Sobha Dream Acres - Tropical Greens Phase 22 Wing 23 and 24

This project, on the record

The comparable facts of this project, from its own RERA registration record. Each context percentile names its exact comparison set, drawn from Quietlist’s full register store. The paid report adds drawing-read rows to this same table — what the filed plans show about the site, its edges and the unit layouts.

Values as crawled from the official K-RERA record; context percentiles name their comparison population.

Official Registry Facts

Registration-form facts from the K-RERA detail page: use these to sanity-check the builder brochure, parking allotment, and sanctioned-plan references before relying on plan-extracted approximations.

K-RERA registration tables showing the project mix and tower/wing scale. Use this to sanity-check sales claims such as "only large homes", "low density", or "plenty of parking" against the filed inventory.

K-RERA detail-page flat rows: exact unit numbers, official carpet area, UDS, and parking lots. 237 official flat/unit rows, matching the 237 registered units disclosed above. Use this as a checklist against the specific flat number in your cost sheet and draft agreement.

Legal, Approvals & Project Team

⚠ 12 litigation cases on record

• Partition Suit in O.S. filed by Smt.Ramakka against Sri. Akrishnappa and others — II Addl. (Sr.Dn.), Bangalore Rural (2016)
• Partition Suit in O.S. filed by Smt. Rajamma against B.C. Narayana Reddy and others (M/s.Sobha Limited is not a party and no adverse Order/s on land / project is passed by the Court;) — Principal Civil Judge (Sr. Dn.), Banglaore Rural (2010)
• Partition Suit in O.S. filed by Smt.Y.Achhamma against Y.Venkata Reddy and others (M/s.Sobha Limited is not a party and no adverse Order/s on land / project is passed by the Court;) — Principal (Sr.Dn.) Civil Judge, Bangalore Rural (2011)
• Partition Suit in O.S. filed by Smt. Rathnamma & Others Vs. Sri. Muniraju and Others (M/s.Sobha Limited is not a party and no adverse Order/s on land / project is passed by the Court;) — III Additional Senior Civil Judge Bengaluru Rural Dist (2014)
• Partition Suit in O.S. filed by Muniyappa Vs Smt. Shaifunissa and Others (M/s.Sobha Limited is not a party and no adverse Order/s on land / project is passed by the Court;) — 1st Additional Senior Civil Judge Bengaluru Rural Dist (2009)
• Partition Suit in O.S. filed by Anand Kumar and Anr Vs. Gauramma and Ors (M/s.Sobha Limited is not a party and no adverse Order/s on land / project is passed by the Court;) — I Additional Senior Civil Judge, Bengaluru Rural, Bengaluru (2017)
• Writ Petition — High Court of Karnataka (2015)
• W.P filed by Sobha Limited against BBMP and Others, before the High Court of Karnataka, challenging the Ground Rent charges claimed by BBMP — High Court of Karnataka (2019)
• Writ petition filed by Sobha Limited against BBMP and Others, challenging the Ground Rent charges claimed by BBMP — High court of Karnataka (2020)
• Writ petition filed by Sobha Limited against BBMP and Others, before the High Court of Karnataka, challenging the Ground Rent,GSt and others charges claimed by BBMP — High court of Karnataka (2020)
• OS 368/2020 filed by Manohar Babu and another against Rukkamma and others before IV Addl Senior Civil Judge at Bangalore Rural for partition, separate possession and other reliefs — IV Additional Senior Civil Judge Bengaluru Rural Dist (2020)
• OS 483/2022 filed by Kaveramma against Muniyappa and others before III Addl Senior Civil Judge at Bangalore Rural for partition, separate possession and other reliefs — III Additional Senior Civil Judge Bengaluru Rural Dist (2022)

11 of 36 compliance document slots are filed as Not Applicable; the remaining 25 slots have usable uploaded filings.

No completion certificate (OC) on file yet — project has not been declared complete.

⚠ Registration validity has lapsed: originally due 30 Jun 2025, extended (Covid Extension) to 30 Mar 2026 — both dates have passed with no OC on file.

3 of 4 applicable approvals are on file; still outstanding: KPTCL- BESCOM. Confirm each has been granted, not merely applied for, before booking.

6 further authority slots are marked not applicable by the regulator.

K-RERA names 3 project professional/vendor rows across Architect, Contractor, Structural engineer. Use this to cross-check whose certificates, drawings, and contractor commitments support the filing; final reliance still belongs with your lawyer/technical reviewer.

Sobha has 121 other K-RERA-registered projects in our records — grouped across the several project-specific entities this developer registers under (e.g. this project is filed as “Sobha”) (average reported construction progress 60%). 60 are past their declared completion deadline with no completion certificate recorded — but because K-RERA publishes OCs inconsistently, a project that has actually been finished and handed over still shows up this way, so this overstates real delays, especially for a high-volume established builder. That is a lower delayed rate than the K-RERA average across Bengaluru on the same measure.

Read this as a list to spot-check for a pattern of genuinely stalled projects, not as a delay rate — pull up a few of the builder’s other K-RERA registrations and check whether they’ve actually been delivered.

Financials & Construction Progress

Latest quarterly filing (2025-Q4): ₹5.71 Cr collected from buyers, ₹5.70 Cr withdrawn from the project's escrow account.

• 100% of registered units are shown as sold/booked, but no completion certificate is on file yet.
• Construction progress moved from 96% to 100% across the filed QPR window.
• The filed unit sales count did not move across the available QPR window because the project was already effectively sold out.

QPR figures are developer-filed quarterly disclosures. Collections and withdrawals are not a project valuation; they are a sanity check for whether sales, construction progress, and escrow draws appear directionally aligned.

Declared construction cost ÷ registered units averages to ₹39.2 lakhs per unit — the developer's own declared construction/development cost, not a sale price. K-RERA filings don't disclose what the builder is charging, so this can't tell you whether you're getting a fair deal — only you comparing your quoted price against comparable listings nearby can answer that.

RERA 70% project account is on file: RATNAKAR BANK Residency Road (IFSC RATN0000156, a/c …9689). RERA requires 70% of buyer collections to sit in this separate, project-specific account, drawn only against certified construction milestones — confirm your payments are made to THIS account (not a general builder account) and that it appears on your allotment letter.

K-RERA has 1 project-photo upload across Wing 23.

These are developer-uploaded progress photos in the official document catalog. We do not treat them as proof of current site condition; use them as a prompt to ask for newer dated photos or a site visit. Individual filings are listed in the document catalog below.

Location & Connectivity

The nearest major job hub is ~4 km away — walking/short-hop distance to a major employment hub — a genuine work-near-home location.

Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.