Suvrith Shelter
RERA Property Intelligence Report · Preview
Countryside E city · Anekal · K-RERA PRM/KA/RERA/1251/308/PR/180119/002145
Report coverage
K-RERA registry & builder-record report
What this report covers
To confirm directly with the builder
🔒 The verdict & buyer playbook · Compliance report
The paid report opens with the overall risk rating, the specific red-flag findings, exactly what I'd do as a buyer in this project, who it suits, and the questions to put to the builder before you commit.
Registration-form facts from the K-RERA detail page: use these to sanity-check the builder brochure, parking allotment, and sanctioned-plan references before relying on plan-extracted approximations.
| Disclosure | Official value | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Registered units | 124 | Total inventory registered with K-RERA. |
| Official carpet area | 12,263 sqm | Regulator-disclosed project-level carpet area, not vision-derived room sums. |
| Registered land area | 7,591 sqm | The land area attached to this K-RERA registration. |
| Sanctioned FAR/FSI | ~2.24 | Sanctioned floor-area ratio (≈17,035 sqm sanctioned FAR area ÷ 7,591 sqm land) — higher means a denser vertical build. |
| Registered towers/wings | 2 | Official tower/wing count in the K-RERA detail page. |
| Parking disclosed | 153 total (129 open) — 1.23 spaces/unit | Confirm whether your quoted unit includes an allotted parking space and where it sits. |
| Project start date | 01-08-2017 |
K-RERA registration tables showing the project mix and tower/wing scale. Use this to sanity-check sales claims such as "only large homes", "low density", or "plenty of parking" against the filed inventory.
Registered inventory mix
| Type | Units | Share | Official carpet area |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apartments | 124 | 100% | 12,263 sqm |
Registered tower / wing summary
| Tower/wing | Floors | Units | Parking | Height |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIRRUS | 13 | 62 | 78 | - |
| NIMBUS | 13 | 62 | 75 | - |
K-RERA detail-page flat rows: exact unit numbers, official carpet area, UDS, and parking lots. 124 official flat/unit rows, matching the 124 registered units disclosed above. Use this as a checklist against the specific flat number in your cost sheet and draft agreement.
By unit type
| Unit type | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3BHK | 100 | 96.4-108.9 sqm | 657.2-750.4 sqm | 0 (100 with 0) |
| 2BHK | 24 | 75.4-80.3 sqm | 517.2-557.6 sqm | 0 (24 with 0) |
By tower / wing
| Tower/wing | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CIRRUS | 62 | 80.3-108.9 sqm | 557.6-750.4 sqm | 0 (62 with 0) |
| NIMBUS | 62 | 75.4-106.8 sqm | 517.2-729.0 sqm | 0 (62 with 0) |
| Unit | Tower | Floor | Type | Carpet | UDS | Parking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 101 | CIRRUS | 1 | 3BHK | 108.9 sqm | 750.4 sqm | 0 |
| 102 | CIRRUS | 1 | 2BHK | 80.3 sqm | 557.6 sqm | 0 |
| 103 | CIRRUS | 1 | 3BHK | 97.0 sqm | 671.3 sqm | 0 |
| 104 | CIRRUS | 1 | 3BHK | 96.4 sqm | 671.2 sqm | 0 |
| 105 | CIRRUS | 1 | 3BHK | 96.5 sqm | 677.3 sqm | 0 |
| 201 | CIRRUS | 2 | 3BHK | 108.9 sqm | 750.4 sqm | 0 |
What the numbers tell you
Synthesis from the official RERA scale, unit register, and land rows — the read a sales team won't volunteer.
🔒 Unit-by-unit guidance · Unit Guidance report
Which block and unit to prefer, the livability read on the filed plans, and a plan-by-plan walkthrough — the ₹2,999 guidance layer.
🔒 Full records — land title, amenities paperwork & document catalog · Compliance report
The complete land-title chain, the paperwork behind each declared amenity, and every document row on file with the regulator — the raw records the compliance read is built on.
No litigation declared on this project's K-RERA filing.
All 23 standard compliance document slots have usable uploaded filings.
No completion certificate (OC) on file yet — project has not been declared complete.
⚠ Registration validity has lapsed: originally due 31 May 2021, extended (Section 6 Extension) to 25 Feb 2023 — both dates have passed with no OC on file. The extension on file was granted on 02 Sep 2022 (K-RERA extension no. EX/PRM/KA/RERA/1251/308/PR/220902/002145) — it has been used, its deadline has also passed, and no further extension is recorded.
Named utility/regulatory approvals
"Not found in catalog" can mean the approval genuinely isn't on file yet, or that it doesn't apply to this project (K-RERA doesn't tell us which). Ask the builder directly for any marked not found before relying on it.
