SBR Earth & SKY
RERA Property Intelligence Report · Preview
Assetz Whitefiled homes · Bengaluru East · K-RERA PRM/KA/RERA/1251/446/PR/171016/000973
Report coverage
K-RERA registry & builder-record report
What this report covers
To confirm directly with the builder
🔒 The verdict & buyer playbook · Compliance report
The paid report opens with the overall risk rating, the specific red-flag findings, exactly what I'd do as a buyer in this project, who it suits, and the questions to put to the builder before you commit.
Registration-form facts from the K-RERA detail page: use these to sanity-check the builder brochure, parking allotment, and sanctioned-plan references before relying on plan-extracted approximations.
| Disclosure | Official value | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Registered units | 469 | Total inventory registered with K-RERA. |
| Official carpet area | 79 sqm | Regulator-disclosed project-level carpet area, not vision-derived room sums. |
| Registered land area | 18,700 sqm | The land area attached to this K-RERA registration. |
| Sanctioned FAR/FSI | 2.44 | Higher FAR generally means a denser vertical build, subject to site layout and open-space design. |
| Registered towers/wings | 4 | Official tower/wing count in the K-RERA detail page. |
| Parking disclosed | 469 total (16 open) — 1.00 spaces/unit | Confirm whether your quoted unit includes an allotted parking space and where it sits. |
| Project start date | 30-06-2014 |
K-RERA registration tables showing the project mix and tower/wing scale. Use this to sanity-check sales claims such as "only large homes", "low density", or "plenty of parking" against the filed inventory.
Registered inventory mix
| Type | Units | Share | Official carpet area |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2BHK | 12 | 100% | 79 sqm |
Registered tower / wing summary
| Tower/wing | Floors | Units | Parking | Height |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tower 1 | 13 | 102 | 102 | - |
| Tower 2 | 9 | 72 | 72 | - |
| Tower 3 | 26 | 204 | 204 | - |
| Tower 4 | 8 | 91 | 91 | - |
K-RERA detail-page flat rows: exact unit numbers, official carpet area, UDS, and parking lots. 469 official flat/unit rows, matching the 469 registered units disclosed above. Use this as a checklist against the specific flat number in your cost sheet and draft agreement.
By unit type
| Unit type | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2BHK | 258 | 76.1-81.8 sqm | 33.6-35.7 sqm | 258 |
| 3BHK | 207 | 94.0-102.3 sqm | 40.4-45.4 sqm | 207 |
| 3BHKDuplex | 4 | 156.4-158.7 sqm | 72.6-73.5 sqm | 8 |
By tower / wing
| Tower/wing | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tower 3 | 204 | 77.7-158.7 sqm | 33.6-73.5 sqm | 208 |
| Tower 1 | 102 | 76.1-102.3 sqm | 33.7-45.4 sqm | 102 |
| Tower 4 | 91 | 76.4-96.8 sqm | 33.9-41.4 sqm | 91 |
| Tower 2 | 72 | 76.3-96.8 sqm | 33.9-41.4 sqm | 72 |
| Unit | Tower | Floor | Type | Carpet | UDS | Parking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A 002 | Tower 1 | 0 | 2BHK | 76.1 sqm | 33.7 sqm | 1 |
| A 003 | Tower 1 | 0 | 2BHK | 78.2 sqm | 34.7 sqm | 1 |
| B 002 | Tower 1 | 0 | 2BHK | 76.4 sqm | 33.9 sqm | 1 |
| B 003 | Tower 1 | 0 | 2BHK | 78.2 sqm | 34.7 sqm | 1 |
| A 012 | Tower 1 | 1 | 2BHK | 76.1 sqm | 33.7 sqm | 1 |
| A 013 | Tower 1 | 1 | 2BHK | 78.2 sqm | 34.7 sqm | 1 |
What the numbers tell you
Synthesis from the official RERA scale, unit register, and land rows — the read a sales team won't volunteer.
