Casagrand Zaiden
RERA Property Intelligence Report · Preview
Casa Grande Garden City Builders · Bengaluru East · K-RERA PRM/KA/RERA/1251/446/PR/210928/004324
Report coverage
K-RERA registry & builder-record report
What this report covers
To confirm directly with the builder
🔒 The verdict & buyer playbook · Compliance report
The paid report opens with the overall risk rating, the specific red-flag findings, exactly what I'd do as a buyer in this project, who it suits, and the questions to put to the builder before you commit.
Registration-form facts from the K-RERA detail page: use these to sanity-check the builder brochure, parking allotment, and sanctioned-plan references before relying on plan-extracted approximations.
| Disclosure | Official value | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Registered units | 296 | Total inventory registered with K-RERA. |
| Official carpet area | 96 sqm | Regulator-disclosed project-level carpet area, not vision-derived room sums. |
| Registered land area | 16,161 sqm | The land area attached to this K-RERA registration. |
| Sanctioned FAR/FSI | 2.25 | Higher FAR generally means a denser vertical build, subject to site layout and open-space design. |
| Registered towers/wings | 2 | Official tower/wing count in the K-RERA detail page. |
| Parking disclosed | 339 total (44 open) — 1.15 spaces/unit | Confirm whether your quoted unit includes an allotted parking space and where it sits. |
| Project start date | 01-09-2021 |
K-RERA registration tables showing the project mix and tower/wing scale. Use this to sanity-check sales claims such as "only large homes", "low density", or "plenty of parking" against the filed inventory.
Registered inventory mix
| Type | Units | Share | Official carpet area |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3BHK | 150 | 100% | 96 sqm |
Registered tower / wing summary
| Tower/wing | Floors | Units | Parking | Height |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Building 1 | 7 | 112 | 129 | - |
| Building 2 | 7 | 184 | 210 | - |
K-RERA detail-page flat rows: exact unit numbers, official carpet area, UDS, and parking lots. 296 official flat/unit rows, matching the 296 registered units disclosed above. Use this as a checklist against the specific flat number in your cost sheet and draft agreement.
By unit type
| Unit type | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3BHK+3T | 150 | 87.3-100.2 sqm | 57.4-68.5 sqm | 198 |
| 2BHK+2T | 136 | 64.0-70.8 sqm | 42.6-49.1 sqm | 136 |
| 1RK+1T | 10 | 29.9-30.8 sqm | 20.2-20.7 sqm | 5 (5 with 0) |
By tower / wing
| Tower/wing | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Building 2 | 184 | 30.8-100.2 sqm | 20.7-68.5 sqm | 210 (5 with 0) |
| Building 1 | 112 | 29.9-100.2 sqm | 20.2-68.3 sqm | 129 |
| Unit | Tower | Floor | Type | Carpet | UDS | Parking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| AG01 | Building 1 | 0 | 1RK+1T | 29.9 sqm | 20.4 sqm | 1 |
| AG02 | Building 1 | 0 | 1RK+1T | 29.9 sqm | 20.2 sqm | 1 |
| AG03 | Building 1 | 0 | 3BHK+3T | 96.8 sqm | 63.4 sqm | 1 |
| AG04 | Building 1 | 0 | 3BHK+3T | 96.8 sqm | 63.6 sqm | 1 |
| AG05 | Building 1 | 0 | 3BHK+3T | 99.8 sqm | 65.0 sqm | 1 |
| AG06 | Building 1 | 0 | 2BHK+2T | 70.4 sqm | 46.5 sqm | 1 |
What the numbers tell you
Synthesis from the official RERA scale, unit register, and land rows — the read a sales team won't volunteer.
🔒 Unit-by-unit guidance · Unit Guidance report
Which block and unit to prefer, the livability read on the filed plans, and a plan-by-plan walkthrough — the ₹2,999 guidance layer.
🔒 Full records — land title, amenities paperwork & document catalog · Compliance report
The complete land-title chain, the paperwork behind each declared amenity, and every document row on file with the regulator — the raw records the compliance read is built on.
No litigation declared on this project's K-RERA filing.
