K-RERA · the public record
Skylark Royaume
Bengaluru South · Royaume Estates
Know the project.
Then choose your home.
The registration, progress and filed details in one place. Go further with an independent reading of the project’s evidence.
The record · free to read
Registration read 20 Sep 2026Progress & dates
The timeline on file.
Promoter-reported construction
K-RERA quarterly filings · Q3 2025 to Q3 2025
declared completion
31 Dec 2021
The registered date and a construction update answer different questions. Neither is a confirmation of possession.
K-RERA registration · read 20 Sep 2026
Inventory & scale
What this registration contains.
Filed categories, unchanged · K-RERA registration · read 20 Sep 2026
The whole registration
7.2registered acres
100.6registered units per acre
The average covers the registered land and all registered unit types. It does not describe the space, outlook or surroundings of an individual home.
From another project · Prestige Park Grove
A larger advertised area. Almost the same carpet area.
In Tower 14, E4 has 141 sq ft more saleable area than E2. Its carpet area is only 0.46 sq m larger. The report puts the two layouts side by side.
This illustrates the report format. These findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the sample report ↗
The source record
The details behind the headline.
K-RERA · PRM/KA/RERA/1251/310/PR/170907/000047
This project, on the record
The comparable facts of this project, from its own RERA registration record. Each context percentile names its exact comparison set, drawn from Quietlist’s full register store. The paid report adds drawing-read rows to this same table — what the filed plans show about the site, its edges and the unit layouts.
On the register
In context
Values as crawled from the official K-RERA record; context percentiles name their comparison population.
Official Registry Facts
Official project scale
RERA filingRegistration-form facts from the K-RERA detail page: use these to sanity-check the builder brochure, parking allotment, and sanctioned-plan references before relying on plan-extracted approximations.
| Disclosure | Official value | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Registered units | 729 | Total inventory registered with K-RERA. |
| Official carpet area | 55,534 sqm | Regulator-disclosed project-level carpet area, not vision-derived room sums. |
| Registered land area | 29,339 sqm | The land area attached to this K-RERA registration. |
| Sanctioned FAR/FSI | 3.6 | Higher FAR generally means a denser vertical build, subject to site layout and open-space design. |
| Registered tower/wing entries | 6 | Official tower/wing count in the K-RERA detail page. |
| Parking total (reconciled) | 693 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Open-parking field | 96 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Garage field | 0 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Project start date | 28-12-2016 |
Official inventory & towers
RERA filingK-RERA registration tables showing the project mix and tower/wing scale. Use this to sanity-check sales claims such as "only large homes", "low density", or "plenty of parking" against the filed inventory.
Registered inventory mix
| Type | Units | Share | Official carpet area |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apartment | 729 | 100% | 55,534 sqm |
Registered tower / wing summary
| Tower/wing | Floors | Units | Parking | Height |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Towe A | 14 | 138 | 120 | - |
| Tower B | 14 | 113 | 95 | - |
| Tower C | 14 | 118 | 118 | - |
| Tower D | 14 | 120 | 120 | - |
| Tower E | 14 | 120 | 120 | - |
| Tower F | 14 | 120 | 120 | - |
Official unit register
RERA filingK-RERA detail-page flat rows: exact unit numbers, official carpet area, UDS, and parking lots. 729 official flat/unit rows, matching the 729 registered units disclosed above. Use this as a checklist against the specific flat number in your cost sheet and draft agreement.
