Mantri Centrium
RERA Property Intelligence Report · Preview
Mantri Developers · Bengaluru South · K-RERA PRM/KA/RERA/1251/310/PR/171015/000620
Report coverage
K-RERA registry & builder-record report
What this report covers
To confirm directly with the builder
🔒 The verdict & buyer playbook · Compliance report
The paid report opens with the overall risk rating, the specific red-flag findings, exactly what I'd do as a buyer in this project, who it suits, and the questions to put to the builder before you commit.
Registration-form facts from the K-RERA detail page: use these to sanity-check the builder brochure, parking allotment, and sanctioned-plan references before relying on plan-extracted approximations.
| Disclosure | Official value | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Registered units | 441 | Total inventory registered with K-RERA. |
| Registered land area | 21,448 sqm | The land area attached to this K-RERA registration. |
| Sanctioned FAR/FSI | 3 | Higher FAR generally means a denser vertical build, subject to site layout and open-space design. |
| Registered towers/wings | 3 | Official tower/wing count in the K-RERA detail page. |
| Parking disclosed | 481 total (24 open) — 1.09 spaces/unit | Confirm whether your quoted unit includes an allotted parking space and where it sits. |
| Project start date | 04-03-2013 |
K-RERA registration tables showing the project mix and tower/wing scale. Use this to sanity-check sales claims such as "only large homes", "low density", or "plenty of parking" against the filed inventory.
Registered inventory mix
| Type | Units | Share | Official carpet area |
|---|---|---|---|
| NOT WORKING | 0 | 0 sqm |
Registered tower / wing summary
| Tower/wing | Floors | Units | Parking | Height |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K | 22 | 147 | 160 | - |
| L | 22 | 147 | 160 | - |
| M | 22 | 147 | 161 | - |
K-RERA detail-page flat rows: exact unit numbers, official carpet area, UDS, and parking lots. 441 official flat/unit rows, matching the 441 registered units disclosed above. Use this as a checklist against the specific flat number in your cost sheet and draft agreement.
By unit type
| Unit type | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2.5-BHK | 231 | 89.3-95.6 sqm | 5.4-5.9 sqm | 231 |
| 2-BHK | 210 | 67.0-79.0 sqm | 4.1-4.9 sqm | 210 |
By tower / wing
| Tower/wing | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| K | 147 | 67.0-95.6 sqm | 4.2-5.9 sqm | 147 |
| L | 147 | 67.0-89.8 sqm | 4.1-5.5 sqm | 147 |
| M | 147 | 67.0-89.7 sqm | 4.1-5.4 sqm | 147 |
| Unit | Tower | Floor | Type | Carpet | UDS | Parking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| K-201 | K | 2 | 2.5-BHK | 89.3 sqm | 5.5 sqm | 1 |
| K-202 | K | 2 | 2-BHK | 70.9 sqm | 4.4 sqm | 1 |
| K-203 | K | 2 | 2-BHK | 70.9 sqm | 4.4 sqm | 1 |
| K-204 | K | 2 | 2.5-BHK | 89.8 sqm | 5.5 sqm | 1 |
| K-205 | K | 2 | 2-BHK | 78.1 sqm | 4.9 sqm | 1 |
| K-206 | K | 2 | 2-BHK | 67.0 sqm | 4.2 sqm | 1 |
What the numbers tell you
Synthesis from the official RERA scale, unit register, and land rows — the read a sales team won't volunteer.
🔒 Unit-by-unit guidance · Unit Guidance report
Which block and unit to prefer, the livability read on the filed plans, and a plan-by-plan walkthrough — the ₹2,999 guidance layer.
🔒 Full records — land title, amenities paperwork & document catalog · Compliance report
The complete land-title chain, the paperwork behind each declared amenity, and every document row on file with the regulator — the raw records the compliance read is built on.
No litigation declared on this project's K-RERA filing.
3 of 35 compliance document slots are filed as Not Applicable; the remaining 32 slots have usable uploaded filings.
