MahaRERA · the public record
Shreeji Towers
Barkat Ali Naka · NEUMEC DEVELOPER AND BUILDERS
Know the project.
Then choose your home.
The registration, progress and filed details in one place. Go further with an independent reading of the project’s evidence.
The record · free to read
Registration read 12 Jul 2026Progress & dates
The timeline on file.
Available record
No construction trend to plot.
The records used for this page do not supply a series of construction percentages. This does not establish whether possession has been given.
declared completion
30 Sep 2027
The registered date and a construction update answer different questions. Neither is a confirmation of possession.
MahaRERA registration · read 12 Jul 2026
From another project
See the report before you buy.
A published sample shows the level of detail, source illustrations and buyer reasoning. Its findings belong to that project.
Read a sample report ↗The source record
The details behind the headline.
MahaRERA · P51900012467
Delivery and registration
When is the project declared for completion?
Shreeji Towers is registered with MahaRERA as P51900012467 and the promoter has declared completion for 30 Sep 2027.
30 Sep 2027
declared completion
12months to go
against the declared date
The completion date and status as they stand on the MahaRERA registration record.
Source · MahaRERA project registration · read 12 Jul 2026
| MahaRERA registration | P51900012467 |
| Registered on | 01 Sep 2017 |
| Promoter-declared completion | 30 Sep 2027 |
| Current status | Certificate Signed |
| Against today | 12 months to the declared date |
Approvals and compliance
What compliance filings are on record?
MahaRERA's defaulter and deregistration lists and the quarterly-progress filing for Shreeji Towers record 38 quarterly progress reports since registration.
38quarterly filings
Entries as they appear on MahaRERA's own lists and the project's progress filing.
Source · MahaRERA defaulter, deregistration and QPR lists · read 12 Jul 2026
- Current QPR default — the promoter has stopped filing the mandatory quarterly progress report (FY 2025-2026).
Promoter record
What else is this promoter on record for?
Neumec Developer is the promoter of record on 10 projects registered with MahaRERA, none of which carry a MahaRERA regulator flag (insolvency, deregistration, completion lapse or QPR default).
10projects
registered with MahaRERA
0flagged
by MahaRERA
Counted across Quietlist's full MahaRERA register store, matched on the promoter name as it appears on each filing.
Source · MahaRERA register, all projects · read 12 Jul 2026
Construction
How much construction cost has been reported?
In Shreeji Towers , ₹53.22 Cr of a declared ₹56.06 Cr estimated project cost is reported as incurred, about 94.9%, as at the last certified filing with MahaRERA.
94.9%
₹53.22 Cr
of ₹56.06 Cr declared cost
Cost incurred as last certified to MahaRERA. It is a financial measure, not a survey of site work, and it can lag on-site reality between filings.
Source · MahaRERA quarterly progress filing · read 12 Jul 2026
Sales
How much has actually been sold?
In Shreeji Towers , 59 of 84 homes filed with MahaRERA are recorded as sold or booked, about 70%, and 25 remain available.
70%sold
59 of 84 homes
₹71.86 Cr
committed by buyers
Counts and agreement value as the promoter filed them at the last compliance date; this is the filed inventory, not current availability. Of that agreement value, ₹71.86 Cr (about 100%) is recorded as collected and ₹0 as receivable.
Source · MahaRERA sold/unsold inventory filing · read 12 Jul 2026
What buyers actually paid: across 59 registered agreements, the effective carpet rate is ₹20,098/sqft, with eight in ten falling between ₹15,303 and ₹25,611 — computed from the agreement values and carpet areas the promoter filed, not broker quotes.
