THE Greens Phase I
K-RERA · the public record
THE GREENS PHASE II
Anekal · Sanchaya Land And Estate
Know the project.
Then choose your home.
The registration, progress and filed details in one place. Go further with an independent reading of the project’s evidence.
31 Mar 2016declared completionK-RERA registration · read 20 Sep 2026
513registered unitsK-RERA registration · read 20 Sep 2026
The record · free to read
Registration read 20 Sep 2026Progress & dates
The timeline on file.
Available record
No construction trend to plot.
The records used for this page do not supply a series of construction percentages. This does not establish whether possession has been given.
declared completion
31 Mar 2016
The registered date and a construction update answer different questions. Neither is a confirmation of possession.
K-RERA registration · read 20 Sep 2026
Inventory & scale
What this registration contains.
Filed categories, unchanged · K-RERA registration · read 20 Sep 2026
The whole registration
5.1registered acres
99.9registered units per acre
The average covers the registered land and all registered unit types. It does not describe the space, outlook or surroundings of an individual home.
From another project · Prestige Park Grove
A larger advertised area. Almost the same carpet area.
In Tower 14, E4 has 141 sq ft more saleable area than E2. Its carpet area is only 0.46 sq m larger. The report puts the two layouts side by side.
This illustrates the report format. These findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the sample report ↗
The source record
The details behind the headline.
K-RERA · PRM/KA/RERA/1251/308/PR/171014/000599
This project, on the record
The comparable facts of this project, from its own RERA registration record. Each context percentile names its exact comparison set, drawn from Quietlist’s full register store. The paid report adds drawing-read rows to this same table — what the filed plans show about the site, its edges and the unit layouts.
On the register
Declared completion31 March 2016
Land area20,777 sq m (5.1 acres)
Homes registered513
Tower/wing entries6
In context
Density99.9 homes per acre
Density in context80th percentile of 471 Anekal projects (median 75.8)
Values as crawled from the official K-RERA record; context percentiles name their comparison population.
Official Registry Facts
Official project scale
RERA filingRegistration-form facts from the K-RERA detail page: use these to sanity-check the builder brochure, parking allotment, and sanctioned-plan references before relying on plan-extracted approximations.
| Disclosure | Official value | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Registered units | 513 | Total inventory registered with K-RERA. |
| Registered land area | 20,777 sqm | The land area attached to this K-RERA registration. |
| Sanctioned FAR/FSI | 2.21 | Higher FAR generally means a denser vertical build, subject to site layout and open-space design. |
| Registered tower/wing entries | 6 | Official tower/wing count in the K-RERA detail page. |
| Parking total (reconciled) | 504 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Open-parking field | 150 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Garage field | 0 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Project start date | 17-06-2014 |
Official inventory & towers
RERA filingK-RERA registration tables showing the project mix and tower/wing scale. Use this to sanity-check sales claims such as "only large homes", "low density", or "plenty of parking" against the filed inventory.
Registered tower / wing summary
| Tower/wing | Floors | Units | Parking | Height |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OAK BLOCK TOWER A | 9 | 90 | 90 | - |
| OAK BLOCK TOWER B | 9 | 90 | 90 | - |
| OAK BLOCK TOWER C | 9 | 90 | 90 | - |
| OAK BLOCK TOWER D | 9 | 90 | 90 | - |
| OAK BLOCK TOWER E | 9 | 90 | 90 | - |
| CEDAR | 9 | 63 | 54 | - |
Official unit register
RERA filingK-RERA detail-page flat rows: exact unit numbers, official carpet area, UDS, and parking lots. 495 official flat/unit rows vs 513 registered units disclosed above; ask why the row count differs. Use this as a checklist against the specific flat number in your cost sheet and draft agreement.
