I Towers Exente
RERA Property Intelligence Report · Preview
KOLTE PATIL DEVELOPERS · Bengaluru East · K-RERA PRM/KA/RERA/1251/446/PR/170922/000838
Report coverage
K-RERA registry & builder-record report
What this report covers
To confirm directly with the builder
🔒 The verdict & buyer playbook · Compliance report
The paid report opens with the overall risk rating, the specific red-flag findings, exactly what I'd do as a buyer in this project, who it suits, and the questions to put to the builder before you commit.
Registration-form facts from the K-RERA detail page: use these to sanity-check the builder brochure, parking allotment, and sanctioned-plan references before relying on plan-extracted approximations.
| Disclosure | Official value | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Registered units | 640 | Total inventory registered with K-RERA. |
| Official carpet area | 49,375 sqm | Regulator-disclosed project-level carpet area, not vision-derived room sums. |
| Registered land area | 28,935 sqm | The land area attached to this K-RERA registration. |
| Sanctioned FAR/FSI | 2.4 | Higher FAR generally means a denser vertical build, subject to site layout and open-space design. |
| Registered towers/wings | 7 | Official tower/wing count in the K-RERA detail page. |
| Parking disclosed | 725 total (165 open) — 1.13 spaces/unit | Confirm whether your quoted unit includes an allotted parking space and where it sits. |
| Project start date | 09-08-2016 |
K-RERA registration tables showing the project mix and tower/wing scale. Use this to sanity-check sales claims such as "only large homes", "low density", or "plenty of parking" against the filed inventory.
Registered inventory mix
| Type | Units | Share | Official carpet area |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 bhk , 2 bhk, 2.5 bhk, 3 bhk, 4 bhk | 640 | 100% | 49,375 sqm |
Registered tower / wing summary
| Tower/wing | Floors | Units | Parking | Height |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOWER A | 12 | 104 | 118 | - |
| TOWER B | 12 | 92 | 105 | - |
| TOWER B1 | 12 | 92 | 104 | - |
| TOWER C | 12 | 100 | 113 | - |
| TOWER D | 12 | 100 | 113 | - |
| TOWER E | 6 | 48 | 54 | - |
| TOWER F | 12 | 104 | 118 | - |
K-RERA detail-page flat rows: exact unit numbers, official carpet area, UDS, and parking lots. 640 official flat/unit rows, matching the 640 registered units disclosed above. Use this as a checklist against the specific flat number in your cost sheet and draft agreement.
By unit type
| Unit type | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2BHK | 324 | 61.4-75.0 sqm | 31.0-36.5 sqm | 0 (324 with 0) |
| 3BHK | 244 | 78.1-100.2 sqm | 39.1-49.3 sqm | 0 (244 with 0) |
| 1BHK | 64 | 29.2-43.5 sqm | 13.4-22.0 sqm | 0 (64 with 0) |
| 4BHK | 8 | 137.5-141.8 sqm | 70.3-70.8 sqm | 0 (8 with 0) |
By tower / wing
| Tower/wing | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOWER A | 104 | 29.2-96.8 sqm | 13.4-48.7 sqm | 0 (104 with 0) |
| TOWER F | 104 | 29.2-96.8 sqm | 13.4-48.7 sqm | 0 (104 with 0) |
| TOWER C | 100 | 30.9-141.8 sqm | 14.2-70.8 sqm | 0 (100 with 0) |
| TOWER D | 100 | 31.1-141.8 sqm | 14.2-70.8 sqm | 0 (100 with 0) |
| TOWER B | 92 | 71.0-100.2 sqm | 35.8-49.3 sqm | 0 (92 with 0) |
| TOWER B1 | 92 | 71.0-100.2 sqm | 35.8-49.3 sqm | 0 (92 with 0) |
| TOWER E | 48 | 67.9-93.6 sqm | 34.5-46.1 sqm | 0 (48 with 0) |
| Unit | Tower | Floor | Type | Carpet | UDS | Parking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A-101 | TOWER A | 1 | 1BHK | 34.0 sqm | 15.4 sqm | 0 |
| A-102 | TOWER A | 1 | 1BHK | 42.6 sqm | 22.0 sqm | 0 |
| A-103 | TOWER A | 1 | 1BHK | 43.5 sqm | 19.7 sqm | 0 |
| A-104 | TOWER A | 1 | 1BHK | 29.2 sqm | 13.4 sqm | 0 |
| A-105 | TOWER A | 1 | 1BHK | 29.2 sqm | 13.4 sqm | 0 |
| A-106 | TOWER A | 1 | 1BHK | 43.5 sqm | 19.7 sqm | 0 |
What the numbers tell you
Synthesis from the official RERA scale, unit register, and land rows — the read a sales team won't volunteer.