By unit type
| Unit type | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3BHK | 488 | 940.1-1,098.5 sqft | 383.0-448.0 sqft | 488 |
| 2BHK | 158 | 740.2-914.9 sqft | 304.0-373.0 sqft | 158 |
| 1BHK | 83 | 429.7-690.1 sqft | 180.0-288.0 sqft | 29 (54 with 0) |
By tower / wing
| Tower/wing | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Towe A | 138 | 429.7-1,011.0 sqft | 180.0-415.0 sqft | 111 (27 with 0) |
| Tower D | 120 | 635.7-945.9 sqft | 265.0-389.0 sqft | 120 |
| Tower E | 120 | 635.7-945.9 sqft | 265.0-389.0 sqft | 120 |
| Tower F | 120 | 690.1-1,098.5 sqft | 288.0-448.0 sqft | 120 |
| Tower C | 118 | 635.7-945.9 sqft | 265.0-389.0 sqft | 118 |
| Tower B | 113 | 429.7-1,011.0 sqft | 180.0-415.0 sqft | 86 (27 with 0) |
Show sample official unit rows
| Unit | Tower | Floor | Type | Carpet | UDS | Parking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A - 001 | Towe A | 0 | 2BHK | 740.2 sqft | 304.0 sqft | 1 |
| A - 002 | Towe A | 0 | 2BHK | 740.2 sqft | 304.0 sqft | 1 |
| A - 003 | Towe A | 0 | 1BHK | 483.0 sqft | 201.0 sqft | 1 |
| A - 004 | Towe A | 0 | 1BHK | 483.0 sqft | 201.0 sqft | 1 |
| A - 005 | Towe A | 0 | 1BHK | 440.7 sqft | 182.0 sqft | 0 |
| A - 006 | Towe A | 0 | 1BHK | 440.7 sqft | 182.0 sqft | 0 |
Legal, Approvals & Project Team
Litigation & compliance
RERA filingNo litigation declared on this project's K-RERA filing.
All 20 standard compliance document slots have usable uploaded filings.
No completion certificate (OC) on file yet — project has not been declared complete.
Named utility/regulatory approvals
"Not found in catalog" can mean the approval genuinely isn't on file yet, or that it doesn't apply to this project (K-RERA doesn't tell us which). Ask the builder directly for any marked not found before relying on it.
K-RERA complaint orders (10 complaints against a project of this name on K-RERA's orders register)
| Parties | Relief sought | Disposal | Order date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Rajeshwari K vs Royaume Estates Private Limited | Refund of amount with interest/or completion of the project. At present there is zero progress!! | AUTHORITY | 29/01/2026 |
| Mohammed Nayaz Ahmed vs Royaume Estates Private Limited | I'm looking for my refund of money with interest and other compensation | AUTHORITY | 29/01/2026 |
| Vighnesh vs M/S.SKYLARK ROYAUME | Project completion with penalty as per RERA agreement or full refund with interest | AUTHORITY | 23/02/2026 |
| Siby jacob vs SKYLARK ROYAUME | return of amount paid with interest | AUTHORITY | 19/05/2025 |
| kishan kanodia vs SKYLARK ROYAUME | Refund the full amount paid with Interest as the property has already cross the delivery date and no sign of construction progress is showing over last 2 years. | AUTHORITY | 15/05/2025 |
| Subhransu Sahoo vs SKYLARK ROYAUME | Dear Sir/Madam - Request you to kindly take cognisance of this matter and direct Skylark to proceed with refund along with interest amount. | AUTHORITY | 15/05/2025 |
| Thinesh kumar P vs M/S.ROYAUME ESTATES PVT LTD | Need to get Money + Relief money for repeated Cheating and Creating Torture and Stress + Interest for Money Held for Long Duration | AUTHORITY | 13/05/2025 |
| Neelanjana Panda vs Royaume Estates Private Limited | I want permission to stop paying EMI | AUTHORITY | 11/03/2024 |
| MS ARTI PANJA & ANOTHER vs M/S.ROYAUME ESTATES PVT LTD | We are looking for full refund with interest amount and other compensation. Till now we paid approx. 27Lacs | AUTHORITY | 05/12/2024 |
| Vikash Kumar Pandey vs Royaume Builders and Promoters Private Limited | I seek to get my money ( around 18.5 lakh ) back from the builder, which I have paid them . It's my hard-earned money I have put in, and due to this, I am unable to buy a house in Bangalore. | AUTHORITY | 01/07/2024 |
⚠ Matched by PROJECT NAME (the orders register carries no registration number) — confirm the respondent above is this project's builder before relying on it.