🔒 Unit-by-unit guidance · Unit Guidance report
Which block and unit to prefer, the livability read on the filed plans, and a plan-by-plan walkthrough — the ₹2,999 guidance layer.
🔒 Full records — land title, amenities paperwork & document catalog · Compliance report
The complete land-title chain, the paperwork behind each declared amenity, and every document row on file with the regulator — the raw records the compliance read is built on.
No litigation declared on this project's K-RERA filing.
All 21 standard compliance document slots have usable uploaded filings.
No completion certificate (OC) on file yet — project has not been declared complete.
⚠ Registration validity has lapsed: originally due 31 Dec 2018, extended (Section 6 Extension) to 30 Jun 2019 — both dates have passed with no OC on file. The extension on file was granted on 08 Jun 2022 (K-RERA extension no. EX/PRM/KA/RERA/1251/446/PR/220608/000973) — it has been used, its deadline has also passed, and no further extension is recorded.
Named utility/regulatory approvals
"Not found in catalog" can mean the approval genuinely isn't on file yet, or that it doesn't apply to this project (K-RERA doesn't tell us which). Ask the builder directly for any marked not found before relying on it.
K-RERA complaint orders (5 complaints against a project of this name on K-RERA's orders register)
| Parties | Relief sought | Disposal | Order date |
|---|---|---|---|
| RASHMI REKHA ROUT vs assets marq | Yes. | AUTHORITY | 27/06/2025 |
| ARUNKUMAR SHARMA vs ASSETZ WHITEFIELD HOMES PVT. LTD. | We pray to the Honorable RERA for directing the promoter/builder to pay the compensation for the delay as per the RERA guidelines and which will justice to us | AUTHORITY | 26/07/2023 |
| KIDAMBI RAMANUJACHARI vs ASSETZ WHITEFIELD HOME PVT LTD | Compensation of Rs 145319 along with interest of 24%p.a from the date of default till date of realisation along with costs to the complainant in the interest of justice and equity. | AUTHORITY | 08/06/2024 |
| MUKESH RANJANDAS vs ASSETZ MARQ | LEVY OF PENALTY UNDER SECTION 63 OF THE ACT & PAYMENT OF MAINTENENCE CHARGES UPTO THE DATE OF REGISTRATION OF SALE DEED AND HAND OVER OF POSSESSION | AUTHORITY | 03/02/2023 |
| MUKESH RANJANDAS PAREKH vs ASSETZ WHITEFIELD HOMES PRIVATE LTD | Compensation for delay, alteration in plan specifications and veracity of advertisement + grant possession of apartment | AUTHORITY | 01/09/2022 |
⚠ Matched by PROJECT NAME (the orders register carries no registration number) — confirm the respondent above is this project's builder before relying on it.
Complaints on this project's K-RERA page (10 complaints listed against this promoter)
| Complaint | Subject (as filed) | Project | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| CMP/190425/0002731 25-04-2019 | Assetz Marq Unit E021 Delivery delayed by more than one year | Assetz Marq | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190504/0002890 04-05-2019 | Delay Compensation | Assetz Marq | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190524/0003146 24-05-2019 | Compensation for delay and shortage of Balcony carpet Area | Assetz Marq | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190525/0003149 25-05-2019 | Delay compensation not inline with agreement | Assetz Marq | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/191205/0004877 05-12-2019 | Delay Compensation offered by Builder not as per RERA | Assetz Marq | DISPOSED AUTHORITY FULLBENCH |
| CMP/200119/0005257 19-01-2020 | Payment of delay compensation | Assetz Marq | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH5 |
| CMP/200228/0005594 28-02-2020 | Delivery date expiry, compensation for deviation | Assetz Marq | DISPOSED AUTHORITY FULLBENCH |
| CMP/200521/0005915 21-05-2020 | compensation amount on delayed possession | Assetz Marq | DISPOSED AUTHORITY FULLBENCH |
Listed on the project's own K-RERA detail page (registration-exact source). Rows on the promoter's other projects are track-record context — read the subject text, it is the complainant's own filed wording.
