Mantri Serenity1
RERA Property Intelligence Report · Preview
CASTLES VISTA · Bengaluru South · K-RERA PRM/KA/RERA/1251/310/PR/171019/000504
Report coverage
K-RERA registry & builder-record report
What this report covers
To confirm directly with the builder
🔒 The verdict & buyer playbook · Compliance report
The paid report opens with the overall risk rating, the specific red-flag findings, exactly what I'd do as a buyer in this project, who it suits, and the questions to put to the builder before you commit.
Registration-form facts from the K-RERA detail page: use these to sanity-check the builder brochure, parking allotment, and sanctioned-plan references before relying on plan-extracted approximations.
| Disclosure | Official value | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Registered units | 560 | Total inventory registered with K-RERA. |
| Registered land area | 79,287 sqm | The land area attached to this K-RERA registration. |
| Sanctioned FAR/FSI | 3.25 | Higher FAR generally means a denser vertical build, subject to site layout and open-space design. |
| Registered towers/wings | 5 | Official tower/wing count in the K-RERA detail page. |
| Parking disclosed | 1,471 total (17 open) — 2.63 spaces/unit | Confirm whether your quoted unit includes an allotted parking space and where it sits. |
| Project start date | 27-04-2015 |
K-RERA registration tables showing the project mix and tower/wing scale. Use this to sanity-check sales claims such as "only large homes", "low density", or "plenty of parking" against the filed inventory.
Registered inventory mix
| Type | Units | Share | Official carpet area |
|---|---|---|---|
| Not working | 0 | 0 sqm |
Registered tower / wing summary
| Tower/wing | Floors | Units | Parking | Height |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 27 | 112 | 295 | - |
| O | 27 | 112 | 294 | - |
| P | 27 | 112 | 294 | - |
| Q | 27 | 112 | 294 | - |
| R | 27 | 112 | 294 | - |
K-RERA detail-page flat rows: exact unit numbers, official carpet area, UDS, and parking lots. 560 official flat/unit rows, matching the 560 registered units disclosed above. Use this as a checklist against the specific flat number in your cost sheet and draft agreement.
By unit type
| Unit type | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3-BHK+3T | 313 | 102.7-119.6 sqm | 6.5-7.2 sqm | 313 |
| 2-BHK+2T | 227 | 77.2-87.5 sqm | 4.8-5.5 sqm | 227 |
| 3-BHK+4T | 12 | 106.5-120.0 sqm | 9.7-10.6 sqm | 12 |
| 3-BHK+2T | 8 | 91.8 sqm | 9.1-9.4 sqm | 8 |
By tower / wing
| Tower/wing | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | 112 | 83.9-120.0 sqm | 5.2-10.6 sqm | 112 |
| O | 112 | 77.2-106.5 sqm | 4.9-9.7 sqm | 112 |
| P | 112 | 77.2-106.5 sqm | 4.8-9.7 sqm | 112 |
| Q | 112 | 77.2-106.5 sqm | 4.9-9.7 sqm | 112 |
| R | 112 | 83.9-120.0 sqm | 5.2-10.6 sqm | 112 |
| Unit | Tower | Floor | Type | Carpet | UDS | Parking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N-001 | N | 0 | 2-BHK+2T | 83.9 sqm | 5.3 sqm | 1 |
| N-002 | N | 0 | 2-BHK+2T | 85.4 sqm | 5.2 sqm | 1 |
| N-003 | N | 0 | 2-BHK+2T | 85.4 sqm | 5.2 sqm | 1 |
| N-004 | N | 0 | 2-BHK+2T | 83.9 sqm | 5.3 sqm | 1 |
| N-101 | N | 1 | 2-BHK+2T | 87.4 sqm | 5.3 sqm | 1 |
| N-102 | N | 1 | 3-BHK+3T | 119.5 sqm | 7.1 sqm | 1 |
What the numbers tell you
Synthesis from the official RERA scale, unit register, and land rows — the read a sales team won't volunteer.