⚠ 3 of 22 compliance document slots are filed as under process / not yet usable: Proforma For Sale Deed, Performa of Allotment Letter, Brochure of Current Project.
No completion certificate (OC) on file yet — project has not been declared complete.
⚠ Registration validity has lapsed: originally due 21 Aug 2024, extended (Section 6 Extension) to 21 Aug 2025 — both dates have passed with no OC on file. The extension on file was granted on 09 Oct 2024 (K-RERA extension no. EX/PRM/KA/RERA/1251/446/PR/241009/004324) — it has been used, its deadline has also passed, and no further extension is recorded.
Named utility/regulatory approvals
"Not found in catalog" can mean the approval genuinely isn't on file yet, or that it doesn't apply to this project (K-RERA doesn't tell us which). Ask the builder directly for any marked not found before relying on it.
K-RERA enforcement record (the regulator's own defaulter list & penalty orders)
⚠ Listed on K-RERA's official DEFAULTER list.
Penalty orders on record:
| Violation | Under section | Penalty | Order date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Non Submission Of Annual Report 2021 22 | Section 4(2)(l)(D) | ₹4,421,781 | 14/12/2023 |
K-RERA complaint orders (27 complaints against a project of this name on K-RERA's orders register)
| Parties | Relief sought | Disposal | Order date |
|---|---|---|---|
| PRATHEEKSHITH KUNJATHUR vs Casagrand Orlena | Interest on delayed period. | AUTHORITY | 26/03/2026 |
| Joe Thomas vs Casagrand Orlena | Direct the builder to share the updated building plan. Provide justification for building plan change. Action against the builder for non-compliance with RERA guidelines. | AUTHORITY | 26/03/2026 |
| Shivaraman N vs Casagrand Orlena | Interest on delay period | AUTHORITY | 26/03/2026 |
| Augustine Francis vs Casagrand Orlena | direct promoter to share revised plan approvals and clubhouse land documents ensure the timely delivery of the flat | AUTHORITY | 26/03/2026 |
| Rani Chintha vs Casagrand Orlena | Direct Builder to share revised plan, pay compensation for the changes done, handover the project after full completion as soon as possible and pay interest on delay period happened | AUTHORITY | 26/03/2026 |
| Annapoorani D vs Casagrand Orlena | to grant interest on delay period for handing over the physical possession of the flat to the complainant | AUTHORITY | 26/03/2026 |
| Puja Priya vs Casagrand Orlena | seeking for the compensation and interest on delay caused towards handing over the possession | AUTHORITY | 26/03/2026 |
| Mary Prakasam vs Casagrand Orlena | to pay the necessary interest towards the failure of handing over the possession within time. | AUTHORITY | 26/03/2026 |
| Puja Priya vs Casagrand Orlena | seeking for the compensation and interest on delay caused towards handing over the possession | AUTHORITY | 26/03/2026 |
| Avinash Kumar vs Casagrand Orlena | Direct Promoter to share the revised plans and relevant approvals. gurantee a timeline for the delivery of the project, interest on delay period | AUTHORITY | 13/03/2026 |
| Viswanath K vs Casagrand Orlena | Direct promoter to share updated plan of apartment and clubhouse. Ensure timely delivery of flat and clubhouse as agreed in the Sale deed. Ensure promoter pay interest on delay period. | AUTHORITY | 13/03/2026 |
| Dilliraj Ramakrishna vs Casagrand Orlena | interest/compensation for the delay caused | AUTHORITY | 13/03/2026 |
| Vivek Srinivasan vs Casagrand Orlena | seeking compensation and interest on delay caused towards delivery of the possession of the said flat | AUTHORITY | 13/03/2026 |
| Neethi Prakasam A vs Casagrand Orlena | interest on delay of the possession of the said flats | AUTHORITY | 13/03/2026 |
| SAMINATHAN K vs Casagrand Orlena | Direct to handover the units as soon as possible with promised Amenities, Impose penalty for violation of Sec-14 of RERA act, grand interest on delay may deem fit per justice. | AUTHORITY | 13/03/2026 |
| Amiya Ranjan Behera vs Casagrand Orlena | interest on delay of handing over the possession of the said flat i.e., E407 | AUTHORITY | 13/03/2026 |
