RERA Property Intelligence Report · Preview
sipani properties · Anekal · K-RERA PRM/KA/RERA/1251/308/PR/180328/002366
Report coverage
K-RERA registry & builder-record report
What this report covers
To confirm directly with the builder
🔒 The verdict & buyer playbook · Compliance report
The paid report opens with the overall risk rating, the specific red-flag findings, exactly what I'd do as a buyer in this project, who it suits, and the questions to put to the builder before you commit.
Registration-form facts from the K-RERA detail page: use these to sanity-check the builder brochure, parking allotment, and sanctioned-plan references before relying on plan-extracted approximations.
| Disclosure | Official value | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Registered units | 980 | Total inventory registered with K-RERA. |
| Official carpet area | 52,749 sqm | Regulator-disclosed project-level carpet area, not vision-derived room sums. |
| Registered land area | 39,406 sqm | The land area attached to this K-RERA registration. |
| Sanctioned FAR/FSI | 2.09 | Higher FAR generally means a denser vertical build, subject to site layout and open-space design. |
| Registered towers/wings | 10 | Official tower/wing count in the K-RERA detail page. |
| Parking disclosed | 1,078 total (350 open) — 1.10 spaces/unit | Confirm whether your quoted unit includes an allotted parking space and where it sits. |
| Project start date | 15-11-2017 |
K-RERA registration tables showing the project mix and tower/wing scale. Use this to sanity-check sales claims such as "only large homes", "low density", or "plenty of parking" against the filed inventory.
Registered inventory mix
| Type | Units | Share | Official carpet area |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 & 2 BHK units | 933 | 100% | 52,749 sqm |
Registered tower / wing summary
| Tower/wing | Floors | Units | Parking | Height |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A WING | 14 | 98 | 98 | - |
| B wing | 14 | 98 | 98 | - |
| C Wing | 14 | 98 | 98 | - |
| D wing | 14 | 98 | 98 | - |
| E Wing | 14 | 98 | 98 | - |
| F Wing | 14 | 98 | 98 | - |
| G wing | 14 | 98 | 98 | - |
| H wing | 14 | 98 | 98 | - |
Showing first 8 of 10 tower/wing rows.
K-RERA detail-page flat rows: exact unit numbers, official carpet area, UDS, and parking lots. 980 official flat/unit rows, matching the 980 registered units disclosed above. Use this as a checklist against the specific flat number in your cost sheet and draft agreement.
By unit type
| Unit type | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2BHK- TYPE-5 | 304 | 58.7 sqm | 28.2 sqm | 304 |
| 2BHK- TYPE-2 | 174 | 52.6 sqm | 25.3 sqm | 174 |
| 2BHK- TYPE-5A | 104 | 57.3 sqm | 27.5 sqm | 104 |
| 1BHK- TYPE-1 | 100 | 36.5 sqm | 17.5 sqm | 100 |
| 2BHK- TYPE-4 | 92 | 54.9 sqm | 26.4 sqm | 92 |
| 2BHK- TYPE-3 | 56 | 52.2 sqm | 25.1 sqm | 56 |
| 2BHK- TYPE-4A | 48 | 56.1 sqm | 27.0 sqm | 48 |
| 2BHK- TYPE-5+TERRACE | 32 | 58.7 sqm | 28.2 sqm | 32 |
| 2BHK- TYPE-2+TERRACE | 20 | 52.6 sqm | 25.3 sqm | 20 |
| 2BHK- TYPE-4+TERRACE | 20 | 54.9 sqm | 26.4 sqm | 20 |
| 1BHK- TYPE-1+TERRACE | 12 | 36.5 sqm | 17.5 sqm | 12 |
| 2BHK- TYPE-4A+TERRACE | 8 | 56.1 sqm | 27.0 sqm | 8 |
Showing first 12 of 14 unit type groups.