🔒 Unit-by-unit guidance · Unit Guidance report
Which block and unit to prefer, the livability read on the filed plans, and a plan-by-plan walkthrough — the ₹2,999 guidance layer.
🔒 Full records — land title, amenities paperwork & document catalog · Compliance report
The complete land-title chain, the paperwork behind each declared amenity, and every document row on file with the regulator — the raw records the compliance read is built on.
No litigation declared on this project's K-RERA filing.
All 23 standard compliance document slots have usable uploaded filings.
No completion certificate (OC) on file yet — project has not been declared complete.
⚠ Registration validity has lapsed: originally due 29 Apr 2021, extended (Covid Extension) to 29 Oct 2021 — both dates have passed with no OC on file.
Named utility/regulatory approvals
"Not found in catalog" can mean the approval genuinely isn't on file yet, or that it doesn't apply to this project (K-RERA doesn't tell us which). Ask the builder directly for any marked not found before relying on it.
K-RERA complaint orders (23 complaints against a project of this name on K-RERA's orders register)
| Parties | Relief sought | Disposal | Order date |
|---|---|---|---|
| PRAVEEN GOPINATHAN vs MIRABILLIS | Direction to comply with the terms and conditions of OC & Fire NOC and remove all violations in contravention to the existing laws in force in the Karnataka state. Allot parking without any prejudice | AUTHORITY | 27/09/2022 |
| Deeraj Nair vs KOLTE PATIL DEVELOPERS LIMITED | relief be made available in the form of compensation and interest payable from June 2019 till the date of possession with all the amenities. | AUTHORITY | 27/06/2023 |
| KARUNAKARA S SUMANI vs MIRABILLIS | Delay compensation asper Sec 16 and 17 of RERA KAR | AUTHORITY | 27/06/2022 |
| DIVYA GEORGE vs MIRA BILLIS | Delay compensation as per RERA rules | AUTHORITY | 27/06/2022 |
| VIJAYA MAHANTESH C KALAKOTI vs MIIRABILLLIS | Builder should follow due process of handover and honor the agreement term with regard to compensation. | AUTHORITY | 27/06/2022 |
| RIMI TALAPATRA vs KOLTE PATIL DEVELOPERS LTD | Delay compensation for 18 months @ 12% p.a. of total payment made to the builder PLUS Rs. 50,000 for mental harassment . | AUTHORITY | 25/06/2022 |
| PRAVEEN GOPINATHAN vs KOLTE PATIL DEVELOPERS LTD, DRA GROUP (DINESH RANKA) | TO REFUND JOINTLY & SEVERALLY, A SUM TOTAL OF Rs 19701/- along with @18% interest PER ANNUM on this amount along with Rs 50,000/- as cost of this litigation. | AUTHORITY | 20/04/2023 |
| ERIC ABI ROY vs KOLTE PATIL DEVELOPERS LTD | 1) Provide the compensation for delay 2) Fix/rectify dampness on the walls, without additional cost to me. | AUTHORITY | 19/09/2022 |
| PRAVEEN GOPINATHAN vs MIrabilis | Direction or orders to promoters to Jointly and Severally pay to the complainant, interest for period of delayed possession as per the Memo of Calculation annexed along with the cost of litigation. | AUTHORITY | 18/08/2025 |
| VINAYAK RAMESH KAMANURI vs KOLTE PATIL DEVELOPERS LIMITED | Delay compensation as per Rera rules | AUTHORITY | 13/09/2022 |
| SANTHOSH KRISHNAMURTHY vs KOLTE PATIL DEVELOPERS LTD | Payment of the delay compensation immediately calculated along with the interest calculation from Oct 2017 | AUTHORITY | 13/09/2022 |
| MAHESH ARKALGUD SHIVAKUMAR vs KOLTE PATIL DEVELOPERS LTD | Delay compensation of 6 months till Jan 2020 as per the RERA rules. | AUTHORITY | 13/09/2022 |
| RAKESH RANJAN vs KOLTE PATIL DEVELOPERS LTD | Compensation for delayed possession as per RERA | AUTHORITY | 13/09/2022 |
| DHIRAJ TATIPALLI vs KOLTE PATIL DEVELOPERS LTD | Delay compensation and Force the builder to complete the project ASAP with quality | AUTHORITY | 13/09/2022 |
