MSR Passion Square
RERA Property Intelligence Report · Preview
Inner spaces · Bengaluru East · K-RERA PRM/KA/RERA/1251/446/PR/180131/000544
Report coverage
K-RERA registry & builder-record report
What this report covers
To confirm directly with the builder
🔒 The verdict & buyer playbook · Compliance report
The paid report opens with the overall risk rating, the specific red-flag findings, exactly what I'd do as a buyer in this project, who it suits, and the questions to put to the builder before you commit.
Registration-form facts from the K-RERA detail page: use these to sanity-check the builder brochure, parking allotment, and sanctioned-plan references before relying on plan-extracted approximations.
| Disclosure | Official value | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Registered units | 144 | Total inventory registered with K-RERA. |
| Official carpet area | 42,416 sqm | Regulator-disclosed project-level carpet area, not vision-derived room sums. |
| Registered land area | 19,523 sqm | The land area attached to this K-RERA registration. |
| Sanctioned FAR/FSI | ~2.01 | Sanctioned floor-area ratio (≈39,166 sqm sanctioned FAR area ÷ 19,523 sqm land) — higher means a denser vertical build. |
| Registered towers/wings | 9 | Official tower/wing count in the K-RERA detail page. |
| Parking disclosed | 288 total (0 open) — 2.00 spaces/unit | Confirm whether your quoted unit includes an allotted parking space and where it sits. |
| Project start date | 04-12-2015 |
K-RERA registration tables showing the project mix and tower/wing scale. Use this to sanity-check sales claims such as "only large homes", "low density", or "plenty of parking" against the filed inventory.
Registered inventory mix
| Type | Units | Share | Official carpet area |
|---|---|---|---|
| Residential apartement | 144 | 100% | 42,416 sqm |
Registered tower / wing summary
| Tower/wing | Floors | Units | Parking | Height |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | 8 | 6 | 12 | - |
| B | 9 | 17 | 34 | - |
| C | 9 | 18 | 36 | - |
| D | 9 | 17 | 34 | - |
| E | 9 | 17 | 34 | - |
| F | 9 | 17 | 34 | - |
| G | 9 | 18 | 36 | - |
| H | 9 | 17 | 34 | - |
Showing first 8 of 9 tower/wing rows.
K-RERA detail-page flat rows: exact unit numbers, official carpet area, UDS, and parking lots. 144 official flat/unit rows, matching the 144 registered units disclosed above. Use this as a checklist against the specific flat number in your cost sheet and draft agreement.
By unit type
| Unit type | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| NA | 144 | 960.0-3,958.0 sqft | 452.0-1,883.0 sqft | 288 |
By tower / wing
| Tower/wing | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| C | 18 | 960.0-3,502.0 sqft | 452.0-1,661.0 sqft | 36 |
| G | 18 | 1,676.0-3,958.0 sqft | 789.0-1,883.0 sqft | 36 |
| B | 17 | 960.0-3,502.0 sqft | 452.0-1,620.0 sqft | 34 |
| D | 17 | 2,040.0-3,502.0 sqft | 970.0-1,661.0 sqft | 34 |
| E | 17 | 2,040.0-3,502.0 sqft | 970.0-1,661.0 sqft | 34 |
| F | 17 | 1,240.0-3,509.0 sqft | 573.0-1,665.0 sqft | 34 |
| H | 17 | 2,040.0-3,502.0 sqft | 970.0-1,661.0 sqft | 34 |
| I | 17 | 1,232.0-3,502.0 sqft | 593.0-1,661.0 sqft | 34 |
| A | 6 | 2,648.0 sqft | 1,262.0 sqft | 12 |
| Unit | Tower | Floor | Type | Carpet | UDS | Parking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A301 | A | 3 | NA | 2,648.0 sqft | 1,262.0 sqft | 2 |
| A401 | A | 4 | NA | 2,648.0 sqft | 1,262.0 sqft | 2 |
| A501 | A | 5 | NA | 2,648.0 sqft | 1,262.0 sqft | 2 |
| A601 | A | 6 | NA | 2,648.0 sqft | 1,262.0 sqft | 2 |
| A701 | A | 7 | NA | 2,648.0 sqft | 1,262.0 sqft | 2 |
| A801 | A | 8 | NA | 2,648.0 sqft | 1,262.0 sqft | 2 |
What the numbers tell you
Synthesis from the official RERA scale, unit register, and land rows — the read a sales team won't volunteer.