By tower / wing
| Tower/wing | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A WING | 98 | 52.6 sqm | 25.3 sqm | 98 |
| B wing | 98 | 52.6 sqm | 25.3 sqm | 98 |
| C Wing | 98 | 52.2-58.7 sqm | 25.1-28.2 sqm | 98 |
| D wing | 98 | 52.2-58.7 sqm | 25.1-28.2 sqm | 98 |
| E Wing | 98 | 52.2-58.7 sqm | 25.1-28.2 sqm | 98 |
| F Wing | 98 | 52.2-58.7 sqm | 25.1-28.2 sqm | 98 |
| G wing | 98 | 36.5-58.7 sqm | 17.5-28.2 sqm | 98 |
| H wing | 98 | 36.5-58.7 sqm | 17.5-28.2 sqm | 98 |
| I wing | 98 | 36.5-58.7 sqm | 17.5-28.2 sqm | 98 |
| J wing | 98 | 36.5-58.7 sqm | 17.5-28.2 sqm | 98 |
| Unit | Tower | Floor | Type | Carpet | UDS | Parking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A101 | A WING | 1 | 2BHK- TYPE-2 | 52.6 sqm | 25.3 sqm | 1 |
| A102 | A WING | 1 | 2BHK- TYPE-2 | 52.6 sqm | 25.3 sqm | 1 |
| A103 | A WING | 1 | 2BHK- TYPE-2 | 52.6 sqm | 25.3 sqm | 1 |
| A104 | A WING | 1 | 2BHK- TYPE-2 | 52.6 sqm | 25.3 sqm | 1 |
| A105 | A WING | 1 | 2BHK- TYPE-2 | 52.6 sqm | 25.3 sqm | 1 |
| A106 | A WING | 1 | 2BHK- TYPE-2 | 52.6 sqm | 25.3 sqm | 1 |
What the numbers tell you
Synthesis from the official RERA scale, unit register, and land rows — the read a sales team won't volunteer.
🔒 Unit-by-unit guidance · Unit Guidance report
Which block and unit to prefer, the livability read on the filed plans, and a plan-by-plan walkthrough — the ₹2,999 guidance layer.
🔒 Full records — land title, amenities paperwork & document catalog · Compliance report
The complete land-title chain, the paperwork behind each declared amenity, and every document row on file with the regulator — the raw records the compliance read is built on.
No litigation declared on this project's K-RERA filing.
1 of 25 compliance document slots are filed as Not Applicable; the remaining 24 slots have usable uploaded filings.
No completion certificate (OC) on file yet — project has not been declared complete.
Named utility/regulatory approvals
"Not found in catalog" can mean the approval genuinely isn't on file yet, or that it doesn't apply to this project (K-RERA doesn't tell us which). Ask the builder directly for any marked not found before relying on it.
K-RERA enforcement record (the regulator's own defaulter list & penalty orders)
2 K-RERA orders on this project (PROJECT EXTENSION, PROJECT REGISTRATION) — read the order copies on the K-RERA portal.
K-RERA complaint orders (3 complaints against a project of this name on K-RERA's orders register)
| Parties | Relief sought | Disposal | Order date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pravat Kumar Sahoo vs Sipani Rayal Heritage Phase-1 | Refund of total amount : Rs 16627.20/- which include extra maintenence charges (14627.20) water reconnection charges (1000) and RERA complaint charges (1000). | AUTHORITY | 23/09/2025 |
| AYAPPANE D vs SIPANI PROPERTIES PVT LTD | Pls help me get back my booking amount of Rs.2 lacs along with legal fees, if any | AUTHORITY | 13/09/2022 |
| SUBBHAJIT RAHA vs SIPANI ROYAL HERITAE PHASE I | Financial compensation and Proper handover with OC immediately | AUTHORITY | 09/05/2024 |
⚠ Matched by PROJECT NAME (the orders register carries no registration number) — confirm the respondent above is this project's builder before relying on it.
Complaints on this project's K-RERA page (4 complaints listed against this promoter)
| Complaint | Subject (as filed) | Project | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| CMP/200624/0006069 24-06-2020 | Pre-emi refund | SIPANI ROYAL HERITAGE PHASE-II (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4 |
| CMP/200701/0006099 01-07-2020 | Booking Amount Not Refunded | sipani Royal Heritage Phase-I | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4 |
| CMP/211028/0008480 28-10-2021 | Refund and compensation U/s 18 of RERA | sipani jardin (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4 |
| CMP/220119/0008828 19-01-2022 | Delivery date exceeds as per agreement | sipani Royal Heritage Phase-I | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH5 |
Listed on the project's own K-RERA detail page (registration-exact source). Rows on the promoter's other projects are track-record context — read the subject text, it is the complainant's own filed wording.
Clean approvals profile: every applicable statutory NOC is on file — including Fire NOC, environmental clearance and pollution-control clearance (KSPCB), the clearances buyers most often find still pending. Nothing is outstanding among the statutory NOCs — which compliance documents are filed versus still under process is a separate matter, covered in Litigation & compliance above. Since these are developer-filed portal statuses, have your lawyer confirm them against the linked NOC copies.
