DS MAX SKY Sanjeevini
RERA Property Intelligence Report · Preview
ROYALE TOWNSHIP · Bengaluru North · K-RERA PRM/KA/RERA/1251/309/PR/190125/002305
Report coverage
K-RERA registry & builder-record report
What this report covers
To confirm directly with the builder
🔒 The verdict & buyer playbook · Compliance report
The paid report opens with the overall risk rating, the specific red-flag findings, exactly what I'd do as a buyer in this project, who it suits, and the questions to put to the builder before you commit.
Registration-form facts from the K-RERA detail page: use these to sanity-check the builder brochure, parking allotment, and sanctioned-plan references before relying on plan-extracted approximations.
| Disclosure | Official value | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Registered land area | 205,327 sqm | The land area attached to this K-RERA registration. |
| Project start date | 24-01-2017 |
🔒 Unit-by-unit guidance · Unit Guidance report
Which block and unit to prefer, the livability read on the filed plans, and a plan-by-plan walkthrough — the ₹2,999 guidance layer.
🔒 Full records — land title, amenities paperwork & document catalog · Compliance report
The complete land-title chain, the paperwork behind each declared amenity, and every document row on file with the regulator — the raw records the compliance read is built on.
No litigation declared on this project's K-RERA filing.
3 of 17 compliance document slots are filed as Not Applicable; the remaining 14 slots have usable uploaded filings.
No completion certificate (OC) on file yet — project has not been declared complete.
⚠ Registration validity has lapsed: originally due 31 Dec 2022 — which has passed with no OC on file.
Named utility/regulatory approvals
"Not found in catalog" can mean the approval genuinely isn't on file yet, or that it doesn't apply to this project (K-RERA doesn't tell us which). Ask the builder directly for any marked not found before relying on it.
K-RERA complaint orders (24 complaints against a project of this name on K-RERA's orders register)
| Parties | Relief sought | Disposal | Order date |
|---|---|---|---|
| MOHAMMED KHALANDAR vs ROYALE TOWNSHIP | Please help the buyers by stopping the new project and complete the current project first. Thanks | AUTHORITY | 12/05/2025 |
| Kavya Sanjeevini MV vs ROYALE TOWNSHIP | Completion of the project | AUTHORITY | 12/05/2025 |
| Divya H S vs ROYALE TOWNSHIP | Completion of project as per the advertisement and the agreement | AUTHORITY | 12/05/2025 |
| Subhash B vs ROYALE TOWNSHIP | Request Completion of project | AUTHORITY | 12/05/2025 |
| N Kamal vs ROYALE TOWNSHIP | Completion of the project as per the advertisement and agreement | AUTHORITY | 12/05/2025 |
| Raghunath Narasappa vs ROYALE TOWNSHIP | Make the Builder accountable and enforce them to complete all the amenities | AUTHORITY | 12/05/2025 |
| Mahantesh Patil C vs ROYALE TOWNSHIP | Project should be developed and completed as per the advertisement and the agreement | AUTHORITY | 12/05/2025 |
| Maya salimath vs ROYALE TOWNSHIP | giving directions to complete the project with providing suitable compensation | AUTHORITY | 12/05/2025 |
| Basavalingaiah M S vs ROYALE TOWNSHIP | COMPLITION OF THE PROJECT AS PER THE ADVERTISEMENT ANFD PROMISES IN SALE DEED | AUTHORITY | 12/05/2025 |
| Virendra Kumar Shukla vs ROYALE TOWNSHIP | Project should be developed and completed as per the advertisement and the agreement | AUTHORITY | 12/05/2025 |
| Ananda Bettahalli Rangappa vs ROYALE TOWNSHIP | COMPLETION OF ALL PROMISED AMENITIES AND FINISH THE PENDING WORKS OF PROJECT AND MAINTIAN THE LAYOUT AS PROMISED | AUTHORITY | 12/05/2025 |
| R UMA MAHESHWARI vs ROYALE TOWNSHIP | COMPLITION OF PROJECT WITH ALL AMENITIES AND FECITILIES AS PROMISED | AUTHORITY | 12/05/2025 |
| Rajesh Kumar vs ROYALE TOWNSHIP | Completion of the project as per the advertisement and agreement | AUTHORITY | 12/05/2025 |
| ANIL KUMAR vs ROYALE TOWNSHIP | : Completion of the project as per the advertisement and agreement | AUTHORITY | 12/05/2025 |
| PAWAN KUMAR SHARMA vs ROYALE TOWNSHIP | Completion of the project as per the advertisement and agreement | AUTHORITY | 12/05/2025 |
| Yasmeen Sultana Ahmed vs ROYALE TOWNSHIP | completion of amenities as per RERA rules | AUTHORITY | 12/05/2025 |
| GOVARDHAN S vs ROYALE TOWNSHIP | Request RERA's support to escalate this and get the pending work done as soon as possible. | AUTHORITY | 12/05/2025 |
| Ramajagol Rajkumar M vs ROYALE TOWNSHIP | Completion of pending work at the earliest | AUTHORITY | 12/05/2025 |
| Yogeesha vs ROYALE TOWNSHIP | Direct the Promotor or Developer to complete the Project | AUTHORITY | 12/05/2025 |
