K-RERA · the public record
Legacy Vivienda
Bengaluru North · Legacy Global Projects
Know the project.
Then choose your home.
The registration, progress and filed details in one place. Go further with an independent reading of the project’s evidence.
The record · free to read
Registration read 20 Sep 2026Progress & dates
The timeline on file.
Promoter-reported construction
K-RERA quarterly filings · Q3 2025 to Q1 2026
declared completion
31 Jul 2020
The registered date and a construction update answer different questions. Neither is a confirmation of possession.
K-RERA registration · read 20 Sep 2026
Inventory & scale
What this registration contains.
Filed categories, unchanged · K-RERA registration · read 20 Sep 2026
The whole registration
3.0registered acres
92.0registered units per acre
The average covers the registered land and all registered unit types. It does not describe the space, outlook or surroundings of an individual home.
From another project · Prestige Park Grove
A larger advertised area. Almost the same carpet area.
In Tower 14, E4 has 141 sq ft more saleable area than E2. Its carpet area is only 0.46 sq m larger. The report puts the two layouts side by side.
This illustrates the report format. These findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the sample report ↗
The source record
The details behind the headline.
K-RERA · PRM/KA/RERA/1251/309/PR/171015/000885
This project, on the record
The comparable facts of this project, from its own RERA registration record. Each context percentile names its exact comparison set, drawn from Quietlist’s full register store. The paid report adds drawing-read rows to this same table — what the filed plans show about the site, its edges and the unit layouts.
On the register
In context
Values as crawled from the official K-RERA record; context percentiles name their comparison population.
Official Registry Facts
Official project scale
RERA filingRegistration-form facts from the K-RERA detail page: use these to sanity-check the builder brochure, parking allotment, and sanctioned-plan references before relying on plan-extracted approximations.
| Disclosure | Official value | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Registered units | 276 | Total inventory registered with K-RERA. |
| Official carpet area | 1,032 sqm | Regulator-disclosed project-level carpet area, not vision-derived room sums. |
| Registered land area | 12,140 sqm | The land area attached to this K-RERA registration. |
| Sanctioned FAR/FSI | 2.24 | Higher FAR generally means a denser vertical build, subject to site layout and open-space design. |
| Registered tower/wing entries | 1 | Official tower/wing count in the K-RERA detail page. |
| Parking total (reconciled) | 265 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Open-parking field | 29 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Garage field | 0 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Project start date | 30-06-2016 |
Official inventory & towers
RERA filingK-RERA registration tables showing the project mix and tower/wing scale. Use this to sanity-check sales claims such as "only large homes", "low density", or "plenty of parking" against the filed inventory.
Registered inventory mix
| Type | Units | Share | Official carpet area |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 BHK | 28 | 100% | 1,032 sqm |
Registered tower / wing summary
| Tower/wing | Floors | Units | Parking | Height |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LEGACY VIVIENDA | 6 | 276 | 265 | - |
Official unit register
RERA filingK-RERA detail-page flat rows: exact unit numbers, official carpet area, UDS, and parking lots. 276 official flat/unit rows, matching the 276 registered units disclosed above. Use this as a checklist against the specific flat number in your cost sheet and draft agreement.
