Mantri Centrium
RERA Property Intelligence Report · Preview
Mantri Developers · Bengaluru South · K-RERA PRM/KA/RERA/1251/310/PR/171015/000608
Report coverage
K-RERA registry & builder-record report
What this report covers
To confirm directly with the builder
🔒 The verdict & buyer playbook · Compliance report
The paid report opens with the overall risk rating, the specific red-flag findings, exactly what I'd do as a buyer in this project, who it suits, and the questions to put to the builder before you commit.
Registration-form facts from the K-RERA detail page: use these to sanity-check the builder brochure, parking allotment, and sanctioned-plan references before relying on plan-extracted approximations.
| Disclosure | Official value | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Registered units | 588 | Total inventory registered with K-RERA. |
| Registered land area | 21,448 sqm | The land area attached to this K-RERA registration. |
| Sanctioned FAR/FSI | 3 | Higher FAR generally means a denser vertical build, subject to site layout and open-space design. |
| Registered towers/wings | 4 | Official tower/wing count in the K-RERA detail page. |
| Parking disclosed | 641 total (31 open) — 1.09 spaces/unit | Confirm whether your quoted unit includes an allotted parking space and where it sits. |
| Project start date | 04-03-2013 |
K-RERA registration tables showing the project mix and tower/wing scale. Use this to sanity-check sales claims such as "only large homes", "low density", or "plenty of parking" against the filed inventory.
Registered inventory mix
| Type | Units | Share | Official carpet area |
|---|---|---|---|
| NOT WORKING | 0 | 0 sqm |
Registered tower / wing summary
| Tower/wing | Floors | Units | Parking | Height |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | 22 | 147 | 161 | - |
| G | 22 | 147 | 160 | - |
| H | 22 | 147 | 160 | - |
| J | 22 | 147 | 160 | - |
K-RERA detail-page flat rows: exact unit numbers, official carpet area, UDS, and parking lots. 588 official flat/unit rows, matching the 588 registered units disclosed above. Use this as a checklist against the specific flat number in your cost sheet and draft agreement.
By unit type
| Unit type | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5-BHK | 336 | 89.3-97.1 sqm | 5.3-5.8 sqm | 336 |
| 2-BHK | 252 | 67.0-79.2 sqm | 4.1-4.8 sqm | 252 |
By tower / wing
| Tower/wing | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| F | 147 | 67.0-89.8 sqm | 4.1-5.4 sqm | 147 |
| G | 147 | 67.0-89.8 sqm | 4.1-5.4 sqm | 147 |
| H | 147 | 67.0-89.8 sqm | 4.1-5.4 sqm | 147 |
| J | 147 | 67.0-97.1 sqm | 4.1-5.8 sqm | 147 |
| Unit | Tower | Floor | Type | Carpet | UDS | Parking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| F-201 | F | 2 | 2.5-BHK | 89.3 sqm | 5.4 sqm | 1 |
| F-202 | F | 2 | 2-BHK | 70.9 sqm | 4.3 sqm | 1 |
| F-203 | F | 2 | 2-BHK | 70.9 sqm | 4.3 sqm | 1 |
| F-204 | F | 2 | 2.5-BHK | 89.8 sqm | 5.4 sqm | 1 |
| F-205 | F | 2 | 2.5-BHK | 89.7 sqm | 5.4 sqm | 1 |
| F-206 | F | 2 | 2-BHK | 67.0 sqm | 4.1 sqm | 1 |
What the numbers tell you
Synthesis from the official RERA scale, unit register, and land rows — the read a sales team won't volunteer.
🔒 Unit-by-unit guidance · Unit Guidance report
Which block and unit to prefer, the livability read on the filed plans, and a plan-by-plan walkthrough — the ₹2,999 guidance layer.
🔒 Full records — land title, amenities paperwork & document catalog · Compliance report
The complete land-title chain, the paperwork behind each declared amenity, and every document row on file with the regulator — the raw records the compliance read is built on.
No litigation declared on this project's K-RERA filing.
3 of 35 compliance document slots are filed as Not Applicable; the remaining 32 slots have usable uploaded filings.
No completion certificate (OC) on file yet — project has not been declared complete.
⚠ Registration validity has lapsed: originally due 28 Feb 2020, extended (an extension) to 28 Feb 2021 — both dates have passed with no OC on file. An extension application filed on 29 Mar 2021 is pending with K-RERA — until it is approved, the registration stands lapsed.
