G R Floret
RERA Property Intelligence Report · Preview
Windsor Edifices · Bengaluru South · K-RERA PRM/KA/RERA/1251/310/PR/171214/001023
Report coverage
K-RERA registry & builder-record report
What this report covers
To confirm directly with the builder
🔒 The verdict & buyer playbook · Compliance report
The paid report opens with the overall risk rating, the specific red-flag findings, exactly what I'd do as a buyer in this project, who it suits, and the questions to put to the builder before you commit.
Registration-form facts from the K-RERA detail page: use these to sanity-check the builder brochure, parking allotment, and sanctioned-plan references before relying on plan-extracted approximations.
| Disclosure | Official value | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Registered units | 292 | Total inventory registered with K-RERA. |
| Official carpet area | 32,878 sqm | Regulator-disclosed project-level carpet area, not vision-derived room sums. |
| Registered land area | 19,698 sqm | The land area attached to this K-RERA registration. |
| Sanctioned FAR/FSI | 2.29 | Higher FAR generally means a denser vertical build, subject to site layout and open-space design. |
| Registered towers/wings | 3 | Official tower/wing count in the K-RERA detail page. |
| Parking disclosed | 465 total (29 open) — 1.59 spaces/unit | Confirm whether your quoted unit includes an allotted parking space and where it sits. |
| Project start date | 01-12-2014 |
K-RERA registration tables showing the project mix and tower/wing scale. Use this to sanity-check sales claims such as "only large homes", "low density", or "plenty of parking" against the filed inventory.
Registered inventory mix
| Type | Units | Share | Official carpet area |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2BHK 3BHK & 4BHK | 286 | 100% | 32,878 sqm |
Registered tower / wing summary
| Tower/wing | Floors | Units | Parking | Height |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A - BLOCK | 18 | 141 | 38 | - |
| B - BLOCK | 18 | 145 | 33 | - |
| C - BLOCK | 5 | 6 | 394 | - |
K-RERA detail-page flat rows: exact unit numbers, official carpet area, UDS, and parking lots. 292 official flat/unit rows, matching the 292 registered units disclosed above. Use this as a checklist against the specific flat number in your cost sheet and draft agreement.
By unit type
| Unit type | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2BHK | 133 | 951.6-1,942.6 sqft | 602.0-1,229.0 sqft | 133 |
| 3BHK | 131 | 1,175.0-1,902.9 sqft | 742.0-1,204.0 sqft | 131 |
| 4BHK | 22 | 1,816.1-2,261.5 sqft | 1,200.0-1,431.0 sqft | 22 |
| CAR PARKING | 4 | 3,295.2-3,325.0 sqft | 0.0 sqft | 394 |
| CLUBHOUSE | 2 | 931.4-1,743.0 sqft | 0.0 sqft | 0 (2 with 0) |
By tower / wing
| Tower/wing | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| B - BLOCK | 145 | 951.6-2,261.5 sqft | 602.0-1,431.0 sqft | 145 |
| A - BLOCK | 141 | 951.6-2,261.5 sqft | 602.0-1,431.0 sqft | 141 |
| C - BLOCK | 6 | 931.4-3,325.0 sqft | 0.0 sqft | 394 (2 with 0) |
| Unit | Tower | Floor | Type | Carpet | UDS | Parking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 102 | A - BLOCK | 1 | 2BHK | 951.6 sqft | 602.0 sqft | 1 |
| 103 | A - BLOCK | 1 | 3BHK | 1,175.0 sqft | 742.0 sqft | 1 |
| 105 | A - BLOCK | 1 | 2BHK | 1,009.4 sqft | 639.0 sqft | 1 |
| 202 | A - BLOCK | 2 | 2BHK | 951.6 sqft | 602.0 sqft | 1 |
| 203 | A - BLOCK | 2 | 3BHK | 1,175.0 sqft | 742.0 sqft | 1 |
| 205 | A - BLOCK | 2 | 2BHK | 1,009.4 sqft | 639.0 sqft | 1 |
What the numbers tell you
Synthesis from the official RERA scale, unit register, and land rows — the read a sales team won't volunteer.
