K-RERA · the public record
WINDSOR TROIKA
Bengaluru South · Windsor Edifices
Know the project.
Then choose your home.
The registration, progress and filed details in one place. Go further with an independent reading of the project’s evidence.
The record · free to read
Registration read 20 Sep 2026Progress & dates
The timeline on file.
Available record
No construction trend to plot.
The records used for this page do not supply a series of construction percentages. This does not establish whether possession has been given.
declared completion
30 Jun 2019
The registered date and a construction update answer different questions. Neither is a confirmation of possession.
K-RERA registration · read 20 Sep 2026
Inventory & scale
What this registration contains.
Filed categories, unchanged · K-RERA registration · read 20 Sep 2026
The whole registration
4.9registered acres
60.0registered units per acre
The average covers the registered land and all registered unit types. It does not describe the space, outlook or surroundings of an individual home.
From another project · Prestige Park Grove
A larger advertised area. Almost the same carpet area.
In Tower 14, E4 has 141 sq ft more saleable area than E2. Its carpet area is only 0.46 sq m larger. The report puts the two layouts side by side.
This illustrates the report format. These findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the sample report ↗
The source record
The details behind the headline.
K-RERA · PRM/KA/RERA/1251/310/PR/171214/001023
This project, on the record
The comparable facts of this project, from its own RERA registration record. Each context percentile names its exact comparison set, drawn from Quietlist’s full register store. The paid report adds drawing-read rows to this same table — what the filed plans show about the site, its edges and the unit layouts.
On the register
In context
Values as crawled from the official K-RERA record; context percentiles name their comparison population.
Official Registry Facts
Official project scale
RERA filingRegistration-form facts from the K-RERA detail page: use these to sanity-check the builder brochure, parking allotment, and sanctioned-plan references before relying on plan-extracted approximations.
| Disclosure | Official value | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Registered units | 292 | Total inventory registered with K-RERA. |
| Official carpet area | 32,878 sqm | Regulator-disclosed project-level carpet area, not vision-derived room sums. |
| Registered land area | 19,698 sqm | The land area attached to this K-RERA registration. |
| Sanctioned FAR/FSI | 2.29 | Higher FAR generally means a denser vertical build, subject to site layout and open-space design. |
| Registered tower/wing entries | 3 | Official tower/wing count in the K-RERA detail page. |
| Parking total (reconciled) | 465 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Open-parking field | 29 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Garage field | 469 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Project start date | 01-12-2014 |
Official inventory & towers
RERA filingK-RERA registration tables showing the project mix and tower/wing scale. Use this to sanity-check sales claims such as "only large homes", "low density", or "plenty of parking" against the filed inventory.
Registered inventory mix
| Type | Units | Share | Official carpet area |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2BHK 3BHK & 4BHK | 286 | 100% | 32,878 sqm |
Registered tower / wing summary
| Tower/wing | Floors | Units | Parking | Height |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A - BLOCK | 18 | 141 | 38 | - |
| B - BLOCK | 18 | 145 | 33 | - |
| C - BLOCK | 5 | 6 | 394 | - |
Official unit register
RERA filingK-RERA detail-page flat rows: exact unit numbers, official carpet area, UDS, and parking lots. 292 official flat/unit rows, matching the 292 registered units disclosed above. Use this as a checklist against the specific flat number in your cost sheet and draft agreement.
By unit type
| Unit type | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2BHK | 133 | 951.6-1,942.6 sqft | 602.0-1,229.0 sqft | 133 |
| 3BHK | 131 | 1,175.0-1,902.9 sqft | 742.0-1,204.0 sqft | 131 |
| 4BHK | 22 | 1,816.1-2,261.5 sqft | 1,200.0-1,431.0 sqft | 22 |
| CAR PARKING | 4 | 3,295.2-3,325.0 sqft | 0.0 sqft | 394 |
| CLUBHOUSE | 2 | 931.4-1,743.0 sqft | 0.0 sqft | 0 (2 with 0) |
By tower / wing
| Tower/wing | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| B - BLOCK | 145 | 951.6-2,261.5 sqft | 602.0-1,431.0 sqft | 145 |
| A - BLOCK | 141 | 951.6-2,261.5 sqft | 602.0-1,431.0 sqft | 141 |
| C - BLOCK | 6 | 931.4-3,325.0 sqft | 0.0 sqft | 394 (2 with 0) |
Show sample official unit rows
| Unit | Tower | Floor | Type | Carpet | UDS | Parking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 102 | A - BLOCK | 1 | 2BHK | 951.6 sqft | 602.0 sqft | 1 |
| 103 | A - BLOCK | 1 | 3BHK | 1,175.0 sqft | 742.0 sqft | 1 |
| 105 | A - BLOCK | 1 | 2BHK | 1,009.4 sqft | 639.0 sqft | 1 |
| 202 | A - BLOCK | 2 | 2BHK | 951.6 sqft | 602.0 sqft | 1 |
| 203 | A - BLOCK | 2 | 3BHK | 1,175.0 sqft | 742.0 sqft | 1 |
| 205 | A - BLOCK | 2 | 2BHK | 1,009.4 sqft | 639.0 sqft | 1 |
Legal, Approvals & Project Team
Litigation & compliance
RERA filingNo litigation declared on this project's K-RERA filing.