| GUNJAN PATHAK vs KOLTE PATIL DEVELOPERS LTD | Compensation should be adjusted/paid per RERA guidelines | AUTHORITY | 13/09/2022 |
| JYOTIRMAYEE DEHURY vs MIRABILIS | Respected Sir/Madam, With due respect, we Siba Bra | AUTHORITY | 08/06/2020 |
| SANTOSH KUMAR PARIDA vs KOLTE PATIL DEVELOPERS LTD | DELAY COMPENSATION AS PER RERA AND POSESSION OF FLAT | AUTHORITY | 03/06/2026 |
| Partha Chauhan vs KOLTE PATIL DEVELOPERS LTD | Direction to the respondents to jointly and severally pay a sum total of RS 20418 towards the amount of property tax paid by me along with RS 10000 towards the cost of litigation | AUTHORITY | 03/06/2026 |
| K Seshagiri Rao vs KOLTE PATIL DEVELOPERS LTD | Need kolte-patil to remove the plants on terrace and fix external cracks leading to seapage and also fix internal damages. no excuses of timeline from koltepatil because since 2nd year it started | AUTHORITY | 03/06/2026 |
| Sai Sudheer Mantri and Chinmayee Jena vs KOLTE PATIL DEVELOPERS LTD | Need support for permanent resolution of Seepage issue inside the Flat | AUTHORITY | 03/06/2026 |
| Tharani Rajan Narasimhan vs KOLTE PATIL DEVELOPERS LTD | Root cause of the Seepage from Terrace to be identified and it should be fixed immediately. Restoration of the painting in the grill, floor, wall and ceiling due to seepage should be done. | AUTHORITY | 03/06/2026 |
| PRAVEEN GOPINATHAN vs M/S KOLTEPATIL DEVELOPERS LIMITED & OTHERS | Direct Respondent/s to pay delay compensation under Sec 18(1) of the act in accordance with law & pay the cost of Rs 25,000/- towards the expense of this litigation and other detriments | AUTHORITY | 03/04/2024 |
| SAI SANKAR BALIVADA vs KOLTE PATIL DEVELOPERS LTD | May please instruct M/s Kolte Patil to refund Booking amount | AUTHORITY | 03/04/2023 |
⚠ Matched by PROJECT NAME (the orders register carries no registration number) — confirm the respondent above is this project's builder before relying on it.
Complaints on this project's K-RERA page (44 complaints listed against this promoter)
| Complaint | Subject (as filed) | Project | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| CMP/190304/0002340 04-03-2019 | Delay compensation as per RERA | MIRABILIS | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190307/0002278 07-03-2019 | Delay in delivery of flat (C401) and delay compensation not paid | MIRABILIS | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/200919/0006615 19-09-2020 | Cancellation and Refund | I TOWERS EXENTE (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/221027/0010133 27-10-2022 | FORM O-COMPENSATION & COST OF LITIGATION FOR MENTAL AGONY & OTHER DETRIMENT FACED BY THE PETITIONER BY VIOLATIONS OF PROVISIONS OF SECTION 11(4)(G) OF THE REAL ESTATE(R&D) ACT 2016 BY THE RESPONDENT/S | MIRABILIS | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/220914/0010014 14-09-2022 | FORM O - COMPENSATION FOR MENTAL AGONY,DIFFICULTIES, & OTHER DETRIMENTS PLUS COST OF LITIGATION ARISING OUT OF COMPLAINT NO-CMP/200301/0005610 DECIDED IN FAVOUR OF THE PETITIONER BY THE HON AUTHORITY | MIRABILIS | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/221102/0010159 02-11-2022 | FORM O COMPENSATION FOR MENTAL AGONY ARISING FROM THE MATTER ADJUDICATED BY COMPLAINT NO 7738 | MIRABILIS | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/200301/0005619 01-03-2020 | Delay compensation | MIRABILIS | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/200224/0005511 24-02-2020 | Refund request due to property litigation on Mirabilis | MIRABILIS | DISPOSED AO |
Listed on the project's own K-RERA detail page (registration-exact source). Rows on the promoter's other projects are track-record context — read the subject text, it is the complainant's own filed wording.