The units recorded as unsold on the filing. The reckoner value is the government's ready-reckoner assessment the promoter filed against that unit, the figure stamp duty is charged on. It is not a price anyone paid, not an asking price, and not a valuation of the home.
| Floor | Unit | Carpet | Govt reckoner value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Floor 11 | 1101 | 575 sqft (53.42 sqm) | ₹66.95 Lakh |
| Floor 13 | 1301 | 575 sqft (53.42 sqm) | ₹66.95 Lakh |
| Floor 15 | 1501 | 575 sqft (53.42 sqm) | ₹66.95 Lakh |
| Floor 17 | 1701 | 575 sqft (53.42 sqm) | ₹66.95 Lakh |
| Floor 19 | 1903 | 398 sqft (36.98 sqm) | ₹46.34 Lakh |
| Floor 20 | 2001 | 781 sqft (72.56 sqm) | ₹90.93 Lakh |
| Floor 20 | 2002 | 728 sqft (67.63 sqm) | ₹84.75 Lakh |
| Floor 21 | 2101 | 781 sqft (72.56 sqm) | ₹95.07 Lakh |
| Floor 26 | 2602 | 728 sqft (67.63 sqm) | ₹88.61 Lakh |
| Floor 29 | 2901 | 781 sqft (72.56 sqm) | ₹95.07 Lakh |
| Floor 30 | 3001 | 781 sqft (72.56 sqm) | ₹95.07 Lakh |
| Floor 31 | 3101 | 781 sqft (72.56 sqm) | ₹99.20 Lakh |
| Floor 32 | 3201 | 781 sqft (72.56 sqm) | ₹99.20 Lakh |
| Floor 32 | 3202 | 728 sqft (67.63 sqm) | ₹92.46 Lakh |
| Floor 33 | 3301 | 781 sqft (72.56 sqm) | ₹99.20 Lakh |
| Floor 34 | 3401 | 781 sqft (72.56 sqm) | ₹99.20 Lakh |
| Floor 34 | 3402 | 728 sqft (67.63 sqm) | ₹92.46 Lakh |
| Floor 35 | 3501 | 781 sqft (72.56 sqm) | ₹99.20 Lakh |
| Floor 35 | 3502 | 728 sqft (67.63 sqm) | ₹92.46 Lakh |
| Floor 36 | 3601 | 781 sqft (72.56 sqm) | ₹99.20 Lakh |
| Floor 36 | 3602 | 728 sqft (67.63 sqm) | ₹92.46 Lakh |
| Floor 36 | 3603 | 562 sqft (52.21 sqm) | ₹71.38 Lakh |
| Floor 7 | 701 | 575 sqft (53.42 sqm) | ₹63.90 Lakh |
| Floor 8 | 801 | 575 sqft (53.42 sqm) | ₹63.90 Lakh |
| Floor 9 | 901 | 575 sqft (53.42 sqm) | ₹63.90 Lakh |
No units are declared mortgaged, reserved, investor-held or not-for-sale in this inventory filing.
What the filings record, home by home
Read from MahaRERA on 13 September 2026
MahaRERA publishes, home by home, what this promoter filed: which homes are sold and which are not, the RERA carpet area of each, and for the sold ones the registered agreement value — the consideration filed for that specific home. On this project 59 homes carry one, and 25 of the 84 are recorded unsold.
Here is one of those unsold homes, priced against what buyers of the same home on other floors actually filed:
| Home | Carpet | Filed for the same home on other floors | Based on |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3603 | 562 sqft | Rs 1.0114 cr typical, over Rs 85.27 lakh to Rs 1.4353 cr | 13 filed on this stack, floors 20–34 |
A filed consideration is what was registered for one home. It is not a valuation, and MahaRERA does not publish the date of any of these agreements — read a range as a spread, not as a trend. An unsold row means no sale had been filed for it when we looked, which is a filing state, not a promise that the home is available to you today. Only one observation of this ledger so far: no change can be reported yet. This observation is an archived copy whose time is the moment the file was written, not a portal fetch time.