4 further authority slots are marked not applicable by the regulator.
| Authority / NOC | Status | Date | File |
|---|---|---|---|
| KSPCB- PCB (10 Acres to 125 Acres) | Approved | 20-08-2017 | KSPCB_NOC_SRH.pdf |
| KSPCB- MOEF (Above 50 Acres) | Approved | 27-10-2016 | Environment NOC FOR SRH 12-5-17.pdf |
| KPTCL- BESCOM | Approved | 04-03-2017 | BESCOM SRH NOC.pdf |
| Fire and Safety | Approved | 21-03-2017 | Fire NOC for SRH.pdf |
| Airport Authority of India | Approved | 01-08-2016 | AIR PORT AUTHORITY NOC SRH.pdf |
| BSNL/Telecommunication Department | Approved | 05-12-2016 | BSNL SRH NOC.pdf |
K-RERA names 3 project professional/vendor rows across Architect, Contractor, Structural engineer. Use this to cross-check whose certificates, drawings, and contractor commitments support the filing; final reliance still belongs with your lawyer/technical reviewer.
| Role | Name | Registration / licence | Since | Locality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Architect | VERNEKAR ASSOCIATES pvt ltd | - | 2004 | 4th Block kormangla, BANGALORE |
| Contractor | S A CONSTRUCTIONS | - | 2016 | SARJAPUR POST, BANGALORE |
| Structural engineer | VENKATESH BABU REDDY | - | - | - |
Sipani Properties has 6 other K-RERA-registered projects in our records (average reported construction progress 56%). 5 are past their declared completion deadline with no completion certificate recorded — but because K-RERA publishes OCs inconsistently, a project that has actually been finished and handed over still shows up this way, so this overstates real delays, especially for a high-volume established builder.
Read this as a list to spot-check for a pattern of genuinely stalled projects, not as a delay rate — pull up a few of the builder’s other K-RERA registrations and check whether they’ve actually been delivered.
Latest quarterly filing (2025-Q4): ₹18.46 Cr collected from buyers, ₹19.21 Cr withdrawn from the project's escrow account. This quarter the escrow withdrawal (₹19.21 Cr) exceeded buyer collections (₹18.46 Cr) — worth asking the builder to reconcile against certified construction milestones, which is what RERA requires escrow draws to track.
| Construction progress | 95% → 91% (-4 pts) |
| Units sold/booked as registered | 19/6869 (0%) |
| Buyer collections in available QPRs | ₹34.60 Cr |
| Escrow withdrawals in available QPRs | ₹35.30 Cr (1.02x collections) |
QPR figures are developer-filed quarterly disclosures. Collections and withdrawals are not a project valuation; they are a sanity check for whether sales, construction progress, and escrow draws appear directionally aligned.
Declared construction cost ÷ registered units averages to ₹12.0 lakhs per unit — the developer's own declared construction/development cost, not a sale price. K-RERA filings don't disclose what the builder is charging, so this can't tell you whether you're getting a fair deal — only you comparing your quoted price against comparable listings nearby can answer that.
RERA 70% project account is on file: HDFC kasturba road (IFSC HDFC0000009, a/c …7360). RERA requires 70% of buyer collections to sit in this separate, project-specific account, drawn only against certified construction milestones — confirm your payments are made to THIS account (not a general builder account) and that it appears on your allotment letter.
K-RERA has 1 project-photo upload.
These are developer-uploaded progress photos in the official document catalog. We do not treat them as proof of current site condition; use them as a prompt to ask for newer dated photos or a site visit.
The nearest major job hub is ~9 km away — a manageable everyday commute to a major job hub.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| Electronic City | 9 km |
| Bellandur–Marathahalli belt | 18 km |
| Whitefield IT hub | 22 km |
| MG Road / city centre | 24 km |
| Outer Ring Road / Manyata | 31 km |
| Kempegowda Int'l Airport | 47 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.
Should you buy in sipani Royal Heritage Phase-I?
This page is the free K-RERA filing summary. The full RERA Property Intelligence Report gives you buyer-complaint history, regulatory flags, builder track record, the official unit register, land title, NOCs, and (where the sanctioned plans support it) room-by-room unit data and an annotated site plan. See a real one first:
Sample: Sobha Silicon Oasis → · browse all sample reports →
Compliance Report · ₹999
The regulator’s filing record, read · 1 working day
Scan with any UPI app to pay · quietlist@kotak
Unit Guidance Report · ₹2,999
Everything, down to which unit · 1 working day
Not useful to your decision? Full refund — no questions asked.
Scan with any UPI app to pay · quietlist@kotak
Paying from outside India? Pay $15 (Compliance) or $39 (Unit Guidance) via PayPal, or email hello@quietlist.in for a card invoice. Prefer to talk first, or have a portfolio to check? Same address. An information aid for your own due diligence, not legal or investment advice.
Free · Watch this project
We'll email you when this project's RERA record changes.
Built by Sipani Properties. View Sipani Properties's full track record →
Figures are the developer's own quarterly disclosures on the Karnataka RERA register. "Built" is the highest construction % filed; "sold" is booked units over total. Not a claim about the developer's intent. Explore every project on our Bangalore project-health tool.
Own a unit in Sipani Royal Heritage Phase-I?
Sell directly to Quietlist's pre-screened buyer list — flat fee, no broker commission.
Last checked against the RERA register: 27 Jul 2026