K-RERA · the public record
SHRIRAM SOUTHERN CREST
Bengaluru South · SHRIPROP PROJECTS
Know the project.
Then choose your home.
The registration, progress and filed details in one place. Go further with an independent reading of the project’s evidence.
The record · free to read
Registration read 20 Sep 2026Progress & dates
The timeline on file.
Available record
No construction trend to plot.
The records used for this page do not supply a series of construction percentages. This does not establish whether possession has been given.
declared completion
30 Jun 2021
The registered date and a construction update answer different questions. Neither is a confirmation of possession.
K-RERA registration · read 20 Sep 2026
Inventory & scale
What this registration contains.
Filed categories, unchanged · K-RERA registration · read 20 Sep 2026
The whole registration
3.7registered acres
90.7registered units per acre
The average covers the registered land and all registered unit types. It does not describe the space, outlook or surroundings of an individual home.
From another project · Prestige Park Grove
A larger advertised area. Almost the same carpet area.
In Tower 14, E4 has 141 sq ft more saleable area than E2. Its carpet area is only 0.46 sq m larger. The report puts the two layouts side by side.
This illustrates the report format. These findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the sample report ↗
The source record
The details behind the headline.
K-RERA · PRM/KA/RERA/1251/310/PR/171014/000364
This project, on the record
The comparable facts of this project, from its own RERA registration record. Each context percentile names its exact comparison set, drawn from Quietlist’s full register store. The paid report adds drawing-read rows to this same table — what the filed plans show about the site, its edges and the unit layouts.
On the register
In context
Values as crawled from the official K-RERA record; context percentiles name their comparison population.
Official Registry Facts
Official project scale
RERA filingRegistration-form facts from the K-RERA detail page: use these to sanity-check the builder brochure, parking allotment, and sanctioned-plan references before relying on plan-extracted approximations.
| Disclosure | Official value | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Registered units | 338 | Total inventory registered with K-RERA. |
| Official carpet area | 33,997 sqm | Regulator-disclosed project-level carpet area, not vision-derived room sums. |
| Registered land area | 15,073 sqm | The land area attached to this K-RERA registration. |
| Sanctioned FAR/FSI | ~3.25 | Sanctioned floor-area ratio (≈48,949 sqm sanctioned FAR area ÷ 15,073 sqm land) — higher means a denser vertical build. |
| Registered tower/wing entries | 3 | Official tower/wing count in the K-RERA detail page. |
| Parking total (reconciled) | 494 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Open-parking field | 0 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Garage field | 0 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Project start date | 14-01-2017 |
Official inventory & towers
RERA filingK-RERA registration tables showing the project mix and tower/wing scale. Use this to sanity-check sales claims such as "only large homes", "low density", or "plenty of parking" against the filed inventory.
Registered inventory mix
| Type | Units | Share | Official carpet area |
|---|---|---|---|
| APARTMENTS | 338 | 100% | 33,997 sqm |
Registered tower / wing summary
| Tower/wing | Floors | Units | Parking | Height |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 17 | 140 | 228 | - |
| B | 16 | 58 | 94 | - |
| C | 17 | 140 | 172 | - |
Official unit register
RERA filingK-RERA detail-page flat rows: exact unit numbers, official carpet area, UDS, and parking lots. 338 official flat/unit rows, matching the 338 registered units disclosed above. Use this as a checklist against the specific flat number in your cost sheet and draft agreement.
By unit type
| Unit type | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 BHK | 134 | 82.9 sqm | 0.2 sqm | 134 |
| 3 BHK | 96 | 113.2 sqm | 0.3 sqm | 96 |
| 2 + Study | 62 | 92.4 sqm | 0.2 sqm | 62 |
| 3 + Study | 34 | 124.5 sqm | 0.3 sqm | 34 |
| Penthouse | 10 | 163.5-223.5 sqm | 0.4-0.5 sqm | 20 |
| 1 BHK | 2 | 64.4 sqm | 0.2 sqm | 2 |
By tower / wing
| Tower/wing | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 140 | 64.4-223.5 sqm | 0.2-0.5 sqm | 144 |
| C | 140 | 64.4-223.5 sqm | 0.2-0.5 sqm | 144 |
| B | 58 | 92.4-220.6 sqm | 0.2-0.5 sqm | 60 |
Show sample official unit rows
| Unit | Tower | Floor | Type | Carpet | UDS | Parking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A.00.01 | A | 0 | 3 + Study | 124.5 sqm | 0.3 sqm | 1 |
| A.00.02 | A | 0 | 2 + Study | 92.4 sqm | 0.2 sqm | 1 |
| A.00.03 | A | 0 | 2 BHK | 82.9 sqm | 0.2 sqm | 1 |
| A.00.04 | A | 0 | 1 BHK | 64.4 sqm | 0.2 sqm | 1 |
| A.00.05 | A | 0 | 3 BHK | 113.2 sqm | 0.3 sqm | 1 |
| A.00.06 | A | 0 | 3 BHK | 113.2 sqm | 0.3 sqm | 1 |
Legal, Approvals & Project Team
Litigation & compliance
RERA filingNo litigation declared on this project's K-RERA filing.
