Elements OF Nature Happy Hive
K-RERA · the public record
Emprasa Startup City - Residential
Hosakote · HOSKOTE NEO HOMES
Know the project.
Then choose your home.
The registration, progress and filed details in one place. Go further with an independent reading of the project’s evidence.
31 Dec 2019declared completionK-RERA registration · read 20 Sep 2026
900registered unitsK-RERA registration · read 20 Sep 2026
The record · free to read
Registration read 20 Sep 2026Progress & dates
The timeline on file.
Available record
No construction trend to plot.
The records used for this page do not supply a series of construction percentages. This does not establish whether possession has been given.
declared completion
31 Dec 2019
The registered date and a construction update answer different questions. Neither is a confirmation of possession.
K-RERA registration · read 20 Sep 2026
Inventory & scale
What this registration contains.
1 BHK
900
Filed categories, unchanged · K-RERA registration · read 20 Sep 2026
The whole registration
8.4registered acres
106.5registered units per acre
The average covers the registered land and all registered unit types. It does not describe the space, outlook or surroundings of an individual home.
From another project · Prestige Park Grove
A larger advertised area. Almost the same carpet area.
In Tower 14, E4 has 141 sq ft more saleable area than E2. Its carpet area is only 0.46 sq m larger. The report puts the two layouts side by side.
This illustrates the report format. These findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the sample report ↗
The source record
The details behind the headline.
K-RERA · PRM/KA/RERA/1250/304/PR/171031/001084
This project, on the record
The comparable facts of this project, from its own RERA registration record. Each context percentile names its exact comparison set, drawn from Quietlist’s full register store. The paid report adds drawing-read rows to this same table — what the filed plans show about the site, its edges and the unit layouts.
On the register
Declared completion31 December 2019
Land area34,195 sq m (8.4 acres)
Homes registered900
Tower/wing entries3
Unit mix900 × 1 BHK
In context
Density106.5 homes per acre
Density in context82nd percentile of 112 Hosakote projects (median 79.1)
Values as crawled from the official K-RERA record; context percentiles name their comparison population.
Official Registry Facts
Official project scale
RERA filingRegistration-form facts from the K-RERA detail page: use these to sanity-check the builder brochure, parking allotment, and sanctioned-plan references before relying on plan-extracted approximations.
| Disclosure | Official value | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Registered units | 900 | Total inventory registered with K-RERA. |
| Official carpet area | 38 sqm | Regulator-disclosed project-level carpet area, not vision-derived room sums. |
| Registered land area | 34,195 sqm | The land area attached to this K-RERA registration. |
| Sanctioned FAR/FSI | 1.638 | Higher FAR generally means a denser vertical build, subject to site layout and open-space design. |
| Registered tower/wing entries | 3 | Official tower/wing count in the K-RERA detail page. |
| Parking total (reconciled) | 457 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Open-parking field | 99 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Garage field | 0 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Project start date | 08-02-2017 |
Official inventory & towers
RERA filingK-RERA registration tables showing the project mix and tower/wing scale. Use this to sanity-check sales claims such as "only large homes", "low density", or "plenty of parking" against the filed inventory.
Registered inventory mix
| Type | Units | Share | Official carpet area |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 BHK | 900 | 100% | 38 sqm |
Registered tower / wing summary
| Tower/wing | Floors | Units | Parking | Height |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Block 1 | 9 | 504 | 252 | - |
| Block 2 | 9 | 216 | 108 | - |
| Block 3 | 9 | 180 | 97 | - |
Official unit register
RERA filingK-RERA detail-page flat rows: exact unit numbers, official carpet area, UDS, and parking lots. 900 official flat/unit rows, matching the 900 registered units disclosed above. Use this as a checklist against the specific flat number in your cost sheet and draft agreement.
By unit type
| Unit type | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1BHK | 900 | 38.2 sqm | 3.4-47.1 sqm | 0 (900 with 0) |
By tower / wing
| Tower/wing | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Block 1 | 504 | 38.2 sqm | 21.8-22.1 sqm | 0 (504 with 0) |
| Block 2 | 216 | 38.2 sqm | 3.4-33.7 sqm | 0 (216 with 0) |
| Block 3 | 180 | 38.2 sqm | 46.1-47.1 sqm | 0 (180 with 0) |
Show sample official unit rows
| Unit | Tower | Floor | Type | Carpet | UDS | Parking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A101 | Block 1 | 1 | 1BHK | 38.2 sqm | 21.9 sqm | 0 |
| A102 | Block 1 | 1 | 1BHK | 38.2 sqm | 22.1 sqm | 0 |
| A103 | Block 1 | 1 | 1BHK | 38.2 sqm | 22.1 sqm | 0 |
| A104 | Block 1 | 1 | 1BHK | 38.2 sqm | 22.0 sqm | 0 |
| A106 | Block 1 | 1 | 1BHK | 38.2 sqm | 21.9 sqm | 0 |
| A107 | Block 1 | 1 | 1BHK | 38.2 sqm | 22.1 sqm | 0 |
Legal, Approvals & Project Team
Litigation & compliance
RERA filingNo litigation declared on this project's K-RERA filing.