No completion certificate (OC) on file yet — project has not been declared complete.
⚠ Registration validity has lapsed: originally due 31 Mar 2022, extended (Covid Extension) to 31 Dec 2022 — both dates have passed with no OC on file. An extension application filed on 02 Sep 2023 is pending with K-RERA — until it is approved, the registration stands lapsed.
Named utility/regulatory approvals
"Not found in catalog" can mean the approval genuinely isn't on file yet, or that it doesn't apply to this project (K-RERA doesn't tell us which). Ask the builder directly for any marked not found before relying on it.
K-RERA enforcement record (the regulator's own defaulter list & penalty orders)
⚠ Listed on K-RERA's official DEFAULTER list.
1 K-RERA order on this project (PROJECT EXTENSION) — read the order copies on the K-RERA portal.
K-RERA complaint orders (20 complaints against a project of this name on K-RERA's orders register)
| Parties | Relief sought | Disposal | Order date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Siva Prasad A K vs Mantri Developers Private Limited | As prayed in the Facts of Case | AUTHORITY | 29/10/2022 |
| RAKESH V. S vs MATRI DEVELOPER PVT. LTD. | As prayed in facts | AUTHORITY | 26/06/2023 |
| GHATIGEPPA BASAVARAJ JAVALI vs MANTRI WEBCITY 2B | As prayed in the facts | AUTHORITY | 24/05/2023 |
| Gourav Gupta vs Mantri Developers Private Limited | Initiate penalty proceedings under Section 63 of the RERA Act against the Respondent Company and its Directors | AUTHORITY | 24/03/2026 |
| Debadatta patra vs mantri developers pvt ltd | Cancellation of my booking in the project and refund of entire amount along with interest from the builder | AUTHORITY | 17/02/2023 |
| Baskaran Kailasam vs MANTRI DEVELOPERS PVT LTD | Regarding Cancellation Refund of Outstanding Amount with Interest for the Unit M603 | AUTHORITY | 16/01/2023 |
| Jinu Raghavan vs MANTRI DEVELOPERS PVT LTD | As prayed in the Facts of Complaint | AUTHORITY | 15/10/2022 |
| DEEPAK ABHICHANDANI vs MANTRI DEVELOPERS PVT LTD | as prayed in the facts of case | AUTHORITY | 13/06/2023 |
| Girish Nayak vs Mantri Technology Constellations Pvt Ltd | As prayed in facts of Complaint | AUTHORITY | 07/11/2022 |
| Srinivas Kulkarni vs Mantri Developers Private Limited | Request you to help us get our money back | AUTHORITY | 05/11/2022 |
| Santosh Kumar Rout vs Mantri Developers Private Limited | A.Refund entire sale consideration, PRE-EMIs paid by Complainant along with 2x as promised under the Pre-EMI Scheme with Interest, B. Direct developer to pay loan outstanding amount. | AUTHORITY | 03/06/2026 |
| RAM SANTHANAM PRASAD & ANOTHER vs M/S MANTRI DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED | A.Refund entire sale consideration, PRE-EMIs paid by Complainant along with 2x as promised under the Pre-EMI Scheme with interest B. Direct developer to pay loan outstanding amount | AUTHORITY | 03/04/2024 |
| RAM SANTHANAM PRASAD & ANOTHER vs M/S MANTRI DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED | : A.Refund entire sale consideration, PRE-EMIs paid by Complainant along with 2x as promised under the Pre-EMI Scheme with interest, B. Direct developer to pay loan outstanding amount | AUTHORITY | 03/04/2024 |
| ARVIND SANTHANAM PRASAD & ANOTHER vs M/S MANTRI DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED | A.Refund entire sale consideration, PRE-EMIs paid by Complainant along with 2x as promised under the Pre-EMI Scheme with Interest, B. Direct developer to pay loan outstanding amount | AUTHORITY | 03/04/2024 |