🔒 Unit-by-unit guidance · Unit Guidance report
Which block and unit to prefer, the livability read on the filed plans, and a plan-by-plan walkthrough — the ₹2,999 guidance layer.
🔒 Full records — land title, amenities paperwork & document catalog · Compliance report
The complete land-title chain, the paperwork behind each declared amenity, and every document row on file with the regulator — the raw records the compliance read is built on.
No litigation declared on this project's K-RERA filing.
3 of 34 compliance document slots are filed as Not Applicable; the remaining 31 slots have usable uploaded filings.
No completion certificate (OC) on file yet — project has not been declared complete.
⚠ Registration validity has lapsed: originally due 29 Jan 2020, extended (Extension) to 31 Dec 2022 — both dates have passed with no OC on file. The extension on file was granted on 24 Jun 2020 (K-RERA extension no. EX/PRM/KA/RERA/1251/310/PR/200624/000504) — it has been used, its deadline has also passed, and no further extension is recorded.
Named utility/regulatory approvals
"Not found in catalog" can mean the approval genuinely isn't on file yet, or that it doesn't apply to this project (K-RERA doesn't tell us which). Ask the builder directly for any marked not found before relying on it.
K-RERA enforcement record (the regulator's own defaulter list & penalty orders)
⚠ Listed on K-RERA's official DEFAULTER list.
1 K-RERA order on this project (PROJECT EXTENSION) — read the order copies on the K-RERA portal.
K-RERA complaint orders (24 complaints against a project of this name on K-RERA's orders register)
| Parties | Relief sought | Disposal | Order date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jagalur Thippeswamy Ravi vs Mantri Serenity5 | As prayed in the Facts of Complaint | AUTHORITY | 27/07/2022 |
| Tirupati Rao K vs Mantri Serenity5 | As prayed in the facts of Complaint | AUTHORITY | 27/07/2022 |
| Sham Sunder U N vs Mantri Serenity5 | As prayed in the facts of Complaint | AUTHORITY | 27/07/2022 |
| Murthy Ranjit Murthy vs Mantri Serenity5 | As prayed in the facts of case | AUTHORITY | 27/07/2022 |
| Suresh Krishnan vs Mantri Serenity5 | Delay compensation and possession of Apartment with all amenities and Occupancy Certificate, as per section 12 14 18 & 19. detail relief provided in the Facts of Complaint due to lack of space | AUTHORITY | 27/07/2022 |
| NEELAM CHOUHAN & GOVIND RAJAN vs CASTLES VISTA PRIVATE LIMITED | Refund Amount at the earliest | AUTHORITY | 25/10/2024 |
| G Kannan vs Mantri Serenity5 | As prayed in the Facts of Complaint | AUTHORITY | 25/07/2022 |
| SHEKAR KHAWAS vs MANTRI CASTLE PVT LTD | As prayed in the Facts of Case | AUTHORITY | 24/08/2022 |
| SATISH GOPINATH vs MAHAVEER CYGNET | Refund of 2x amount, PRE-EMI and Closure of Bank Loan | AUTHORITY | 20/12/2023 |
| Bhargava Huchurao vs Mantri Castles Pvt Ltd | As prayed in the Fact of Complaint | AUTHORITY | 18/10/2022 |
| B K Srinivas Murthy vs Mantri Castles Pvt Ltd | As prayed in the facts of case | AUTHORITY | 18/10/2022 |
| SATISH GOPINATH vs MANTRI SERENITY 5 | A.Refund entire sale consideration, PRE-EMIs paid by Complainant along with 2x as promised under the Pre-EMI Scheme with Interest, B. Direct developer to pay loan outstanding amount. | AUTHORITY | 18/06/2024 |
| Santosh Patiil vs Mantri Castles Pvt Ltd | Possession of flat | AUTHORITY | 16/04/2025 |
| SHAMASUNDAR T K vs MANTRI CASTLES PVT LTD | Compensation requested as per the RERA guidelines. | AUTHORITY | 15/10/2022 |
| Sandesh V vs MANTRI CASTLES PVT LTD | As prayed in the Facts of Complaint | AUTHORITY | 15/10/2022 |
