RERA Property Intelligence Report · Preview
Puravankara · Bengaluru East · K-RERA PRM/KA/RERA/1251/446/PR/170907/000091
Report coverage
K-RERA registry & builder-record report
What this report covers
To confirm directly with the builder
🔒 The verdict & buyer playbook · Compliance report
The paid report opens with the overall risk rating, the specific red-flag findings, exactly what I'd do as a buyer in this project, who it suits, and the questions to put to the builder before you commit.
Registration-form facts from the K-RERA detail page: use these to sanity-check the builder brochure, parking allotment, and sanctioned-plan references before relying on plan-extracted approximations.
| Disclosure | Official value | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Registered units | 1,171 | Total inventory registered with K-RERA. |
| Official carpet area | 77 sqm | Regulator-disclosed project-level carpet area, not vision-derived room sums. |
| Registered land area | 78,819 sqm | The land area attached to this K-RERA registration. |
| Sanctioned FAR/FSI | 2.25 | Higher FAR generally means a denser vertical build, subject to site layout and open-space design. |
| Registered towers/wings | 15 | Official tower/wing count in the K-RERA detail page. |
| Parking disclosed | 1,469 total (200 open) — 1.25 spaces/unit | Confirm whether your quoted unit includes an allotted parking space and where it sits. |
| Project start date | 23-09-2015 |
K-RERA registration tables showing the project mix and tower/wing scale. Use this to sanity-check sales claims such as "only large homes", "low density", or "plenty of parking" against the filed inventory.
Registered inventory mix
| Type | Units | Share | Official carpet area |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2BHK A1T1 BL1WA | 1 | 100% | 77 sqm |
Registered tower / wing summary
| Tower/wing | Floors | Units | Parking | Height |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wing A | 19 | 78 | 92 | - |
| Wing B | 19 | 78 | 92 | - |
| Wing C | 19 | 78 | 91 | - |
| Wing D | 19 | 78 | 99 | - |
| Wing E | 19 | 78 | 99 | - |
| Wing F | 19 | 78 | 99 | - |
| Wing G | 19 | 78 | 99 | - |
| Wing H | 19 | 78 | 99 | - |
Showing first 8 of 15 tower/wing rows.
K-RERA detail-page flat rows: exact unit numbers, official carpet area, UDS, and parking lots. 1,169 official flat/unit rows vs 1,171 registered units disclosed above; ask why the row count differs. Use this as a checklist against the specific flat number in your cost sheet and draft agreement.
By unit type
| Unit type | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3BHK | 672 | 77.5-104.3 sqm | 0.0 sqm | 0 (672 with 0) |
| 2BHK | 497 | 77.5-104.1 sqm | 0.0 sqm | 0 (497 with 0) |
By tower / wing
| Tower/wing | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wing J | 79 | 77.5-95.9 sqm | 0.0 sqm | 0 (79 with 0) |
| Wing A | 78 | 77.5-104.1 sqm | 0.0 sqm | 0 (78 with 0) |
| Wing B | 78 | 77.5-103.2 sqm | 0.0 sqm | 0 (78 with 0) |
| Wing C | 78 | 103.2-104.3 sqm | 0.0 sqm | 0 (78 with 0) |
| Wing D | 78 | 77.5-104.3 sqm | 0.0 sqm | 0 (78 with 0) |
| Wing E | 78 | 77.5-95.9 sqm | 0.0 sqm | 0 (78 with 0) |
| Wing F | 78 | 77.5-95.9 sqm | 0.0 sqm | 0 (78 with 0) |
| Wing G | 78 | 77.5-95.9 sqm | 0.0 sqm | 0 (78 with 0) |
| Wing H | 78 | 77.5-95.9 sqm | 0.0 sqm | 0 (78 with 0) |
| Wing K | 78 | 103.2-104.3 sqm | 0.0 sqm | 0 (78 with 0) |
| Wing L | 78 | 77.5-103.2 sqm | 0.0 sqm | 0 (78 with 0) |
| Wing M | 78 | 77.5-104.1 sqm | 0.0 sqm | 0 (78 with 0) |
Showing first 12 of 15 tower/wing groups.
| Unit | Tower | Floor | Type | Carpet | UDS | Parking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 001 | Wing A | 0 | 2BHK | 77.5 sqm | 0.0 sqm | 0 |
| 006 | Wing A | 0 | 3BHK | 103.4 sqm | 0.0 sqm | 0 |
| 101 | Wing A | 1 | 2BHK | 77.5 sqm | 0.0 sqm | 0 |
| 103 | Wing A | 1 | 3BHK | 104.1 sqm | 0.0 sqm | 0 |
| 104 | Wing A | 1 | 3BHK | 103.3 sqm | 0.0 sqm | 0 |
| 106 | Wing A | 1 | 3BHK | 103.4 sqm | 0.0 sqm | 0 |
What the numbers tell you
Synthesis from the official RERA scale, unit register, and land rows — the read a sales team won't volunteer.