| Nandini KS vs Casa Grande Garden City Builders Pvt ltd | A clear and legally binding timeline for the completion and handover of the flat, especially the clubhouse,Penalty or interest on paid amount. | AUTHORITY | 12/08/2025 |
| kuldeep kothari vs Casagrand Orlena | interest on delay period and plan should be approved and consent should be secured from 2/3 majority without further delay. | AUTHORITY | 10/03/2026 |
| IswaryaLakshmi Mopuri vs Casagrand Orlena | Immediate action to ensure the completion and handover of the apartment as per the agreed timeline. Clarification and approval status for the clubhouse construction. Compensation/Interest for delay. | AUTHORITY | 10/03/2026 |
| Fazlur Rahman vs Casagrand Orlena | Interest on delay period | AUTHORITY | 10/03/2026 |
| Vigneshwari Rajasekaran vs Casagrand | need interest on delay period | AUTHORITY | 10/03/2026 |
| Kajal Rauto vs Casagrand Orlena | Direct promoter to share revised plan approvals and clubhouse land documents, ensure timely delivery of promised amenities, and grant intrest on delay period. | AUTHORITY | 10/03/2026 |
| Suhird Sinha vs Casagrand Orlena | Direct promoter to share revised plan approvals and clubhouse land documents, ensure timely delivery of promised amenities, and grant interest on delay period beyond the original August 2024 | AUTHORITY | 10/03/2026 |
| Shahul Hameed vs Casagrand Orlena | Order the Builder to share revised plan approvals and clubhouse land documents, pay applicable interest on delay period and ensure prompt completion of the project and handover on time | AUTHORITY | 10/03/2026 |
| AVINASH KIRTI vs Casagrand Orlena | Reprimand the builder for delaying the project and provide interest on delay period | AUTHORITY | 10/03/2026 |
| Arpan Sarkar vs Casagrand Orlena | Direct the promoter to promptly share the revised plan including all amenities agreed upon at the time of registration, and to provide appropriate interest on delay period | AUTHORITY | 10/03/2026 |
| Resmi Suresh M P vs Casagrand Orlena | Interest on delay period | AUTHORITY | 10/03/2026 |
⚠ Matched by PROJECT NAME (the orders register carries no registration number) — confirm the respondent above is this project's builder before relying on it.
Complaints on this project's K-RERA page (8 complaints listed against this promoter)
| Complaint | Subject (as filed) | Project | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| CMP/200816/0006368 16-08-2020 | Delay in Handover of Apartment C204 - CASAGRAND ROYCE Project | Casagrand Royce (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4 |
| CMP/211201/0008654 01-12-2021 | DELAYED COMPLETION BREACH OF TRUST FINANCIAL LOSSES SUFFERED BY COMPLAINANTS | Casagrand Royce (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4 |
| CMP/220321/0009178 21-03-2022 | Builder refuses to pay interset for the amount refunded after 4 years | Casagrand Royce (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH5 |
| CMP/220616/0009641 16-06-2022 | Delay In hand over which was expected to be done by 9th of March 2022 | Casagrand Florella (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4 |
| CMP/220706/0009722 06-07-2022 | Builder not refunding the booking amount due to unavailability of the unit | Casagrand Florella Phase 2 (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4 |
| CMP/221104/0010175 04-11-2022 | Builder not delivering the apartment flat C306 to date even after the expiry of the RERA Extended due date (15th July 2022) and denied to pay delay compensation | Casa Grande Lorenza (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH5 |
| CMP/221107/0010222 07-11-2022 | Builder not delivering the apartment flat C306 to date even after the expiry of the RERA Extended due date (15th July 2022) and denied to pay delay compensation | Casa Grande Lorenza (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH5 |
| CMP/221221/0010496 21-12-2022 | Builder not adhering to the agreed and adding new clause in the sale deed | Casagrand Florella (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH5 |
Listed on the project's own K-RERA detail page (registration-exact source). Rows on the promoter's other projects are track-record context — read the subject text, it is the complainant's own filed wording.
