Mantri Serenity1
RERA Property Intelligence Report · Preview
CASTLES VISTA · Bengaluru South · K-RERA PRM/KA/RERA/1251/310/PR/171016/000502
Report coverage
K-RERA registry & builder-record report
What this report covers
To confirm directly with the builder
🔒 The verdict & buyer playbook · Compliance report
The paid report opens with the overall risk rating, the specific red-flag findings, exactly what I'd do as a buyer in this project, who it suits, and the questions to put to the builder before you commit.
Registration-form facts from the K-RERA detail page: use these to sanity-check the builder brochure, parking allotment, and sanctioned-plan references before relying on plan-extracted approximations.
| Disclosure | Official value | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Registered units | 580 | Total inventory registered with K-RERA. |
| Registered land area | 79,287 sqm | The land area attached to this K-RERA registration. |
| Sanctioned FAR/FSI | 3.25 | Higher FAR generally means a denser vertical build, subject to site layout and open-space design. |
| Registered towers/wings | 5 | Official tower/wing count in the K-RERA detail page. |
| Parking disclosed | 1,525 total (8 open) — 2.63 spaces/unit | Confirm whether your quoted unit includes an allotted parking space and where it sits. |
| Project start date | 27-04-2015 |
K-RERA registration tables showing the project mix and tower/wing scale. Use this to sanity-check sales claims such as "only large homes", "low density", or "plenty of parking" against the filed inventory.
Registered inventory mix
| Type | Units | Share | Official carpet area |
|---|---|---|---|
| Not working | 0 | 0 sqm |
Registered tower / wing summary
| Tower/wing | Floors | Units | Parking | Height |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| I | 28 | 116 | 305 | - |
| J | 28 | 116 | 305 | - |
| K | 28 | 116 | 305 | - |
| L | 28 | 116 | 305 | - |
| M | 28 | 116 | 305 | - |
K-RERA detail-page flat rows: exact unit numbers, official carpet area, UDS, and parking lots. 580 official flat/unit rows, matching the 580 registered units disclosed above. Use this as a checklist against the specific flat number in your cost sheet and draft agreement.
By unit type
| Unit type | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-BHK+2T | 324 | 85.0-85.9 sqm | 4.6-5.3 sqm | 324 |
| 2-BHK+2T | 236 | 65.2-82.0 sqm | 3.7-4.2 sqm | 236 |
| 3-BHK+3T | 20 | 71.5-92.0 sqm | 6.8-8.2 sqm | 20 |
By tower / wing
| Tower/wing | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| I | 116 | 65.2-92.0 sqm | 3.7-7.6 sqm | 116 |
| J | 116 | 65.2-85.4 sqm | 4.1-7.9 sqm | 116 |
| K | 116 | 66.2-85.4 sqm | 4.1-8.0 sqm | 116 |
| L | 116 | 65.2-85.4 sqm | 4.1-7.9 sqm | 116 |
| M | 116 | 65.2-89.3 sqm | 4.0-8.2 sqm | 116 |
| Unit | Tower | Floor | Type | Carpet | UDS | Parking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| I-001 | I | 0 | 2-BHK+2T | 65.2 sqm | 3.8 sqm | 1 |
| I-002 | I | 0 | 2-BHK+2T | 67.1 sqm | 3.7 sqm | 1 |
| I-003 | I | 0 | 2-BHK+2T | 67.1 sqm | 3.7 sqm | 1 |
| I-004 | I | 0 | 2-BHK+2T | 65.2 sqm | 3.8 sqm | 1 |
| I-101 | I | 1 | 2-BHK+2T | 68.2 sqm | 3.7 sqm | 1 |
| I-102 | I | 1 | 3-BHK+2T | 85.9 sqm | 4.6 sqm | 1 |
What the numbers tell you
Synthesis from the official RERA scale, unit register, and land rows — the read a sales team won't volunteer.
🔒 Unit-by-unit guidance · Unit Guidance report
Which block and unit to prefer, the livability read on the filed plans, and a plan-by-plan walkthrough — the ₹2,999 guidance layer.