🔒 Unit-by-unit guidance · Unit Guidance report
Which block and unit to prefer, the livability read on the filed plans, and a plan-by-plan walkthrough — the ₹2,999 guidance layer.
🔒 Full records — land title, amenities paperwork & document catalog · Compliance report
The complete land-title chain, the paperwork behind each declared amenity, and every document row on file with the regulator — the raw records the compliance read is built on.
No litigation declared on this project's K-RERA filing.
⚠ 1 of 23 compliance document slots are filed as under process / not yet usable: Commencement Certificate.
1 additional compliance slots are filed as Not Applicable.
No completion certificate (OC) on file yet — project has not been declared complete.
⚠ Registration validity has lapsed: originally due 31 Dec 2019, extended (Section 6 Extension) to 31 Dec 2020 — both dates have passed with no OC on file. The extension on file was granted on 19 Jan 2021 (K-RERA extension no. EX/PRM/KA/RERA/1251/446/PR/210119/000544) — it has been used, its deadline has also passed, and no further extension is recorded.
Named utility/regulatory approvals
"Not found in catalog" can mean the approval genuinely isn't on file yet, or that it doesn't apply to this project (K-RERA doesn't tell us which). Ask the builder directly for any marked not found before relying on it.
K-RERA complaint orders (9 complaints against a project of this name on K-RERA's orders register)
| Parties | Relief sought | Disposal | Order date |
|---|---|---|---|
| PRADEEP KUMAR DODLE vs INNER SPACES | Request intervention in continuation of maintenance by the promoter / builder till handover to the association after OC | AUTHORITY | 31/01/2024 |
| NITYA CHALLAM vs INNER SPACES | Fair Maintainance , essential services | AUTHORITY | 31/01/2024 |
| NITHYA CHELLAM vs INNER SPACES | Refund or Compensation | AUTHORITY | 27/03/2023 |
| MR.SUNIL SURANA vs M/S.INNER SPACES | Seeking a total relief of Rs. 16,45,350 from the Builder as per Construction Agreement. | AUTHORITY | 23/08/2023 |
| PRADEEP KUMAR DODLE vs INNER SPACES | I seek compensation for the delay from the promoter / builder Innerspaces under RERA ACT 2016 | AUTHORITY | 17/02/2023 |
| VISHWANATH & SUDHA VISHWANATH vs INNER SPACES | Seek compensation for delayed handover at the rate as per committed in the construction agreement clause no. 10 | AUTHORITY | 17/02/2023 |
| Vishwanath vs INNER SPACES | The developer be told to facilitate the formation of RWA and maintain the property till such time. RWA formation has been initiated but it takes time. | AUTHORITY | 10/11/2022 |
| Kenneth Eric Sequeira vs M/s.Inner Spaces | To get the builder to pay interest on delay period as per agreement. | AUTHORITY | 06/07/2026 |
| MS.NITHYA CHELLAM vs M/S.INNER SPACES | compensation for delay | AUTHORITY | 03/11/2023 |
⚠ Matched by PROJECT NAME (the orders register carries no registration number) — confirm the respondent above is this project's builder before relying on it.