By unit type
| Unit type | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3BHK | 351 | 79.6-87.9 sqm | 31.2-33.4 sqm | 351 |
| 2BHK | 144 | 40.5-58.1 sqm | 23.9-34.2 sqm | 144 |
By tower / wing
| Tower/wing | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OAK BLOCK TOWER A | 90 | 79.6 sqm | 31.2 sqm | 90 |
| OAK BLOCK TOWER B | 90 | 79.6 sqm | 31.2 sqm | 90 |
| OAK BLOCK TOWER D | 90 | 87.9 sqm | 33.4 sqm | 90 |
| OAK BLOCK TOWER C | 81 | 58.1 sqm | 23.9 sqm | 81 |
| OAK BLOCK TOWER E | 81 | 79.6 sqm | 31.2 sqm | 81 |
| CEDAR | 63 | 40.5-55.4 sqm | 25.1-34.2 sqm | 63 |
Show sample official unit rows
| Unit | Tower | Floor | Type | Carpet | UDS | Parking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | OAK BLOCK TOWER A | 1 | 3BHK | 79.6 sqm | 31.2 sqm | 1 |
| 2 | OAK BLOCK TOWER A | 1 | 3BHK | 79.6 sqm | 31.2 sqm | 1 |
| 3 | OAK BLOCK TOWER A | 1 | 3BHK | 79.6 sqm | 31.2 sqm | 1 |
| 4 | OAK BLOCK TOWER A | 1 | 3BHK | 79.6 sqm | 31.2 sqm | 1 |
| 5 | OAK BLOCK TOWER A | 1 | 3BHK | 79.6 sqm | 31.2 sqm | 1 |
| 6 | OAK BLOCK TOWER A | 1 | 3BHK | 79.6 sqm | 31.2 sqm | 1 |
Legal, Approvals & Project Team
Litigation & compliance
RERA filingNo litigation declared on this project's K-RERA filing.
All 15 standard compliance document slots have usable uploaded filings.
No completion certificate (OC) on file yet — project has not been declared complete.
⚠ Registration validity has lapsed: originally due 31 Mar 2016, extended (an extension) to 31 Mar 2017 — both dates have passed with no OC on file. An extension application filed on 07 May 2024 is pending with K-RERA — until it is approved, the registration stands lapsed.
Named utility/regulatory approvals
Electricity (BESCOM/ESCOM)✓ On file (All NOCs from Authority)
Water & sewage (BWSSB/KWSSB)✓ On file (All NOCs from Authority)
Fire NOC✓ On file (All NOCs from Authority)
Pollution control (KSPCB)✓ On file (All NOCs from Authority)
Environmental clearance✓ On file (All NOCs from Authority)
Airport Authority height clearance✓ On file (All NOCs from Authority)
"Not found in catalog" can mean the approval genuinely isn't on file yet, or that it doesn't apply to this project (K-RERA doesn't tell us which). Ask the builder directly for any marked not found before relying on it.
K-RERA enforcement record (the regulator's own defaulter list & penalty orders)
⚠ Listed on K-RERA's official DEFAULTER list.
K-RERA complaint orders (27 complaints against a project of this name on K-RERA's orders register)
| Parties | Relief sought | Disposal | Order date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Vincent Fernandes vs THE GREENS PHASE II | Total amount paid for the flat is 24,88,594 till date. Requesting the builder to pay the Interest on the payments as compensation for delay in handing over the property. | AUTHORITY | 27/10/2022 |
| SUDHAKAR DAVULURI vs THE GREEN PHASE 2 | FULL Complaint uploaded online with supporting doc | AUTHORITY | 27/07/2022 |
| KULDIP KOKERI vs THE GREENS PHASE II | Refund of paid Amount with interest | AUTHORITY | 27/07/2022 |
| Bibhuti Bhushan Jha vs THE GREENS PHASE II | As per the brief above and attached Form O | AUTHORITY | 27/07/2022 |
| Anandoth Mohan vs Sanchaya Land And Estate Pvt Ltd | Refund of amount paid Rs.30,81,222 ( Rs.30 lakhs 81 thousand and twenty two) with interest accrued. All persons involved in this fraud to be punished under the law. | AUTHORITY | 20/10/2022 |
| Shivanand S Dhupad and Dr Vijaya Shivanand vs Sanchaya Land And Estate Pvt Ltd | Exit from the Project and Refund the whole amount | AUTHORITY | 18/10/2022 |
| Dayanand Madhu shetty vs Sanchaya Land And Estate Pvt Ltd | To order for registration of the flat by accepting the balance payment or refund of the amounts paid along with cost | AUTHORITY | 18/10/2022 |
| S RAMESH vs Sanchaya Land And Estate Pvt Ltd | Hence for the brief facts mentioned above we are seeking for following Reliefs and Prayer before Hon'ble RERA K, Adjudicating Officer | AUTHORITY | 18/05/2022 |