🔒 Unit-by-unit guidance · Unit Guidance report
Which block and unit to prefer, the livability read on the filed plans, and a plan-by-plan walkthrough — the ₹2,999 guidance layer.
🔒 Full records — land title, amenities paperwork & document catalog · Compliance report
The complete land-title chain, the paperwork behind each declared amenity, and every document row on file with the regulator — the raw records the compliance read is built on.
No litigation declared on this project's K-RERA filing.
All 27 standard compliance document slots have usable uploaded filings.
No completion certificate (OC) on file yet — project has not been declared complete.
⚠ Registration validity has lapsed: originally due 30 Jun 2019, extended (Extension) to 30 Sep 2021 — both dates have passed with no OC on file. The extension on file was granted on 20 Jun 2022 (K-RERA extension no. EX/PRM/KA/RERA/1251/310/PR/220620/001023) — it has been used, its deadline has also passed, and no further extension is recorded.
Named utility/regulatory approvals
"Not found in catalog" can mean the approval genuinely isn't on file yet, or that it doesn't apply to this project (K-RERA doesn't tell us which). Ask the builder directly for any marked not found before relying on it.
K-RERA enforcement record (the regulator's own defaulter list & penalty orders)
1 K-RERA order on this project (PROJECT EXTENSION) — read the order copies on the K-RERA portal.
K-RERA complaint orders (57 complaints against a project of this name on K-RERA's orders register)
| Parties | Relief sought | Disposal | Order date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Akash Nishant vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of the 1 (one) car parking space in the multi level car park as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as cost. | AUTHORITY | 29/11/2023 |
| AMITA SARKAR vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 29/11/2023 |
| Vishwas Gupta vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost. | AUTHORITY | 29/11/2023 |
| Tapan Kumar Pattanaik vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 29/11/2023 |
| Sagar Bhikamchand Gugaliya vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 29/11/2023 |
| John Mathew vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 29/11/2023 |
| Rahul Khandewal vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 29/11/2023 |
| Sanket Tendulkar vs Windsor Troika | Allot the covered car parking space as mentioned in the registered Sale Deed, without any additional charges along with NOC | AUTHORITY | 29/06/2026 |
| SUDHIR GANGADHAR vs WINDSOR EDIFICES PRIVATE LIMITED | to direct the respondent for entire refund with profits, amounting to 21,14,500/- plus interest at 18% from the date of receiving amount, to the complainant, morefully prayed in the attachment | AUTHORITY | 29/04/2023 |
| MRS SUSHREE SANGITA DALAI vs WINDSOR EDIFICES PRIVATE LIMITED | Builder shall be directed to hand over possession of my Flat No.1401-A without any further payment and also directed to pay compensation for delay in giving possession. | AUTHORITY | 29/04/2023 |
| Vrindavan Singh Yadav vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost. | AUTHORITY | 24/08/2023 |
| Vikesh B Narielwala vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 24/08/2023 |
| Ekta vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 24/08/2023 |
| Anirudh Sareen vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 24/08/2023 |
| Apurv Gupta vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space in multilevel car park per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 24/08/2023 |
| Umesh Kumar Syal vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 24/08/2023 |
| Darryl Dennis Dias vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 2 (two) covered car parking space with EV charging points as per sale deed 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs.11,000 as legal cost. | AUTHORITY | 24/08/2023 |
| Aravind Konidala vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 24/08/2023 |
| Ashish Rawat vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost. | AUTHORITY | 24/08/2023 |
| Maheswar Panda vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost. | AUTHORITY | 24/08/2023 |
| Pranesh R Gajendragad vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost. | AUTHORITY | 24/08/2023 |
| Darryl Dennis Dias vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space with EV charging point as per sale deed 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs.11,000 as legal cost. | AUTHORITY | 24/08/2023 |