| Neekunj Todi vs ROYALE TOWNSHIP | Request RERA's support to escalate this issue with the developer and get the pending work done as per the sale agreement | AUTHORITY | 12/05/2025 |
| Raghavendra AA vs ROYALE TOWNSHIP | completion of project with amenities as per agreement | AUTHORITY | 12/05/2025 |
| Varadarajan Chakradhar vs ROYALE TOWNSHIP | RERA should immediately ensure that the Developer accounts for all deposits collected for the common facilities are appropriately invested for the 523 Plot buyers' common benefit. | AUTHORITY | 12/05/2025 |
| Rajesh Moola vs ROYALE TOWNSHIP | RERA should immediately ensure that the Developer accounts for all deposits, collected for the common facilities are appropriately invested for the 523 Plot buyers common benefit | AUTHORITY | 12/05/2025 |
| Ketan S Mehta vs ROYALE TOWNSHIP | Project should be developed and completed as per the promise in the advertisement and the sale deed. | AUTHORITY | 12/05/2025 |
⚠ Matched by PROJECT NAME (the orders register carries no registration number) — confirm the respondent above is this project's builder before relying on it.
Complaints on this project's K-RERA page (1 complaint listed against this promoter)
| Complaint | Subject (as filed) | Project | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| CMP/220317/0009148 17-03-2022 | Amenities not fulfilled as promised and promoted. Moreover basic necessities to live are not fulfilled. Street Lights, Power connection, power lines etc | ROYALE TOWNSHIP | DISPOSED AUTHORITY FULLBENCH |
Listed on the project's own K-RERA detail page (registration-exact source). Rows on the promoter's other projects are track-record context — read the subject text, it is the complainant's own filed wording.
⚠ No quarterly financial disclosures (collections, escrow withdrawals) on record, despite no completion certificate yet — meaning we can't verify the project's cashflows against its construction progress. Worth asking the builder directly why no quarterly filings are available.
The estimated cost above is the developer's declared construction cost only (K-RERA's own label: "Estimated Cost of Construction as certified by Engineer") — it excludes land cost, so it isn't comparable to the buyer-collection figures below or to a sale price.
RERA 70% project account is on file: UCO Bank KORAMANGALA (IFSC UCBA0001053, a/c …2513). RERA requires 70% of buyer collections to sit in this separate, project-specific account, drawn only against certified construction milestones — confirm your payments are made to THIS account (not a general builder account) and that it appears on your allotment letter.
The nearest major job hub is ~20 km away — well outside the job hubs — this is a value/space play, not a short-commute one; budget for the drive.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| Outer Ring Road / Manyata | 20 km |
| MG Road / city centre | 22 km |
| Kempegowda Int'l Airport | 31 km |
| Bellandur–Marathahalli belt | 32 km |
| Electronic City | 36 km |
| Whitefield IT hub | 36 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.
Should you buy in ROYALE TOWNSHIP?
This page is the free K-RERA filing summary. The full RERA Property Intelligence Report gives you buyer-complaint history, regulatory flags, builder track record, the official unit register, land title, NOCs, and (where the sanctioned plans support it) room-by-room unit data and an annotated site plan. See a real one first:
Sample: Century OneWorld Seraya (plotted) → · browse all sample reports →
Compliance Report · ₹999
The regulator’s filing record, read · 1 working day
Scan with any UPI app to pay · quietlist@kotak
Unit Guidance Report · ₹2,999
Everything, down to which unit · 1 working day
Not useful to your decision? Full refund — no questions asked.
Scan with any UPI app to pay · quietlist@kotak
Paying from outside India? Pay $15 (Compliance) or $39 (Unit Guidance) via PayPal, or email hello@quietlist.in for a card invoice. Prefer to talk first, or have a portfolio to check? Same address. An information aid for your own due diligence, not legal or investment advice.
Free · Watch this project
We'll email you when this project's RERA record changes.
Built by Royale Township.
Figures are the developer's own quarterly disclosures on the Karnataka RERA register. "Built" is the highest construction % filed; "sold" is booked units over total. Not a claim about the developer's intent. Explore every project on our Bangalore project-health tool.
Own a unit in Royale Township?
Sell directly to Quietlist's pre-screened buyer list — flat fee, no broker commission.
Last checked against the RERA register: 27 Jul 2026