Complaints on this project's K-RERA page (9 complaints listed against this promoter)
| Complaint | Subject (as filed) | Project | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| CMP/210929/0008396 29-09-2021 | Breach of sale and construction agreement | Meadow in the sun | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/210925/0008378 25-09-2021 | Promoter / Builder denying maintenance & threatening to withdraw essential services | Meadow in the sun | DISPOSED AUTHORITY FULLBENCH |
| CMP/210926/0008379 26-09-2021 | Delay in committed delivery date | Meadow in the sun | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4 |
| CMP/210926/0008381 26-09-2021 | Builder is not ready to maintain property | Meadow in the sun | DISPOSED AUTHORITY FULLBENCH |
| CMP/211018/0008448 18-10-2021 | Denial of service and refund for Lawn and Solar heater | Meadow in the sun | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH5 |
| CMP/210926/0008382 26-09-2021 | Delayed handover by more than a year | Meadow in the sun | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH5 |
| CMP/210929/0008398 29-09-2021 | Delay Compensation for Delayed Completion | Meadow in the sun | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4 |
| CMP/220125/0008870 25-01-2022 | Breach of Sale Agreement. Failure to Perform as mentioned in the agreement | Meadow in the sun | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH6 |
Listed on the project's own K-RERA detail page (registration-exact source). Rows on the promoter's other projects are track-record context — read the subject text, it is the complainant's own filed wording.
⚠ No quarterly financial disclosures (collections, escrow withdrawals) on record, despite no completion certificate yet — meaning we can't verify the project's cashflows against its construction progress. Worth asking the builder directly why no quarterly filings are available.
Declared construction cost ÷ registered units averages to ₹62.5 lakhs per unit — the developer's own declared construction/development cost, not a sale price. K-RERA filings don't disclose what the builder is charging, so this can't tell you whether you're getting a fair deal — only you comparing your quoted price against comparable listings nearby can answer that.
RERA 70% project account is on file: HDFC Sarjapur road. RERA requires 70% of buyer collections to sit in this separate, project-specific account, drawn only against certified construction milestones — confirm your payments are made to THIS account (not a general builder account) and that it appears on your allotment letter.
K-RERA has 1 project-photo upload.
These are developer-uploaded progress photos in the official document catalog. We do not treat them as proof of current site condition; use them as a prompt to ask for newer dated photos or a site visit.
The nearest major job hub is ~4 km away — a manageable everyday commute to a major job hub.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| Bellandur–Marathahalli belt | 4 km |
| Electronic City | 6 km |
| MG Road / city centre | 11 km |
| Whitefield IT hub | 12 km |
| Outer Ring Road / Manyata | 17 km |
| Kempegowda Int'l Airport | 34 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.
Should you buy in Meadow in the sun?
This page is the free K-RERA filing summary. The full RERA Property Intelligence Report gives you buyer-complaint history, regulatory flags, builder track record, the official unit register, land title, NOCs, and (where the sanctioned plans support it) room-by-room unit data and an annotated site plan. See a real one first:
Sample: Sobha Silicon Oasis → · browse all sample reports →
Compliance Report · ₹999
The regulator’s filing record, read · 1 working day
Scan with any UPI app to pay · quietlist@kotak
Unit Guidance Report · ₹2,999
Everything, down to which unit · 1 working day
Not useful to your decision? Full refund — no questions asked.
Scan with any UPI app to pay · quietlist@kotak
Paying from outside India? Pay $15 (Compliance) or $39 (Unit Guidance) via PayPal, or email hello@quietlist.in for a card invoice. Prefer to talk first, or have a portfolio to check? Same address. An information aid for your own due diligence, not legal or investment advice.
Free · Watch this project
We'll email you when this project's RERA record changes.
Built by Inner Spaces.
Figures are the developer's own quarterly disclosures on the Karnataka RERA register. "Built" is the highest construction % filed; "sold" is booked units over total. Not a claim about the developer's intent. Explore every project on our Bangalore project-health tool.
Own a unit in Meadow In The Sun?
Sell directly to Quietlist's pre-screened buyer list — flat fee, no broker commission.
Last checked against the RERA register: 27 Jul 2026