| Anush Kumar Bulusu vs Sanchaya Land And Estate Pvt Ltd | As Mentioned in the Complaint form. | AUTHORITY | 18/03/2025 |
| AJIT KUMAR PATHAK vs Sanchaya Land And Estate Pvt Ltd | The Applicants are seeking refund along with intetrest for purchase of Flat No. 104, Cedar Block, in Phase 2A and 2B, as follows: Rs 3,00,000/- (Rupees Three Lakh Only). | AUTHORITY | 18/03/2025 |
| Mohan Nagayya Shetty vs Sanchaya Land And Estate Pvt Ltd | Refund with interest for delivery date expiry | AUTHORITY | 18/03/2025 |
| Francis Pradeep Fernandes vs THE GREENS PHASE II | RERA's help is required to get the refund of the cancelled booking from 26th December, 2019 | AUTHORITY | 16/11/2022 |
| Shobha Thondiathara Rajappan vs THE GREENS PHASE II | Full refund of booking amount with delayed interests & other charges. | AUTHORITY | 16/11/2022 |
| S SUGANTHA vs SANCHAYA LAND AND ESTATE PVT LTD | Hence for the brief facts mentioned above we are seeking for following Reliefs and Prayer before Honourable RERAK Adjudicating Officer. | AUTHORITY | 14/07/2022 |
| RAJESH S T vs SANCHAYA LAND AND ESTATE PVT LTD | Kindly seeking Hon’ble RERA K, Adjudicating Officer for Flat Completion, Handover & Compensations. | AUTHORITY | 13/07/2022 |
| RISHAB SAHAY vs SANCHAYA LAND AND ESTATE PVT LTD | Hence for the brief facts mentioned above we are seeking for following reliefs and prayer hon,ble RERA K, Adjudicating officer | AUTHORITY | 13/07/2022 |
| SUUNIL TIKAMDAS DATWANI vs SANCHAYA LAND AND ESTATE PVT LTD., | Exit & Refund of the full Amount Paid along with the Interest, legal costs and such other relief as the Hon'ble Authority may deem fit in the interest of justuce. | AUTHORITY | 13/02/2025 |
| KAUSAR ABDUL KADIR KHAN vs SANCHAYA LAND AND ESTATE PVT LTD., | Kindly help us in returning our booking amount. All the necessary details of booking are attached. | AUTHORITY | 13/02/2025 |
| VANDANA VISHWANATH SHENOY vs SANCHAYA LAND AND ESTATE PVT LTD., | Exit & Refund of the amount paid, Legal Costs & such other relief as deemed fit by the Hon'ble Authority in the interest of justice. | AUTHORITY | 13/02/2025 |
| SRIKANTH H P & H S SURYAPRAKASH MURTHY vs SANCHAYA LAND AND ESTATE PVT LTD., | Return of sum paid of 19 Lakhs with interest (~18%) to a 9 year term as per recurring deposit transaction | AUTHORITY | 13/02/2025 |
| ABHIKARSHA DEBNATH & BIPASHA DEBNATH vs SANCHAYA LAND AND ESTATE PVT LTD., | 1. Need the full refund of what has been paid to the builder. 2. PRE EMI amount that was promised Builder and also is in Agreement. 3. Penalty for not completing in time along with bank interest | AUTHORITY | 13/02/2025 |
| MOHAN SHETTY vs SANCHAYA LAND AND ESTATE PVT LTD., | Refund of booking amount of Rs.11,34,591 + interest and compensation | AUTHORITY | 13/02/2025 |
| GIDUTHURI VARA LAKSHMI vs SANCHAYA LAND AND ESTATE PVT LTD., | Project Stalled - Builder absconding - Appeal for Money Refund | AUTHORITY | 13/02/2025 |
| Sundareshwar Jayachandran vs SANCHAYA LAND AND ESTATE PVT LTD | As per brief facts mentioned above and detailed complaint attached, I seek for reliefs and pray before Hon'ble RERA-K and Adjudicating officer as stated in section 5 of Form O uploaded. | AUTHORITY | 10/10/2022 |
| Vishal Dubey vs SANCHAYA LAND AND ESTATE PVT LTD | Full Refund of Amount paid along with Pre-EMI, Delayed compensation and Loss of interest OR Immesiate delivery of Flat post adjusting Pre-EMI, Delay compensation and Los of Interest | AUTHORITY | 06/07/2022 |
| V Rajagopalan vs SANCHAYA LAND AND ESTATE PVT LTD | Direct the respondent to handover the project, revoke the unilateral and illegal cancellation of our booking, refund of Pre EMI paid for Rs192661 with interest at 12%, continue pre EMI Payment etc | AUTHORITY | 06/07/2022 |
| ANIL FERNANDES & ANITA FERNANDES vs SANCHAYA LAND AND ESTATE PVT LTD., | REFUND OF FULL AMOUNT PAID ALONG WITH INTEREST | AUTHORITY | 01/03/2025 |
⚠ Matched by PROJECT NAME (the orders register carries no registration number) — confirm the respondent above is this project's builder before relying on it.
