K-RERA · the public record
Purva Zenium 2
Bengaluru North · Puravankara
Know the project.
Then choose your home.
The registration, progress and filed details in one place. Go further with an independent reading of the project’s evidence.
The record · free to read
Registration read 20 Sep 2026Progress & dates
The timeline on file.
Promoter-reported construction
K-RERA quarterly filings · Q3 2025 to Q3 2025
declared completion
30 Jun 2027
The registered date and a construction update answer different questions. Neither is a confirmation of possession.
K-RERA registration · read 20 Sep 2026
Inventory & scale
What this registration contains.
Filed categories, unchanged · K-RERA registration · read 20 Sep 2026
The whole registration
3.0registered acres
146.7registered units per acre
The average covers the registered land and all registered unit types. It does not describe the space, outlook or surroundings of an individual home.
From another project · Prestige Park Grove
A larger advertised area. Almost the same carpet area.
In Tower 14, E4 has 141 sq ft more saleable area than E2. Its carpet area is only 0.46 sq m larger. The report puts the two layouts side by side.
This illustrates the report format. These findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the sample report ↗
The source record
The details behind the headline.
K-RERA · PRM/KA/RERA/1251/309/PR/071022/005303
This project, on the record
The comparable facts of this project, from its own RERA registration record. Each context percentile names its exact comparison set, drawn from Quietlist’s full register store. The paid report adds drawing-read rows to this same table — what the filed plans show about the site, its edges and the unit layouts.
On the register
In context
Values as crawled from the official K-RERA record; context percentiles name their comparison population.
Official Registry Facts
Official project scale
RERA filingRegistration-form facts from the K-RERA detail page: use these to sanity-check the builder brochure, parking allotment, and sanctioned-plan references before relying on plan-extracted approximations.
| Disclosure | Official value | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Registered units | 436 | Total inventory registered with K-RERA. |
| Official carpet area | 31,061 sqm | Regulator-disclosed project-level carpet area, not vision-derived room sums. |
| Official built-up area | 40,775 sqm | Useful scale context when comparing density and project cost. |
| Registered land area | 12,025 sqm | The land area attached to this K-RERA registration. |
| Sanctioned FAR/FSI | ~3.33 | Sanctioned floor-area ratio (≈40,061 sqm sanctioned FAR area ÷ 12,025 sqm land) — higher means a denser vertical build. |
| Registered tower/wing entries | 4 | Official tower/wing count in the K-RERA detail page. |
| Parking total (reconciled) | 436 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Covered-parking field | 430 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Open-parking field | 6 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Garage field | 0 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Approved plan number | BIAPPA/TP02/CC/30/2018-19 | Use this to match the sanctioned drawing set shown by the builder. |
| Plan approval date | 23-09-2021 | |
| Project start date | 15-07-2022 |
Official inventory & towers
RERA filingK-RERA registration tables showing the project mix and tower/wing scale. Use this to sanity-check sales claims such as "only large homes", "low density", or "plenty of parking" against the filed inventory.
Registered inventory mix
| Type | Units | Share | Official carpet area |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3BHK | 25 | 6% | 77 sqm |
| 2BHK | 28 | 6% | 64 sqm |
| 3BHK | 13 | 3% | 82 sqm |
| 3BHK | 28 | 6% | 84 sqm |
| 3BHK | 13 | 3% | 83 sqm |
| 2BHK | 331 | 76% | 65 sqm |
Registered tower / wing summary
| Tower/wing | Floors | Units | Parking | Height |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tower 1 | 13 | 111 | 111 | 0 m |
| Tower 2 | 13 | 111 | 111 | 0 m |
| Tower 3 | 13 | 111 | 111 | 0 m |
| Tower 4 | 12 | 103 | 103 | 0 m |
Official unit register
RERA filingK-RERA detail-page flat rows: exact unit numbers, official carpet area, UDS, and parking lots. 436 official flat/unit rows, matching the 436 registered units disclosed above. Use this as a checklist against the specific flat number in your cost sheet and draft agreement.
By unit type
| Unit type | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2 BHK | 359 | 64.8-83.6 sqm | 26.1-33.6 sqm | 359 |
| 3 BHK | 77 | 64.8-84.1 sqm | 26.1-33.9 sqm | 77 |
By tower / wing
| Tower/wing | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tower 1 | 111 | 65.6-84.1 sqm | 26.4-33.9 sqm | 111 |
| Tower 2 | 111 | 65.6 sqm | 26.4 sqm | 111 |
| Tower 3 | 111 | 65.6 sqm | 26.4 sqm | 111 |
| Tower 4 | 103 | 64.8-83.6 sqm | 26.1-33.6 sqm | 103 |
Show sample official unit rows
| Unit | Tower | Floor | Type | Carpet | UDS | Parking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Tower 1 | 0 | 2 BHK | 65.6 sqm | 26.4 sqm | 1 |
| 2 | Tower 1 | 0 | 2 BHK | 65.6 sqm | 26.4 sqm | 1 |
| 3 | Tower 1 | 0 | 3 BHK | 84.1 sqm | 33.9 sqm | 1 |
| 4 | Tower 1 | 0 | 3 BHK | 84.1 sqm | 33.9 sqm | 1 |
| 5 | Tower 1 | 0 | 2 BHK | 65.6 sqm | 26.4 sqm | 1 |
| 6 | Tower 1 | 0 | 2 BHK | 65.6 sqm | 26.4 sqm | 1 |
Legal, Approvals & Project Team
Litigation & compliance
RERA filingNo litigation declared on this project's K-RERA filing.
All 44 standard compliance document slots have usable uploaded filings.
No completion certificate (OC) on file yet — project has not been declared complete.
