Shubh Elanza
MahaRERA Property Intelligence · Mumbai Suburban
P51800008680 · Vikhroli East · promoter Geetai Developers Private
| MahaRERA registration | P51800008680 |
| Registered on | 19 Aug 2017 |
| Promoter-declared completion | 31 Dec 2026 |
| Current status | Certificate Signed |
| Against today | 5 months to the declared date |
MahaRERA's own defaulter/deregistration lists and the project's quarterly-progress-report filing — the regulator's view of whether this project is in good standing.
Across MahaRERA, Geetai Developers Private is the promoter of record on 9 projects, of which none currently carry a MahaRERA regulator flag (insolvency, deregistration, completion-lapse or QPR default). Read the pattern across the portfolio, not just this project's brochure — matched on the promoter name in the MahaRERA register.
The buildings and wings registered under this project, with each tower's sanctioned height and declared completion date. Here the tallest tower rises to G+25.
| Building | Wings | Floors | Declared completion |
|---|---|---|---|
| A Wing and B Wing | 1 | G+21 | - |
| C Wing and D Wing | 1 | G+25 | - |
31 complaints are on the MahaRERA record for this project, with orders passed in 31. An adjudicated complaint is the clearest evidence of how this promoter behaves when pushed — read the orders in full.
| Complaint no. | Filed | Parties | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| CC006000000001103 | 15/03/2019 | Nitin Deepak Nimbalkar vs Yogesh Jadhav & Vinayak Gawde | order passed |
| CC006000000012483 | 06/05/2018 | Kiran Dhamapurkar vs Yogesh Balakrishna Jadhav | order passed |
| CC006000000000361 | 06/09/2017 | Sanjay Chintala vs Yogesh Jadhav | order passed |
| CC006000000012037 | 20/11/2017 | Sanjay chintala vs Yogesh Balkrishna Jadhav | order passed |
| CC006000000198920 | 02/11/2021 | Sanjay Chintala vs Geetai Developer Pvt Ltd | order passed |
| CC006000000000572 | 14/09/2017 | Virendra Ashok Pandare vs Yogesh Jadhav | order passed |
| CC006000000001967 | 25/11/2017 | Smita Duraphe vs Geetai Developers Private Limited | order passed |
| CC006000000012475 | 16/01/2018 | santosh jayram pawar vs M/s Geetai Developers Pvt Ltd | order passed |
| CC006000000012610 | 25/12/2017 | Pranali Devendra Mahajan vs Geetai Developers Private Limited | order passed |
| CC006000000012799 | 14/02/2018 | Jacintha Pates vs Geetai Developers Pvt Ltd | order passed |
| CC006000000012805 | 09/01/2018 | RAVINDRA D. CHAVAN vs GEETAI DEVELOPERS PVT LTD | order passed |
| CC006000000068151 | 22/02/2019 | Pravin Tukaram Metangale vs Geetai Developers Pvt. Ltd. | order passed |
| CC006000000210568 | 28/03/2022 | Pravin Tukaram Metangale vs Geetai Developers Pvt. Ltd. | order passed |
| CC006000000023228 | 23/04/2019 | Sunil Shantaram Lidkar vs Geetai Developers Private Limited | order passed |
| CC006000000023680 | 10/03/2018 | Santosh Vaidya and Seema Santosh Vaidya vs Yogesh Jadhav & Vinayak Gawde ,Geetai Developer pvt ltd | order passed |
| CC006000000023697 | 01/08/2018 | Shekhar Baban Thorat vs Geetai Developers Pvt. Ltd. | order passed |
| CC006000000023728 | 14/03/2018 | RANJAN KUMAR MEHER vs GEETAI DEVELOPERS PVT LTD. | order passed |
| CC006000000023967 | 01/05/2018 | SANTOSH SHANKAR KABLE vs BALKRISHNA BABAN JADHAV | order passed |
| CC006000000068142 | 19/02/2019 | Santosh pai vs Yogesh B Jadhav | order passed |
| CC006000000068149 | 19/02/2019 | Vaishali Santosh Pai vs Yogesh B. Jadhav | order passed |
| CC006000000068161 | 19/02/2019 | Mukesh D Mahashabde & Manjusha M Mahashabde vs Geetai Developers Pvt Ltd | order passed |
| CC006000000078282 | 28/02/2019 | PRAVIN THIRWANI AND JIA THIRWANI vs YOGESH B JADHAV | order passed |
| CC006000000209546 | 25/12/2021 | Vishwas Khanvilkar vs Geetai Developers | order passed |
| CC006000000210276 | 25/03/2022 | Swapnil Rajaram Deorukhkar vs Geetai Developer Pvt Ltd. | order passed |
| CC006000000210292 | 19/03/2022 | Ramchandra Laxman Kadam and Tanvi Ramchandra Kadam vs Geetai Developer Private Limited | order passed |
| CC006000000210546 | 26/03/2022 | Shailesh Joshi & Manisha Joshi vs Geetai Developers Pvt ltd | order passed |
| CC006000000221051 | 02/05/2022 | Bhakti Kalpak Suryavanshi vs Yogesh Jadhav | order passed |
| CC006000000303224 | 08/11/2022 | Hitesh Ramesh Solanki vs Geetai Developers Pvt. Ltd. | order passed |
| CC12600043 | 03/01/2026 | Geetai Developers Private Limited vs Manishkumar Bhogilal Shah | order passed |
| CC12600044 | 03/01/2026 | Geetai Developers Private Limited vs Manishkumar Bhogilal Shah | order passed |
| SM12600160 | 05/03/2026 | Bhakti Achrekar vs Geetai Developers Private Limited | order passed |
The promoter has declared 4 court cases on this project to MahaRERA. 1 is still pending. Litigation can cloud the land title or stall the build — have a lawyer pull the cause list for each and confirm whether it touches the title to your flat. This is declared by the promoter; there may be further cases not on the RERA record.