🔒 Unit-by-unit guidance · Unit Guidance report
Which block and unit to prefer, the livability read on the filed plans, and a plan-by-plan walkthrough — the ₹2,999 guidance layer.
🔒 Full records — land title, amenities paperwork & document catalog · Compliance report
The complete land-title chain, the paperwork behind each declared amenity, and every document row on file with the regulator — the raw records the compliance read is built on.
No litigation declared on this project's K-RERA filing.
All 24 standard compliance document slots have usable uploaded filings.
No completion certificate (OC) on file yet — project has not been declared complete.
⚠ Registration validity has lapsed: originally due 31 Mar 2019 — which has passed with no OC on file.
Named utility/regulatory approvals
"Not found in catalog" can mean the approval genuinely isn't on file yet, or that it doesn't apply to this project (K-RERA doesn't tell us which). Ask the builder directly for any marked not found before relying on it.
K-RERA complaint orders (10 complaints against a project of this name on K-RERA's orders register)
| Parties | Relief sought | Disposal | Order date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Leena Joseph vs Purvankara | refund of booking amount | AUTHORITY | 20/05/2025 |
| VASUDEVAMURTY VENKATA VEMULA vs Puravankara Limited | PAYMENT OF Rs. 9,33,950/- AS COMPENSATION FOR DELAY POSSESSION OF THE FLAT. DETAILS OF CALCULATIONS IN ATTACHMENT COMPENSATION CALCULATIONS.PDF | AUTHORITY | 20/03/2023 |
| Mrs Teresa Regina Kumari vs Puravankara Limited | REQUESTED TO KINDLY INTERVENE AND ADVISE PROMOTER TO MAKE THE REFUND OF BALANCE AMOUN T IMMEDIATELY | AUTHORITY | 20/01/2023 |
| LAKSHMI RAMESH ALIAS NAGALAKSHMI RAVI vs PURVANKARA LIMITTED | The respondent be directed to restore the units as per the original floor plan at no cost and hand over the possession of the units to the complainants. | AUTHORITY | 16/05/2022 |
| Lavanya Jagadeesh Mirle vs Puravankara Limited | Compensation should be paid by the Builder with Interest rate, for delay in handover of possession of the flat which was agreed as per the agreement signed. | AUTHORITY | 12/10/2022 |
| M.A.UPPAL vs PURAVANKARA LIMITED | Direction to the builder to give possession at the agreed price | AUTHORITY | 10/03/2023 |
| Sunil Christopher Soans vs Puravankara Limited | 1.Direct the Developer to refund the Holding Charges of INR 60000 along with interest at the highest SBI MCLR + 2% from 9th January 2020 till payment is made. 2.Pay the costs of petition at INR10000 | AUTHORITY | 08/06/2023 |
| Aniruddh Verma vs PURVA PALAM BEACH | Delay compensation to be paid from the month of delay (March 2019) till handover of possession and adherence to the cost sheet agreed at the time of booking | AUTHORITY | 06/05/2025 |
| ANITHA K S vs PURVA PALAMBEACH | As per GST provisions, it is possible to repay the entire amount of Rs.7,31,566 along with interest and compensation. | AUTHORITY | 04/06/2022 |
| AHAMMED MIRADAS vs PURVAPALAMBEACH | Should allot a COVERED TANDEM CAR PARKING in BLOCK 3 Ground Floor without charging an additional amount. NOT to Sell OPEN Car parking which is not marked and numbered. Refer BBMP Plan sanction. | AUTHORITY | 04/06/2022 |
⚠ Matched by PROJECT NAME (the orders register carries no registration number) — confirm the respondent above is this project's builder before relying on it.
Complaints on this project's K-RERA page (53 complaints listed against this promoter)
| Complaint | Subject (as filed) | Project | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| CMP/190321/0002481 21-03-2019 | Refund of 2lac rupees token amount | Provident Park Square Phase - 1 (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190416/0002487 16-04-2019 | Delay of flat delivery and Compensation as per Rera act | Purva Westend Phase 1 (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190501/0002703 01-05-2019 | Misguided ,Forced to pay 10% and with out SBI approval of Tower -not given Requested Flat | Provident Park Square Phase - 1 (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190511/0002977 11-05-2019 | NON REGISTRATION AND POSSESSION OF FLAT DELIVERY DATE EXPIRED | Purva Sunflower (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190611/0003274 11-06-2019 | Builder is not responding to: cancellation of agreement by buyer due to delay in completion | Purva Sunflower (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190618/0003322 18-06-2019 | Booking amount refund 2 lakhs | Provident Park Square 4 (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190714/0003570 14-07-2019 | Complaint under Sec 18, Sec 31 & Sec 71 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act 2016, and under Rule 17, 29 & 30 of the Karnataka Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Rules 2017. | Purva Palmbeach | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190731/0003677 31-07-2019 | Builder not paying the penalty for delayed possession & Inturn asking for Interest payment charges for period before obtaining commencement certificate charges for period before obtaining commencemer | Purva Westend Phase 1 (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
Listed on the project's own K-RERA detail page (registration-exact source). Rows on the promoter's other projects are track-record context — read the subject text, it is the complainant's own filed wording.