All 27 standard compliance document slots have usable uploaded filings.
No completion certificate (OC) on file yet — project has not been declared complete.
⚠ Registration validity has lapsed: originally due 30 Jun 2019, extended (Extension) to 30 Sep 2021 — both dates have passed with no OC on file. The extension on file was granted on 20 Jun 2022 (K-RERA extension no. EX/PRM/KA/RERA/1251/310/PR/220620/001023) — it has been used, its deadline has also passed, and no further extension is recorded.
Named utility/regulatory approvals
"Not found in catalog" can mean the approval genuinely isn't on file yet, or that it doesn't apply to this project (K-RERA doesn't tell us which). Ask the builder directly for any marked not found before relying on it.
K-RERA enforcement record (the regulator's own defaulter list & penalty orders)
1 K-RERA order on this project (PROJECT EXTENSION) — read the order copies on the K-RERA portal.
K-RERA complaint orders (57 complaints against a project of this name on K-RERA's orders register)
| Parties | Relief sought | Disposal | Order date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Akash Nishant vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of the 1 (one) car parking space in the multi level car park as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as cost. | AUTHORITY | 29/11/2023 |
| AMITA SARKAR vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 29/11/2023 |
| Vishwas Gupta vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost. | AUTHORITY | 29/11/2023 |
| Tapan Kumar Pattanaik vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 29/11/2023 |
| Sagar Bhikamchand Gugaliya vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 29/11/2023 |
| John Mathew vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 29/11/2023 |
| Rahul Khandewal vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 29/11/2023 |
| Sanket Tendulkar vs Windsor Troika | Allot the covered car parking space as mentioned in the registered Sale Deed, without any additional charges along with NOC | AUTHORITY | 29/06/2026 |
| SUDHIR GANGADHAR vs WINDSOR EDIFICES PRIVATE LIMITED | to direct the respondent for entire refund with profits, amounting to 21,14,500/- plus interest at 18% from the date of receiving amount, to the complainant, morefully prayed in the attachment | AUTHORITY | 29/04/2023 |
| MRS SUSHREE SANGITA DALAI vs WINDSOR EDIFICES PRIVATE LIMITED | Builder shall be directed to hand over possession of my Flat No.1401-A without any further payment and also directed to pay compensation for delay in giving possession. | AUTHORITY | 29/04/2023 |
| Vrindavan Singh Yadav vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost. | AUTHORITY | 24/08/2023 |
| Vikesh B Narielwala vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 24/08/2023 |
| Ekta vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 24/08/2023 |
| Anirudh Sareen vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 24/08/2023 |
| Apurv Gupta vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space in multilevel car park per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 24/08/2023 |
| Umesh Kumar Syal vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 24/08/2023 |
| Darryl Dennis Dias vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 2 (two) covered car parking space with EV charging points as per sale deed 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs.11,000 as legal cost. | AUTHORITY | 24/08/2023 |
| Aravind Konidala vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 24/08/2023 |
| Ashish Rawat vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost. | AUTHORITY | 24/08/2023 |
| Maheswar Panda vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost. | AUTHORITY | 24/08/2023 |
| Pranesh R Gajendragad vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost. | AUTHORITY | 24/08/2023 |
| Darryl Dennis Dias vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space with EV charging point as per sale deed 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs.11,000 as legal cost. | AUTHORITY | 24/08/2023 |
| Sreevathsa KS vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 24/08/2023 |
| Shantanu K Sahay vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 24/08/2023 |
| Shankar Kumar vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 24/08/2023 |
| Saurav Guha vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 2 (two) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 24/08/2023 |
| Sanjeev Ranjan vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 24/08/2023 |
| Sandip Ghosh vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) car parking space in the multi level car park as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 24/08/2023 |
| Roni S Mascarenhas vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 24/08/2023 |
| Avinchandra vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 24/08/2023 |
| Praveen Kumar Kothapalli vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 2 (Two) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 24/08/2023 |
| Dayalan Krishnamurthy vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 24/08/2023 |
| Deepak Kumar vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 24/08/2023 |
| Dwitiya Devidutta Nayak vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) car parking space in the multi level car park as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 24/08/2023 |
| Maya Gupta vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 24/08/2023 |
| Nidhi Lalwani vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 24/08/2023 |
| Naveena Chandra H J vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 2 (Two) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 24/08/2023 |
| S V Rakesh vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) car parking space in the multi level car park as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 24/08/2023 |
| Ranjeeta Shome vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 3 (Three) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 24/08/2023 |