🔒 Full records — land title, amenities paperwork & document catalog · Compliance report
The complete land-title chain, the paperwork behind each declared amenity, and every document row on file with the regulator — the raw records the compliance read is built on.
No litigation declared on this project's K-RERA filing.
3 of 35 compliance document slots are filed as Not Applicable; the remaining 32 slots have usable uploaded filings.
No completion certificate (OC) on file yet — project has not been declared complete.
⚠ Registration validity has lapsed: originally due 29 Jan 2020, extended (Section 6 Extension) to 29 Oct 2021 — both dates have passed with no OC on file. The extension on file was granted on 24 Jun 2020 (K-RERA extension no. EX/PRM/KA/RERA/1251/310/PR/200624/000502) — it has been used, its deadline has also passed, and no further extension is recorded.
Named utility/regulatory approvals
"Not found in catalog" can mean the approval genuinely isn't on file yet, or that it doesn't apply to this project (K-RERA doesn't tell us which). Ask the builder directly for any marked not found before relying on it.
K-RERA enforcement record (the regulator's own defaulter list & penalty orders)
⚠ Listed on K-RERA's official DEFAULTER list.
1 K-RERA order on this project (PROJECT EXTENSION) — read the order copies on the K-RERA portal.
K-RERA complaint orders (27 complaints against a project of this name on K-RERA's orders register)
| Parties | Relief sought | Disposal | Order date |
|---|---|---|---|
| RAMNATH S vs MANTRI CASTLES PVT LTD | Compensation in the form interest on the total consideration of Rs. 1,45,86,515.00 @ 9 % pa; for 62 months (from 01.01.2016 to 28.02.2021) Rs. 67,82,729.00. Total compensation of Rs. | AUTHORITY | 30/08/2022 |
| Radhika Ravi vs Mantri Castles Pvt Ltd | As prayed in Facts of Complaints | AUTHORITY | 28/09/2022 |
| Komala V vs MANTRI CASTLE PRIVATE LIMITED | As prayed in the Facts of Complaint | AUTHORITY | 27/07/2022 |
| Sangita Monga vs MANTRI CASTLES PRIVATE LIMITED | As sought in the facts of Complaint | AUTHORITY | 27/07/2022 |
| Rudraswamy M vs MANTRI CASTLE PRIVATE LIMITED | As prayed in the Facts of Complaint | AUTHORITY | 27/07/2022 |
| DHANANJAYA vs MANTRI CASTLES PVT LTD | As prayed in the Facts of Complaint | AUTHORITY | 26/08/2022 |
| RAMALINGESWARA RAO DRONAMRAJU vs MANTRI CASTLES PVT LTD | As prayed in the Facts of Complaint | AUTHORITY | 26/08/2022 |
| ROHIT SOMANI vs MANTRI CASTLES PVT LTD. | As prayed in the Facts of Complaint | AUTHORITY | 26/08/2022 |
| NIRAJ NAWANIT vs MANTRI CASTLES PVT LTD | delay compensation as per RERA Provisions | AUTHORITY | 25/06/2022 |
| Mr Raghushankar Mrs Usharani P vs MANTRI CASTLES PVT LTD | Delay compensation as per RERA provisions | AUTHORITY | 25/05/2023 |
| SRIDHAR C vs MANTRI CASTLES PRIVATE LIMITED & ANOTHER | As prayed in the Fact of complaint | AUTHORITY | 25/03/2024 |
| Ramkumar Ratnagiri vs CASTLES VISTA PRIVATE LIMITED | Please ask the Builder to provide permanent Electrical Supply and permanent Water Supply. | AUTHORITY | 24/11/2025 |
| BHUSHAN SALAGAR vs MANTRI CASTLE PVT LTD | As prayed in Facts of Complaint | AUTHORITY | 24/08/2022 |
| NINGANNA BIRADAR vs MANTRI CASTLE PVT LTD | Delay compensation as per section 12, 14, 18 and 19 complete relief described in the Facts of Complaint colume | AUTHORITY | 24/08/2022 |
| GURUPRASAD B S vs MANTRI SERENITY -4 | As prayed for in the Facts of complaint | AUTHORITY | 22/07/2022 |