K-RERA complaint orders (10 complaints against a project of this name on K-RERA's orders register)
| Parties | Relief sought | Disposal | Order date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Abhishek Pandey vs Countryside E city LLP | Project completion and handover per sale agreement | AUTHORITY | 16/06/2026 |
| Rajitha Nair vs Countryside E city LLP | Seeking justice in getting the flats ready as promised with all the amenities by end of Septemeber 2023 and also a compensation for the delay in the completion of the project since March 2023. | AUTHORITY | 16/06/2026 |
| DHANUSH vs Countryside E city LLP | Promoter should release the Flats with Hebitable condition at the earliest, else Coutryside has to pay the Bank EMI intrest every month, also the compensation from March'23.. | AUTHORITY | 16/06/2026 |
| Dhanapal vs Countryside E city LLP | Immediate completion of project. Compensation if amenities not delivered as promised or delay in possession | AUTHORITY | 16/06/2026 |
| Padmini Chetan Parmar vs Countryside E city LLP | Compensation for project delay and there should be no deviation as per agreement and marketing brochure which was provided during flat booking. | AUTHORITY | 16/06/2026 |
| Sreehari K V vs Countryside E city LLP | Expedited Possession , Enforcement of Promised Specifications, Compensation for Delay, Investigation into Fund Utilization, Penalties for Misrepresentation | AUTHORITY | 16/06/2026 |
| Thomas Mathew vs Countryside E city LLP | Compensation for the delay in project delivery and adherance to the promised set of amenities. | AUTHORITY | 16/06/2026 |
| Shashank R vs Countryside E city LLP | Interest on delay period and handing over the property as soon as possible | AUTHORITY | 16/06/2026 |
| Shanmuga Prabhu vs Countryside E city LLP | Request to complete the project and provide interest on delay period. | AUTHORITY | 16/06/2026 |
| PRANKUR CHAUDHARY vs COUNTRYSIDE E CITY LLP & OTHERS | I want RERA to take strict ACTION against the builder and force him to keep all his promises he made to the buyers without compromising on quality | AUTHORITY | 11/03/2024 |
⚠ Matched by PROJECT NAME (the orders register carries no registration number) — confirm the respondent above is this project's builder before relying on it.
⚠ No quarterly financial disclosures (collections, escrow withdrawals) on record, despite no completion certificate yet — meaning we can't verify the project's cashflows against its construction progress. Worth asking the builder directly why no quarterly filings are available.
Declared construction cost ÷ registered units averages to ₹36.3 lakhs per unit — the developer's own declared construction/development cost, not a sale price. K-RERA filings don't disclose what the builder is charging, so this can't tell you whether you're getting a fair deal — only you comparing your quoted price against comparable listings nearby can answer that.
RERA 70% project account is on file: Bank of Baroda Jayanagar 3rd Block (IFSC BARB0JAYANA, a/c …1025). RERA requires 70% of buyer collections to sit in this separate, project-specific account, drawn only against certified construction milestones — confirm your payments are made to THIS account (not a general builder account) and that it appears on your allotment letter.
K-RERA has 1 project-photo upload.
These are developer-uploaded progress photos in the official document catalog. We do not treat them as proof of current site condition; use them as a prompt to ask for newer dated photos or a site visit.
The nearest major job hub is ~1 km away — walking/short-hop distance to a major employment hub — a genuine work-near-home location.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| Electronic City | 1 km |
| Bellandur–Marathahalli belt | 12 km |
| MG Road / city centre | 17 km |
| Whitefield IT hub | 18 km |
| Outer Ring Road / Manyata | 24 km |
| Kempegowda Int'l Airport | 41 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.
Should you buy in Raindance?
This page is the free K-RERA filing summary. The full RERA Property Intelligence Report gives you buyer-complaint history, regulatory flags, builder track record, the official unit register, land title, NOCs, and (where the sanctioned plans support it) room-by-room unit data and an annotated site plan. See a real one first:
Sample: Sobha Silicon Oasis → · browse all sample reports →
Compliance Report · ₹999
The regulator’s filing record, read · 1 working day
Scan with any UPI app to pay · quietlist@kotak
Unit Guidance Report · ₹2,999
Everything, down to which unit · 1 working day
Not useful to your decision? Full refund — no questions asked.
Scan with any UPI app to pay · quietlist@kotak
Paying from outside India? Pay $15 (Compliance) or $39 (Unit Guidance) via PayPal, or email hello@quietlist.in for a card invoice. Prefer to talk first, or have a portfolio to check? Same address. An information aid for your own due diligence, not legal or investment advice.
Free · Watch this project
We'll email you when this project's RERA record changes.
Built by Countryside City.
Figures are the developer's own quarterly disclosures on the Karnataka RERA register. "Built" is the highest construction % filed; "sold" is booked units over total. Not a claim about the developer's intent. Explore every project on our Bangalore project-health tool.
Own a unit in Raindance?
Sell directly to Quietlist's pre-screened buyer list — flat fee, no broker commission.
Last checked against the RERA register: 27 Jul 2026