RERA Property Intelligence Report · Preview

Radiant Spencer Annex

Radiant Properties · Anekal · K-RERA PRM/KA/RERA/1251/308/PR/171014/000263

Report coverage

K-RERA registry & builder-record report

What this report covers

  • Official K-RERA registry facts — units, cost, land area, towers, approvals
  • Complaint / litigation & compliance history
  • Builder delivery record across their K-RERA portfolio
  • Construction trajectory & sales pace from quarterly filings

To confirm directly with the builder

  • No dimensioned unit layouts could be confidently extracted from the filed plans.
Not yet
Completion certificate
None declared
Legal status
Other RERA projects by builder

🔒 The verdict & buyer playbook · Compliance report

The paid report opens with the overall risk rating, the specific red-flag findings, exactly what I'd do as a buyer in this project, who it suits, and the questions to put to the builder before you commit.

Unlock in the ₹999 report →

64
Registered units
₹10.0 Cr
Est. construction cost
Units profiled
22
RERA documents on file

Official Registry Facts

Official project scale

RERA filing

Registration-form facts from the K-RERA detail page: use these to sanity-check the builder brochure, parking allotment, and sanctioned-plan references before relying on plan-extracted approximations.

DisclosureOfficial valueWhy it matters
Registered units64Total inventory registered with K-RERA.
Official carpet area5,325 sqmRegulator-disclosed project-level carpet area, not vision-derived room sums.
Registered land area2,023 sqmThe land area attached to this K-RERA registration.
Sanctioned FAR/FSI2Higher FAR generally means a denser vertical build, subject to site layout and open-space design.
Registered towers/wings1Official tower/wing count in the K-RERA detail page.
Parking disclosed64 total (0 open) — 1.00 spaces/unitConfirm whether your quoted unit includes an allotted parking space and where it sits.
Project start date25-05-2017

Official inventory & towers

RERA filing

K-RERA registration tables showing the project mix and tower/wing scale. Use this to sanity-check sales claims such as "only large homes", "low density", or "plenty of parking" against the filed inventory.

Registered inventory mix

TypeUnitsShareOfficial carpet area
Flat64100%5,325 sqm

Registered tower / wing summary

Tower/wingFloorsUnitsParkingHeight
Spencer Annex46464-

Official unit register

RERA filing

K-RERA detail-page flat rows: exact unit numbers, official carpet area, UDS, and parking lots. 4 official flat/unit rows vs 64 registered units disclosed above; ask why the row count differs. Use this as a checklist against the specific flat number in your cost sheet and draft agreement.

By unit type

Unit typeRowsCarpet areaUDSParking lots
2BHK41.0 sqm1.0 sqm4

By tower / wing

Tower/wingRowsCarpet areaUDSParking lots
Spencer Annex41.0 sqm1.0 sqm4
Show sample official unit rows
UnitTowerFloorTypeCarpetUDSParking
1Spencer Annex02BHK1.0 sqm1.0 sqm1
1Spencer Annex12BHK1.0 sqm1.0 sqm1
1Spencer Annex22BHK1.0 sqm1.0 sqm1
1Spencer Annex32BHK1.0 sqm1.0 sqm1

What the numbers tell you

Synthesis from the official RERA scale, unit register, and land rows — the read a sales team won't volunteer.

Unit formatAverage official carpet area is ~11 sqft — compact homes (1–2BHK / studio territory), not compact stock. This is a boutique, low-density project — 64 homes across 1 tower. Carpet is the RERA-defined usable area, so compare it against the 'super built-up' a broker quotes (typically 25–35% larger).
ParkingThe project declares 64 parking spaces for 64 homes (~1.0 per home) — about one space per home — adequate but tight if you have two cars.
Your land share (UDS)Undivided land share averages ~1 sqm per home; across all 64 homes that is ~3% of the plot — on the lower side — the undivided shares sum to noticeably less than the plot, worth asking the builder why before relying on it. Low UDS relative to land can mean the builder keeps land value the flat owners think they're buying.

🔒 Unit-by-unit guidance · Unit Guidance report

Which block and unit to prefer, the livability read on the filed plans, and a plan-by-plan walkthrough — the ₹2,999 guidance layer.

Unlock in the ₹2,999 report →

🔒 Full records — land title, amenities paperwork & document catalog · Compliance report

The complete land-title chain, the paperwork behind each declared amenity, and every document row on file with the regulator — the raw records the compliance read is built on.

Unlock in the ₹999 report →

Legal, Approvals & Project Team

Litigation & compliance

RERA filing

No litigation declared on this project's K-RERA filing.

All 18 standard compliance document slots have usable uploaded filings.

No completion certificate (OC) on file yet — project has not been declared complete.

⚠ Registration validity has lapsed: originally due 31 May 2019, extended (Section 6 Extension) to 31 May 2020 — both dates have passed with no OC on file. The extension on file was granted on 11 Jul 2022 (K-RERA extension no. EX/PRM/KA/RERA/1251/308/PR/220711/000263) — it has been used, its deadline has also passed, and no further extension is recorded.

Named utility/regulatory approvals

Electricity (BESCOM/ESCOM)✓ On file (All NOCs from Authority)
Water & sewage (BWSSB/KWSSB)✓ On file (All NOCs from Authority)
Fire NOC✓ On file (All NOCs from Authority)
Pollution control (KSPCB)✓ On file (All NOCs from Authority)
Environmental clearance✓ On file (All NOCs from Authority)
Airport Authority height clearance✓ On file (All NOCs from Authority)

"Not found in catalog" can mean the approval genuinely isn't on file yet, or that it doesn't apply to this project (K-RERA doesn't tell us which). Ask the builder directly for any marked not found before relying on it.

