Peninsula Centre Commercial Building Shopping Complex
MahaRERA Property Intelligence · Pune
P52100004437 · promoter Kishankumar Jugalkishor Kedia
| MahaRERA registration | P52100004437 |
| Registered on | 09 Aug 2017 |
| Promoter-declared completion | 31 Dec 2029 |
| Current status | Certificate Signed |
| Against today | 41 months to the declared date |
MahaRERA's own defaulter/deregistration lists and the project's quarterly-progress-report filing — the regulator's view of whether this project is in good standing.
Of 1 homes filed with MahaRERA, 0 are sold/booked and 1 remain available (~0% sold) — early in sales — more choice of units now, but confirm the developer has the pre-sales to fund the build. This is the promoter's own reported inventory as at the last compliance filing; confirm current availability directly.
The unsold units on the filing — if you're quoted a unit NOT on this list, ask why it shows as sold/booked on the RERA record:
| Floor | Unit | Carpet | Reckoner value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Floor 2 | Bungalow | 1,184 sqft (110 sqm) | - |
No units are declared mortgaged, reserved, investor-held or not-for-sale in this inventory filing — still confirm your specific unit's status in the agreement.
The buildings and wings registered under this project, with each tower's sanctioned height and declared completion date. Here the tallest tower rises to G+1 and 1 homes are registered across the project.
| Building | Wings | Floors | Homes | Declared completion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bungalow No 1 | 1 | G+1 | 1 | - |
| Bungalow No 2 | 1 | G+1 | - | - |
| Bungalow No 3 | 1 | G+1 | - | - |
| Bungalow No 4 | 1 | G+1 | - | - |
| Bungalow No 5 | 1 | G+1 | - | - |
| Bungalow No 6 | 1 | G+1 | - | - |
| Bungalow no 7 | 1 | G+1 | - | - |
| Bungalow No 8 | 1 | G+1 | - | - |
| Bungalow No 9 | 1 | G+1 | - | - |
| Bungalow No 10 | 1 | G+1 | - | - |
| Bungalow No 11 | 1 | G+1 | - | - |
| Bungalow No 12 | 1 | G+1 | - | - |
| Bungalow No 13 | 1 | G+1 | - | - |
| Bungalow No 14 | 1 | G+1 | - | - |
| Bungalow No 15 | 1 | G+1 | - | - |
| Bungalow No16 | 1 | G+1 | - | - |
| Bungalow no 17 | 1 | G+1 | - | - |
| Bungalow no 18 | 1 | G+1 | - | - |
| Bungalow no 19 | 1 | G+1 | - | - |
| Bungalow No 20 | 1 | G+1 | - | - |
| Bungalow No 21 | 1 | G+1 | - | - |
| Bungalow No 22 | 1 | G+1 | - | - |
| Bungalow No 23 | 1 | G+1 | - | - |
| Bungalow No 24 | 1 | G+1 | - | - |
| Bungalow No 25 | 1 | G+1 | - | - |
| Bungalow No 26 | 1 | G+1 | - | - |
| Bungalow No 27 | 1 | G+1 | - | - |
| Bungalow No 28 | 1 | G+1 | - | - |
| Bungalow No 29 | 1 | G+1 | - | - |
| Bungalow No 30 | 1 | G+1 | - | - |
| Bungalow No 31 | 1 | G+1 | - | - |
| Bungalow No 32 | 1 | G+1 | - | - |
| Bungalow No33 | 1 | G+1 | - | - |
| Bungalow No 34 | 1 | G+1 | - | - |
| Bungalow No 35 | 1 | G+1 | - | - |
| Bungalow No 36 | 1 | G+1 | - | - |
| Bungalow No 37 | 1 | G+1 | - | - |
