Aksa Tower
MahaRERA Property Intelligence · Mumbai Suburban
P51800011428 · Oshiwara · promoter Siroya Keystone
| MahaRERA registration | P51800011428 |
| Registered on | 31 Aug 2017 |
| Promoter-declared completion | 31 Dec 2026 |
| Current status | Certificate Signed |
| Against today | 5 months to the declared date |
MahaRERA's own defaulter/deregistration lists and the project's quarterly-progress-report filing — the regulator's view of whether this project is in good standing.
Across MahaRERA, Siroya Keystone is the promoter of record on 55 projects, of which 4 carry a MahaRERA regulator flag (insolvency, deregistration, completion-lapse or QPR default). Read the pattern across the portfolio, not just this project's brochure — matched on the promoter name in the MahaRERA register.
The buildings and wings registered under this project, with each tower's sanctioned height and declared completion date. Here the tallest tower rises to G+42.
| Building | Wings | Floors | Declared completion |
|---|---|---|---|
| LEVEL - The Residences | 1 | G+42 | - |
13 complaints are on the MahaRERA record for this project, with orders passed in 13. An adjudicated complaint is the clearest evidence of how this promoter behaves when pushed — read the orders in full.
| Complaint no. | Filed | Parties | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| CC006000000196732 | 19/04/2021 | Asha Sainani vs Siroya Keystone | order passed |
| CC006000000197784 | 28/07/2021 | Ramsevak Gulab Yadav vs M/s UNITY GROUP AND PARTNERS, BUILDERS AND DEVELOPERS | order passed |
| CC006000000198847 | 01/11/2021 | M/s. Siroya Keystone vs M/s. Touch Of Class | order passed |
| CC006000000198861 | 12/11/2021 | Rishabh P Siroya vs M/s. Touch Of Class | order passed |
| CC006000000198957 | 04/01/2022 | Rishabh Pravin Siroya vs Shakil Ahmed Khan Baig | order passed |
| CC006000000209644 | 11/01/2022 | Rishabh P Siroya vs Nitin Dhiraj Jain | order passed |
| CC006000000209725 | 18/05/2022 | Rishabh Pravin Siroya vs Sweety Suraj Jain | order passed |
| CC006000000209812 | 15/02/2022 | Rishabh Siroya vs Chandni Kamal Singh | order passed |
| CC006000000210001 | 15/02/2022 | Rishabh Siroya vs Chandni Kamal Singh | order passed |
| CC006000000199079 | 02/12/2021 | Devnarayan Feku Yadav vs Unity Group & Anr | order passed |
| CC006000000251640 | 28/06/2022 | DURGA MATA MANDIR VIRAJMAAN through SHRI RAMSEVAK GULAB YADAV vs M/s. UNITY GROUP, BUILDERS & DEVELOPERS | order passed |
| CC006000000500563 | 30/05/2024 | LINK PALACE CHS LTD (society) vs Unity Group | order passed |
| CC12503964 | 12/11/2025 | Rishabh Pravin Siroya vs Danish Mohammed Ikram Qureshi | order passed |
⚠ A co-operative housing society is the complainant here (LINK PALACE CHS LTD) and MahaRERA has already passed an order. On a redevelopment, that is the LANDOWNER society in dispute with its developer — a different order of risk from a single buyer's grievance, because it can touch the development rights, the society's consent, and ultimately the title to your flat. Have your lawyer read this order and the development agreement together before you commit.