| Sanjeev Sreedharan vs MANTRI CASTLES PVT LTD | As prayed in the Facts of Complaint | AUTHORITY | 15/10/2022 |
| S Keshava Murthy vs MANTRI CASTLES PVT LTD | As prayed in the Facts of Complaint | AUTHORITY | 15/10/2022 |
| Sharath Chandra Vedantam vs MANTRI CASTLES PVT LTD | as prayed in the facts of complaint | AUTHORITY | 15/10/2022 |
| DILIP KUMAR RATHOD vs MANTRI SERENITY 5 | Refund of 2x amount, Pre-Eemi and closure of bank loan | AUTHORITY | 12/07/2023 |
| MRS. MALA RAMACHANDRA & ANOTHER vs M/S MANTRI CASTLES PVT. LTD. & ANOTHER | Direct the Respondents to pay the Complainants a Total amount of Rs. 66,22,876/- along with 18% interest per annum from date of complaint till date of realisation of entire amount in full obligations | AUTHORITY | 08/01/2024 |
| INDI VIVEKANAND vs MANTRI DEVELOPERS PVT LTD | Refund of 2x the amount, PRE-EMI and close bank loan | AUTHORITY | 03/08/2023 |
| indi vivekanand vs mantri serenity 5 | A.Refund entire sale consideration, PRE-EMIs paid by Complainant along with 2x as promised under the Pre-EMI Scheme with Interest, B. Direct developer to pay loan outstanding amount. | AUTHORITY | 03/08/2023 |
| VISHVEKUMAR SOOD & VINEETA SOOD vs MANTRI SERENITY 5 | Completion and handover of our flat to us and pay compensation for the delay. | AUTHORITY | 02/09/2022 |
| Shanthaiah H C vs Mantri Serenity5 | I request this Hon'ble Authority to direct the respondent to complete and handover the possession by receiving balance sale consideration or refund the amount paid with interest. | AUTHORITY | 01/09/2025 |
⚠ Matched by PROJECT NAME (the orders register carries no registration number) — confirm the respondent above is this project's builder before relying on it.
Complaints on this project's K-RERA page (68 complaints listed against this promoter)
| Complaint | Subject (as filed) | Project | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| CMP/190327/0002525 27-03-2019 | Pending PREMI and loan amount payment from builder as per buyback scheme | Mantri Serenity3 (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190218/0002186 18-02-2019 | Compensation for Delay in Possession | MANTRI SERENITY5 | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/200619/0005942 19-06-2020 | Possession, Delayed Compensation, Occupancy certificate and completion of project and all its amenities | Mantri Serenity4 (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/191111/0004690 11-11-2019 | Delay in possession of flat no.N501 | Mantri Serenity5 | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190716/0003605 16-07-2019 | seeking for delay compensation from the date of default till the date of possession as per RERA rules | Mantri Serenity4 (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190609/0003259 09-06-2019 | Seeking for delay compensation from the date of default till the date of possession as per RERA provisions | Mantri Serenity4 (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190607/0003252 07-06-2019 | Seeking for the delayed compensation as per RERA | Mantri Serenity4 (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190607/0003255 07-06-2019 | Seeking for delayed compensation as per RERA Provisions from the date of Default till the date of possession | Mantri Serenity4 (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
Listed on the project's own K-RERA detail page (registration-exact source). Rows on the promoter's other projects are track-record context — read the subject text, it is the complainant's own filed wording.
