K-RERA · the public record
The Empyrean Prado
· FIRE LUXUR DEVELOPERS
Know the project.
Then choose your home.
The registration, progress and filed details in one place. Go further with an independent reading of the project’s evidence.
The record · free to read
Registration read 16 Jul 2026Progress & dates
The timeline on file.
Promoter-reported construction
K-RERA quarterly filings · Q3 2025 to Q4 2025
declared completion
Not recorded
The registered date and a construction update answer different questions. Neither is a confirmation of possession.
K-RERA registration · read 16 Jul 2026
From another project · Prestige Park Grove
A larger advertised area. Almost the same carpet area.
In Tower 14, E4 has 141 sq ft more saleable area than E2. Its carpet area is only 0.46 sq m larger. The report puts the two layouts side by side.
This illustrates the report format. These findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the sample report ↗
The source record
The details behind the headline.
K-RERA · PRM/KA/RERA/1265/347/PR/050325/007547
Official Registry Facts
Official project scale
RERA filingRegistration-form facts from the K-RERA detail page: use these to sanity-check the builder brochure, parking allotment, and sanctioned-plan references before relying on plan-extracted approximations.
| Disclosure | Official value | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Approved plan number | W6 -27/2024-25 | Use this to match the sanctioned drawing set shown by the builder. |
| Plan approval date | 23-10-2024 | |
| Project start date | 23-10-2024 |
Legal, Approvals & Project Team
Litigation & compliance
RERA filingNo litigation declared on this project's K-RERA filing.
3 of 24 compliance document slots are filed as Not Applicable; the remaining 21 slots have usable uploaded filings.
No completion certificate (OC) on file yet — project has not been declared complete.
Named utility/regulatory approvals
"Not found in catalog" can mean the approval genuinely isn't on file yet, or that it doesn't apply to this project (K-RERA doesn't tell us which). Ask the builder directly for any marked not found before relying on it.
Complaints on this project's K-RERA page (8 complaints listed against this promoter)
| Complaint | Subject (as filed) | Project | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| CMP/190223/0002254 23-02-2019 | Non completion of common ammenties as promised by builder | FIRE Luxur Developers Private Limited (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190223/0002262 23-02-2019 | Non completion of common amenities as promised by builder | FIRE Luxur Developers Private Limited (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190307/0002375 07-03-2019 | Promised Amenities Not delivered | FIRE Luxur Developers Private Limited (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190512/0002980 12-05-2019 | Non Delivery of promised amenities by the promoter | FIRE Luxur Developers Private Limited (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/UR/200605/0005965 05-06-2020 | sales in the nature of plots when project represented as a villa project, deviation from plan sanction, incomplete amenities, return of corpus amongst others | FIRE Luxur Developers Private Limited (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY FULLBENCH |
| CMP/220112/0008780 12-01-2022 | Breach of representations and sanctioned layout plan, pending amenities, and levy of arbitrary maintenance charges | FIRE Luxur Developers Private Limited (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH5 |
| CMP/220112/0008781 12-01-2022 | Breach of representations and sanctioned plan, pending amenities and arbitrary maintenance charges | FIRE Luxur Developers Private Limited (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH5 |
| CMP/220112/0008782 12-01-2022 | Breach of representations, sanctioned layout plan, incomplete amenities, and arbitrary maintenance charges | FIRE Luxur Developers Private Limited (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH5 |
Listed on the project's own K-RERA detail page (registration-exact source). Rows on the promoter's other projects are track-record context — read the subject text, it is the complainant's own filed wording.
Statutory approval status
RERA filingClean approvals profile: every applicable statutory NOC is on file. Nothing is outstanding among the statutory NOCs — which compliance documents are filed versus still under process is a separate matter, covered in Litigation & compliance above. Note Fire NOC, environmental clearance and pollution-control clearance (KSPCB) are not among the approvals K-RERA marks applicable to this project — if the named-approvals check shows them as "not found in catalog", that is why; ask the builder directly whether they apply here. Since these are developer-filed portal statuses, have your lawyer confirm them against the linked NOC copies.
8 further authority slots are marked not applicable by the regulator.
| Authority / NOC | Status | Date | File |
|---|---|---|---|
| Water supply and sewage board | Approved | 21-11-2024 | NOC Water Prado.pdf |
| KPTCL- BESCOM | Approved | 19-11-2024 | NOC Electricity Prado.pdf |
| Horticulture department | Approved | 05-02-2025 | NOC Horticulture prado.pdf |
Project team & certifications
RERA filingK-RERA names 2 project professional/vendor rows across Chartered accountant, Engineer. Use this to cross-check whose certificates, drawings, and contractor commitments support the filing; final reliance still belongs with your lawyer/technical reviewer.
| Role | Name | Registration / licence | Since | Locality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chartered accountant | P Murali Krishna | 204308 | 2000 | Bengaluru Urban, Karnataka - 560078 |
| Engineer | Sanjiv Vasudeo Aundhe | REG/ACK/0408/23-24 | 2023 | Bengaluru Urban, Karnataka - 560038 |
Builder track record
RERA filingFire Luxur has 3 other K-RERA-registered projects in our records (average reported construction progress 50%). 0 are past their declared completion deadline with no completion certificate recorded — but because K-RERA publishes OCs inconsistently, a project that has actually been finished and handed over still shows up this way, so this overstates real delays, especially for a high-volume established builder. That is a lower delayed rate than the K-RERA average across Bengaluru on the same measure.
Read this as a list to spot-check for a pattern of genuinely stalled projects, not as a delay rate — pull up a few of the builder’s other K-RERA registrations and check whether they’ve actually been delivered.
Financials & Construction Progress
Financial disclosures
RERA filingLatest quarterly filing (2025-Q4): ₹0.00 Cr collected from buyers, ₹0.00 Cr withdrawn from the project's escrow account.
| Construction progress | 96% → 100% (+4 pts) |
| Buyer collections in available QPRs | ₹5.82 Cr |
| Escrow withdrawals in available QPRs | ₹4.85 Cr (0.83x collections) |
- Construction progress moved from 96% to 100% across the filed QPR window.
- The builder has drawn 0.83x of buyer collections from escrow (about 83% of the ₹6 Cr collected) — money is largely staying in the regulated escrow account rather than being pulled out ahead of spend, which is the safer direction. A ratio near or above 1.0 would be the one to scrutinise.
QPR figures are developer-filed quarterly disclosures. Collections and withdrawals are not a project valuation; they are a sanity check for whether sales, construction progress, and escrow draws appear directionally aligned.
The estimated cost above is the developer's declared construction cost only (K-RERA's own label: "Estimated Cost of Construction as certified by Engineer") — it excludes land cost, so it isn't comparable to the buyer-collection figures below or to a sale price.
RERA 70% project account is on file: ICICI Bank WHITEFIELD-HOPE FARM IFSC Code : ICIC0002181 Pin Code : 560066. RERA requires 70% of buyer collections to sit in this separate, project-specific account, drawn only against certified construction milestones — confirm your payments are made to THIS account (not a general builder account) and that it appears on your allotment letter.
Location & Connectivity
The nearest major job hub is ~15 km away — a real but liveable commute to the nearest job hub — factor peak-hour traffic.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| Whitefield IT hub | 15 km |
| Bellandur–Marathahalli belt | 20 km |
| Electronic City | 24 km |
| MG Road / city centre | 30 km |
| Outer Ring Road / Manyata | 31 km |
| Kempegowda Int'l Airport | 36 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.