| Sreevathsa KS vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 24/08/2023 |
| Shantanu K Sahay vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 24/08/2023 |
| Shankar Kumar vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 24/08/2023 |
| Saurav Guha vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 2 (two) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 24/08/2023 |
| Sanjeev Ranjan vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 24/08/2023 |
| Sandip Ghosh vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) car parking space in the multi level car park as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 24/08/2023 |
| Roni S Mascarenhas vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 24/08/2023 |
| Avinchandra vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 24/08/2023 |
| Praveen Kumar Kothapalli vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 2 (Two) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 24/08/2023 |
| Dayalan Krishnamurthy vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 24/08/2023 |
| Deepak Kumar vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 24/08/2023 |
| Dwitiya Devidutta Nayak vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) car parking space in the multi level car park as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 24/08/2023 |
| Maya Gupta vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 24/08/2023 |
| Nidhi Lalwani vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 24/08/2023 |
| Naveena Chandra H J vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 2 (Two) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 24/08/2023 |
| S V Rakesh vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) car parking space in the multi level car park as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 24/08/2023 |
| Ranjeeta Shome vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 3 (Three) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 24/08/2023 |
| Rohan vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 24/08/2023 |
| Rohit Vermani vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 24/08/2023 |
| Sunny Sharma vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 24/08/2023 |
| Kotipalli VSVS Gowri Prasad vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 24/08/2023 |
| Jasmine Johnbosco vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) car parking space in the multi level car park as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 24/08/2023 |
| Shilpa Ganapathi vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 2 (Two) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 24/08/2023 |
| Sathish Ranjan vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 24/08/2023 |
| Grishma Nadig vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 24/08/2023 |
| Jagdeesh V vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 24/08/2023 |
| Sumit Sengar vs Windsor Troika | Refund of an Amount of Rs. 13,88,330/- long with Applicable Interest and the cost of litigation. | AUTHORITY | 21/08/2025 |
| Pawan Kumar vs Windsor Troika | direct the respondent to refund the amont of Rs.6,94,330 alongwith 18% interest | AUTHORITY | 21/08/2025 |
| Anil Ramkumar Sharma vs WINDSOR EDIFICES PRIVATE LIMITED & SURAKSHA BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 09/10/2023 |
| SELVI MICHAEL vs WINDSOR EDIFICES PRIVATE LIMITED & SURAKSHA BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 09/10/2023 |
| Sunil Kumar vs WINDSOR EDIFICES PRIVATE LIMITED & SURAKSHA BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 09/10/2023 |
| Hiralal Sahoo vs WINDSOR EDIFICES PRIVATE LIMITED & SURAKSHA BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) car parking space in the multi level car park as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 09/10/2023 |
| Ritika Singodia vs WINDSOR EDIFICES PRIVATE LIMITED & SURAKSHA BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 09/10/2023 |
| Amrendra Bhushan vs WINDSOR EDIFICES PRIVATE LIMITED & SURAKSHA BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 09/10/2023 |
| Vishal Pishe vs WINDSOR EDIFICES PRIVATE LIMITED & SURAKSHA BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED | 1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost | AUTHORITY | 09/10/2023 |
⚠ Matched by PROJECT NAME (the orders register carries no registration number) — confirm the respondent above is this project's builder before relying on it.