Named utility/regulatory approvals
"Not found in catalog" can mean the approval genuinely isn't on file yet, or that it doesn't apply to this project (K-RERA doesn't tell us which). Ask the builder directly for any marked not found before relying on it.
K-RERA enforcement record (the regulator's own defaulter list & penalty orders)
⚠ Listed on K-RERA's official DEFAULTER list.
K-RERA complaint orders (50 complaints against a project of this name on K-RERA's orders register)
| Parties | Relief sought | Disposal | Order date |
|---|---|---|---|
| MRS SHRUTI GAUTAM vs MANTRI DEVELOPERS PVT LTD | As prayed in the facts of case | AUTHORITY | 30/08/2024 |
| MUDIT SAXENA vs MANTRI DEVELOPER PVT. LTD. | Deposit+2X + interest=Rs.3,062,754 + EMIs+interest | AUTHORITY | 30/06/2023 |
| ANUPAMA ARUN vs MANTRI DEVELOPER PVT. LTD. | Refund,closure of home loan & as detailed in facts | AUTHORITY | 30/06/2023 |
| VAIBHAV SHARMA vs MANTRI DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED PNB HOUSING FINANCIAL LIMITED | as prayed in the facts of the complaint | AUTHORITY | 29/07/2022 |
| MR.CHETAN SHAH vs M/S.MANTRI DEVELOPERS PVT LTD | Refund of amount paid till date against flat no J 403 alongwith reasonable interest | AUTHORITY | 27/12/2023 |
| MR ANANT RAMACHANDRAN vs M/S.MANTRI DEVELOPERS PVT LTD | (1) Refund entire sale consideration paid by Complainant, with 2x as per Pre-EMI Scheme. (2) Direct Developer to foreclose Complainant's loan with PNBHFL, and refund PRE-EMIS paid by Complainant | AUTHORITY | 27/03/2025 |
| VARUNA GEDDA vs mantri developers pvt ltd | Refund of money with guaranteed profit and closure of loan | AUTHORITY | 27/01/2025 |
| SHARDUL AND DIVYA SINGH vs MANTRI DEVELOPERS PVT LTD | As prayed in the facts of case | AUTHORITY | 24/01/2023 |
| MITAL DEVANG PATHAK vs Mantri Developers Private Limited | Complainants prays for the refund an amount of Rs.7,00,000/- (Rupees Seven Lakh Only) along with the dues pending against the PNB Loan and the closure of the same with penalty and interest @12% per an | AUTHORITY | 23/12/2025 |
| Ratheesh Kummarkkaroth vs Mantri Developers Private Limited | As prayed in the Facts of Complaint | AUTHORITY | 22/01/2026 |
| PRATIMA GOPAL vs MANTRI WEBCITY 2A | As prayed in the Facts of complaint | AUTHORITY | 21/10/2024 |
| MALAVIKA NAIR vs MANTRI DEVELOPERS PVT LTD | To direct the Respondent to cancel the Sale Agreement and Construction Agreement and refund the consideration paid along with the compensation and pass such orders as this Tribunal may deem fit. | AUTHORITY | 20/01/2023 |
| Garimella Venkata Ramana Sastry vs Mantri Developers Private Limited | For the completion and delivery of the apartment at the first instance and for the payment of interest on delay period. | AUTHORITY | 19/11/2025 |
| BAPAN KUMAR DUTTA vs Mantri Developers Private Limited | The complainant seeks a refund of Rs. 60,02,574.00 with interest from 01/12/2017 and with unpaid pre-EMI installments and , along with the outstanding bank loan amount | AUTHORITY | 19/11/2025 |
| MS.ANKITA SINGH vs M/S.MANTRI DEVELOPERS PVT LTD | Refund needed at earliest with interest, this is a breach of trust and commitment by Manti Developers | AUTHORITY | 18/12/2023 |
| SHREYANSHU PAVAS vs MANTRI WEBCITY 2A | As prayed in the facts of case | AUTHORITY | 18/06/2024 |
| RANJAN BISWAS vs MANTRI WEBCITY 2A | A.Refund entire sale consideration, PRE-EMIs paid by Complainant along with 2x as promised under the Pre-EMI Scheme with Interest, B. Direct developer to pay loan outstanding amount. | AUTHORITY | 18/06/2024 |
| Sameer Gupta vs MANTRI DEVELOPERS PVT LTD | As prayed in the Facts of Complaint | AUTHORITY | 18/01/2023 |
| Sachidanand Joshi vs MANTRI TECHNOLOGY CONSTELLATIONS | As prayed in the Facts of Complaint | AUTHORITY | 18/01/2023 |
| Mohammed Azmathulla vs M/S.MANTRI DEVELOPERS PVT LTD. | handover our flat K2006 with interest on delay period. | AUTHORITY | 16/06/2025 |