Named utility/regulatory approvals
"Not found in catalog" can mean the approval genuinely isn't on file yet, or that it doesn't apply to this project (K-RERA doesn't tell us which). Ask the builder directly for any marked not found before relying on it.
K-RERA complaint orders (1 complaint against a project of this name on K-RERA's orders register)
| Parties | Relief sought | Disposal | Order date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Chandra Bhushan Singh vs Puravankara limited | Refund | AUTHORITY | 16/03/2024 |
⚠ Matched by PROJECT NAME (the orders register carries no registration number) — confirm the respondent above is this project's builder before relying on it.
Complaints on this project's K-RERA page (53 complaints listed against this promoter)
| Complaint | Subject (as filed) | Project | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| CMP/190321/0002481 21-03-2019 | Refund of 2lac rupees token amount | Provident Park Square Phase - 1 (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190416/0002487 16-04-2019 | Delay of flat delivery and Compensation as per Rera act | Purva Westend Phase 1 (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190501/0002703 01-05-2019 | Misguided ,Forced to pay 10% and with out SBI approval of Tower -not given Requested Flat | Provident Park Square Phase - 1 (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190511/0002977 11-05-2019 | NON REGISTRATION AND POSSESSION OF FLAT DELIVERY DATE EXPIRED | Purva Sunflower (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190525/0003132 25-05-2019 | Appeal for invoking section 18 of RERA Act for continuous delay in handover of apartment | Purva Westend Phase 1 (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY FULLBENCH |
| CMP/190611/0003274 11-06-2019 | Builder is not responding to: cancellation of agreement by buyer due to delay in completion | Purva Sunflower (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190618/0003322 18-06-2019 | Booking amount refund 2 lakhs | Provident Park Square 4 (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190714/0003570 14-07-2019 | Complaint under Sec 18, Sec 31 & Sec 71 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act 2016, and under Rule 17, 29 & 30 of the Karnataka Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Rules 2017. | Purva Palmbeach (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
Listed on the project's own K-RERA detail page (registration-exact source). Rows on the promoter's other projects are track-record context — read the subject text, it is the complainant's own filed wording.
Statutory approval status
RERA filing10 further authority slots are marked not applicable by the regulator.
| Authority / NOC | Status | Date | File |
|---|
Project team & certifications
RERA filingK-RERA names 4 project professional/vendor rows across Chartered accountant, Engineer, Architect, Contractor. Use this to cross-check whose certificates, drawings, and contractor commitments support the filing; final reliance still belongs with your lawyer/technical reviewer.
| Role | Name | Registration / licence | Since | Locality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chartered accountant | V D S R & Co LLP | 001626S/S200085 | 1968 | Bengaluru Urban, Karnataka - 560003 |
| Engineer | Prashanth B S | 00000000000000000 | 2016 | Bengaluru Urban, Karnataka - 560042 |
| Architect | Katerra Design | CA/2014/64377 | 2010 | Bengaluru Urban, Karnataka - 560033 |
| Contractor | JMC Projects (India) LTD | - | 1982 | Bengaluru Urban, Karnataka - 560025 |
Builder track record
RERA filingPuravankara has 30 other K-RERA-registered projects in our records (average reported construction progress 77%). 14 are past their declared completion deadline with no completion certificate recorded — but because K-RERA publishes OCs inconsistently, a project that has actually been finished and handed over still shows up this way, so this overstates real delays, especially for a high-volume established builder. That is a lower delayed rate than the K-RERA average across Bengaluru on the same measure.
Read this as a list to spot-check for a pattern of genuinely stalled projects, not as a delay rate — pull up a few of the builder’s other K-RERA registrations and check whether they’ve actually been delivered.
Financials & Construction Progress
Financial disclosures
RERA filingLatest quarterly filing (2025-Q3): ₹6.93 Cr collected from buyers, ₹5.70 Cr withdrawn from the project's escrow account.
| Construction progress | 100% → 100% (+0 pts) |
| Units sold/booked as registered | 429/436 (98%) |
| Buyer collections in available QPRs | ₹6.93 Cr |
| Escrow withdrawals in available QPRs | ₹5.70 Cr (0.82x collections) |
- 98% of registered units are shown as sold/booked, but no completion certificate is on file yet.
- The filed unit sales count did not move across the available QPR window because the project was already effectively sold out.
- The builder has drawn 0.82x of buyer collections from escrow (about 82% of the ₹7 Cr collected) — money is largely staying in the regulated escrow account rather than being pulled out ahead of spend, which is the safer direction. A ratio near or above 1.0 would be the one to scrutinise.
QPR figures are developer-filed quarterly disclosures. Collections and withdrawals are not a project valuation; they are a sanity check for whether sales, construction progress, and escrow draws appear directionally aligned.
Declared construction cost ÷ registered units averages to ₹35.1 lakhs per unit — the developer's own declared construction/development cost, not a sale price. K-RERA filings don't disclose what the builder is charging, so this can't tell you whether you're getting a fair deal — only you comparing your quoted price against comparable listings nearby can answer that.
RERA 70% project account is on file: ICICI Bank Ulsoor Road Branch IFSC Code : ICIC0000002 Pin Code : 560042. RERA requires 70% of buyer collections to sit in this separate, project-specific account, drawn only against certified construction milestones — confirm your payments are made to THIS account (not a general builder account) and that it appears on your allotment letter.
Location & Connectivity
The nearest major job hub is ~12 km away — a real but liveable commute to the nearest job hub — factor peak-hour traffic.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| Kempegowda Int'l Airport | 9 km |
| Outer Ring Road / Manyata | 12 km |
| MG Road / city centre | 19 km |
| Whitefield IT hub | 23 km |
| Bellandur–Marathahalli belt | 24 km |
| Electronic City | 34 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.