| Rohan vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 24/08/2023 |
| Rohit Vermani vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 24/08/2023 |
| Sunny Sharma vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 24/08/2023 |
| Kotipalli VSVS Gowri Prasad vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 24/08/2023 |
| Jasmine Johnbosco vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) car parking space in the multi level car park as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 24/08/2023 |
| Shilpa Ganapathi vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 2 (Two) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 24/08/2023 |
| Sathish Ranjan vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 24/08/2023 |
| Grishma Nadig vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 24/08/2023 |
| Jagdeesh V vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 24/08/2023 |
| Sumit Sengar vs Windsor Troika | Refund of an Amount of Rs. 13,88,330/- long with Applicable Interest and the cost of litigation. | AUTHORITY | 21/08/2025 |
| Pawan Kumar vs Windsor Troika | direct the respondent to refund the amont of Rs.6,94,330 alongwith 18% interest | AUTHORITY | 21/08/2025 |
| Anil Ramkumar Sharma vs WINDSOR EDIFICES PRIVATE LIMITED & SURAKSHA BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 09/10/2023 |
| SELVI MICHAEL vs WINDSOR EDIFICES PRIVATE LIMITED & SURAKSHA BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 09/10/2023 |
| Sunil Kumar vs WINDSOR EDIFICES PRIVATE LIMITED & SURAKSHA BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 09/10/2023 |
| Hiralal Sahoo vs WINDSOR EDIFICES PRIVATE LIMITED & SURAKSHA BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) car parking space in the multi level car park as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 09/10/2023 |
| Ritika Singodia vs WINDSOR EDIFICES PRIVATE LIMITED & SURAKSHA BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 09/10/2023 |
| Amrendra Bhushan vs WINDSOR EDIFICES PRIVATE LIMITED & SURAKSHA BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 09/10/2023 |
| Vishal Pishe vs WINDSOR EDIFICES PRIVATE LIMITED & SURAKSHA BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 09/10/2023 |
⚠ Matched by PROJECT NAME (the orders register carries no registration number) — confirm the respondent above is this project's builder before relying on it.
Complaints on this project's K-RERA page (5 complaints listed against this promoter)
| Complaint | Subject (as filed) | Project | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| CMP/211215/0008727 15-12-2021 | Complainant against Windsor Edifices Pvt Ltd | WINDSOR TROIKA | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4 |
| CMP/211230/0008758 30-12-2021 | Subjected to clear violation of Sections 3, 4, 11, 12, 13 and 14 and the respondents have duly failed to discharge its statutory obligation . | WINDSOR TROIKA:::PRM/KA/RERA/1251/310/PR/171214/001023 (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4 |
| CMP/220430/0009405 30-04-2022 | Application under section 31 of the RERA for Refund | WINDSOR TROIKA | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4 |
| CMP/220504/0009411 04-05-2022 | Complaint under Section 31 of RERA | WINDSOR TROIKA | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4 |
| CMP/220713/0009741 13-07-2022 | Despite receiving entire Sale Consideration and loading charges and execution of Conveyance deed Builder fraudulently not giving Possession. | WINDSOR TROIKA | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4 |
Listed on the project's own K-RERA detail page (registration-exact source). Rows on the promoter's other projects are track-record context — read the subject text, it is the complainant's own filed wording.
Project team & certifications
RERA filingK-RERA names 2 project professional/vendor rows across Architect, Structural engineer. Use this to cross-check whose certificates, drawings, and contractor commitments support the filing; final reliance still belongs with your lawyer/technical reviewer.
| Role | Name | Registration / licence | Since | Locality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Architect | V T ANAND | - | 2004 | 324 nandini 15th cross, palace upper orchards |
| Structural engineer | Munish Sharma | - | - | - |
Financials & Construction Progress
Financial disclosures
RERA filing⚠ No quarterly financial disclosures (collections, escrow withdrawals) on record, despite no completion certificate yet — meaning we can't verify the project's cashflows against its construction progress. Worth asking the builder directly why no quarterly filings are available.
Declared construction cost ÷ registered units averages to ₹27.4 lakhs per unit — the developer's own declared construction/development cost, not a sale price. K-RERA filings don't disclose what the builder is charging, so this can't tell you whether you're getting a fair deal — only you comparing your quoted price against comparable listings nearby can answer that.
RERA 70% project account is on file: HDFC RICHMOND ROAD (IFSC HDFC0000523, a/c …0322). RERA requires 70% of buyer collections to sit in this separate, project-specific account, drawn only against certified construction milestones — confirm your payments are made to THIS account (not a general builder account) and that it appears on your allotment letter.
Construction photo filings
RERA filingK-RERA has 1 project-photo upload from Aug 2017.
These are developer-uploaded progress photos in the official document catalog. We do not treat them as proof of current site condition; use them as a prompt to ask for newer dated photos or a site visit. Individual filings are listed in the document catalog below.
Location & Connectivity
The nearest major job hub is ~5 km away — a manageable everyday commute to a major job hub.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| Electronic City | 5 km |
| Bellandur–Marathahalli belt | 11 km |
| MG Road / city centre | 12 km |
| Whitefield IT hub | 18 km |
| Outer Ring Road / Manyata | 20 km |
| Kempegowda Int'l Airport | 38 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.