| SRIDHAR BALAKRISHNAN vs MANTRI CASTLES PRIVATE LIMITED | Refund of 2x the contributed amount, PRE-EMI, Close Bank loan, and pay cost for legal expenses and mental agony | AUTHORITY | 22/06/2023 |
| SRIRAM R vs MANTRI CASTLE PVT LTD | as prayed in the facts of the complaint | AUTHORITY | 19/10/2022 |
| BHASKAR PEELETI vs MANTRI CASTLE PVT LTD | As prayed in the Facts of Complaint | AUTHORITY | 19/10/2022 |
| SRILAKSHMI vs MANTRI CASTLE PVT LTD | As prayed in the facts of complaint | AUTHORITY | 19/10/2022 |
| K.PUNDALIKA NAYAK vs MANTRI CASTLES PRIVATE LIMITED | (i) To return and pay a sum of Rs.94,63,990/- , (ii) To Pay a sum of Rs.12,00000/-, (iii) To pay a sum of Rs.5,00000/- (iv) Towards the costs of filing the above application and miscellaneous charges | AUTHORITY | 17/08/2023 |
| Rekha K S vs CASTLES VISTA PVT LTD | Direct the Respondent to cancel the above mentioned agreement and refund the entire amount paid by the Complainant along with interest | AUTHORITY | 15/12/2025 |
| Nilesh Pancholi vs Mantri Castles Pvt Ltd | Delay Compensation | AUTHORITY | 13/08/2022 |
| Umesh N S vs Mantri Castles Pvt Ltd | As prayed in the Facts of Complaints | AUTHORITY | 13/08/2022 |
| Prakash Nanjundiah vs Mantri Castles Pvt Ltd., | Compensation for undue delay and quick possession of booked flat. | AUTHORITY | 05/08/2024 |
| Radhika Ravi vs Mantri Castles Pvt. Ltd., | As prayed in the Facts of Complaint | AUTHORITY | 05/08/2024 |
| T N Raghu Ram vs Mantri Castles Pvt Ltd., | As prayed in facts of complaints | AUTHORITY | 05/08/2024 |
| RAJIV JANARDHANAN vs MANTRI CASTLES PVT. LTD., & ANOTHER | As prayed in the Facts of Complaint | AUTHORITY | 01/07/2024 |
⚠ Matched by PROJECT NAME (the orders register carries no registration number) — confirm the respondent above is this project's builder before relying on it.
Complaints on this project's K-RERA page (68 complaints listed against this promoter)
| Complaint | Subject (as filed) | Project | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| CMP/190327/0002525 27-03-2019 | Pending PREMI and loan amount payment from builder as per buyback scheme | Mantri Serenity3 (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190218/0002186 18-02-2019 | Compensation for Delay in Possession | MANTRI SERENITY5 (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/200619/0005942 19-06-2020 | Possession, Delayed Compensation, Occupancy certificate and completion of project and all its amenities | Mantri Serenity4 | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/191111/0004690 11-11-2019 | Delay in possession of flat no.N501 | Mantri Serenity5 (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190716/0003605 16-07-2019 | seeking for delay compensation from the date of default till the date of possession as per RERA rules | Mantri Serenity4 | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190609/0003259 09-06-2019 | Seeking for delay compensation from the date of default till the date of possession as per RERA provisions | Mantri Serenity4 | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190607/0003252 07-06-2019 | Seeking for the delayed compensation as per RERA | Mantri Serenity4 | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190607/0003255 07-06-2019 | Seeking for delayed compensation as per RERA Provisions from the date of Default till the date of possession | Mantri Serenity4 | DISPOSED AO |
Listed on the project's own K-RERA detail page (registration-exact source). Rows on the promoter's other projects are track-record context — read the subject text, it is the complainant's own filed wording.
