K-RERA · the public record
Radiant Spencer Annex
Anekal · Radiant Properties
Know the project.
Then choose your home.
The registration, progress and filed details in one place. Go further with an independent reading of the project’s evidence.
The record · free to read
Registration read 20 Sep 2026Progress & dates
The timeline on file.
Available record
No construction trend to plot.
The records used for this page do not supply a series of construction percentages. This does not establish whether possession has been given.
declared completion
31 May 2019
The registered date and a construction update answer different questions. Neither is a confirmation of possession.
K-RERA registration · read 20 Sep 2026
Inventory & scale
What this registration contains.
Filed categories, unchanged · K-RERA registration · read 20 Sep 2026
The whole registration
0.5registered acres
128.0registered units per acre
The average covers the registered land and all registered unit types. It does not describe the space, outlook or surroundings of an individual home.
From another project · Prestige Park Grove
A larger advertised area. Almost the same carpet area.
In Tower 14, E4 has 141 sq ft more saleable area than E2. Its carpet area is only 0.46 sq m larger. The report puts the two layouts side by side.
This illustrates the report format. These findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the sample report ↗
The source record
The details behind the headline.
K-RERA · PRM/KA/RERA/1251/308/PR/171014/000263
This project, on the record
The comparable facts of this project, from its own RERA registration record. Each context percentile names its exact comparison set, drawn from Quietlist’s full register store. The paid report adds drawing-read rows to this same table — what the filed plans show about the site, its edges and the unit layouts.
On the register
In context
Values as crawled from the official K-RERA record; context percentiles name their comparison population.
Official Registry Facts
Official project scale
RERA filingRegistration-form facts from the K-RERA detail page: use these to sanity-check the builder brochure, parking allotment, and sanctioned-plan references before relying on plan-extracted approximations.
| Disclosure | Official value | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Registered units | 64 | Total inventory registered with K-RERA. |
| Official carpet area | 5,325 sqm | Regulator-disclosed project-level carpet area, not vision-derived room sums. |
| Registered land area | 2,023 sqm | The land area attached to this K-RERA registration. |
| Sanctioned FAR/FSI | 2 | Higher FAR generally means a denser vertical build, subject to site layout and open-space design. |
| Registered tower/wing entries | 1 | Official tower/wing count in the K-RERA detail page. |
| Parking total (reconciled) | 64 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Open-parking field | 0 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Garage field | 0 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Project start date | 25-05-2017 |
Official inventory & towers
RERA filingK-RERA registration tables showing the project mix and tower/wing scale. Use this to sanity-check sales claims such as "only large homes", "low density", or "plenty of parking" against the filed inventory.
Registered inventory mix
| Type | Units | Share | Official carpet area |
|---|---|---|---|
| Flat | 64 | 100% | 5,325 sqm |
Registered tower / wing summary
| Tower/wing | Floors | Units | Parking | Height |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spencer Annex | 4 | 64 | 64 | - |
Official unit register
RERA filingK-RERA detail-page flat rows: exact unit numbers, official carpet area, UDS, and parking lots. 4 official flat/unit rows vs 64 registered units disclosed above; ask why the row count differs. Use this as a checklist against the specific flat number in your cost sheet and draft agreement.
By unit type
| Unit type | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2BHK | 4 | 1.0 sqm | 1.0 sqm | 4 |
By tower / wing
| Tower/wing | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Spencer Annex | 4 | 1.0 sqm | 1.0 sqm | 4 |
Show sample official unit rows
| Unit | Tower | Floor | Type | Carpet | UDS | Parking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Spencer Annex | 0 | 2BHK | 1.0 sqm | 1.0 sqm | 1 |
| 1 | Spencer Annex | 1 | 2BHK | 1.0 sqm | 1.0 sqm | 1 |
| 1 | Spencer Annex | 2 | 2BHK | 1.0 sqm | 1.0 sqm | 1 |
| 1 | Spencer Annex | 3 | 2BHK | 1.0 sqm | 1.0 sqm | 1 |
Legal, Approvals & Project Team
Litigation & compliance
RERA filingNo litigation declared on this project's K-RERA filing.
All 18 standard compliance document slots have usable uploaded filings.
No completion certificate (OC) on file yet — project has not been declared complete.
⚠ Registration validity has lapsed: originally due 31 May 2019, extended (Section 6 Extension) to 31 May 2020 — both dates have passed with no OC on file. The extension on file was granted on 11 Jul 2022 (K-RERA extension no. EX/PRM/KA/RERA/1251/308/PR/220711/000263) — it has been used, its deadline has also passed, and no further extension is recorded.
Named utility/regulatory approvals
"Not found in catalog" can mean the approval genuinely isn't on file yet, or that it doesn't apply to this project (K-RERA doesn't tell us which). Ask the builder directly for any marked not found before relying on it.