Complaints on this project's K-RERA page (5 complaints listed against this promoter)
| Complaint | Subject (as filed) | Project | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| CMP/200117/0005246 17-01-2020 | KINDLY HELP GETTING MY CANCELLATION MONEY BACK from Skylark Royamue | Skylark Royaume | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH5 |
| CMP/220215/0009008 15-02-2022 | Breach of Agreement as delivery date expired | Skylark Royaume | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH5 |
| CMP/220531/0009552 31-05-2022 | Delay in project and no sign of completing it in another 2 years and not receiving penalty as per RERA agreement | Skylark Royaume | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH5 |
| CMP/220601/0009567 01-06-2022 | No Progress in Project Construction | Skylark Royaume | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH5 |
| CMP/221227/0010538 27-12-2022 | Stalled project No delivery date insight | Skylark Royaume | DISPOSED AUTHORITY FULLBENCH |
Listed on the project's own K-RERA detail page (registration-exact source). Rows on the promoter's other projects are track-record context — read the subject text, it is the complainant's own filed wording.
Statutory approval status
RERA filingClean approvals profile: every applicable statutory NOC is on file — including Fire NOC, environmental clearance and pollution-control clearance (KSPCB), the clearances buyers most often find still pending. Nothing is outstanding among the statutory NOCs — which compliance documents are filed versus still under process is a separate matter, covered in Litigation & compliance above. Since these are developer-filed portal statuses, have your lawyer confirm them against the linked NOC copies.
3 further authority slots are marked not applicable by the regulator.
| Authority / NOC | Status | Date | File |
|---|---|---|---|
| Water supply and sewage board | Approved | 24-08-2016 | BWSSB NOC 240816.pdf |
| KSPCB- PCB (10 Acres to 125 Acres) | Approved | 05-10-2016 | KSPCB 051016.pdf |
| KSPCB- MOEF (Above 50 Acres) | Approved | 24-06-2016 | MOEF 240616.pdf |
| KPTCL- BESCOM | Approved | 31-05-2021 | BESCOM 310521.pdf |
| Fire and Safety | Approved | 21-03-2016 | Fire NOC210316.pdf |
| Airport Authority of India | Approved | 03-12-2021 | AAI renewal 031221.pdf |
| BSNL/Telecommunication Department | Approved | 19-02-2016 | BSNL 190216.pdf |
Financials & Construction Progress
Financial disclosures
RERA filingLatest quarterly filing (2025-Q3): ₹11.02 Cr collected from buyers, ₹0.00 Cr withdrawn from the project's escrow account.
| Construction progress | 40% → 40% (+0 pts) |
| Units sold/booked as registered | 250/729 (34%) |
| Buyer collections in available QPRs | ₹11.02 Cr |
- The builder has drawn 0.00x of buyer collections from escrow (about 0% of the ₹11 Cr collected) — money is largely staying in the regulated escrow account rather than being pulled out ahead of spend, which is the safer direction. A ratio near or above 1.0 would be the one to scrutinise.
QPR figures are developer-filed quarterly disclosures. Collections and withdrawals are not a project valuation; they are a sanity check for whether sales, construction progress, and escrow draws appear directionally aligned.
Declared construction cost ÷ registered units averages to ₹46.8 lakhs per unit — the developer's own declared construction/development cost, not a sale price. K-RERA filings don't disclose what the builder is charging, so this can't tell you whether you're getting a fair deal — only you comparing your quoted price against comparable listings nearby can answer that.
RERA 70% project account is on file: HDFC Richmond (IFSC HDFC0000523, a/c …3830). RERA requires 70% of buyer collections to sit in this separate, project-specific account, drawn only against certified construction milestones — confirm your payments are made to THIS account (not a general builder account) and that it appears on your allotment letter.
Location & Connectivity
The nearest major job hub is ~2 km away — walking/short-hop distance to a major employment hub — a genuine work-near-home location.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| Electronic City | 2 km |
| Bellandur–Marathahalli belt | 8 km |
| MG Road / city centre | 14 km |
| Whitefield IT hub | 15 km |
| Outer Ring Road / Manyata | 20 km |
| Kempegowda Int'l Airport | 37 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.