In Shreeji Towers , every one of the 25 unsold homes has agreements filed on its own stack. The Price Comparison Report gives each of them its own row — the filed agreements behind that stack listed in full, the government reckoner value the promoter filed against it, and whether it is mortgaged to a lender while still on the unsold list. Built from the filing itself, sent by email.
Buildings & Wings
The buildings and wings registered under this project, with each tower's sanctioned height and declared completion date. Here the tallest tower rises to G+44 and 84 homes are registered across the project.
| Building | Wings | Floors | Homes | Declared completion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Shreeji Towers | 1 | G+44 | 84 | 27 Aug 2021 |
Unit mix on the filing: 84 residential.
Legal and disputes
What disputes are disclosed?
2 complaints are on the MahaRERA record for Shreeji Towers , with orders passed in 2 of them.
2complaints
2with an order
Counts as disclosed in the project record.
Source · MahaRERA project disclosures · read 12 Jul 2026
| Complaint no. | Filed | Parties | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| CC006000000044450 | 09/05/2018 | Antop Hill Warehousing Company Limited vs M/s Nuemac Builders & Developers | order passed |
| CC006000000292258 | 08/08/2022 | Mr. Chirag Jain and Mr. Vishal Jain vs M/s. Neumec Developer and Builders | order passed |
Legal & Litigation
The promoter has declared 2 court cases on this project to MahaRERA. Litigation can cloud the land title or stall the build — have a lawyer pull the cause list for each and confirm whether it touches the title to your home. This is declared by the promoter; there may be further cases not on the RERA record.
| Court | Case no. | Year | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| High Court | 26628 | 2022 | Ongoing |
| High Court | 26635 | 2022 | Ongoing |
Deadline Extensions
The MahaRERA completion deadline for this project has been formally extended 6 times, as recorded on the register.
| From | Extended to | Stated reason |
|---|---|---|
| as registered | 27 Feb 2021 | As per the details mentioned at the time of registration of the project at the MahaRERA Website we have mentioned 28/02/2020 as the project completion date. Unfortunately, due to v |
| 27 Feb 2021 | 31 Mar 2023 | In accordance with circular no 28, we hereby apply for extension of the project u/s 7(3) in Format B. The project was delayed for reasons beyond our control on account of various r |
| 31 Mar 2023 | 30 Sep 2023 | In accordance with circular no 28, we hereby apply for extension of our project u/s 7(3) in Format B. The project was delayed for reasons beyond our control on account of various r |
| 30 Sep 2023 | 30 Sep 2024 | 1) M/s Neumec Developers and Builders, Limited Liability Partnership Firm having Partners namely 1) Rakesh Jhunjhunwala [deceased] age, 62 years 2) Rekha Jhunjhunwala age, 62 years |
| 30 Sep 2024 | 30 Sep 2025 | We apologize for the delay in the completion of the project and the submission of this request. The delay has occurred due to issues with procurement, unforeseen site conditions, c |
| 30 Sep 2025 | 30 Sep 2027 | We sincerely apologize for the delay in completing the project and for the late submission of this extension request. The delay has been primarily due to several unforeseen and una |
Location, Land & Connectivity
Located at Barkat Ali Naka, Saltpan Division, Kamlakar Nagar, Ward ABCD, Mumbai City, 400037. Per the filed land record, the plot is bounded to the north by Antop Hill warehousing , to the south by Sewri Chembur Road , to the east by Antophill WH Bhaiyasaab Nagar and to the west by Vidyalankar College Road. These are the boundaries as recorded in the filed land record.
Location & connectivity
The nearest major job hub is ~4 km away — walking/short-hop distance to a major employment hub — a genuine work-near-home location.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| Lower Parel / Worli business district | 4 km |
| Bandra Kurla Complex (BKC) | 6 km |
| Chhatrapati Shivaji Int'l Airport | 8 km |
| Nariman Point / Fort | 11 km |
| Powai / Hiranandani business park | 12 km |
| Andheri MIDC / SEEPZ | 13 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.