| ARVIND SANTHANAM PRASAD & ANOTHER vs M/S MANTRI DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED | A.Refund entire sale consideration, PRE-EMIs paid by Complainant along with 2x as promised under the Pre-EMI Scheme with Interest, B. Direct developer to pay loan outstanding amount | AUTHORITY | 03/04/2024 |
| GOURAV GUPTA & ANOTHER vs M/S MANTRI DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED | A.Refund entire sale consideration, PRE-EMIs paid by Complainant along with 2x as promised under the Pre-EMI Scheme with Interest, B. Direct developer to pay loan outstanding amount. | AUTHORITY | 03/04/2024 |
| SHUBHRA MISHRA & ANOTHER vs M/S MANTRI DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED | A.Refund entire sale consideration, PRE-EMIs paid by Complainant along with 2x as promised under the Pre-EMI Scheme with Interest, B. Direct developer to pay loan outstanding amount. | AUTHORITY | 03/04/2024 |
| SUMANT SUBHASHCHANDRA NAIKKHANVTE & ANOTHER vs M/S MANTRI DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED | A.Refund entire sale consideration, PRE-EMIs paid by Complainant along with 2x as promised under the Pre-EMI Scheme with Interest, B. Direct developer to pay loan outstanding amount. | AUTHORITY | 03/04/2024 |
| RAMANAN M vs M/S MANTRI DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED | A.Refund entire sale consideration, PRE-EMIs paid by Complainant along with 2x as promised under the Pre-EMI Scheme with Interest, B. Direct developer to pay loan outstanding amount. | AUTHORITY | 03/04/2024 |
| Dhruv Jhamb vs Mantri Developers Private Limited | As prayed in the Facts of Complaint | AUTHORITY | 02/11/2022 |
⚠ Matched by PROJECT NAME (the orders register carries no registration number) — confirm the respondent above is this project's builder before relying on it.
Complaints on this project's K-RERA page (138 complaints listed against this promoter)
| Complaint | Subject (as filed) | Project | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| CMP/190211/0002111 11-02-2019 | REFUND OF DOWN PAYMENT WITH 100% ASSURED RETURN UNDER BUYBACK, CLOSURE OF HOME LOAN WITH PNBHFL, PAYMENT OF INTEREST, REFUND OF EMIs PAID TO PNBHFL, COMPENSATION | Mantri Webcity3A (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190222/0002125 22-02-2019 | Completion and Possession not delivered in Mantri Webcity Projct by Mantri Developers Pvt Ltd | Mantri Webcity3A (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190217/0002170 17-02-2019 | Project delayed, pushed to acquire a higher cost apartment and further delay on the same | Mantri Webcity3A (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190305/0002188 05-03-2019 | REFUND OF DOWN PAYMENT WITH 100% ASSURED RETURN UNDER BUYBACK, CLOSURE OF HOME LOAN WITH PNBHFL, PAYMENT OF INTEREST, REFUND OF EMIs PAID TO PNBHFL, COMPENSATION | Mantri Webcity2A (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190220/0002206 20-02-2019 | Possession dates are registered wrongly with RERA for MANTRI WEBCITY 2A | Mantri Webcity2A (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190624/0002272 24-06-2019 | Non Delivery of Apartment, Non payment of Pre-EMI, Delayed Compensation, Interest Refund, Damages for Mental Agony, Mental Torture and Unfair Trade Practice | Mantri Webcity3B (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190225/0002286 25-02-2019 | COMPLAINT UNDER SECTION 31 OF RERA 2016 | Mantri Webcity3C (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190319/0002378 19-03-2019 | Buy Back closure 3 Years contract breached for indefinite period, Huge debt on Buyer for Pre-EMi and Home Loan | Mantri Webcity2B | DISPOSED AO |
Listed on the project's own K-RERA detail page (registration-exact source). Rows on the promoter's other projects are track-record context — read the subject text, it is the complainant's own filed wording.
