Bangalore/Project record

K-RERA · the public record

WINDSOR TROIKA

Bengaluru South · Windsor Edifices

Know the project.
Then choose your home.

The registration, progress and filed details in one place. Go further with an independent reading of the project’s evidence.

30 Jun 2019declared completionK-RERA registration · read 20 Sep 2026
292registered unitsK-RERA registration · read 20 Sep 2026

The record · free to read

Registration read 20 Sep 2026

Progress & dates

The timeline on file.

Available record

No construction trend to plot.

The records used for this page do not supply a series of construction percentages. This does not establish whether possession has been given.

declared completion

30 Jun 2019

The registered date and a construction update answer different questions. Neither is a confirmation of possession.

K-RERA registration · read 20 Sep 2026

Inventory & scale

What this registration contains.

2BHK 3BHK & 4BHK
286

Filed categories, unchanged · K-RERA registration · read 20 Sep 2026

The whole registration

4.9registered acres

60.0registered units per acre

The average covers the registered land and all registered unit types. It does not describe the space, outlook or surroundings of an individual home.

From another project · Prestige Park Grove

A larger advertised area. Almost the same carpet area.

In Tower 14, E4 has 141 sq ft more saleable area than E2. Its carpet area is only 0.46 sq m larger. The report puts the two layouts side by side.

This illustrates the report format. These findings concern the named sample, not this project.

Read the sample report ↗
Prestige Park Grove · Tower 14 comparison · approved sample report
Prestige Park Grove · Tower 14 comparison · approved sample report

The source record

The details behind the headline.

K-RERA · PRM/KA/RERA/1251/310/PR/171214/001023

This project, on the record

The comparable facts of this project, from its own RERA registration record. Each context percentile names its exact comparison set, drawn from Quietlist’s full register store. The paid report adds drawing-read rows to this same table — what the filed plans show about the site, its edges and the unit layouts.

On the register

Declared completion30 June 2019
Land area19,698 sq m (4.9 acres)
Homes registered292
Tower/wing entries3
Unit mix286 × 2BHK 3BHK & 4BHK

In context

Density60 homes per acre
Density in context26th percentile of 787 Bengaluru South projects (median 77.3)

Values as crawled from the official K-RERA record; context percentiles name their comparison population.

Official Registry Facts

Official project scale

RERA filing

Registration-form facts from the K-RERA detail page: use these to sanity-check the builder brochure, parking allotment, and sanctioned-plan references before relying on plan-extracted approximations.

DisclosureOfficial valueWhy it matters
Registered units292Total inventory registered with K-RERA.
Official carpet area32,878 sqmRegulator-disclosed project-level carpet area, not vision-derived room sums.
Registered land area19,698 sqmThe land area attached to this K-RERA registration.
Sanctioned FAR/FSI2.29Higher FAR generally means a denser vertical build, subject to site layout and open-space design.
Registered tower/wing entries3Official tower/wing count in the K-RERA detail page.
Parking total (reconciled)465Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together.
Open-parking field29Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together.
Garage field469Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together.
Project start date01-12-2014

Official inventory & towers

RERA filing

K-RERA registration tables showing the project mix and tower/wing scale. Use this to sanity-check sales claims such as "only large homes", "low density", or "plenty of parking" against the filed inventory.

Registered inventory mix

TypeUnitsShareOfficial carpet area
2BHK 3BHK & 4BHK286100%32,878 sqm

Registered tower / wing summary

Tower/wingFloorsUnitsParkingHeight
A - BLOCK1814138-
B - BLOCK1814533-
C - BLOCK56394-

Official unit register

RERA filing

K-RERA detail-page flat rows: exact unit numbers, official carpet area, UDS, and parking lots. 292 official flat/unit rows, matching the 292 registered units disclosed above. Use this as a checklist against the specific flat number in your cost sheet and draft agreement.

