Avantikaa
K-RERA · the public record
THE WATERGROVE
Anekal · S2 HOMES
Know the project.
Then choose your home.
The registration, progress and filed details in one place. Go further with an independent reading of the project’s evidence.
31 Jan 2020declared completionK-RERA registration · read 20 Sep 2026
98registered unitsK-RERA registration · read 20 Sep 2026
The record · free to read
Registration read 20 Sep 2026Progress & dates
The timeline on file.
Available record
No construction trend to plot.
The records used for this page do not supply a series of construction percentages. This does not establish whether possession has been given.
declared completion
31 Jan 2020
The registered date and a construction update answer different questions. Neither is a confirmation of possession.
K-RERA registration · read 20 Sep 2026
Inventory & scale
What this registration contains.
APARTMENT
36
Filed categories, unchanged · K-RERA registration · read 20 Sep 2026
The whole registration
1.5registered acres
64.3registered units per acre
The average covers the registered land and all registered unit types. It does not describe the space, outlook or surroundings of an individual home.
From another project · Prestige Park Grove
A larger advertised area. Almost the same carpet area.
In Tower 14, E4 has 141 sq ft more saleable area than E2. Its carpet area is only 0.46 sq m larger. The report puts the two layouts side by side.
This illustrates the report format. These findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the sample report ↗
The source record
The details behind the headline.
K-RERA · PRM/KA/RERA/1251/308/PR/180222/001666
This project, on the record
The comparable facts of this project, from its own RERA registration record. Each context percentile names its exact comparison set, drawn from Quietlist’s full register store. The paid report adds drawing-read rows to this same table — what the filed plans show about the site, its edges and the unit layouts.
On the register
Declared completion31 January 2020
Land area6,171 sq m (1.5 acres)
Homes registered98
Tower/wing entries4
Unit mix36 × APARTMENT
In context
Density64.3 homes per acre
Density in context33rd percentile of 471 Anekal projects (median 75.8)
Values as crawled from the official K-RERA record; context percentiles name their comparison population.
Official Registry Facts
Official project scale
RERA filingRegistration-form facts from the K-RERA detail page: use these to sanity-check the builder brochure, parking allotment, and sanctioned-plan references before relying on plan-extracted approximations.
| Disclosure | Official value | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Registered units | 98 | Total inventory registered with K-RERA. |
| Official carpet area | 4,979 sqm | Regulator-disclosed project-level carpet area, not vision-derived room sums. |
| Registered land area | 6,171 sqm | The land area attached to this K-RERA registration. |
| Sanctioned FAR/FSI | 1.73 | Higher FAR generally means a denser vertical build, subject to site layout and open-space design. |
| Registered tower/wing entries | 4 | Official tower/wing count in the K-RERA detail page. |
| Parking total (reconciled) | 105 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Open-parking field | 0 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Garage field | 0 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Project start date | 01-01-2016 |
Official inventory & towers
RERA filingK-RERA registration tables showing the project mix and tower/wing scale. Use this to sanity-check sales claims such as "only large homes", "low density", or "plenty of parking" against the filed inventory.
Registered inventory mix
| Type | Units | Share | Official carpet area |
|---|---|---|---|
| APARTMENT | 36 | 100% | 4,979 sqm |
Registered tower / wing summary
| Tower/wing | Floors | Units | Parking | Height |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | 10 | 20 | - |
| 2 | 4 | 16 | 20 | - |
| 3 | 4 | 36 | 20 | - |
| 4 | 4 | 36 | 45 | - |
Official unit register
RERA filingK-RERA detail-page flat rows: exact unit numbers, official carpet area, UDS, and parking lots. 98 official flat/unit rows, matching the 98 registered units disclosed above. Use this as a checklist against the specific flat number in your cost sheet and draft agreement.