| MR SAIRAM DHARMARAJU vs M/S.MANTRI DEVELOPERS PVT LTD. | Refund of amount with assured returns and cancellation of the loan | AUTHORITY | 13/12/2025 |
| MOHAN PULLAIAH vs MANTRI DEVELOPERS PVT LTD | We are seeking refund of the amount invested plus the buy back amount guaranteed with interest and closure of loan. nOC to be provided | AUTHORITY | 13/09/2025 |
| MOHAN PULLIAH vs MANTRI DEVELOPERS PVT LTD | Refund with assured return on investment interest and cancellation of loan | AUTHORITY | 13/09/2025 |
| jitendra kumar vs mantri webcity 2a | As prayed in Facts of complaint | AUTHORITY | 13/07/2023 |
| DEBASIS SARKAR vs MANTRI DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED | Refunf along with interest and cost | AUTHORITY | 13/07/2023 |
| nidhi sibal vs mantri developers | Refund of entire sale consideration along with interest as prescribed in RERA Act and Rules | AUTHORITY | 12/03/2024 |
| MAMTA SHUKLA vs MANTRI DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD | DELAY COMPENSATION @ 18% FROM THE DATE OF POSSESSION AS MENTIONED ON AGREEMENT TILL THE DATE OF ACTUAL POSSESSION WITH OC | AUTHORITY | 11/12/2023 |
| Himanshu Srivastava vs MANTRI TECHNOLOGY CONSTELLATIONS PVT LTD | As prayed in the Facts of Complaint | AUTHORITY | 09/11/2022 |
| Paul Mani vs Mantri Developers Private Limited | As prayed in the Facts of Complaint | AUTHORITY | 07/11/2022 |
| Muralidhar Sortur vs Mantri Technology Constellations Pvt Ltd | As prayed in the Facts of Complaint | AUTHORITY | 07/11/2022 |
| Somashekar S Umadi vs Mantri Developers Private Limited | As prayed in the Facts of Complaint | AUTHORITY | 07/11/2022 |
| MR.ATUL KUMAR VERMA vs M/S.MANTRI DEVELOPERS PVT LTD | Refund of my invested money Rs. 59,37,403 together with INTEREST from the date of payment to until now. | AUTHORITY | 07/03/2023 |
| Devdas Panduranga Shetti & Seema Devdas Shetti vs Mantri Webcity 2A | A.Refund entire sale consideration, PRE-EMIs paid by Complainant along with 2x as promised under the Pre-EMI Scheme with Interest, B. Direct developer to pay loan outstanding amount | AUTHORITY | 06/06/2024 |
| Sharad Mantri vs MANTRI DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED | Reimbursement of the amount already paid along with the interest or allotment of flat | AUTHORITY | 06/06/2023 |
| MOHAN PULLIAH vs MANTRI DEVELOPERS | Pay the money in accordance with buyback scheme + interest for the delay and closure of loan in my name. | AUTHORITY | 06/03/2023 |
| ROSHAN JAMEER PATEL vs MANTRI WEBCITY 2A | As prayed in facts of complaint | AUTHORITY | 05/08/2024 |
| Shahul Hameed Dasthagir vs Mantri Developers Private Limited | Refund | AUTHORITY | 04/06/2024 |
| DURAI RAJ D S vs MANTRI DEVELOPERS PVT LTD | Direct the developer to terminate the agreement dated 01-09-2017 and refund the sum of Rs.38,63,846/- along with compensation of Rs.10,00,000/- and interest and costs. | AUTHORITY | 03/08/2023 |
| SATHEESH DWARAGANAHALLI RAO & ANOTHER vs M/S MANTRI DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED | A.Refund entire sale consideration, PRE-EMIs paid by Complainant along with 2x as promised under the Pre-EMI Scheme with interest, B. Direct developer to pay loan outstanding amount | AUTHORITY | 03/05/2024 |
| MRINMOY DAS & ANOTHER vs M/S MANTRI DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED | A.Refund entire sale consideration, PRE-EMIs paid by Complainant along with 2x as promised under the Pre-EMI Scheme with Interest B. Direct developer to pay loan outstanding amount | AUTHORITY | 03/04/2024 |
| URMIL PARIKH & ANOTHER vs M/S MANTRI DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED | A.Refund entire sale consideration, PRE-EMIs paid by Complainant along with 2x as promised under the Pre-EMI Scheme with interest, B. Direct developer to pay loan outstanding amount | AUTHORITY | 03/04/2024 |
| SATHEESH DWARAGANAHALLI RAO & ANOTHER vs M/S MANTRI DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED | : A.Refund entire sale consideration, PRE-EMIs paid by Complainant along with 2x as promised under the Pre-EMI Scheme with interest, B. Direct developer to pay loan outstanding amount | AUTHORITY | 03/04/2024 |