K-RERA names 3 project professional/vendor rows across Architect, Contractor, Structural engineer. Use this to cross-check whose certificates, drawings, and contractor commitments support the filing; final reliance still belongs with your lawyer/technical reviewer.
| Role | Name | Registration / licence | Since | Locality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Architect | Ashok Design Build Pvt Ltd., | - | NA | West of Chord Road, Mahalakshmipuram |
| Contractor | Tata Projects Ltd Urban Infrastructure-Building & Airports, | - | NA | "11th Floor. Hiranandani Knowledge Park ", Powai |
| Structural engineer | NAGESH CONSULTANTS | - | - | - |
Castles Vista has 3 other K-RERA-registered projects in our records. 3 are past their declared completion deadline with no completion certificate recorded — but because K-RERA publishes OCs inconsistently, a project that has actually been finished and handed over still shows up this way, so this overstates real delays, especially for a high-volume established builder. That is a higher delayed rate than the K-RERA average across Bengaluru on the same measure.
Read this as a list to spot-check for a pattern of genuinely stalled projects, not as a delay rate — pull up a few of the builder’s other K-RERA registrations and check whether they’ve actually been delivered.
⚠ No quarterly financial disclosures (collections, escrow withdrawals) on record, despite no completion certificate yet — meaning we can't verify the project's cashflows against its construction progress. Worth asking the builder directly why no quarterly filings are available.
Declared construction cost ÷ registered units averages to ₹39.6 lakhs per unit — the developer's own declared construction/development cost, not a sale price. K-RERA filings don't disclose what the builder is charging, so this can't tell you whether you're getting a fair deal — only you comparing your quoted price against comparable listings nearby can answer that.
RERA 70% project account is on file: HDFC Richmond Road, Bengaluru (IFSC HDFC0000523, a/c …2120). RERA requires 70% of buyer collections to sit in this separate, project-specific account, drawn only against certified construction milestones — confirm your payments are made to THIS account (not a general builder account) and that it appears on your allotment letter.
K-RERA has 1 project-photo upload.
These are developer-uploaded progress photos in the official document catalog. We do not treat them as proof of current site condition; use them as a prompt to ask for newer dated photos or a site visit.
The nearest major job hub is ~21 km away — well outside the job hubs — this is a value/space play, not a short-commute one; budget for the drive.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| MG Road / city centre | 18 km |
| Electronic City | 21 km |
| Outer Ring Road / Manyata | 24 km |
| Bellandur–Marathahalli belt | 24 km |
| Whitefield IT hub | 32 km |
| Kempegowda Int'l Airport | 43 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.
Should you buy in Mantri Serenity4?
This page is the free K-RERA filing summary. The full RERA Property Intelligence Report gives you buyer-complaint history, regulatory flags, builder track record, the official unit register, land title, NOCs, and (where the sanctioned plans support it) room-by-room unit data and an annotated site plan. See a real one first:
Sample: Sobha Silicon Oasis → · browse all sample reports →
Compliance Report · ₹999
The regulator’s filing record, read · 1 working day
Scan with any UPI app to pay · quietlist@kotak
Unit Guidance Report · ₹2,999
Everything, down to which unit · 1 working day
Not useful to your decision? Full refund — no questions asked.
Scan with any UPI app to pay · quietlist@kotak
Paying from outside India? Pay $15 (Compliance) or $39 (Unit Guidance) via PayPal, or email hello@quietlist.in for a card invoice. Prefer to talk first, or have a portfolio to check? Same address. An information aid for your own due diligence, not legal or investment advice.
Free · Watch this project
We'll email you when this project's RERA record changes.
Built by Castles Vista.
Figures are the developer's own quarterly disclosures on the Karnataka RERA register. "Built" is the highest construction % filed; "sold" is booked units over total. Not a claim about the developer's intent. Explore every project on our Bangalore project-health tool.
Own a unit in Mantri Serenity4?
Sell directly to Quietlist's pre-screened buyer list — flat fee, no broker commission.
Last checked against the RERA register: 27 Jul 2026