By unit type
| Unit type | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3BHK | 52 | 1.0-12.0 sqm | 3.0-4.0 sqm | 56 |
| 2BHK | 36 | 1.0 sqm | 4.0 sqm | 36 |
| DUPLEX | 10 | 23.0 sqm | 22.0 sqm | 20 |
By tower / wing
| Tower/wing | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3 | 36 | 1.0 sqm | 4.0 sqm | 36 |
| 4 | 36 | 1.0 sqm | 4.0 sqm | 36 |
| 2 | 16 | 12.0 sqm | 3.0 sqm | 20 |
| 1 | 10 | 23.0 sqm | 22.0 sqm | 20 |
Show sample official unit rows
| Unit | Tower | Floor | Type | Carpet | UDS | Parking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | 1 | DUPLEX | 23.0 sqm | 22.0 sqm | 2 |
| 2 | 1 | 1 | DUPLEX | 23.0 sqm | 22.0 sqm | 2 |
| 3 | 1 | 1 | DUPLEX | 23.0 sqm | 22.0 sqm | 2 |
| 4 | 1 | 1 | DUPLEX | 23.0 sqm | 22.0 sqm | 2 |
| 5 | 1 | 1 | DUPLEX | 23.0 sqm | 22.0 sqm | 2 |
| 6 | 1 | 3 | DUPLEX | 23.0 sqm | 22.0 sqm | 2 |
Legal, Approvals & Project Team
Litigation & compliance
RERA filingNo litigation declared on this project's K-RERA filing.
All 15 standard compliance document slots have usable uploaded filings.
No completion certificate (OC) on file yet — project has not been declared complete.
⚠ Registration validity has lapsed: originally due 31 Jan 2020, extended (Extension) to 15 Nov 2023 — both dates have passed with no OC on file. The extension on file was granted on 20 Jun 2022 (K-RERA extension no. EX/PRM/KA/RERA/1251/308/PR/220620/001666) — it has been used, its deadline has also passed, and no further extension is recorded.
Named utility/regulatory approvals
Electricity (BESCOM/ESCOM)✓ On file (All NOCs from Authority)
Water & sewage (BWSSB/KWSSB)✓ On file (All NOCs from Authority)
Fire NOC✓ On file (All NOCs from Authority)
Pollution control (KSPCB)✓ On file (All NOCs from Authority)
Environmental clearance✓ On file (All NOCs from Authority)
Airport Authority height clearance✓ On file (All NOCs from Authority)
"Not found in catalog" can mean the approval genuinely isn't on file yet, or that it doesn't apply to this project (K-RERA doesn't tell us which). Ask the builder directly for any marked not found before relying on it.
K-RERA enforcement record (the regulator's own defaulter list & penalty orders)
⚠ Listed on K-RERA's official DEFAULTER list.
1 K-RERA order on this project (PROJECT EXTENSION) — read the order copies on the K-RERA portal.
K-RERA complaint orders (15 complaints against a project of this name on K-RERA's orders register)
| Parties | Relief sought | Disposal | Order date |
|---|---|---|---|
| MR P K CHAKKARAVARTHY & ANOTHER vs M/S S2 HOMES & OTHERS | direct the Respondent to pay Delay Compensation for having failed to handover the possession of the flat as agreed by them under the Sale Agreement dated 10.05.2019 | AUTHORITY | 20/12/2023 |
| Masowon Hongray vs S2 HOMES | Ensure completion of the project within one month and compensate for delay, or refund the agreement amount with compensation. | AUTHORITY | 20/02/2026 |
| Suhas Dwarakanath vs S2 HOMES | Ensure completion of the project within one month and pay interest on delay period, or refund the agreement amount with compensation | AUTHORITY | 06/09/2024 |
| Chihomi Hongray vs S2 HOMES | Refund of Rs. 29,89,333 as agreed after cancelling the agreement. | AUTHORITY | 06/05/2026 |
| PAUL NOEL VINCENT vs S2 HOMES & OTHERS | Ensure completion of the project within one month and compensate for delay, or refund the agreement amount with compensation. | AUTHORITY | 04/02/2025 |
| Ramapally Pradeep vs S2 HOMES & OTHERS | Ensure completion of the project within one month and compensate for delay, or refund the agreement amount with compensation. | AUTHORITY | 04/02/2025 |
| D VIKRAM CHOWDARY & D BHANU vs S2 HOMES & OTHERS | Ensure completion of the project within one month and compensate for delay, or refund the agreement amount with compensation. | AUTHORITY | 04/02/2025 |
| Venkatesh Padarti vs S2 HOMES & OTHERS | Ensure completion of the project within one month and compensate for delay, or refund the agreement amount with compensation. | AUTHORITY | 04/02/2025 |
| CHINMOY BHATTACHARYA vs S2 HOMES & OTHERS | Ensure completion of the project within one month and compensate for delay, or refund the agreement amount with compensation. | AUTHORITY | 04/02/2025 |
| Jijesh K vs S2 HOMES & OTHERS | Ensure completion of the project within one month and compensate for delay, or refund the agreement amount with compensation. | AUTHORITY | 04/02/2025 |