By unit type
| Unit type | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2BHK | 176 | 517.0-934.0 sqft | 374.0-628.0 sqft | 167 (9 with 0) |
| 3BHK | 72 | 517.0-1,191.0 sqft | 374.0-780.0 sqft | 70 (2 with 0) |
| 1BHK | 28 | 397.0 sqft | 291.0 sqft | 28 |
By tower / wing
| Tower/wing | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LEGACY VIVIENDA | 276 | 397.0-1,191.0 sqft | 291.0-780.0 sqft | 265 (11 with 0) |
Show sample official unit rows
| Unit | Tower | Floor | Type | Carpet | UDS | Parking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C-001 | LEGACY VIVIENDA | 0 | 3BHK | 735.0 sqft | 518.0 sqft | 1 |
| C-002 | LEGACY VIVIENDA | 0 | 2BHK | 517.0 sqft | 374.0 sqft | 1 |
| C-003 | LEGACY VIVIENDA | 0 | 3BHK | 735.0 sqft | 518.0 sqft | 1 |
| C-004 | LEGACY VIVIENDA | 0 | 3BHK | 735.0 sqft | 518.0 sqft | 1 |
| C-005 | LEGACY VIVIENDA | 0 | 3BHK | 735.0 sqft | 518.0 sqft | 1 |
| C-007 | LEGACY VIVIENDA | 0 | 2BHK | 517.0 sqft | 374.0 sqft | 1 |
Legal, Approvals & Project Team
Litigation & compliance
RERA filingNo litigation declared on this project's K-RERA filing.
1 of 27 compliance document slots are filed as Not Applicable; the remaining 26 slots have usable uploaded filings.
No completion certificate (OC) on file yet — project has not been declared complete.
Named utility/regulatory approvals
"Not found in catalog" can mean the approval genuinely isn't on file yet, or that it doesn't apply to this project (K-RERA doesn't tell us which). Ask the builder directly for any marked not found before relying on it.
K-RERA complaint orders (14 complaints against a project of this name on K-RERA's orders register)
| Parties | Relief sought | Disposal | Order date |
|---|---|---|---|
| RAJENDRA PRASAD & D MAMATHA vs LEGACY GLOBAL PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED | (a) cancellation of the Agreement for Sale dated 29/12/2017, (b) Refund of the amount paid as per various transactions in terms of the Agreement for Sale and (c) Costs of this proceedings. | AUTHORITY | 29/11/2024 |
| M Mallesh vs Legacy Global Projects Private Limited | Compensation for delay as well as mental agony, briefly explained in the Complaint in the previous page. | AUTHORITY | 21/10/2024 |
| DEEPAK DEWAN vs LEGACY VIVENDA | Compensation for delay as well as damages, Exact prayer is as stated in the complaint which is uploaded with title "Complaint RERA-Deepak Dewan" | AUTHORITY | 20/09/2023 |
| Hema M Nandi vs Legacy Vivienda | Interest on delay period | AUTHORITY | 19/08/2025 |
| Sunil Adhikari vs Legacy Vivienda | Compensation and damages, Reliefs sought are elaborated in brief in the complaint titled "Complaint-RERA-Sunil Adhikari" | AUTHORITY | 18/04/2024 |
| SOMYA P vs LEGACY GLOBAL PROJECTS PVT LTD | Compensation and damages are sought according to the agreement. Reliefs As per the complaint uploaded. (In Previous page, the complaint has been uploaded which is inclusive of the reliefs sought. | AUTHORITY | 17/06/2023 |
| Chiranth KN vs Legacy Global Projects Private Limited | COmpensation and damages are sought for the delay and in fact for not starting the project yet. Reliefs are As per the complaint uploaded. The reliefs sought are mentioned in the complaint. | AUTHORITY | 17/06/2023 |
| THANDAYUDHA BANI S & SUSHEELA vs LEGACY GLOBAL PROJECTS PVT LTD | As mentioned in the complaint uploaded. The reliefs sought are mentioned in the complaint copy uploaded. | AUTHORITY | 17/06/2023 |
| MR.THIMMIAH GUDDANDA SOMANA & ANOTHER vs M/S.LEGACY GLOBAL PROJECTS (P) LTD | Humbly request RERA to (a) Order payment of pre-emi charges by the Developer; or (b) Refund all monies disbursed to the developer till date and terminate contract as per its provisions. | AUTHORITY | 14/09/2023 |