By unit type

Unit typeRowsCarpet areaUDSParking lots
2BHK133951.6-1,942.6 sqft602.0-1,229.0 sqft133
3BHK1311,175.0-1,902.9 sqft742.0-1,204.0 sqft131
4BHK221,816.1-2,261.5 sqft1,200.0-1,431.0 sqft22
CAR PARKING43,295.2-3,325.0 sqft0.0 sqft394
CLUBHOUSE2931.4-1,743.0 sqft0.0 sqft0 (2 with 0)

By tower / wing

Tower/wingRowsCarpet areaUDSParking lots
B - BLOCK145951.6-2,261.5 sqft602.0-1,431.0 sqft145
A - BLOCK141951.6-2,261.5 sqft602.0-1,431.0 sqft141
C - BLOCK6931.4-3,325.0 sqft0.0 sqft394 (2 with 0)
Show sample official unit rows
UnitTowerFloorTypeCarpetUDSParking
102A - BLOCK12BHK951.6 sqft602.0 sqft1
103A - BLOCK13BHK1,175.0 sqft742.0 sqft1
105A - BLOCK12BHK1,009.4 sqft639.0 sqft1
202A - BLOCK22BHK951.6 sqft602.0 sqft1
203A - BLOCK23BHK1,175.0 sqft742.0 sqft1
205A - BLOCK22BHK1,009.4 sqft639.0 sqft1

Legal, Approvals & Project Team

Litigation & compliance

RERA filing

No litigation declared on this project's K-RERA filing.

All 27 standard compliance document slots have usable uploaded filings.

No completion certificate (OC) on file yet — project has not been declared complete.

⚠ Registration validity has lapsed: originally due 30 Jun 2019, extended (Extension) to 30 Sep 2021 — both dates have passed with no OC on file. The extension on file was granted on 20 Jun 2022 (K-RERA extension no. EX/PRM/KA/RERA/1251/310/PR/220620/001023) — it has been used, its deadline has also passed, and no further extension is recorded.

Named utility/regulatory approvals

Electricity (BESCOM/ESCOM)✓ On file (All NOCs from Authority)
Water & sewage (BWSSB/KWSSB)✓ On file (All NOCs from Authority)
Fire NOC✓ On file (All NOCs from Authority)
Pollution control (KSPCB)✓ On file (All NOCs from Authority)
Environmental clearance✓ On file (All NOCs from Authority)
Airport Authority height clearance✓ On file (All NOCs from Authority)

"Not found in catalog" can mean the approval genuinely isn't on file yet, or that it doesn't apply to this project (K-RERA doesn't tell us which). Ask the builder directly for any marked not found before relying on it.

K-RERA enforcement record (the regulator's own defaulter list & penalty orders)

1 K-RERA order on this project (PROJECT EXTENSION) — read the order copies on the K-RERA portal.

K-RERA complaint orders (57 complaints against a project of this name on K-RERA's orders register)