K-RERA names 3 project professional/vendor rows across Architect, Contractor, Structural engineer. Use this to cross-check whose certificates, drawings, and contractor commitments support the filing; final reliance still belongs with your lawyer/technical reviewer.
| Role | Name | Registration / licence | Since | Locality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Architect | Venkataramanan Associates | - | 1970 | 10/2 OShaughnessy Road, Langford Gardens |
| Contractor | JMC Projects India Limited | - | 1987 | 50 Gold Tower 2nd Floor Residency Road, Near Konark Hotel |
| Structural engineer | Design Tree Service Consultants Private Limited | - | - | - |
Puravankara has 32 other K-RERA-registered projects in our records (average reported construction progress 84%). 13 are past their declared completion deadline with no completion certificate recorded — but because K-RERA publishes OCs inconsistently, a project that has actually been finished and handed over still shows up this way, so this overstates real delays, especially for a high-volume established builder. That is a lower delayed rate than the K-RERA average across Bengaluru on the same measure.
Read this as a list to spot-check for a pattern of genuinely stalled projects, not as a delay rate — pull up a few of the builder’s other K-RERA registrations and check whether they’ve actually been delivered.
⚠ No quarterly financial disclosures (collections, escrow withdrawals) on record, despite no completion certificate yet — meaning we can't verify the project's cashflows against its construction progress. Worth asking the builder directly why no quarterly filings are available.
Declared construction cost ÷ registered units averages to ₹68.2 lakhs per unit — the developer's own declared construction/development cost, not a sale price. K-RERA filings don't disclose what the builder is charging, so this can't tell you whether you're getting a fair deal — only you comparing your quoted price against comparable listings nearby can answer that.
RERA 70% project account is on file: HDFC Richmond Road (IFSC HDFC0000523, a/c …8964). RERA requires 70% of buyer collections to sit in this separate, project-specific account, drawn only against certified construction milestones — confirm your payments are made to THIS account (not a general builder account) and that it appears on your allotment letter.
K-RERA has 1 project-photo upload.
These are developer-uploaded progress photos in the official document catalog. We do not treat them as proof of current site condition; use them as a prompt to ask for newer dated photos or a site visit.
The nearest major job hub is ~5 km away — a manageable everyday commute to a major job hub.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| MG Road / city centre | 3 km |
| Outer Ring Road / Manyata | 5 km |
| Bellandur–Marathahalli belt | 10 km |
| Whitefield IT hub | 15 km |
| Electronic City | 18 km |
| Kempegowda Int'l Airport | 24 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.
Should you buy in Purva Palmbeach?
This page is the free K-RERA filing summary. The full RERA Property Intelligence Report gives you buyer-complaint history, regulatory flags, builder track record, the official unit register, land title, NOCs, and (where the sanctioned plans support it) room-by-room unit data and an annotated site plan. See a real one first:
Sample: Sobha Silicon Oasis → · browse all sample reports →
Compliance Report · ₹999
The regulator’s filing record, read · 1 working day
Scan with any UPI app to pay · quietlist@kotak
Unit Guidance Report · ₹2,999
Everything, down to which unit · 1 working day
Not useful to your decision? Full refund — no questions asked.
Scan with any UPI app to pay · quietlist@kotak
Paying from outside India? Pay $15 (Compliance) or $39 (Unit Guidance) via PayPal, or email hello@quietlist.in for a card invoice. Prefer to talk first, or have a portfolio to check? Same address. An information aid for your own due diligence, not legal or investment advice.
Free · Watch this project
We'll email you when this project's RERA record changes.
Built by Puravankara. View Puravankara's full track record →
Buyer reviews · MouthShut
Figures are the developer's own quarterly disclosures on the Karnataka RERA register. "Built" is the highest construction % filed; "sold" is booked units over total. Not a claim about the developer's intent. Explore every project on our Bangalore project-health tool.
Own a unit in Purva Palmbeach?
Sell directly to Quietlist's pre-screened buyer list — flat fee, no broker commission.
Last checked against the RERA register: 27 Jul 2026