Futurity Homes
K-RERA · the public record
CASAGRAND BOULEVARD
Bengaluru East · GAZY MAG
Know the project.
Then choose your home.
The registration, progress and filed details in one place. Go further with an independent reading of the project’s evidence.
31 Dec 2024declared completionK-RERA registration · read 20 Sep 2026
528registered unitsK-RERA registration · read 20 Sep 2026
The record · free to read
Registration read 20 Sep 2026Progress & dates
The timeline on file.
Available record
No construction trend to plot.
The records used for this page do not supply a series of construction percentages. This does not establish whether possession has been given.
declared completion
31 Dec 2024
The registered date and a construction update answer different questions. Neither is a confirmation of possession.
K-RERA registration · read 20 Sep 2026
Inventory & scale
What this registration contains.
Residential apartments
528
Filed categories, unchanged · K-RERA registration · read 20 Sep 2026
The whole registration
7.7registered acres
68.8registered units per acre
The average covers the registered land and all registered unit types. It does not describe the space, outlook or surroundings of an individual home.
From another project · Prestige Park Grove
A larger advertised area. Almost the same carpet area.
In Tower 14, E4 has 141 sq ft more saleable area than E2. Its carpet area is only 0.46 sq m larger. The report puts the two layouts side by side.
This illustrates the report format. These findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the sample report ↗
The source record
The details behind the headline.
K-RERA · PRM/KA/RERA/1251/446/PR/201001/003629
This project, on the record
The comparable facts of this project, from its own RERA registration record. Each context percentile names its exact comparison set, drawn from Quietlist’s full register store. The paid report adds drawing-read rows to this same table — what the filed plans show about the site, its edges and the unit layouts.
On the register
Declared completion31 December 2024
Land area31,059 sq m (7.7 acres)
Homes registered528
Tower/wing entries1
Unit mix528 × Residential apartments
In context
Density68.8 homes per acre
Density in context39th percentile of 1119 Bengaluru East projects (median 75.5)
Values as crawled from the official K-RERA record; context percentiles name their comparison population.
Official Registry Facts
Official project scale
RERA filingRegistration-form facts from the K-RERA detail page: use these to sanity-check the builder brochure, parking allotment, and sanctioned-plan references before relying on plan-extracted approximations.
| Disclosure | Official value | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Registered units | 528 | Total inventory registered with K-RERA. |
| Official carpet area | 41,917 sqm | Regulator-disclosed project-level carpet area, not vision-derived room sums. |
| Registered land area | 31,059 sqm | The land area attached to this K-RERA registration. |
| Sanctioned FAR/FSI | 2 | Higher FAR generally means a denser vertical build, subject to site layout and open-space design. |
| Registered tower/wing entries | 1 | Official tower/wing count in the K-RERA detail page. |
| Parking total (reconciled) | 600 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Open-parking field | 0 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Garage field | 0 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Project start date | 01-10-2020 |
Official inventory & towers
RERA filingK-RERA registration tables showing the project mix and tower/wing scale. Use this to sanity-check sales claims such as "only large homes", "low density", or "plenty of parking" against the filed inventory.
Registered inventory mix
| Type | Units | Share | Official carpet area |
|---|---|---|---|
| Residential apartments | 528 | 100% | 41,917 sqm |
Registered tower / wing summary
| Tower/wing | Floors | Units | Parking | Height |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Casagrand Boulavard | 4 | 528 | 600 | - |
Official unit register
RERA filingK-RERA detail-page flat rows: exact unit numbers, official carpet area, UDS, and parking lots. 528 official flat/unit rows, matching the 528 registered units disclosed above. Use this as a checklist against the specific flat number in your cost sheet and draft agreement.
By unit type
| Unit type | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2BHK | 286 | 65.0-80.7 sqm | 39.0-48.5 sqm | 286 |
| 3BHK | 184 | 86.0-117.0 sqm | 49.6-69.2 sqm | 184 |
| 1BHK | 48 | 40.0 sqm | 24.2-24.5 sqm | 35 (13 with 0) |
| 4BHK | 10 | 135.5-137.8 sqm | 77.4-80.8 sqm | 10 |
By tower / wing
| Tower/wing | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Casagrand Boulavard | 528 | 40.0-137.8 sqm | 24.2-80.8 sqm | 515 (13 with 0) |
Show sample official unit rows
| Unit | Tower | Floor | Type | Carpet | UDS | Parking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AG01 | Casagrand Boulavard | 0 | 2BHK | 70.8 sqm | 42.0 sqm | 1 |
| AG04 | Casagrand Boulavard | 0 | 2BHK | 74.3 sqm | 43.7 sqm | 1 |
| AG05 | Casagrand Boulavard | 0 | 2BHK | 72.4 sqm | 43.6 sqm | 1 |
| A101 | Casagrand Boulavard | 0 | 2BHK | 70.8 sqm | 41.9 sqm | 1 |
| A104 | Casagrand Boulavard | 0 | 2BHK | 74.3 sqm | 43.6 sqm | 1 |
| A105 | Casagrand Boulavard | 0 | 2BHK | 72.4 sqm | 43.6 sqm | 1 |
Legal, Approvals & Project Team
Litigation & compliance
RERA filingNo litigation declared on this project's K-RERA filing.