K-RERA names 3 project professional/vendor rows across Architect, Contractor, Structural engineer. Use this to cross-check whose certificates, drawings, and contractor commitments support the filing; final reliance still belongs with your lawyer/technical reviewer.
| Role | Name | Registration / licence | Since | Locality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Architect | RSP | - | NA | RSP House, 30 Museum Road |
| Contractor | M/S Simplex | - | NA | SC Road, Anand Rao circle |
| Structural engineer | NAGESH CONSULTANTS | - | - | - |
Mantri has 8 other K-RERA-registered projects in our records — grouped across the several project-specific entities this developer registers under (e.g. this project is filed as “Mantri Developers”). 8 are past their declared completion deadline with no completion certificate recorded — but because K-RERA publishes OCs inconsistently, a project that has actually been finished and handed over still shows up this way, so this overstates real delays, especially for a high-volume established builder. That is a higher delayed rate than the K-RERA average across Bengaluru on the same measure.
Read this as a list to spot-check for a pattern of genuinely stalled projects, not as a delay rate — pull up a few of the builder’s other K-RERA registrations and check whether they’ve actually been delivered.
⚠ No quarterly financial disclosures (collections, escrow withdrawals) on record, despite no completion certificate yet — meaning we can't verify the project's cashflows against its construction progress. Worth asking the builder directly why no quarterly filings are available.
Declared construction cost ÷ registered units averages to ₹44.3 lakhs per unit — the developer's own declared construction/development cost, not a sale price. K-RERA filings don't disclose what the builder is charging, so this can't tell you whether you're getting a fair deal — only you comparing your quoted price against comparable listings nearby can answer that.
RERA 70% project account is on file: Bank of Baroda Altamount Branch, Mumbai (IFSC BARB0ALTAMO, a/c …1041). RERA requires 70% of buyer collections to sit in this separate, project-specific account, drawn only against certified construction milestones — confirm your payments are made to THIS account (not a general builder account) and that it appears on your allotment letter.
K-RERA has 1 project-photo upload.
These are developer-uploaded progress photos in the official document catalog. We do not treat them as proof of current site condition; use them as a prompt to ask for newer dated photos or a site visit.
The nearest major job hub is ~10 km away — a manageable everyday commute to a major job hub.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| MG Road / city centre | 5 km |
| Bellandur–Marathahalli belt | 10 km |
| Electronic City | 12 km |
| Outer Ring Road / Manyata | 12 km |
| Whitefield IT hub | 17 km |
| Kempegowda Int'l Airport | 32 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.
Should you buy in Mantri Webcity2B?
This page is the free K-RERA filing summary. The full RERA Property Intelligence Report gives you buyer-complaint history, regulatory flags, builder track record, the official unit register, land title, NOCs, and (where the sanctioned plans support it) room-by-room unit data and an annotated site plan. See a real one first:
Sample: Sobha Silicon Oasis → · browse all sample reports →
Compliance Report · ₹999
The regulator’s filing record, read · 1 working day
Scan with any UPI app to pay · quietlist@kotak
Unit Guidance Report · ₹2,999
Everything, down to which unit · 1 working day
Not useful to your decision? Full refund — no questions asked.
Scan with any UPI app to pay · quietlist@kotak
Paying from outside India? Pay $15 (Compliance) or $39 (Unit Guidance) via PayPal, or email hello@quietlist.in for a card invoice. Prefer to talk first, or have a portfolio to check? Same address. An information aid for your own due diligence, not legal or investment advice.
Free · Watch this project
We'll email you when this project's RERA record changes.
Built by Mantri Developers. View Mantri Developers's full track record →
Figures are the developer's own quarterly disclosures on the Karnataka RERA register. "Built" is the highest construction % filed; "sold" is booked units over total. Not a claim about the developer's intent. Explore every project on our Bangalore project-health tool.
Own a unit in Mantri Webcity2b?
Sell directly to Quietlist's pre-screened buyer list — flat fee, no broker commission.
Last checked against the RERA register: 27 Jul 2026