K-RERA names 3 project professional/vendor rows across Architect, Contractor, Structural engineer. Use this to cross-check whose certificates, drawings, and contractor commitments support the filing; final reliance still belongs with your lawyer/technical reviewer.
| Role | Name | Registration / licence | Since | Locality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Architect | Suresh Kumar Marthandan - Destination Designs | - | 2017 | Jayanagar, Bangalore |
| Contractor | Casagrand | - | 2015 | Meanee Avenue road, Ulsoor road |
| Structural engineer | V G Palaksha - Anagha Engineering Consultants | - | - | - |
Casagrand has 20 other K-RERA-registered projects in our records — grouped across the several project-specific entities this developer registers under (e.g. this project is filed as “Casa Grande”) (average reported construction progress 41%). 10 are past their declared completion deadline with no completion certificate recorded — but because K-RERA publishes OCs inconsistently, a project that has actually been finished and handed over still shows up this way, so this overstates real delays, especially for a high-volume established builder. That is a lower delayed rate than the K-RERA average across Bengaluru on the same measure.
Read this as a list to spot-check for a pattern of genuinely stalled projects, not as a delay rate — pull up a few of the builder’s other K-RERA registrations and check whether they’ve actually been delivered.
⚠ No quarterly financial disclosures (collections, escrow withdrawals) on record, despite no completion certificate yet — meaning we can't verify the project's cashflows against its construction progress. Worth asking the builder directly why no quarterly filings are available.
Declared construction cost ÷ registered units averages to ₹27.6 lakhs per unit — the developer's own declared construction/development cost, not a sale price. K-RERA filings don't disclose what the builder is charging, so this can't tell you whether you're getting a fair deal — only you comparing your quoted price against comparable listings nearby can answer that.
RERA 70% project account is on file: ICICI Bank ULSOOR ROAD (IFSC ICIC0003904, a/c …1236). RERA requires 70% of buyer collections to sit in this separate, project-specific account, drawn only against certified construction milestones — confirm your payments are made to THIS account (not a general builder account) and that it appears on your allotment letter.
K-RERA has 1 project-photo upload.
These are developer-uploaded progress photos in the official document catalog. We do not treat them as proof of current site condition; use them as a prompt to ask for newer dated photos or a site visit.
The nearest major job hub is ~2 km away — walking/short-hop distance to a major employment hub — a genuine work-near-home location.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| Outer Ring Road / Manyata | 2 km |
| MG Road / city centre | 8 km |
| Bellandur–Marathahalli belt | 13 km |
| Whitefield IT hub | 15 km |
| Kempegowda Int'l Airport | 19 km |
| Electronic City | 22 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.
Should you buy in Casagrand Orlena?
This page is the free K-RERA filing summary. The full RERA Property Intelligence Report gives you buyer-complaint history, regulatory flags, builder track record, the official unit register, land title, NOCs, and (where the sanctioned plans support it) room-by-room unit data and an annotated site plan. See a real one first:
Sample: Sobha Silicon Oasis → · browse all sample reports →
Compliance Report · ₹999
The regulator’s filing record, read · 1 working day
Scan with any UPI app to pay · quietlist@kotak
Unit Guidance Report · ₹2,999
Everything, down to which unit · 1 working day
Not useful to your decision? Full refund — no questions asked.
Scan with any UPI app to pay · quietlist@kotak
Paying from outside India? Pay $15 (Compliance) or $39 (Unit Guidance) via PayPal, or email hello@quietlist.in for a card invoice. Prefer to talk first, or have a portfolio to check? Same address. An information aid for your own due diligence, not legal or investment advice.
Free · Watch this project
We'll email you when this project's RERA record changes.
Built by Casa Grande. View Casa Grande's full track record →
Figures are the developer's own quarterly disclosures on the Karnataka RERA register. "Built" is the highest construction % filed; "sold" is booked units over total. Not a claim about the developer's intent. Explore every project on our Bangalore project-health tool.
Own a unit in Casagrand Orlena?
Sell directly to Quietlist's pre-screened buyer list — flat fee, no broker commission.
Last checked against the RERA register: 27 Jul 2026