All 24 standard compliance document slots have usable uploaded filings.
No completion certificate (OC) on file yet — project has not been declared complete.
⚠ Registration validity has lapsed: originally due 30 Jun 2021, extended (Section 6 Extension) to 30 Mar 2023 — both dates have passed with no OC on file. The extension on file was granted on 04 Jun 2022 (K-RERA extension no. EX/PRM/KA/RERA/1251/310/PR/220604/000364) — it has been used, its deadline has also passed, and no further extension is recorded.
Named utility/regulatory approvals
"Not found in catalog" can mean the approval genuinely isn't on file yet, or that it doesn't apply to this project (K-RERA doesn't tell us which). Ask the builder directly for any marked not found before relying on it.
K-RERA enforcement record (the regulator's own defaulter list & penalty orders)
⚠ Listed on K-RERA's official DEFAULTER list.
K-RERA complaint orders (17 complaints against a project of this name on K-RERA's orders register)
| Parties | Relief sought | Disposal | Order date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kapil Chandrika Pandey & Punam Kapil Pandey vs Shriprop Projects Private Limited | Compensation for delayed handover | AUTHORITY | 22/08/2024 |
| Gurunath Nayak K vs M/S.SHRIPROP PROJECTS PVT LTD | Interest for delay in completion and delivery possesion on my flat C1407. (Delay period is 32months ) | AUTHORITY | 22/07/2025 |
| Gurunath Nayak K vs M/S.SHRIPROP PROJECTS PVT LTD | Interest for delay period, for completion and delivery possessionon our flat C1408. (Delay period 32months) | AUTHORITY | 22/07/2025 |
| Ravindra R Grandhim & Rashmi G R vs Shriprop Projects Private Limited | Compensation for the 10 month delay in delivery of the flat | AUTHORITY | 22/04/2024 |
| Ravindra R Grandhim & Rashmi G R vs Shriprop Projects Private Limited | Obtain fair compensation from Shriram for delay in handing over the flat | AUTHORITY | 22/04/2024 |
| VIJAYA KUMAR D & GOMATHI VIJAYAKUMAR vs SHRIPROP PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED | To intervene and extend compensation for their lapse in delivery, not updating the real situation instead played around with standard mails which had caused financial loss (rent 35k & bank emi) | AUTHORITY | 20/05/2024 |
| R Nilakantan Iyer vs M/S.SHRIPROP PROJECTS PVT LTD | Refund of excess charged / supportings for payments | AUTHORITY | 19/11/2025 |
| Sharan UR vs SHRIPROP PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED | We would require support from RERA as per standard relief offered (in terms of interest/amount support) toward this delay | AUTHORITY | 13/12/2022 |
| Sunil B vs M/S.SHRIPROP PROJECTS PVT LTD | Interest Sought: Rs 12,67,500. Payment towards Shriram Prop till Dec 2021 is Rs 1.01Cr Int: 8% (mclr) + 2% = 10% Delay: 15months | AUTHORITY | 13/08/2025 |
| Rahul Kumar vs M/S.SHRIPROP PROJECTS PVT LTD. | Interest on delay period | AUTHORITY | 13/05/2025 |
| Deepak Prakash Shetty vs M/s.Shriprop Projects Pvt Ltd. | Request to the builder for interest on delay period | AUTHORITY | 13/05/2025 |
| Manish Kumar Agrawala vs M/S.SHRIPROP PROJECTS PVT LTD | Request to RERA to direct builder to pay interest for delay in handover of residential property | AUTHORITY | 13/05/2025 |
| AIYAPPA K B vs M/s.Shriprop Projects Pvt Ltd. | intrest on delay period | AUTHORITY | 13/05/2025 |
| Akash Saraiya vs M/S.SHRIPROP PROJECTS PVT LTD. | Pray for Interest on Delay Period | AUTHORITY | 13/05/2025 |
| Sudhir S vs SHRIPROP PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED | Interest for the delayed delivery for the period 1st April 2022 to 26th Sep 2022 at MCLR + 2% as per our agreement to sale | AUTHORITY | 04/12/2023 |
| Tejas Ramaswamy vs SHRIPROP PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED | Compensation and the interest for the period of delayed handover | AUTHORITY | 04/07/2023 |
| Sachin vs SHRIPROP PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED | Request to get booking amount refund from the promotor | AUTHORITY | 03/05/2023 |
⚠ Matched by PROJECT NAME (the orders register carries no registration number) — confirm the respondent above is this project's builder before relying on it.