⚠ 3 of 25 compliance document slots are filed as under process / not yet usable: Proforma For Sale Deed, Performa of Allotment Letter, Brochure of Current Project.
2 additional compliance slots are filed as Not Applicable.
No completion certificate (OC) on file yet — project has not been declared complete.
⚠ Registration validity has lapsed: originally due 31 Dec 2024 — which has passed with no OC on file.
Named utility/regulatory approvals
Electricity (BESCOM/ESCOM)✓ On file (BESCOM)
Water & sewage (BWSSB/KWSSB)✓ On file (BWSSB)
Fire NOCNot found in catalog
Pollution control (KSPCB)✓ On file (KSPCB)
Environmental clearance✓ On file (SEIAA)
Airport Authority height clearanceNot found in catalog
"Not found in catalog" can mean the approval genuinely isn't on file yet, or that it doesn't apply to this project (K-RERA doesn't tell us which). Ask the builder directly for any marked not found before relying on it.
K-RERA enforcement record (the regulator's own defaulter list & penalty orders)
Penalty orders on record:
| Violation | Under section | Penalty | Order date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Non Submission Of Annual Report 2021 22 | Section 4(2)(l)(D) | ₹13,000,000 | 14/12/2023 |
K-RERA complaint orders (22 complaints against a project of this name on K-RERA's orders register)
| Parties | Relief sought | Disposal | Order date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Yashwanth N Kaushik vs GAZY MAG PVT LTD | Interest on delay period | AUTHORITY | 31/03/2026 |
| Katasani Mahesh Reddy vs GAZY MAG PVT LTD | Interest on delay period | AUTHORITY | 31/03/2026 |
| Yukti Gursahaney vs Casagrand Boulevard | Builder to Issue Formal Apology for harassment caused and agreeing to responding to me in a fixed timeline of 2 business days | AUTHORITY | 30/06/2025 |
| Sanket Suresh Patil vs GAZY MAG PVT LTD | Direct the respondents to pay the compensation to the complainants as per clause 9.1 of the sale agreement. | AUTHORITY | 29/01/2025 |
| ARUNKUMAR HARIDAS vs M/S GAZY MAG PRIVATE LIMITED | Refund of advance payments, legal expenses, relief towards loss of opportunity, time and effort on following up with this builder | AUTHORITY | 24/01/2024 |
| Tatavarti Venkata Nihar vs GAY MAG PVT LTD. | Interest on Delay of Possession as per Section 18 of RERA from October 2023 to till the time the Builder remits the rightful Interest on Delay of Possession into the Buyer’s bank account. | AUTHORITY | 23/03/2026 |
| Gopinath D vs GAY MAG PVT LTD. | As per the agreement, the builder is liable to pay interest on the delay period. I request your intervention in the matter to help secure the payment of interest on the delay period | AUTHORITY | 23/03/2026 |
| Hari Kishore P V vs GAY MAG PVT LTD. | Interest on delay period | AUTHORITY | 23/03/2026 |
| Deepa M vs GAY MAG PVT LTD. | interest on delay period as the property has been bought on loan and huge bank interest is being paid on the loan amount till date and currently paying rent due to delay | AUTHORITY | 23/03/2026 |
| Rajinder Singh vs GAY MAG PVT LTD. | Please look into this matter seriously and appropriate action should be taken on the Builder. Interest on delay period should be paid by the Builder. | AUTHORITY | 23/03/2026 |
| Chaithra D Shetty vs GAY MAG PVT LTD. | Please look into this matter seriously and appropriate action should be taken on the Builder. Interest on delay Period should be paid by the builder | AUTHORITY | 23/03/2026 |
| Rinku Sadhu vs GAY MAG PVT LTD. | Please look into this matter seriously and appropriate action should be taken on the builder. Interest on delay period should be paid by the Builder. | AUTHORITY | 23/03/2026 |
| TMC Kavitha vs GAY MAG PVT LTD. | Interest on delay period | AUTHORITY | 23/03/2026 |
| Abinash Acharya vs GAY MAG PVT LTD. | I request the Authority to direct the Promoter to hand over possession of the apartment immediately and pay interest on delay period as per the sales agreement. | AUTHORITY | 23/03/2026 |
| Rohit Chauhan vs GAY MAG PVT LTD. | Interest on delay period | AUTHORITY | 23/03/2026 |
| Aiyappa vs GAY MAG PVT LTD. | interest on delay period | AUTHORITY | 23/03/2026 |