| SATISH ARORA vs M/S MANTRI DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED | A.Refund entire sale consideration, PRE-EMIs paid by Complainant along with 2x as promised under the Pre-EMI Scheme with interest, B. Direct developer to pay loan outstanding amount | AUTHORITY | 03/04/2024 |
| VINOD A CHETTIAR & ANOTHER vs M/S MANTRI DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED | A.Refund entire sale consideration, PRE-EMIs paid by Complainant along with 2x as promised under the Pre-EMI Scheme with Interest, B. Direct developer to pay loan outstanding amount. | AUTHORITY | 03/04/2024 |
| RAGHAVENDRA KUDVA PADUBIDRI & ANOTHER vs M/S MANTRI DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED | A.Refund entire sale consideration, PRE-EMIs paid by Complainant along with 2x as promised under the Pre-EMI Scheme with Interest, B. Direct developer to pay loan outstanding amount | AUTHORITY | 03/04/2024 |
| MR.RAGHAVENDRA VT vs M/S.MANTRI DEVELOPERS PVT LTD | As prayed in the facts of complaint | AUTHORITY | 03/03/2026 |
| Guru Bhadra Singh vs Mantri Developers Private Limited | As prayed in Facts of Complaint | AUTHORITY | 02/11/2022 |
| PALLAV RUSTOGI vs MANTRI WEBCITY 2A | As prayed in the Facts of Complaint | AUTHORITY | 02/07/2024 |
| MS SONAL GUPTA AND ANOTHER vs M/S.MANTRI DEVELOPERS PVT LTD | Refund of amount with interest and directing the developer to close the loan | AUTHORITY | 02/04/2024 |
| HAMEEDA BEGUM A vs MANTRI WEBCITY 2A | Refund of amount paid and compensation of the losses incurred by interests, inflation etc due to delay in flats. | AUTHORITY | 02/02/2023 |
⚠ Matched by PROJECT NAME (the orders register carries no registration number) — confirm the respondent above is this project's builder before relying on it.
Complaints on this project's K-RERA page (138 complaints listed against this promoter)
| Complaint | Subject (as filed) | Project | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| CMP/190211/0002111 11-02-2019 | REFUND OF DOWN PAYMENT WITH 100% ASSURED RETURN UNDER BUYBACK, CLOSURE OF HOME LOAN WITH PNBHFL, PAYMENT OF INTEREST, REFUND OF EMIs PAID TO PNBHFL, COMPENSATION | Mantri Webcity3A (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190222/0002125 22-02-2019 | Completion and Possession not delivered in Mantri Webcity Projct by Mantri Developers Pvt Ltd | Mantri Webcity3A (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190217/0002170 17-02-2019 | Project delayed, pushed to acquire a higher cost apartment and further delay on the same | Mantri Webcity3A (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190305/0002188 05-03-2019 | REFUND OF DOWN PAYMENT WITH 100% ASSURED RETURN UNDER BUYBACK, CLOSURE OF HOME LOAN WITH PNBHFL, PAYMENT OF INTEREST, REFUND OF EMIs PAID TO PNBHFL, COMPENSATION | Mantri Webcity2A | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190220/0002206 20-02-2019 | Possession dates are registered wrongly with RERA for MANTRI WEBCITY 2A | Mantri Webcity2A | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190624/0002272 24-06-2019 | Non Delivery of Apartment, Non payment of Pre-EMI, Delayed Compensation, Interest Refund, Damages for Mental Agony, Mental Torture and Unfair Trade Practice | Mantri Webcity3B (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190225/0002286 25-02-2019 | COMPLAINT UNDER SECTION 31 OF RERA 2016 | Mantri Webcity3C (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190319/0002378 19-03-2019 | Buy Back closure 3 Years contract breached for indefinite period, Huge debt on Buyer for Pre-EMi and Home Loan | Mantri Webcity2B (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
Listed on the project's own K-RERA detail page (registration-exact source). Rows on the promoter's other projects are track-record context — read the subject text, it is the complainant's own filed wording.