Complaints on this project's K-RERA page (135 complaints listed against this promoter)
| Complaint | Subject (as filed) | Project | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| CMP/190227/0002312 27-02-2019 | Complaint under Section 31 RERA Act r/w Rule 29 and 30 Karnataka RERA Rules for Refund of Invested Amount | THE GREENS PHASE I (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY FULLBENCH |
| CMP/190307/0002380 07-03-2019 | Return of amount and Compensation | THE GREENS PHASE II | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190321/0002364 21-03-2019 | THE COMPLAINT UNDER SECTION 31 OF R. E. (R.&D.) ACT, 2016 | skyview (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY FULLBENCH |
| CMP/190522/0002133 22-05-2019 | Complaint u/s 31 of the RERA Act | skyview (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190522/0002152 22-05-2019 | Variation in Sale Price | skyview (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190522/0002363 22-05-2019 | Direct the Promoter to sell the Apartment at rate as advertised | skyview (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190727/0003733 27-07-2019 | Non delivery of apartment | THE GREENS PHASE II | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190728/0003735 28-07-2019 | NON DELIVERY OF APARTMENT, NON PAYMENT OF PRE-EMI, DELAYED COMPENSATION,INTEREST REFUND, DAMAGE FOR MENTAL AGONY AND UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES | THE GREENS PHASE I (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
Listed on the project's own K-RERA detail page (registration-exact source). Rows on the promoter's other projects are track-record context — read the subject text, it is the complainant's own filed wording.
Project team & certifications
RERA filingK-RERA names 3 project professional/vendor rows across Architect, Contractor, Structural engineer. Use this to cross-check whose certificates, drawings, and contractor commitments support the filing; final reliance still belongs with your lawyer/technical reviewer.
| Role | Name | Registration / licence | Since | Locality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Architect | MUNIRATHNAMMA | - | 1998 | parvati nagar, laggere |
| Contractor | M/S Vishwas Constructions | - | 2009 | HSR Layout, 7th Sector |
| Structural engineer | KK Mohan | - | - | - |
Builder track record
RERA filingSanchaya Land has 2 other K-RERA-registered projects in our records. 2 are past their declared completion deadline with no completion certificate recorded — but because K-RERA publishes OCs inconsistently, a project that has actually been finished and handed over still shows up this way, so this overstates real delays, especially for a high-volume established builder. That is a higher delayed rate than the K-RERA average across Bengaluru on the same measure.
Read this as a list to spot-check for a pattern of genuinely stalled projects, not as a delay rate — pull up a few of the builder’s other K-RERA registrations and check whether they’ve actually been delivered.
Financials & Construction Progress
Financial disclosures
RERA filing⚠ No quarterly financial disclosures (collections, escrow withdrawals) on record, despite no completion certificate yet — meaning we can't verify the project's cashflows against its construction progress. Worth asking the builder directly why no quarterly filings are available.
Declared construction cost ÷ registered units averages to ₹20.1 lakhs per unit — the developer's own declared construction/development cost, not a sale price. K-RERA filings don't disclose what the builder is charging, so this can't tell you whether you're getting a fair deal — only you comparing your quoted price against comparable listings nearby can answer that.
RERA 70% project account is on file: Axis Bank RT Nagar (IFSC UTIB0000363, a/c …0050). RERA requires 70% of buyer collections to sit in this separate, project-specific account, drawn only against certified construction milestones — confirm your payments are made to THIS account (not a general builder account) and that it appears on your allotment letter.
Construction photo filings
RERA filingK-RERA has 1 project-photo upload.
These are developer-uploaded progress photos in the official document catalog. We do not treat them as proof of current site condition; use them as a prompt to ask for newer dated photos or a site visit. Individual filings are listed in the document catalog below.
Location & Connectivity
The nearest major job hub is ~5 km away — a manageable everyday commute to a major job hub.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| Bellandur–Marathahalli belt | 5 km |
| Electronic City | 6 km |
| Whitefield IT hub | 11 km |
| MG Road / city centre | 12 km |
| Outer Ring Road / Manyata | 18 km |
| Kempegowda Int'l Airport | 34 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.