12 of 44 compliance document slots are filed as Not Applicable; the remaining 32 slots have usable uploaded filings.
No completion certificate (OC) on file yet — project has not been declared complete.
⚠ Registration validity has lapsed: originally due 31 Dec 2019, extended (Extension) to 31 Dec 2023 — both dates have passed with no OC on file. The extension on file was granted on 18 Feb 2020 (K-RERA extension no. EX/PRM/KA/RERA/1250/304/PR/200218/001084) — it has been used, its deadline has also passed, and no further extension is recorded.
Named utility/regulatory approvals
Electricity (BESCOM/ESCOM)✓ On file (All NOCs from Authority)
Water & sewage (BWSSB/KWSSB)✓ On file (All NOCs from Authority)
Fire NOC✓ On file (All NOCs from Authority)
Pollution control (KSPCB)✓ On file (All NOCs from Authority)
Environmental clearance✓ On file (All NOCs from Authority)
Airport Authority height clearance✓ On file (All NOCs from Authority)
"Not found in catalog" can mean the approval genuinely isn't on file yet, or that it doesn't apply to this project (K-RERA doesn't tell us which). Ask the builder directly for any marked not found before relying on it.
K-RERA enforcement record (the regulator's own defaulter list & penalty orders)
⚠ Listed on K-RERA's official DEFAULTER list.
1 K-RERA order on this project (PROJECT EXTENSION) — read the order copies on the K-RERA portal.
K-RERA complaint orders (32 complaints against a project of this name on K-RERA's orders register)
| Parties | Relief sought | Disposal | Order date |
|---|---|---|---|
| AMRITHA GOWRI vs HOSKOTE NEO HOMES LIMITED | Refund of amount and compensation | AUTHORITY | 31/05/2023 |
| MR AMARJEET KUMAR & ANOTHER vs M/S.HOSKOTE NEO HOMES | 1) Termination of agreements and booking cancellation. 2) Full refund of Principal amount with accrued Interest. 3) Compensation for Paid Pre-EMI & EMI and other charges. | AUTHORITY | 29/11/2024 |
| WALTER PRADIP FERNANDES vs M/S.HOSKOTE NEO HOMES | (i) Complete refund of Rs. 23,72,813.50 along with interest calculated at MCLR + 2%. (ii) Reimbursement of Legal Expenses of Rs. 25,000/-. | AUTHORITY | 29/05/2025 |
| AJAY KUMAR KASLIIWAL vs M/S.HOSKOTE NEO HOMES | Complete refund of Rs.2,22,276/- (Paid at the time of booking) and Loan Amount of Rs. 1930,000/- totalling to an amount of Rs. 21,52,276/- along with interest calculated at MCLR + 2% from the date of | AUTHORITY | 29/05/2025 |
| KINSHUK GOEL vs M/S.KINSHUK GOEL | Complete refund of Rs. 21,52,037/- along with interest calculated at MCLR + 2% from the date of each payment. (ii) Reimbursement of Legal Expenses of Rs. 55,000/-. | AUTHORITY | 29/05/2025 |
| ASHISH SINGHAL vs M/S.HOSKOTE NEO HOMES | Complete refund of Rs. 21,52,762/- along with interest calculated at MCLR + 2% from the date of each payment. (ii) Reimbursement of Legal Expenses of Rs. 55,000/-. | AUTHORITY | 29/05/2025 |
| KUNAL WALIA vs M/S.HOSKOTE NEO HOMES | Complete refund of Rs. 24,90,159/- along with interest calculated at MCLR + 2% from the date of each payment. (ii) Reimbursement of Legal Expenses of Rs. 55,000/-. | AUTHORITY | 29/05/2025 |
| Pooja Khater vs M/S.HOSKOTE NEO HOMES | 1) Refund of entire amount of Rs. 17,67,800/- paid to Respondent along with interest as per RERA rules 2) Direct the Respondent to pay Rs50,000/- as legal expenses towards this Complaint | AUTHORITY | 29/05/2025 |
| Sundaresh MS vs HOSKOTE NEO HOMES | Full Refund of the amount paid to the builder with interest | AUTHORITY | 28/05/2025 |
| MR.GAJENDRA KUMAR AND ANOTHER vs M/S.HOSKOTE NEO HOMES LIMITED | Complainant prays for the refund of an amount of Rs.54,06,276/- (Rupees Fifty-Four Lakh Six thousand Two Hundred Seventy Six Only) paid towards the units and Rs.10,29,675 /- paid towards the pre EMI | AUTHORITY | 26/12/2023 |
| MR.VIVEK KUMAR AND ANOTHER vs M/S.HOSKOTE NEO HOMES LIMITED | Complainant prays for the refund of an amount of Rs 29,28,645/- paid along with interest @10% simple interest from the date of agreement plus an Amount of Rs. 3,60,000/- (Assured Rentals @15000/- P.m. | AUTHORITY | 26/12/2023 |