Complaints on this project's K-RERA page (5 complaints listed against this promoter)
| Complaint | Subject (as filed) | Project | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| CMP/220521/0009505 21-05-2022 | Delivery Date Expiry, No update on status and therefore incurred financial loss to buyer. | SHRIRAM SOUTHERN CREST | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH6 |
| CMP/220609/0009608 09-06-2022 | Handover pending even post RERA deadline (after revision for Covid) | SHRIRAM SOUTHERN CREST | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH6 |
| CMP/220819/0009916 19-08-2022 | Inordinate delay in Property handover | SHRIRAM SOUTHERN CREST | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH6 |
| CMP/221020/0010122 20-10-2022 | Interest not received from the builder for the delayed delivery | SHRIRAM SOUTHERN CREST | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH6 |
| CMP/221112/0010254 12-11-2022 | paid 1 Lakh Rs for blocking the unit only.not signed any agreement with the company | SHRIRAM SOUTHERN CREST - Phase -2 (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH6 |
Listed on the project's own K-RERA detail page (registration-exact source). Rows on the promoter's other projects are track-record context — read the subject text, it is the complainant's own filed wording.
Project team & certifications
RERA filingK-RERA names 3 project professional/vendor rows across Architect, Contractor, Structural engineer. Use this to cross-check whose certificates, drawings, and contractor commitments support the filing; final reliance still belongs with your lawyer/technical reviewer.
| Role | Name | Registration / licence | Since | Locality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Architect | CnT Architects | - | 1963 | NO.7, PALACE ROAD |
| Contractor | SIMPLEX INFRASTRUCTURES LIMITED | - | 1924 | S.C.ROAD, ANANDARAO CIRCLE |
| Structural engineer | Innotech Engineering Consult Pvt Ltd | - | - | - |
Financials & Construction Progress
Financial disclosures
RERA filing⚠ No quarterly financial disclosures (collections, escrow withdrawals) on record, despite no completion certificate yet — meaning we can't verify the project's cashflows against its construction progress. Worth asking the builder directly why no quarterly filings are available.
Declared construction cost ÷ registered units averages to ₹71.4 lakhs per unit — the developer's own declared construction/development cost, not a sale price. K-RERA filings don't disclose what the builder is charging, so this can't tell you whether you're getting a fair deal — only you comparing your quoted price against comparable listings nearby can answer that.
RERA 70% project account is on file: YES BANK Kasturba Road, Bangalore (IFSC YESB0000022, a/c …3963). RERA requires 70% of buyer collections to sit in this separate, project-specific account, drawn only against certified construction milestones — confirm your payments are made to THIS account (not a general builder account) and that it appears on your allotment letter.
Construction photo filings
RERA filingK-RERA has 1 project-photo upload.
These are developer-uploaded progress photos in the official document catalog. We do not treat them as proof of current site condition; use them as a prompt to ask for newer dated photos or a site visit. Individual filings are listed in the document catalog below.
Location & Connectivity
The nearest major job hub is ~12 km away — a real but liveable commute to the nearest job hub — factor peak-hour traffic.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| MG Road / city centre | 9 km |
| Electronic City | 12 km |
| Bellandur–Marathahalli belt | 13 km |
| Outer Ring Road / Manyata | 16 km |
| Whitefield IT hub | 21 km |
| Kempegowda Int'l Airport | 36 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.