Complaints on this project's K-RERA page (5 complaints listed against this promoter)
| Complaint | Subject (as filed) | Project | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| CMP/211230/0008758 30-12-2021 | Subjected to clear violation of Sections 3, 4, 11, 12, 13 and 14 and the respondents have duly failed to discharge its statutory obligation . | WINDSOR TROIKA:::PRM/KA/RERA/1251/310/PR/171214/001023 (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4 |
| CMP/211215/0008727 15-12-2021 | Complainant against Windsor Edifices Pvt Ltd | WINDSOR TROIKA | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4 |
| CMP/220430/0009405 30-04-2022 | Application under section 31 of the RERA for Refund | WINDSOR TROIKA | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4 |
| CMP/220504/0009411 04-05-2022 | Complaint under Section 31 of RERA | WINDSOR TROIKA | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4 |
| CMP/220713/0009741 13-07-2022 | Despite receiving entire Sale Consideration and loading charges and execution of Conveyance deed Builder fraudulently not giving Possession. | WINDSOR TROIKA | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4 |
Listed on the project's own K-RERA detail page (registration-exact source). Rows on the promoter's other projects are track-record context — read the subject text, it is the complainant's own filed wording.
K-RERA names 2 project professional/vendor rows across Architect, Structural engineer. Use this to cross-check whose certificates, drawings, and contractor commitments support the filing; final reliance still belongs with your lawyer/technical reviewer.
| Role | Name | Registration / licence | Since | Locality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Architect | V T ANAND | - | 2004 | 324 nandini 15th cross, palace upper orchards |
| Structural engineer | Munish Sharma | - | - | - |
⚠ No quarterly financial disclosures (collections, escrow withdrawals) on record, despite no completion certificate yet — meaning we can't verify the project's cashflows against its construction progress. Worth asking the builder directly why no quarterly filings are available.
Declared construction cost ÷ registered units averages to ₹27.4 lakhs per unit — the developer's own declared construction/development cost, not a sale price. K-RERA filings don't disclose what the builder is charging, so this can't tell you whether you're getting a fair deal — only you comparing your quoted price against comparable listings nearby can answer that.
RERA 70% project account is on file: HDFC RICHMOND ROAD (IFSC HDFC0000523, a/c …0322). RERA requires 70% of buyer collections to sit in this separate, project-specific account, drawn only against certified construction milestones — confirm your payments are made to THIS account (not a general builder account) and that it appears on your allotment letter.
K-RERA has 1 project-photo upload from Aug 2017.
These are developer-uploaded progress photos in the official document catalog. We do not treat them as proof of current site condition; use them as a prompt to ask for newer dated photos or a site visit.
The nearest major job hub is ~5 km away — a manageable everyday commute to a major job hub.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| Electronic City | 5 km |
| Bellandur–Marathahalli belt | 11 km |
| MG Road / city centre | 12 km |
| Whitefield IT hub | 18 km |
| Outer Ring Road / Manyata | 20 km |
| Kempegowda Int'l Airport | 38 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.
Should you buy in WINDSOR TROIKA?
This page is the free K-RERA filing summary. The full RERA Property Intelligence Report gives you buyer-complaint history, regulatory flags, builder track record, the official unit register, land title, NOCs, and (where the sanctioned plans support it) room-by-room unit data and an annotated site plan. See a real one first:
Sample: Sobha Silicon Oasis → · browse all sample reports →
Compliance Report · ₹999
The regulator’s filing record, read · 1 working day
Scan with any UPI app to pay · quietlist@kotak
Unit Guidance Report · ₹2,999
Everything, down to which unit · 1 working day
Not useful to your decision? Full refund — no questions asked.
Scan with any UPI app to pay · quietlist@kotak
Paying from outside India? Pay $15 (Compliance) or $39 (Unit Guidance) via PayPal, or email hello@quietlist.in for a card invoice. Prefer to talk first, or have a portfolio to check? Same address. An information aid for your own due diligence, not legal or investment advice.
Free · Watch this project
We'll email you when this project's RERA record changes.
Built by Windsor Edifices.
Figures are the developer's own quarterly disclosures on the Karnataka RERA register. "Built" is the highest construction % filed; "sold" is booked units over total. Not a claim about the developer's intent. Explore every project on our Bangalore project-health tool.
Own a unit in Windsor Troika?
Sell directly to Quietlist's pre-screened buyer list — flat fee, no broker commission.
Last checked against the RERA register: 27 Jul 2026