| Amit Kanodia vs EMPRASA STARTUP CITY RESIDENTIAL | Interest from 1st Jan 2019 untill possession of flat as per specified rate in RERA | AUTHORITY | 26/05/2025 |
| Joseph Sijo vs Emprasa Startup City-Residential | As they breached the trust of the customer, I don’t want to continue with the project. I want to get full reimbursement of the money which I paid along with interest. | AUTHORITY | 22/06/2023 |
| ANIMESH TIWARI AND ANUBHA TIWARI vs HOSKOTE NEO HOMES LTD | Payment of full interest till physically possession done means till date of final decisison of RERA | AUTHORITY | 22/01/2025 |
| Babu Perumsalsamy Kannuraj vs Emprasa Startup City - Residential | As they breached the trust of the customer, I don’t want to continue with the project. I want to get full reimbursement of the money which I paid along with interest. | AUTHORITY | 21/12/2022 |
| Hasanand Dayal Motiramani vs M/S.HOSKOTE NEO HOMES | Intervention from RERA is expected for the justice of investment made by senior citizens in the project. An immediate action is requested in this particular complaint. | AUTHORITY | 16/04/2025 |
| SRIPANA GHOSE & ANOTHER vs M/S HOSKOTE NEO HOMES LIMITED | To refund the amount of Rs.18,29,532.00 along with interest of 24% p.a from February, 2017 and cancel the Agreement to Sell and a Construction Agreement dated 09.02.2017 | AUTHORITY | 15/12/2023 |
| SIRSIMTH MEER ASHRAF ALI vs VARINDER KAUR | Refund of Rs 4,43,080/- | AUTHORITY | 14/03/2023 |
| Dhruba Bhowmik vs EMPRASA STARTUP CITY | Complete refund of Rs. 30,90,019/- (Booking Amount:- 2,50,000/- + Loan Disbursement: - 19,46,922/- + Pre-Emi:- 8,93,097/-) along with interest calculated at MCLR + 2%. | AUTHORITY | 12/05/2025 |
| Prasoon Kumar vs Emprasa Startup City Residential | Cancellation of Allocation and Sale and Construction Agreement; Refund of money's paid (own contribution & PEMI) & interest; Closure of loan account and refund of disbursed loan amount; compensation | AUTHORITY | 10/07/2024 |
| KAUSHAL PARIKH vs EMPRASA STARTUP CITY RESIDENTIAL | To get back my PRE EMI amount along with the interest | AUTHORITY | 09/12/2024 |
| RAJANIMURTHY vs HOSKOTE NEO HOMES | Handing over of the apartment, to be paid all preEMI amount by builder and 2 years rental amount | AUTHORITY | 09/02/2026 |
| ZAKIA PARVEEN ZAIDI vs HOSKOTE NEO HOMES LIMITED | Refund of booking amount along with interest | AUTHORITY | 08/12/2022 |
| BINDHYACHAL SINGH vs Emprasa Startup City | 1. STOPPAGE OF FURTHER DEDUCTION OF PEMI AND REFUND OF DEDUCTED PEMI WHAT SO EVER AND COMPENSATION OF DELAY DELIEVRY OF FLATTILL DATE WITH INTEREST | AUTHORITY | 07/04/2025 |
| Deepak Motiramani vs HOSKOTE NEO HOMES LTD | Refund with delay period interest as per memo of calculation prescribed by Karnataka RERA | AUTHORITY | 06/07/2026 |
| MOHMMED IRFAN MHAMMED IQBAL vs M/S.HOSKOTE NEO HOMES | Refund of Principal paid along with interest and other cost as decided by RERA | AUTHORITY | 06/02/2025 |
| Deepak Motiramani vs HOSKOTE NEW HOMES LIMITED | Refund of Pre-EMI amount ,NBFC loan disbursed, promised 2 year rental and compensation | AUTHORITY | 04/07/2023 |
| NIZAR MOHAMMED KELOTHUM KANDY vs HOSKOTE NEO HOMES LIMITED | REFUND PAYMENT OF RS 18,70,000 | AUTHORITY | 04/07/2023 |
| VIKRAMADITYA GOYAL vs HOSKOTE NEO HOMES LIMITED | Full Refund of Pre-Emi, Loan EMI and Insurance Amount paid thru NBFC and Property Registration | AUTHORITY | 03/04/2023 |
| THIYAGARAJAN S vs M/S.HOSKOTE NEO HOMES | I am expecting a quick resolution for this never ending problem since 2019. Kindly request RERA should arrange a refund from the non performing promotor. | AUTHORITY | 02/08/2025 |
| VINAY SINGH vs EMPRASA STARTUP CITY-RESIDENTIAL | I WANT MY MY MONEY BACK AND CANCAL MY BOOKING | AUTHORITY | 02/02/2023 |
| HERLEEN VENUGOPAL vs HOSKOTE NEO HOMES LIMITED | 1) Refund of entire amount paid to respondent along with interest as per RERA rules 2) Legal expenses amounting to Rs 50000 | AUTHORITY | 01/07/2026 |
⚠ Matched by PROJECT NAME (the orders register carries no registration number) — confirm the respondent above is this project's builder before relying on it.