PartiesRelief soughtDisposalOrder date
Akash Nishant vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of the 1 (one) car parking space in the multi level car park as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as cost.AUTHORITY29/11/2023
AMITA SARKAR vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal costAUTHORITY29/11/2023
Vishwas Gupta vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost.AUTHORITY29/11/2023
Tapan Kumar Pattanaik vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal costAUTHORITY29/11/2023
Sagar Bhikamchand Gugaliya vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal costAUTHORITY29/11/2023
John Mathew vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal costAUTHORITY29/11/2023
Rahul Khandewal vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal costAUTHORITY29/11/2023
Sanket Tendulkar vs Windsor TroikaAllot the covered car parking space as mentioned in the registered Sale Deed, without any additional charges along with NOCAUTHORITY29/06/2026
SUDHIR GANGADHAR vs WINDSOR EDIFICES PRIVATE LIMITEDto direct the respondent for entire refund with profits, amounting to 21,14,500/- plus interest at 18% from the date of receiving amount, to the complainant, morefully prayed in the attachmentAUTHORITY29/04/2023
MRS SUSHREE SANGITA DALAI vs WINDSOR EDIFICES PRIVATE LIMITEDBuilder shall be directed to hand over possession of my Flat No.1401-A without any further payment and also directed to pay compensation for delay in giving possession.AUTHORITY29/04/2023
Vrindavan Singh Yadav vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost.AUTHORITY24/08/2023
Vikesh B Narielwala vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal costAUTHORITY24/08/2023
Ekta vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal costAUTHORITY24/08/2023
Anirudh Sareen vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal costAUTHORITY24/08/2023
Apurv Gupta vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space in multilevel car park per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal costAUTHORITY24/08/2023
Umesh Kumar Syal vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal costAUTHORITY24/08/2023
Darryl Dennis Dias vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 2 (two) covered car parking space with EV charging points as per sale deed 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs.11,000 as legal cost.AUTHORITY24/08/2023
Aravind Konidala vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal costAUTHORITY24/08/2023
Ashish Rawat vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost.AUTHORITY24/08/2023
Maheswar Panda vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost.AUTHORITY24/08/2023
Pranesh R Gajendragad vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal cost.AUTHORITY24/08/2023
Darryl Dennis Dias vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space with EV charging point as per sale deed 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs.11,000 as legal cost.AUTHORITY24/08/2023
Sreevathsa KS vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal costAUTHORITY24/08/2023
Shantanu K Sahay vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal costAUTHORITY24/08/2023
Shankar Kumar vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal costAUTHORITY24/08/2023
Saurav Guha vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 2 (two) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal costAUTHORITY24/08/2023
Sanjeev Ranjan vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal costAUTHORITY24/08/2023
Sandip Ghosh vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) car parking space in the multi level car park as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal costAUTHORITY24/08/2023
Roni S Mascarenhas vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal costAUTHORITY24/08/2023
Avinchandra vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal costAUTHORITY24/08/2023
Praveen Kumar Kothapalli vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 2 (Two) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal costAUTHORITY24/08/2023
Dayalan Krishnamurthy vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal costAUTHORITY24/08/2023
Deepak Kumar vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal costAUTHORITY24/08/2023
Dwitiya Devidutta Nayak vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) car parking space in the multi level car park as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal costAUTHORITY24/08/2023
Maya Gupta vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal costAUTHORITY24/08/2023
Nidhi Lalwani vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal costAUTHORITY24/08/2023
Naveena Chandra H J vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 2 (Two) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal costAUTHORITY24/08/2023
S V Rakesh vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) car parking space in the multi level car park as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal costAUTHORITY24/08/2023
Ranjeeta Shome vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 3 (Three) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal costAUTHORITY24/08/2023
Rohan vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal costAUTHORITY24/08/2023
Rohit Vermani vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal costAUTHORITY24/08/2023
Sunny Sharma vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal costAUTHORITY24/08/2023
Kotipalli VSVS Gowri Prasad vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal costAUTHORITY24/08/2023
Jasmine Johnbosco vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) car parking space in the multi level car park as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal costAUTHORITY24/08/2023
Shilpa Ganapathi vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 2 (Two) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal costAUTHORITY24/08/2023
Sathish Ranjan vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal costAUTHORITY24/08/2023
Grishma Nadig vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal costAUTHORITY24/08/2023
Jagdeesh V vs Windsor Edifices Private Limited1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal costAUTHORITY24/08/2023
Sumit Sengar vs Windsor TroikaRefund of an Amount of Rs. 13,88,330/- long with Applicable Interest and the cost of litigation.AUTHORITY21/08/2025
Pawan Kumar vs Windsor Troikadirect the respondent to refund the amont of Rs.6,94,330 alongwith 18% interestAUTHORITY21/08/2025
Anil Ramkumar Sharma vs WINDSOR EDIFICES PRIVATE LIMITED & SURAKSHA BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal costAUTHORITY09/10/2023
SELVI MICHAEL vs WINDSOR EDIFICES PRIVATE LIMITED & SURAKSHA BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal costAUTHORITY09/10/2023
Sunil Kumar vs WINDSOR EDIFICES PRIVATE LIMITED & SURAKSHA BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal costAUTHORITY09/10/2023
Hiralal Sahoo vs WINDSOR EDIFICES PRIVATE LIMITED & SURAKSHA BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) car parking space in the multi level car park as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal costAUTHORITY09/10/2023
Ritika Singodia vs WINDSOR EDIFICES PRIVATE LIMITED & SURAKSHA BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal costAUTHORITY09/10/2023
Amrendra Bhushan vs WINDSOR EDIFICES PRIVATE LIMITED & SURAKSHA BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal costAUTHORITY09/10/2023
Vishal Pishe vs WINDSOR EDIFICES PRIVATE LIMITED & SURAKSHA BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED1) Direct the Developer to allot and deliver physical possession of 1 (one) covered car parking space as per the sale deed. 2) Direct the Developer to pay Rs. 11,000 as legal costAUTHORITY09/10/2023

⚠ Matched by PROJECT NAME (the orders register carries no registration number) — confirm the respondent above is this project's builder before relying on it.