K-RERA names 2 project professional/vendor rows across Architect, Structural engineer. Use this to cross-check whose certificates, drawings, and contractor commitments support the filing; final reliance still belongs with your lawyer/technical reviewer.
| Role | Name | Registration / licence | Since | Locality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Architect | Dutta & Kannna architects Pvt.ltd | - | 2012 | Karnataka, India |
| Structural engineer | RAJESH CONSULTANTS | - | - | - |
Kolte-Patil has 2 other K-RERA-registered projects in our records. 2 are past their declared completion deadline with no completion certificate recorded — but because K-RERA publishes OCs inconsistently, a project that has actually been finished and handed over still shows up this way, so this overstates real delays, especially for a high-volume established builder. That is a higher delayed rate than the K-RERA average across Bengaluru on the same measure.
Read this as a list to spot-check for a pattern of genuinely stalled projects, not as a delay rate — pull up a few of the builder’s other K-RERA registrations and check whether they’ve actually been delivered.
⚠ No quarterly financial disclosures (collections, escrow withdrawals) on record, despite no completion certificate yet — meaning we can't verify the project's cashflows against its construction progress. Worth asking the builder directly why no quarterly filings are available.
Declared construction cost ÷ registered units averages to ₹36.0 lakhs per unit — the developer's own declared construction/development cost, not a sale price. K-RERA filings don't disclose what the builder is charging, so this can't tell you whether you're getting a fair deal — only you comparing your quoted price against comparable listings nearby can answer that.
RERA 70% project account is on file: Axis Bank M G ROAD BANGALORE (IFSC UTIB0000009, a/c …9297). RERA requires 70% of buyer collections to sit in this separate, project-specific account, drawn only against certified construction milestones — confirm your payments are made to THIS account (not a general builder account) and that it appears on your allotment letter.
K-RERA has 1 project-photo upload.
These are developer-uploaded progress photos in the official document catalog. We do not treat them as proof of current site condition; use them as a prompt to ask for newer dated photos or a site visit.
The nearest major job hub is ~5 km away — a manageable everyday commute to a major job hub.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| MG Road / city centre | 3 km |
| Outer Ring Road / Manyata | 5 km |
| Bellandur–Marathahalli belt | 10 km |
| Whitefield IT hub | 15 km |
| Electronic City | 18 km |
| Kempegowda Int'l Airport | 24 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.
Should you buy in MIRABILIS?
This page is the free K-RERA filing summary. The full RERA Property Intelligence Report gives you buyer-complaint history, regulatory flags, builder track record, the official unit register, land title, NOCs, and (where the sanctioned plans support it) room-by-room unit data and an annotated site plan. See a real one first:
Sample: Sobha Silicon Oasis → · browse all sample reports →
Compliance Report · ₹999
The regulator’s filing record, read · 1 working day
Scan with any UPI app to pay · quietlist@kotak
Unit Guidance Report · ₹2,999
Everything, down to which unit · 1 working day
Not useful to your decision? Full refund — no questions asked.
Scan with any UPI app to pay · quietlist@kotak
Paying from outside India? Pay $15 (Compliance) or $39 (Unit Guidance) via PayPal, or email hello@quietlist.in for a card invoice. Prefer to talk first, or have a portfolio to check? Same address. An information aid for your own due diligence, not legal or investment advice.
Free · Watch this project
We'll email you when this project's RERA record changes.
Built by Kolte Patil. View Kolte Patil's full track record →
Figures are the developer's own quarterly disclosures on the Karnataka RERA register. "Built" is the highest construction % filed; "sold" is booked units over total. Not a claim about the developer's intent. Explore every project on our Bangalore project-health tool.
Own a unit in Mirabilis?
Sell directly to Quietlist's pre-screened buyer list — flat fee, no broker commission.
Last checked against the RERA register: 27 Jul 2026