| Bungalow No 38 | 1 | G+1 | - | - |
| Bungalow No 39 | 1 | G+1 | - | - |
| Bungalow No 40 | 1 | G+1 | - | - |
| Bungalow No 41 | 1 | G+1 | - | - |
| Bungalow No 42 | 1 | G+1 | - | - |
| Bungalow No 43 | 1 | G+1 | - | - |
| Bungalow No 44 | 1 | G+1 | - | - |
| Bungalow No 45 | 1 | G+1 | - | - |
| Bungalow No 46 | 1 | G+1 | - | - |
| Bungalow No 47 | 1 | G+1 | - | - |
| Bungalow No 48 | 1 | G+1 | - | - |
| Bungalow No 49 | 1 | G+1 | - | - |
| Bungalow No 50 | 1 | G+1 | - | - |
| Bungalow No 51 | 1 | G+1 | - | - |
| Bungalow No 52 | 1 | G+1 | - | - |
| Bungalow No 53 | 1 | G+1 | - | - |
| Bungalow No 54 | 1 | G+1 | - | - |
| Bungalow No 55 | 1 | G+1 | - | - |
| Bungalow No 56 | 1 | G+1 | - | - |
| Bungalow No 57 | 1 | G+1 | - | - |
| Bungalow No 58 | 1 | G+1 | - | - |
| Bungalow No 59 | 1 | G+1 | - | - |
| Bungalow No 60 | 1 | G+1 | - | - |
| Bungalow No 61 | 1 | G+1 | - | - |
| Bungalow No 62 | 1 | G+1 | - | - |
| Bungalow No 63 | 1 | G+1 | - | - |
| Bungalow No 64 | 1 | G+1 | - | - |
| Bungalow No 65 | 1 | G+1 | - | - |
| Bungalow No 66 | 1 | G+1 | - | - |
| Bungalow No 67 | 1 | G+1 | - | - |
| Bungalow No 68 | 1 | G+1 | - | - |
| Bungalow No 69 | 1 | G+1 | - | - |
| Bungalow No 70 | 1 | G+1 | - | - |
| Bungalow No 71 | 1 | G+1 | - | - |
| Bungalow No 72 | 1 | G+1 | - | - |
| Bungalow No 73 | 1 | G+1 | - | - |
| Bungalow No 74 | 1 | G+1 | - | - |
| Bungalow No 75 | 1 | G+1 | - | - |
| Bungalow No 76 | 1 | G+1 | - | - |
| Bungalow No 77 | 1 | G+1 | - | - |
| Bungalow No 78 | 1 | G+1 | - | - |
| Bungalow No 79 | 1 | G+1 | - | - |
| Bungalow No 80 | 1 | G+1 | - | - |
| Bungalow No 81 | 1 | G+1 | - | - |
| Bungalow No 82 | 1 | G+1 | - | - |
| Bungalow No 83 | 1 | G+1 | - | - |
| Bungalow No 84 | 1 | G+1 | - | - |
| Bungalow No 85 | 1 | G+1 | - | - |
| Bungalow No 86 | 1 | G+1 | - | - |
| Bungalow No 87 | 1 | G+1 | - | - |
| Bungalow No 88 | 1 | G+1 | - | - |
| Bungalow No 89 | 1 | G+1 | - | - |
| Bungalow No 90 | 1 | G+1 | - | - |
| Bungalow No 91 | 1 | G+1 | - | - |
| Bungalow No 92 | 1 | G+1 | - | - |
| Bungalow No 93 | 1 | G+1 | - | - |
| Bungalow No 94 | 1 | G+1 | - | - |
| Bungalow No 95 | 1 | G+1 | - | - |
| Bungalow No 96 | 1 | G+1 | - | - |
| Bungalow No 97 | 1 | G+1 | - | - |
| Bungalow No 98 | 1 | G+1 | - | - |
| Bunaglow No 99 | 1 | G+1 | - | - |
| Bunglow No 100 | 1 | G+1 | - | - |
| Bungalow No 101 | 1 | G+1 | - | - |
| Bungalow No 102 | 1 | G+1 | - | - |
| Bungalow No 103 | 1 | G+1 | - | - |
| Bungalow No 104 | 1 | G+1 | - | - |
| Bungalow no 1A | 1 | G+1 | - | - |
| Bungalow No 2A | 1 | G+1 | - | - |
| Bungalow No 3A | 1 | G+1 | - | - |
| Bungalow No 4A and 4B | 1 | G+1 | - | - |
| Bungalow No 5A | 1 | G+1 | - | - |
| Bungalow No 6A | 1 | G+1 | - | - |
| Bungalow No 7A and 7B | 1 | G+1 | - | - |
| Bungalow No 8A | 1 | G+1 | - | - |
| Bungalow No 9A | 1 | G+1 | - | - |
| Bungalow No 10A and 10B | 1 | G+1 | - | - |
| Bungalow No 11A | 1 | G+1 | - | - |
Unit mix on the filing: 1 residential.