K-RERA names 3 project professional/vendor rows across Architect, Contractor, Structural engineer. Use this to cross-check whose certificates, drawings, and contractor commitments support the filing; final reliance still belongs with your lawyer/technical reviewer.
| Role | Name | Registration / licence | Since | Locality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Architect | RSP | - | NA | RSP House, 30 Museum Road |
| Contractor | M/S Simplex | - | NA | SC Road, Anand Rao circle |
| Structural engineer | NAGESH CONSULTANTS | - | - | - |
Mantri has 8 other K-RERA-registered projects in our records — grouped across the several project-specific entities this developer registers under (e.g. this project is filed as “Mantri Developers”). 8 are past their declared completion deadline with no completion certificate recorded — but because K-RERA publishes OCs inconsistently, a project that has actually been finished and handed over still shows up this way, so this overstates real delays, especially for a high-volume established builder. That is a higher delayed rate than the K-RERA average across Bengaluru on the same measure.
Read this as a list to spot-check for a pattern of genuinely stalled projects, not as a delay rate — pull up a few of the builder’s other K-RERA registrations and check whether they’ve actually been delivered.
⚠ No quarterly financial disclosures (collections, escrow withdrawals) on record, despite no completion certificate yet — meaning we can't verify the project's cashflows against its construction progress. Worth asking the builder directly why no quarterly filings are available.
Declared construction cost ÷ registered units averages to ₹30.7 lakhs per unit — the developer's own declared construction/development cost, not a sale price. K-RERA filings don't disclose what the builder is charging, so this can't tell you whether you're getting a fair deal — only you comparing your quoted price against comparable listings nearby can answer that.
RERA 70% project account is on file: Bank of Baroda Altamount Branch, Mumbai (IFSC BARB0ALTAMO, a/c …1046). RERA requires 70% of buyer collections to sit in this separate, project-specific account, drawn only against certified construction milestones — confirm your payments are made to THIS account (not a general builder account) and that it appears on your allotment letter.
K-RERA has 1 project-photo upload.
These are developer-uploaded progress photos in the official document catalog. We do not treat them as proof of current site condition; use them as a prompt to ask for newer dated photos or a site visit.
The nearest major job hub is ~10 km away — a manageable everyday commute to a major job hub.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| MG Road / city centre | 5 km |
| Bellandur–Marathahalli belt | 10 km |
| Electronic City | 12 km |
| Outer Ring Road / Manyata | 12 km |
| Whitefield IT hub | 17 km |
| Kempegowda Int'l Airport | 32 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.
Should you buy in Mantri Webcity2A?
This page is the free K-RERA filing summary. The full RERA Property Intelligence Report gives you buyer-complaint history, regulatory flags, builder track record, the official unit register, land title, NOCs, and (where the sanctioned plans support it) room-by-room unit data and an annotated site plan. See a real one first:
Sample: Sobha Silicon Oasis → · browse all sample reports →
Compliance Report · ₹999
The regulator’s filing record, read · 1 working day
Scan with any UPI app to pay · quietlist@kotak
Unit Guidance Report · ₹2,999
Everything, down to which unit · 1 working day
Not useful to your decision? Full refund — no questions asked.
Scan with any UPI app to pay · quietlist@kotak
Paying from outside India? Pay $15 (Compliance) or $39 (Unit Guidance) via PayPal, or email hello@quietlist.in for a card invoice. Prefer to talk first, or have a portfolio to check? Same address. An information aid for your own due diligence, not legal or investment advice.
Free · Watch this project
We'll email you when this project's RERA record changes.
Built by Mantri Developers. View Mantri Developers's full track record →
Figures are the developer's own quarterly disclosures on the Karnataka RERA register. "Built" is the highest construction % filed; "sold" is booked units over total. Not a claim about the developer's intent. Explore every project on our Bangalore project-health tool.
Own a unit in Mantri Webcity2a?
Sell directly to Quietlist's pre-screened buyer list — flat fee, no broker commission.
Last checked against the RERA register: 27 Jul 2026