSED AUTHORITY FULLBENCH
CMP/221123/0010392
23-11-2022
Complainant for delay compensationCommuneDISPOSED AUTHORITY FULLBENCH

Listed on the project's own K-RERA detail page (registration-exact source). Rows on the promoter's other projects are track-record context — read the subject text, it is the complainant's own filed wording.

Project team & certifications

RERA filing

K-RERA names 1 project professional/vendor row across Contractor. Use this to cross-check whose certificates, drawings, and contractor commitments support the filing; final reliance still belongs with your lawyer/technical reviewer.

RoleNameRegistration / licenceSinceLocality
ContractorBhuvana Infra Projects Pvt. Ltd.-201119th Main, Koramangala 6th Block

Financials & Construction Progress

Financial disclosures

RERA filing

⚠ No quarterly financial disclosures (collections, escrow withdrawals) on record, despite no completion certificate yet — meaning we can't verify the project's cashflows against its construction progress. Worth asking the builder directly why no quarterly filings are available.

Declared construction cost ÷ registered units averages to ₹23.6 lakhs per unit — the developer's own declared construction/development cost, not a sale price. K-RERA filings don't disclose what the builder is charging, so this can't tell you whether you're getting a fair deal — only you comparing your quoted price against comparable listings nearby can answer that.

RERA 70% project account is on file: YES BANK Avenue Road (IFSC YESB0000658, a/c …0300). RERA requires 70% of buyer collections to sit in this separate, project-specific account, drawn only against certified construction milestones — confirm your payments are made to THIS account (not a general builder account) and that it appears on your allotment letter.

Location & Connectivity

The nearest major job hub is ~16 km away — a real but liveable commute to the nearest job hub — factor peak-hour traffic.

LandmarkStraight-line
Electronic City16 km
Bellandur–Marathahalli belt25 km
Whitefield IT hub30 km
MG Road / city centre31 km
Outer Ring Road / Manyata38 km
Kempegowda Int'l Airport54 km

Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.

Free · Watch this project

We'll email you when this project's RERA record changes.

Something went wrong — email hello@quietlist.in.

✓ You're watching — we'll email you if the RERA record changes.

Built by Commune Properties.
1 complaints on the K-RERA register against Commune Properties in Bangalore.

Other RERA-registered projects in Weaver Colony

Major developers building in Weaver Colony

Figures are the developer's own quarterly disclosures on the Karnataka RERA register. "Built" is the highest construction % filed; "sold" is booked units over total. Not a claim about the developer's intent. Explore every project on our Bangalore project-health tool.

Own a unit in Commune?

Sell directly to Quietlist's pre-screened buyer list — flat fee, no broker commission.

List your unit →

Last checked against the RERA register: 27 Jul 2026