| Sharanu Kumar Ichanda Devaiah vs GAY MAG PVT LTD. | To direct the Respondent to pay interest on delay on the total amount paid by the Complainants, calculated as per the Karnataka Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Rules, 2017, till the date of | AUTHORITY | 23/03/2026 |
| Hari Kishore P V vs CASAGRAND BOLEVARD | Basic Groundwater or borewell should be given because it 525 flats overall in the project of 7.7ac | AUTHORITY | 17/06/2025 |
| Sneha Rajanikanth vs GAZY MAG PVT LTD | Provide interest on delay period as per the rules for delay of handover of the project | AUTHORITY | 16/12/2025 |
| PRIYADARSHANI vs CASAGRAND BOULEVARD | Kindly help me getting my fund back as I took Loan for booking of the flat. | AUTHORITY | 11/10/2023 |
| NAVEEN ANGURALA vs GAZY MAG PVT LTD | Full refund of booking amount | AUTHORITY | 11/02/2023 |
| Nitish Mohan vs Casagand Boulevard | Reaching out to issue Interest on delay period in handing over of flat to the Allottees. | AUTHORITY | 10/03/2026 |
⚠ Matched by PROJECT NAME (the orders register carries no registration number) — confirm the respondent above is this project's builder before relying on it.
Complaints on this project's K-RERA page (2 complaints listed against this promoter)
| Complaint | Subject (as filed) | Project | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| CMP/210518/0007954 18-05-2021 | Rate increased after 1st advance payment | CASAGRAND BOULEVARD | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4 |
| CMP/221221/0010505 21-12-2022 | Refund of booking amount | CASAGRAND BOULEVARD | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4 |
Listed on the project's own K-RERA detail page (registration-exact source). Rows on the promoter's other projects are track-record context — read the subject text, it is the complainant's own filed wording.
Project team & certifications
RERA filingK-RERA names 3 project professional/vendor rows across Architect, Contractor, Structural engineer. Use this to cross-check whose certificates, drawings, and contractor commitments support the filing; final reliance still belongs with your lawyer/technical reviewer.
| Role | Name | Registration / licence | Since | Locality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Architect | P. N. Medappa | - | 2004 | Sanjaynagar, Bangalore-560094 |
| Contractor | Casagrand | - | 2015 | Meanee Avenue road, Ulsoor road |
| Structural engineer | C. Ramkumar | - | - | - |
Financials & Construction Progress
Financial disclosures
RERA filing⚠ No quarterly financial disclosures (collections, escrow withdrawals) on record, despite no completion certificate yet — meaning we can't verify the project's cashflows against its construction progress. Worth asking the builder directly why no quarterly filings are available.
Declared construction cost ÷ registered units averages to ₹33.3 lakhs per unit — the developer's own declared construction/development cost, not a sale price. K-RERA filings don't disclose what the builder is charging, so this can't tell you whether you're getting a fair deal — only you comparing your quoted price against comparable listings nearby can answer that.
RERA 70% project account is on file: ICICI Bank MG ROAD (IFSC ICIC0000002, a/c …1220). RERA requires 70% of buyer collections to sit in this separate, project-specific account, drawn only against certified construction milestones — confirm your payments are made to THIS account (not a general builder account) and that it appears on your allotment letter.
Construction photo filings
RERA filingK-RERA has 1 project-photo upload.
These are developer-uploaded progress photos in the official document catalog. We do not treat them as proof of current site condition; use them as a prompt to ask for newer dated photos or a site visit. Individual filings are listed in the document catalog below.
Location & Connectivity
The nearest major job hub is ~6 km away — a manageable everyday commute to a major job hub.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| Outer Ring Road / Manyata | 6 km |
| MG Road / city centre | 13 km |
| Kempegowda Int'l Airport | 14 km |
| Whitefield IT hub | 16 km |
| Bellandur–Marathahalli belt | 16 km |
| Electronic City | 26 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.