10 complaints are on the MahaRERA record for this project, with orders passed in 10. An adjudicated complaint is the clearest evidence of how this promoter behaves when pushed — read the orders in full.
| Complaint no. | Filed | Parties | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| CC005000000023435 | 21/09/2019 | Nitish Kumar Patel vs M/s. Garnet Construction Private Limited | order passed |
| CC005000000023438 | 21/09/2019 | Arunbhai Patel vs Garnet Construction Private Limited | order passed |
| CC005000000023439 | 21/09/2019 | Hiralal Lalji Patel vs Garnet Constructions Private Limited | order passed |
| CC005000000023440 | 14/10/2019 | Ms. Ruth Emily Nimbargi vs Garnet Constructions Private Limited | order passed |
| CC005000000023441 | 21/09/2019 | Mr Vasant Sanghani vs Garnet Constructions Private Limited | order passed |
| CC005000000198048 | 05/01/2023 | Garnet Construction Limited vs Vasant D. Sanghani | order passed |
| CC005000000198049 | 05/01/2023 | Garnet Construction Limited vs Hiralal Lalji Patel | order passed |
| CC005000000198050 | 05/01/2023 | Garnet Construction Limited vs Nitish Kumar Patel | order passed |
| CC005000000198051 | 05/01/2023 | Garnet Construction Limited vs Ruth Emily Nimbargi | order passed |
| CC005000000198052 | 05/01/2023 | Garnet Construction Limited vs Arunbhai M. Patel | order passed |
The promoter has declared 1 court case on this project to MahaRERA. Litigation can cloud the land title or stall the build — have a lawyer pull the cause list for each and confirm whether it touches the title to your flat. This is declared by the promoter; there may be further cases not on the RERA record.
| Court | Case no. | Year | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Revenue Minister Government Of Maharashtra | S 30/465-466/22/J-5 | 2016 | For Order |
The promoter has had the MahaRERA completion deadline formally extended 1 time. Each extension is the regulator letting the finish line move — the clearest evidence of delivery slippage, straight from the record.
| From (declared) | To (revised) | Stated reason |
|---|---|---|
| 31 Dec 2029 | 31 Dec 2029 | As we are unable to get 51% consents from allottees we would like to apply under order 40. |
Located at Karla, Andheri, Mumbai Suburban, 410405. Per the filed land record, the plot is bounded to the north by GUT NOS 306 311 294 AND 295, to the south by GUT N0 290 291 AND INDRAYANI RIVER, to the east by GUT 290 291 AND 304 and to the west by GUT NO 301 AND INDRAYANI RIVER. Confirm these against the 7/12 extract and the sanctioned plan before you rely on them.
The nearest major job hub is ~5 km away — a manageable everyday commute to a major job hub.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| Pune Junction / city centre | 1 km |
| Magarpatta / Hadapsar IT | 5 km |
| Kharadi / EON IT Park | 7 km |
| Pune Int'l Airport (Lohegaon) | 8 km |
| Baner–Balewadi belt | 11 km |
| Hinjewadi Rajiv Gandhi IT Park | 17 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.
🔒 The verdict & buyer playbook · Compliance report
The paid report opens with the overall risk read on this MahaRERA filing, exactly what I'd do as a buyer in this project, who it suits, and the questions to put to the promoter before you commit.
🔒 Unit-by-unit guidance · Unit Guidance report
Which building/wing and unit to prefer and the sanctioned-plan read for this project — the ₹2,999 guidance layer.
🔒 Full financial records — escrow, funding & the document catalog · Compliance report
The RERA 70% designated-escrow account activity, the declared means-of-finance, the professionals of record, and every document filed with MahaRERA — the raw records the read above is built on.
Should you buy in CRYSTAL SPRING?
This page is the free MahaRERA filing summary. The full RERA Property Intelligence Report gives you the full regulatory standing, declared court litigation, buyer-complaint and adjudication history, quarterly-progress-report discipline, the builder's MahaRERA-wide track record, the building/tower breakdown, and the sanctioned layout plan. See a real one first:
Sample: Lodha Kandivali – Tower 2 → · browse all sample reports →
Compliance Report · ₹999
The regulator’s filing record, read · 1 working day
Scan with any UPI app to pay · quietlist@kotak
Unit Guidance Report · ₹2,999
Everything, down to which unit · 1 working day
Not useful to your decision? Full refund — no questions asked.
Scan with any UPI app to pay · quietlist@kotak
Paying from outside India? Pay $15 (Compliance) or $39 (Unit Guidance) via PayPal, or email hello@quietlist.in for a card invoice. Prefer to talk first, or have a portfolio to check? Same address. An information aid for your own due diligence, not legal or investment advice.
Free · Watch this project
We'll email you when this project's RERA record changes.
Flags are from MahaRERA's own published problem lists — not a claim about the developer's intent. Explore every flagged project on our Pune RERA red-flag register.
Last checked against the RERA register: 27 Jul 2026