K-RERA names 3 project professional/vendor rows across Architect, Contractor, Structural engineer. Use this to cross-check whose certificates, drawings, and contractor commitments support the filing; final reliance still belongs with your lawyer/technical reviewer.
| Role | Name | Registration / licence | Since | Locality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Architect | Ashok Design Build Pvt Ltd., | - | NA | West of Chord Road, Mahalakshmipuram |
| Contractor | Tata Projects Ltd Urban Infrastructure-Building & Airports, | - | NA | "11th Floor. Hiranandani Knowledge Park ", Powai |
| Structural engineer | NAGESH CONSULTANTS | - | - | - |
Castles Vista has 3 other K-RERA-registered projects in our records. 3 are past their declared completion deadline with no completion certificate recorded — but because K-RERA publishes OCs inconsistently, a project that has actually been finished and handed over still shows up this way, so this overstates real delays, especially for a high-volume established builder. That is a higher delayed rate than the K-RERA average across Bengaluru on the same measure.
Read this as a list to spot-check for a pattern of genuinely stalled projects, not as a delay rate — pull up a few of the builder’s other K-RERA registrations and check whether they’ve actually been delivered.
⚠ No quarterly financial disclosures (collections, escrow withdrawals) on record, despite no completion certificate yet — meaning we can't verify the project's cashflows against its construction progress. Worth asking the builder directly why no quarterly filings are available.
Declared construction cost ÷ registered units averages to ₹47.3 lakhs per unit — the developer's own declared construction/development cost, not a sale price. K-RERA filings don't disclose what the builder is charging, so this can't tell you whether you're getting a fair deal — only you comparing your quoted price against comparable listings nearby can answer that.
RERA 70% project account is on file: HDFC Richmond Road, Bengaluru (IFSC HDFC0000523, a/c …2156). RERA requires 70% of buyer collections to sit in this separate, project-specific account, drawn only against certified construction milestones — confirm your payments are made to THIS account (not a general builder account) and that it appears on your allotment letter.
K-RERA has 1 project-photo upload.
These are developer-uploaded progress photos in the official document catalog. We do not treat them as proof of current site condition; use them as a prompt to ask for newer dated photos or a site visit.
The nearest major job hub is ~21 km away — well outside the job hubs — this is a value/space play, not a short-commute one; budget for the drive.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| MG Road / city centre | 18 km |
| Electronic City | 21 km |
| Outer Ring Road / Manyata | 24 km |
| Bellandur–Marathahalli belt | 24 km |
| Whitefield IT hub | 32 km |
| Kempegowda Int'l Airport | 43 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.
Should you buy in Mantri Serenity5?
This page is the free K-RERA filing summary. The full RERA Property Intelligence Report gives you buyer-complaint history, regulatory flags, builder track record, the official unit register, land title, NOCs, and (where the sanctioned plans support it) room-by-room unit data and an annotated site plan. See a real one first:
Sample: Sobha Silicon Oasis → · browse all sample reports →
Compliance Report · ₹999
The regulator’s filing record, read · 1 working day
Scan with any UPI app to pay · quietlist@kotak
Unit Guidance Report · ₹2,999
Everything, down to which unit · 1 working day
Not useful to your decision? Full refund — no questions asked.
Scan with any UPI app to pay · quietlist@kotak
Paying from outside India? Pay $15 (Compliance) or $39 (Unit Guidance) via PayPal, or email hello@quietlist.in for a card invoice. Prefer to talk first, or have a portfolio to check? Same address. An information aid for your own due diligence, not legal or investment advice.
Free · Watch this project
We'll email you when this project's RERA record changes.
Built by Castles Vista.
Figures are the developer's own quarterly disclosures on the Karnataka RERA register. "Built" is the highest construction % filed; "sold" is booked units over total. Not a claim about the developer's intent. Explore every project on our Bangalore project-health tool.
Own a unit in Mantri Serenity5?
Sell directly to Quietlist's pre-screened buyer list — flat fee, no broker commission.
Last checked against the RERA register: 27 Jul 2026