K-RERA enforcement record (the regulator's own defaulter list & penalty orders)
⚠ Listed on K-RERA's official DEFAULTER list.
K-RERA complaint orders (6 complaints against a project of this name on K-RERA's orders register)
| Parties | Relief sought | Disposal | Order date |
|---|---|---|---|
| sudheer vs Radiant Properties | Expecting builder to look into root cause of leakage and cracks and do it for ceiling, common area and rooftop. | AUTHORITY | 12/01/2026 |
| HARSHITHA vs Radiant Properties | Expecting Electrical pipelines , terrace & exterior cracks to be fixed and provide leakage free building | AUTHORITY | 12/01/2026 |
| Rajesh R vs Radiant Properties | Expecting electrical pipie line to be corrected, Biulding exterior cracks to be fixed from the root and tearrace chppings and painting and provide leakage free building | AUTHORITY | 12/01/2026 |
| Hanumantha Reddy vs Radiant Properties | Wish that builder will look into the water leakage problems, cracks on building walls and terrace cracks to be fixed properly with an expert engineer solutions as early as possible | AUTHORITY | 12/01/2026 |
| abinash vs Radiant Properties | Builder should send good structural enginner to analyse the issue of CRACK coming on wall and provide the solution to resolve it permanetly. | AUTHORITY | 12/01/2026 |
| Amit Kumar Singh vs Radiant Properties | Direct the promoter to fix all construction defects and compensate for damages and inconvenience under Section 14(3) of the RERA Act.” | AUTHORITY | 12/01/2026 |
⚠ Matched by PROJECT NAME (the orders register carries no registration number) — confirm the respondent above is this project's builder before relying on it.
Complaints on this project's K-RERA page (2 complaints listed against this promoter)
| Complaint | Subject (as filed) | Project | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| CMP/220928/0010044 28-09-2022 | MEMORANDUM OF COMPLAINT UNDER SECTION 31 OF THE REAL ESTATE (REGULATION AND DEVELOPMENT) ACT, 2016 READ WITH RULE 29 OF THE KARANATAKA REAL ESTATE (REGULATION AND DEVLOPMENT) RULES, 2017 (FORM N) | Radiant silver oak (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY FULLBENCH |
| CMP/220928/0010045 28-09-2022 | MEMORANDUM OF APPLICATION UNDER SECTIONS 14, 31, READ WITH SECTIONS 71 AND 72 OF THE REAL ESTATE (REGULATION AND DEVELOPMENT) ACT, 2016 READ WITH RULE 30. | Radiant silver oak (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
Listed on the project's own K-RERA detail page (registration-exact source). Rows on the promoter's other projects are track-record context — read the subject text, it is the complainant's own filed wording.
Project team & certifications
RERA filingK-RERA names 3 project professional/vendor rows across Architect, Contractor, Structural engineer. Use this to cross-check whose certificates, drawings, and contractor commitments support the filing; final reliance still belongs with your lawyer/technical reviewer.
| Role | Name | Registration / licence | Since | Locality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Architect | Raghavendra Reddy B.E | - | 2002 | 9th Cross, Jp Nagar 1st phase. |
| Contractor | Munna Maharana | - | 2005 | 15th Main, J.P Nagar 5th Phase |
| Structural engineer | Ramakrishna Patnala | - | - | - |
Financials & Construction Progress
Financial disclosures
RERA filing⚠ No quarterly financial disclosures (collections, escrow withdrawals) on record, despite no completion certificate yet — meaning we can't verify the project's cashflows against its construction progress. Worth asking the builder directly why no quarterly filings are available.
Declared construction cost ÷ registered units averages to ₹15.6 lakhs per unit — the developer's own declared construction/development cost, not a sale price. K-RERA filings don't disclose what the builder is charging, so this can't tell you whether you're getting a fair deal — only you comparing your quoted price against comparable listings nearby can answer that.
RERA 70% project account is on file: Axis Bank Mejestic (IFSC UTIB0000693, a/c …8571). RERA requires 70% of buyer collections to sit in this separate, project-specific account, drawn only against certified construction milestones — confirm your payments are made to THIS account (not a general builder account) and that it appears on your allotment letter.
Construction photo filings
RERA filingK-RERA has 1 project-photo upload.
These are developer-uploaded progress photos in the official document catalog. We do not treat them as proof of current site condition; use them as a prompt to ask for newer dated photos or a site visit. Individual filings are listed in the document catalog below.
Location & Connectivity
The nearest major job hub is ~4 km away — walking/short-hop distance to a major employment hub — a genuine work-near-home location.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| Electronic City | 4 km |
| Bellandur–Marathahalli belt | 12 km |
| Whitefield IT hub | 17 km |
| MG Road / city centre | 19 km |
| Outer Ring Road / Manyata | 25 km |
| Kempegowda Int'l Airport | 41 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.