The promoter has declared 8 court cases on this project to MahaRERA. 3 are still pending. Litigation can cloud the land title or stall the build — have a lawyer pull the cause list for each and confirm whether it touches the title to your flat. This is declared by the promoter; there may be further cases not on the RERA record.
| Court | Case no. | Year | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bombay High Court | Chamber Summon No 811/14 in SC suit no 944/11 | 2014 | Rejected |
| City Civil Court Dindoshi | S C Suit no 1408/2012 | 2012 | Pending |
| Deputy Collector Appeal Msd Bandra East | appeal from order no 30/2011 | 2011 | Dismissed |
| Bombay High Court | Misc Petition No 102/11 in testamentary petition no 814/1985 | 1985 | Dismissed |
| Sub Divisional Officer Msd Bandra | DLN/RTS/A9/2011 | 2011 | Dismissed |
| City Civil Court Dindoshi | S C Suit No 944/2011 | 2011 | Pending |
| Bombay High Court | Notice of Motion No 595/2014 in Suit no 965/2014 | 2014 | Pending |
| Bombay High Court | SUIT LD NO 4033 OF 2024 | 2024 | Appealed Is File Against The Inpunged Order |
The promoter has had the MahaRERA completion deadline formally extended 2 times. Each extension is the regulator letting the finish line move — the clearest evidence of delivery slippage, straight from the record.
| From (declared) | To (revised) | Stated reason |
|---|---|---|
| 29 Dec 2024 | 29 Dec 2024 | This extension is sought for the flats to be constructed on the floors from 32nd till 35th which the promoter has not sold to any of the purchaser till date. The Promoter undertake |
| 30 Dec 2023 | 31 Dec 2026 | Impact of Pandemic and Rising Construction Material Costs: The COVID-19 pandemic has had a profound and far-reaching impact on the construction industry, both locally and globally. |
Located at Oshiwara, New Link Road, Ward ABCD, Mumbai City, 400102. Per the filed land record, the plot is bounded to the north by 27 Meter DP Road, to the south by CTS No 270, to the east by 36 Meter DP Road and to the west by 13 Meter DP Road. Confirm these against the 7/12 extract and the sanctioned plan before you rely on them.
The nearest major job hub is ~4 km away — walking/short-hop distance to a major employment hub — a genuine work-near-home location.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| Andheri MIDC / SEEPZ | 4 km |
| Chhatrapati Shivaji Int'l Airport | 7 km |
| Powai / Hiranandani business park | 8 km |
| Bandra Kurla Complex (BKC) | 10 km |
| Lower Parel / Worli business district | 16 km |
| Nariman Point / Fort | 25 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.
🔒 The verdict & buyer playbook · Compliance report
The paid report opens with the overall risk read on this MahaRERA filing, exactly what I'd do as a buyer in this project, who it suits, and the questions to put to the promoter before you commit.
🔒 Unit-by-unit guidance · Unit Guidance report
Which building/wing and unit to prefer and the sanctioned-plan read for this project — the ₹2,999 guidance layer.
🔒 Full financial records — escrow, funding & the document catalog · Compliance report
The RERA 70% designated-escrow account activity, the declared means-of-finance, the professionals of record, and every document filed with MahaRERA — the raw records the read above is built on.
Should you buy in LEVEL - The Residences?
This page is the free MahaRERA filing summary. The full RERA Property Intelligence Report gives you the full regulatory standing, declared court litigation, buyer-complaint and adjudication history, quarterly-progress-report discipline, the builder's MahaRERA-wide track record, the building/tower breakdown, and the sanctioned layout plan. See a real one first:
Sample: Lodha Kandivali – Tower 2 → · browse all sample reports →
Compliance Report · ₹999
The regulator’s filing record, read · 1 working day
Scan with any UPI app to pay · quietlist@kotak
Unit Guidance Report · ₹2,999
Everything, down to which unit · 1 working day
Not useful to your decision? Full refund — no questions asked.
Scan with any UPI app to pay · quietlist@kotak
Paying from outside India? Pay $15 (Compliance) or $39 (Unit Guidance) via PayPal, or email hello@quietlist.in for a card invoice. Prefer to talk first, or have a portfolio to check? Same address. An information aid for your own due diligence, not legal or investment advice.
Free · Watch this project
We'll email you when this project's RERA record changes.
Flags are from MahaRERA's own published problem lists — not a claim about the developer's intent. Explore every flagged project on our Mumbai, Thane & the MMR RERA red-flag register.
Last checked against the RERA register: 27 Jul 2026