K-RERA enforcement record (the regulator's own defaulter list & penalty orders)

⚠ Listed on K-RERA's official DEFAULTER list.

K-RERA complaint orders (6 complaints against a project of this name on K-RERA's orders register)

PartiesRelief soughtDisposalOrder date
sudheer vs Radiant PropertiesExpecting builder to look into root cause of leakage and cracks and do it for ceiling, common area and rooftop.AUTHORITY12/01/2026
HARSHITHA vs Radiant PropertiesExpecting Electrical pipelines , terrace & exterior cracks to be fixed and provide leakage free buildingAUTHORITY12/01/2026
Rajesh R vs Radiant PropertiesExpecting electrical pipie line to be corrected, Biulding exterior cracks to be fixed from the root and tearrace chppings and painting and provide leakage free buildingAUTHORITY12/01/2026
Hanumantha Reddy vs Radiant PropertiesWish that builder will look into the water leakage problems, cracks on building walls and terrace cracks to be fixed properly with an expert engineer solutions as early as possibleAUTHORITY12/01/2026
abinash vs Radiant PropertiesBuilder should send good structural enginner to analyse the issue of CRACK coming on wall and provide the solution to resolve it permanetly.AUTHORITY12/01/2026
Amit Kumar Singh vs Radiant PropertiesDirect the promoter to fix all construction defects and compensate for damages and inconvenience under Section 14(3) of the RERA Act.”AUTHORITY12/01/2026

⚠ Matched by PROJECT NAME (the orders register carries no registration number) — confirm the respondent above is this project's builder before relying on it.

Complaints on this project's K-RERA page (2 complaints listed against this promoter)

ComplaintSubject (as filed)ProjectStatus
CMP/220928/0010045
28-09-2022
MEMORANDUM OF APPLICATION UNDER SECTIONS 14, 31, READ WITH SECTIONS 71 AND 72 OF THE REAL ESTATE (REGULATION AND DEVELOPMENT) ACT, 2016 READ WITH RULE 30.Radiant silver oak (another project by this promoter)DISPOSED AO
CMP/220928/0010044
28-09-2022
MEMORANDUM OF COMPLAINT UNDER SECTION 31 OF THE REAL ESTATE (REGULATION AND DEVELOPMENT) ACT, 2016 READ WITH RULE 29 OF THE KARANATAKA REAL ESTATE (REGULATION AND DEVLOPMENT) RULES, 2017 (FORM N)Radiant silver oak (another project by this promoter)DISPOSED AUTHORITY FULLBENCH

Listed on the project's own K-RERA detail page (registration-exact source). Rows on the promoter's other projects are track-record context — read the subject text, it is the complainant's own filed wording.

Project team & certifications

RERA filing

K-RERA names 3 project professional/vendor rows across Architect, Contractor, Structural engineer. Use this to cross-check whose certificates, drawings, and contractor commitments support the filing; final reliance still belongs with your lawyer/technical reviewer.

RoleNameRegistration / licenceSinceLocality
ArchitectRaghavendra Reddy B.E-20029th Cross, Jp Nagar 1st phase.
ContractorMunna Maharana-200515th Main, J.P Nagar 5th Phase
Structural engineerRamakrishna Patnala---

Financials & Construction Progress

Financial disclosures

RERA filing

⚠ No quarterly financial disclosures (collections, escrow withdrawals) on record, despite no completion certificate yet — meaning we can't verify the project's cashflows against its construction progress. Worth asking the builder directly why no quarterly filings are available.

Declared construction cost ÷ registered units averages to ₹15.6 lakhs per unit — the developer's own declared construction/development cost, not a sale price. K-RERA filings don't disclose what the builder is charging, so this can't tell you whether you're getting a fair deal — only you comparing your quoted price against comparable listings nearby can answer that.

RERA 70% project account is on file: Axis Bank Mejestic (IFSC UTIB0000693, a/c …8571). RERA requires 70% of buyer collections to sit in this separate, project-specific account, drawn only against certified construction milestones — confirm your payments are made to THIS account (not a general builder account) and that it appears on your allotment letter.

Construction photo filings

RERA filing

K-RERA has 1 project-photo upload.

These are developer-uploaded progress photos in the official document catalog. We do not treat them as proof of current site condition; use them as a prompt to ask for newer dated photos or a site visit.

Location & Connectivity

The nearest major job hub is ~4 km away — walking/short-hop distance to a major employment hub — a genuine work-near-home location.

LandmarkStraight-line
Electronic City4 km
Bellandur–Marathahalli belt12 km
Whitefield IT hub17 km
MG Road / city centre19 km
Outer Ring Road / Manyata25 km
Kempegowda Int'l Airport41 km

Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.

Free · Watch this project

We'll email you when this project's RERA record changes.

Something went wrong — email hello@quietlist.in.

✓ You're watching — we'll email you if the RERA record changes.

Built by Radiant Properties.
Radiant Properties has 2 projects registered in Bangalore.
8 complaints on the K-RERA register against Radiant Properties in Bangalore.

Other projects by this builder in Bangalore

Other RERA-registered projects in Electronic City

Major developers building in Electronic City

Figures are the developer's own quarterly disclosures on the Karnataka RERA register. "Built" is the highest construction % filed; "sold" is booked units over total. Not a claim about the developer's intent. Explore every project on our Bangalore project-health tool.

Own a unit in Radiant Spencer Annex?

Sell directly to Quietlist's pre-screened buyer list — flat fee, no broker commission.

List your unit →

Last checked against the RERA register: 27 Jul 2026