K-RERA names 3 project professional/vendor rows across Architect, Contractor, Structural engineer. Use this to cross-check whose certificates, drawings, and contractor commitments support the filing; final reliance still belongs with your lawyer/technical reviewer.
| Role | Name | Registration / licence | Since | Locality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Architect | CNT Architects | - | 1963 | No. 7, Palace Cross Rd |
| Contractor | Shapoorji Pallonji and Co Private Limited | - | 1943 | Fort, Mumbai |
| Structural engineer | Designtree Service Consultants Private Limited | - | - | - |
Assetz has 16 other K-RERA-registered projects in our records — grouped across the several project-specific entities this developer registers under (e.g. this project is filed as “Assetz Whitefiled”) (average reported construction progress 100%). 11 are past their declared completion deadline with no completion certificate recorded — but because K-RERA publishes OCs inconsistently, a project that has actually been finished and handed over still shows up this way, so this overstates real delays, especially for a high-volume established builder.
Read this as a list to spot-check for a pattern of genuinely stalled projects, not as a delay rate — pull up a few of the builder’s other K-RERA registrations and check whether they’ve actually been delivered.
⚠ No quarterly financial disclosures (collections, escrow withdrawals) on record, despite no completion certificate yet — meaning we can't verify the project's cashflows against its construction progress. Worth asking the builder directly why no quarterly filings are available.
Declared construction cost ÷ registered units averages to ₹45.7 lakhs per unit — the developer's own declared construction/development cost, not a sale price. K-RERA filings don't disclose what the builder is charging, so this can't tell you whether you're getting a fair deal — only you comparing your quoted price against comparable listings nearby can answer that.
RERA 70% project account is on file: HDFC Richmond Road (IFSC HDFC0000009, a/c …7665). RERA requires 70% of buyer collections to sit in this separate, project-specific account, drawn only against certified construction milestones — confirm your payments are made to THIS account (not a general builder account) and that it appears on your allotment letter.
K-RERA has 1 project-photo upload.
These are developer-uploaded progress photos in the official document catalog. We do not treat them as proof of current site condition; use them as a prompt to ask for newer dated photos or a site visit.
The nearest major job hub is ~6 km away — a manageable everyday commute to a major job hub.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| Whitefield IT hub | 6 km |
| Bellandur–Marathahalli belt | 13 km |
| Outer Ring Road / Manyata | 16 km |
| MG Road / city centre | 18 km |
| Kempegowda Int'l Airport | 20 km |
| Electronic City | 23 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.
Should you buy in Assetz Marq?
This page is the free K-RERA filing summary. The full RERA Property Intelligence Report gives you buyer-complaint history, regulatory flags, builder track record, the official unit register, land title, NOCs, and (where the sanctioned plans support it) room-by-room unit data and an annotated site plan. See a real one first:
Sample: Sobha Silicon Oasis → · browse all sample reports →
Compliance Report · ₹999
The regulator’s filing record, read · 1 working day
Scan with any UPI app to pay · quietlist@kotak
Unit Guidance Report · ₹2,999
Everything, down to which unit · 1 working day
Not useful to your decision? Full refund — no questions asked.
Scan with any UPI app to pay · quietlist@kotak
Paying from outside India? Pay $15 (Compliance) or $39 (Unit Guidance) via PayPal, or email hello@quietlist.in for a card invoice. Prefer to talk first, or have a portfolio to check? Same address. An information aid for your own due diligence, not legal or investment advice.
Free · Watch this project
We'll email you when this project's RERA record changes.
Built by Assetz Whitefiled. View Assetz Whitefiled's full track record →
Figures are the developer's own quarterly disclosures on the Karnataka RERA register. "Built" is the highest construction % filed; "sold" is booked units over total. Not a claim about the developer's intent. Explore every project on our Bangalore project-health tool.
Own a unit in Assetz Marq?
Sell directly to Quietlist's pre-screened buyer list — flat fee, no broker commission.
Last checked against the RERA register: 27 Jul 2026