Complaints on this project's K-RERA page (14 complaints listed against this promoter)
| Complaint | Subject (as filed) | Project | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| CMP/190910/0004169 10-09-2019 | REFUND OF BOOKING AMOUNT | Emprasa Startup City - Residential | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH5 |
| CMP/200123/0005287 23-01-2020 | Property not handed over even after the expiry of promised possession time | Emprasa Startup City - Residential | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH5 |
| CMP/200215/0005460 15-02-2020 | Posession and rera validity expired | Emprasa Startup City - Residential | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/200226/0005493 26-02-2020 | Breaching the agreement of not giving the property on time | Emprasa Startup City - Residential | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/200428/0005818 28-04-2020 | Property not handed over even after the expiry of promised possession time | Emprasa Startup City - Residential | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4 |
| CMP/201028/0006974 28-10-2020 | Unreasonable delay in completion of project | Emprasa Startup City - Residential | POSTED FOR ORDERS AUTHORITY FULLBENCH |
| CMP/201215/0007267 15-12-2020 | Refund of booking amount | Emprasa Startup City - Residential | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4 |
| CMP/210309/0007768 09-03-2021 | Non possession of the allotted unit in Emprasa Residential Project | Emprasa Startup City - Residential | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4 |
Listed on the project's own K-RERA detail page (registration-exact source). Rows on the promoter's other projects are track-record context — read the subject text, it is the complainant's own filed wording.
Project team & certifications
RERA filingK-RERA names 3 project professional/vendor rows across Architect, Contractor, Structural engineer. Use this to cross-check whose certificates, drawings, and contractor commitments support the filing; final reliance still belongs with your lawyer/technical reviewer.
| Role | Name | Registration / licence | Since | Locality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Architect | Ravi Kumar.G | - | 2012 | Marathahalli, Bengaluru |
| Contractor | M/s. Bhandari Construction and Developers Pvt Ltd. | - | 2009 | Kodihalli, Bengaluru |
| Structural engineer | Mr.Amudhalingam.S | - | - | - |
Financials & Construction Progress
Financial disclosures
RERA filing⚠ No quarterly financial disclosures (collections, escrow withdrawals) on record, despite no completion certificate yet — meaning we can't verify the project's cashflows against its construction progress. Worth asking the builder directly why no quarterly filings are available.
Declared construction cost ÷ registered units averages to ₹15.7 lakhs per unit — the developer's own declared construction/development cost, not a sale price. K-RERA filings don't disclose what the builder is charging, so this can't tell you whether you're getting a fair deal — only you comparing your quoted price against comparable listings nearby can answer that.
RERA 70% project account is on file: KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK MG Road Branch (IFSC KKBK0008066, a/c …3749). RERA requires 70% of buyer collections to sit in this separate, project-specific account, drawn only against certified construction milestones — confirm your payments are made to THIS account (not a general builder account) and that it appears on your allotment letter.
Construction photo filings
RERA filingK-RERA has 9 project-photo uploads.
These are developer-uploaded progress photos in the official document catalog. We do not treat them as proof of current site condition; use them as a prompt to ask for newer dated photos or a site visit. Individual filings are listed in the document catalog below.
Location & Connectivity
The nearest major job hub is ~18 km away — a real but liveable commute to the nearest job hub — factor peak-hour traffic.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| Kempegowda Int'l Airport | 14 km |
| Whitefield IT hub | 18 km |
| Outer Ring Road / Manyata | 22 km |
| Bellandur–Marathahalli belt | 24 km |
| MG Road / city centre | 27 km |
| Electronic City | 34 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.