Complaints on this project's K-RERA page (5 complaints listed against this promoter)

ComplaintSubject (as filed)ProjectStatus
CMP/211215/0008727
15-12-2021
Complainant against Windsor Edifices Pvt LtdWINDSOR TROIKADISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4
CMP/211230/0008758
30-12-2021
Subjected to clear violation of Sections 3, 4, 11, 12, 13 and 14 and the respondents have duly failed to discharge its statutory obligation .WINDSOR TROIKA:::PRM/KA/RERA/1251/310/PR/171214/001023 (another project by this promoter)DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4
CMP/220430/0009405
30-04-2022
Application under section 31 of the RERA for RefundWINDSOR TROIKADISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4
CMP/220504/0009411
04-05-2022
Complaint under Section 31 of RERAWINDSOR TROIKADISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4
CMP/220713/0009741
13-07-2022
Despite receiving entire Sale Consideration and loading charges and execution of Conveyance deed Builder fraudulently not giving Possession.WINDSOR TROIKADISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4

Listed on the project's own K-RERA detail page (registration-exact source). Rows on the promoter's other projects are track-record context — read the subject text, it is the complainant's own filed wording.

Project team & certifications

RERA filing

K-RERA names 2 project professional/vendor rows across Architect, Structural engineer. Use this to cross-check whose certificates, drawings, and contractor commitments support the filing; final reliance still belongs with your lawyer/technical reviewer.

RoleNameRegistration / licenceSinceLocality
ArchitectV T ANAND-2004324 nandini 15th cross, palace upper orchards
Structural engineerMunish Sharma---

Financials & Construction Progress

Financial disclosures

RERA filing

⚠ No quarterly financial disclosures (collections, escrow withdrawals) on record, despite no completion certificate yet — meaning we can't verify the project's cashflows against its construction progress. Worth asking the builder directly why no quarterly filings are available.

Declared construction cost ÷ registered units averages to ₹27.4 lakhs per unit — the developer's own declared construction/development cost, not a sale price. K-RERA filings don't disclose what the builder is charging, so this can't tell you whether you're getting a fair deal — only you comparing your quoted price against comparable listings nearby can answer that.

RERA 70% project account is on file: HDFC RICHMOND ROAD (IFSC HDFC0000523, a/c …0322). RERA requires 70% of buyer collections to sit in this separate, project-specific account, drawn only against certified construction milestones — confirm your payments are made to THIS account (not a general builder account) and that it appears on your allotment letter.

Construction photo filings

RERA filing

K-RERA has 1 project-photo upload from Aug 2017.

These are developer-uploaded progress photos in the official document catalog. We do not treat them as proof of current site condition; use them as a prompt to ask for newer dated photos or a site visit. Individual filings are listed in the document catalog below.

Location & Connectivity

The nearest major job hub is ~5 km away — a manageable everyday commute to a major job hub.

LandmarkStraight-line
Electronic City5 km
Bellandur–Marathahalli belt11 km
MG Road / city centre12 km
Whitefield IT hub18 km
Outer Ring Road / Manyata20 km
Kempegowda Int'l Airport38 km

Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.

Free · Watch this project

We'll email you when this project's RERA record changes, and send the 14-point booking checklist with the first email.

Something went wrong — email hello@quietlist.in.

✓ You're watching — we'll email you if the RERA record changes.

Built by Windsor Edifices.
58 complaints on the K-RERA register against Windsor Edifices in Bangalore.

Other RERA-registered projects in Begur

Assetz Canvas & Cove - Phase 1 Wing A & B

Major developers building in Begur

Figures are the developer's own quarterly disclosures on the Karnataka RERA register. "Built" is the highest construction % filed; "sold" is booked units over total. Not a claim about the developer's intent. Explore every project on our Bangalore project-health tool.

Own a unit in Windsor Troika?

Sell directly to Quietlist's pre-screened buyer list — flat fee, no broker commission.

List your unit →

Last checked against the RERA register: 20 Sep 2026