| PRATEEK SRIVASTAVA vs S2 HOMES & OTHERS | Ensure completion of the project within one month and compensate for delay, or refund the agreement amount with compensation. | AUTHORITY | 04/02/2025 |
| ABHINEET RAJ & NAVNEET RAJ vs S2 HOMES & OTHERS | Ensure completion of the project within one month and compensate for delay, or refund the agreement amount with compensation. | AUTHORITY | 04/02/2025 |
| MADDELA KAMALAKAR & RONITA MONDAL vs S2 HOMES & OTHERS | Ensure completion of the project within one month and compensate for delay, or refund the agreement amount with compensation | AUTHORITY | 04/02/2025 |
| Aneesh Biswas & another vs S2 HOMES & Others | Ensure completion of the project within one month and compensate for delay, or refund the agreement amount with compensation. | AUTHORITY | 04/02/2025 |
| Menaka Singri vs S2 HOMES & OTHERS | Ensure completion of the project within one month and provide interest on the period delayed as per RERA guidelines | AUTHORITY | 04/02/2025 |
⚠ Matched by PROJECT NAME (the orders register carries no registration number) — confirm the respondent above is this project's builder before relying on it.
Complaints on this project's K-RERA page (2 complaints listed against this promoter)
| Complaint | Subject (as filed) | Project | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| CMP/200915/0006589 15-09-2020 | Breach of agreement and delay in delivery | THE WATERGROVE | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/221010/0010073 10-10-2022 | COMPENSATION FOR DELAY IN GIVING POSSESSION | THE WATERGROVE | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4 |
Listed on the project's own K-RERA detail page (registration-exact source). Rows on the promoter's other projects are track-record context — read the subject text, it is the complainant's own filed wording.
Builder track record
RERA filingS2 Homes has 3 other K-RERA-registered projects in our records. 3 are past their declared completion deadline with no completion certificate recorded — but because K-RERA publishes OCs inconsistently, a project that has actually been finished and handed over still shows up this way, so this overstates real delays, especially for a high-volume established builder. That is a higher delayed rate than the K-RERA average across Bengaluru on the same measure.
Read this as a list to spot-check for a pattern of genuinely stalled projects, not as a delay rate — pull up a few of the builder’s other K-RERA registrations and check whether they’ve actually been delivered.
Financials & Construction Progress
Financial disclosures
RERA filing⚠ No quarterly financial disclosures (collections, escrow withdrawals) on record, despite no completion certificate yet — meaning we can't verify the project's cashflows against its construction progress. Worth asking the builder directly why no quarterly filings are available.
Declared construction cost ÷ registered units averages to ₹14.9 lakhs per unit — the developer's own declared construction/development cost, not a sale price. K-RERA filings don't disclose what the builder is charging, so this can't tell you whether you're getting a fair deal — only you comparing your quoted price against comparable listings nearby can answer that.
RERA 70% project account is on file: Axis Bank KARTHIK NAGAR (IFSC UTIB0002766, a/c …5508). RERA requires 70% of buyer collections to sit in this separate, project-specific account, drawn only against certified construction milestones — confirm your payments are made to THIS account (not a general builder account) and that it appears on your allotment letter.
Construction photo filings
RERA filingK-RERA has 1 project-photo upload.
These are developer-uploaded progress photos in the official document catalog. We do not treat them as proof of current site condition; use them as a prompt to ask for newer dated photos or a site visit. Individual filings are listed in the document catalog below.
Location & Connectivity
The nearest major job hub is ~4 km away — walking/short-hop distance to a major employment hub — a genuine work-near-home location.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| Electronic City | 4 km |
| Bellandur–Marathahalli belt | 11 km |
| Whitefield IT hub | 17 km |
| MG Road / city centre | 18 km |
| Outer Ring Road / Manyata | 25 km |
| Kempegowda Int'l Airport | 41 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.