| Court | Case no. | Year | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| State Consumer Forum Mumbai | 1120, 1117, 1086, 1083, 1122, 1116, 1084, 1119, 1118, 1121, 1085, 1038, 1250, 1249, 1234, 1235 of 2016 | 2016 | For Filing Evidence |
| National Company Law Tribunal Mumbai | 201 MAH | 2017 | Pending |
| State Consumer Forum Mumbai | 146, 145 ,65, 66, 235, 346 of 2017 | 2017 | For Hearing On Ad Interim And Filing Evidence |
| State Consumer Forum Mumbai | 146, 145, 65, 66, 235 and 346 | 2017 | Ongoing |
The promoter has had the MahaRERA completion deadline formally extended 2 times. Each extension is the regulator letting the finish line move — the clearest evidence of delivery slippage, straight from the record.
| From (declared) | To (revised) | Stated reason |
|---|---|---|
| 31 Dec 2026 | 30 Jun 2024 | The reasons for delay are not intentional and detailed in the application itself and affidavit cum declaration, application letter & 110 resolution / consents taken for extension a |
| 31 Dec 2026 | 31 Dec 2026 | In accordance with circular no 28, we hereby apply for extension of our project u/s 7(3) in Format B. The project was delayed for reasons beyond our control on account of various r |
Located at Vikhroli East, Tagor Nagar Road, Andheri, Mumbai Suburban, 400083. Per the filed land record, the plot is bounded to the north by Nala, to the south by 12 mtrs DP Road, to the east by 18 mtrs DP Road and to the west by Rehab Bldg - Mhada. Confirm these against the 7/12 extract and the sanctioned plan before you rely on them.
The nearest major job hub is ~3 km away — walking/short-hop distance to a major employment hub — a genuine work-near-home location.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| Powai / Hiranandani business park | 3 km |
| Andheri MIDC / SEEPZ | 6 km |
| Chhatrapati Shivaji Int'l Airport | 8 km |
| Bandra Kurla Complex (BKC) | 9 km |
| Lower Parel / Worli business district | 17 km |
| Nariman Point / Fort | 25 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.
🔒 The verdict & buyer playbook · Compliance report
The paid report opens with the overall risk read on this MahaRERA filing, exactly what I'd do as a buyer in this project, who it suits, and the questions to put to the promoter before you commit.
🔒 Unit-by-unit guidance · Unit Guidance report
Which building/wing and unit to prefer and the sanctioned-plan read for this project — the ₹2,999 guidance layer.
🔒 Full financial records — escrow, funding & the document catalog · Compliance report
The RERA 70% designated-escrow account activity, the declared means-of-finance, the professionals of record, and every document filed with MahaRERA — the raw records the read above is built on.
Should you buy in BBJ Siena?
This page is the free MahaRERA filing summary. The full RERA Property Intelligence Report gives you the full regulatory standing, declared court litigation, buyer-complaint and adjudication history, quarterly-progress-report discipline, the builder's MahaRERA-wide track record, the building/tower breakdown, and the sanctioned layout plan. See a real one first:
Sample: Lodha Kandivali – Tower 2 → · browse all sample reports →
Compliance Report · ₹999
The regulator’s filing record, read · 1 working day
Scan with any UPI app to pay · quietlist@kotak
Unit Guidance Report · ₹2,999
Everything, down to which unit · 1 working day
Not useful to your decision? Full refund — no questions asked.
Scan with any UPI app to pay · quietlist@kotak
Paying from outside India? Pay $15 (Compliance) or $39 (Unit Guidance) via PayPal, or email hello@quietlist.in for a card invoice. Prefer to talk first, or have a portfolio to check? Same address. An information aid for your own due diligence, not legal or investment advice.
Free · Watch this project
We'll email you when this project's RERA record changes.
Flags are from MahaRERA's own published problem lists — not a claim about the developer's intent. Explore every flagged project on our Mumbai, Thane & the MMR RERA red-flag register.
Last checked against the RERA register: 27 Jul 2026