| MR.YUDHISHTIR URS vs M/S.LEGACY GLOBAL PROJECTS PVT LTD | Fulfil obligations under Agreement dated 29.07.2016. OR Refund of Rs 40 Lakhs at 12% interest per annum till realization; Rs. 4,48,000/- delay charges till date. | AUTHORITY | 11/10/2023 |
| MRS NUZHAT SULTANA vs LEGACY GLOBAL PROJECTS PRIVATE LIMITED | a) Repayment of sum of Rs. 18,99,000/- paid by the Complainant towards the purchase of the Flat No.C-402 in the Respondent Project, b) Pay Compensation of Rs. 50,00,000/- towards loss on investment | AUTHORITY | 11/02/2023 |
| MOHAMMED IMRAN vs LEGACY VIVENDA | An Order directing the Respondent to refund the entire amount Rs. 32,67,000/- with interest at 18% per annum and an amount of Rs. 5,00,000/- as compensation | AUTHORITY | 05/02/2024 |
| MS.CHITRA SRINIVAS vs M/S.LEGACY VIVIENDA | Exit from project and refund of money paid with interest and delay compensation | AUTHORITY | 04/10/2023 |
| Ranjit Dutt Urs vs Legacy Vivienda | Refund of 44 lakhs along with interest at 18% from 29.07.2016 till date of realisation; and cost of Rs. 2.5 Lakhs/- | AUTHORITY | 03/11/2025 |
⚠ Matched by PROJECT NAME (the orders register carries no registration number) — confirm the respondent above is this project's builder before relying on it.
Complaints on this project's K-RERA page (13 complaints listed against this promoter)
| Complaint | Subject (as filed) | Project | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| CMP/200529/0005940 29-05-2020 | Refusal to Honour Terms of Sale Agreement | Legacy Vivienda | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH5 |
| CMP/201124/0007120 24-11-2020 | Refund of Sale Consideration with Interest and Compensation | Legacy Vivienda | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH5 |
| CMP/210309/0007771 09-03-2021 | As per the complaint uploaded. | Legacy Vivienda | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH5 |
| CMP/210309/0007772 09-03-2021 | As per the complaint uploaded. | Legacy Vivienda | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH5 |
| CMP/210309/0007773 09-03-2021 | As mentioned in the complaint uploaded | Legacy Vivienda | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH5 |
| CMP/210420/0007910 20-04-2021 | As per mentioned in the Complaint in the previous page. | Legacy Vivienda | DISPOSED AUTHORITY FULLBENCH |
| CMP/210420/0007912 20-04-2021 | My Booking of Apartement-G-01 of M/S Legacy Salvador (Legacy Global Projects Pvt Ltd) | Legacy Salvador (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4 |
| CMP/210531/0007969 31-05-2021 | As per the Complaint uploaded. | Legacy Vivienda | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH5 |
Listed on the project's own K-RERA detail page (registration-exact source). Rows on the promoter's other projects are track-record context — read the subject text, it is the complainant's own filed wording.
Statutory approval status
RERA filingClean approvals profile: every applicable statutory NOC is on file — including Fire NOC, environmental clearance and pollution-control clearance (KSPCB), the clearances buyers most often find still pending. Nothing is outstanding among the statutory NOCs — which compliance documents are filed versus still under process is a separate matter, covered in Litigation & compliance above. Since these are developer-filed portal statuses, have your lawyer confirm them against the linked NOC copies.
4 further authority slots are marked not applicable by the regulator.
| Authority / NOC | Status | Date | File |
|---|---|---|---|
| KSPCB- PCB (10 Acres to 125 Acres) | Approved | 20-11-2015 | KSPCB NOC Vivienda.pdf |
| KSPCB- MOEF (Above 50 Acres) | Approved | 14-12-2015 | MOEF NOC.pdf |
| KPTCL- BESCOM | Approved | 24-03-2015 | BESCOM NOC Vivienda.pdf |
| Fire and Safety | Approved | 21-11-2015 | Fire NOC Viviendacompressed.pdf |
| Airport Authority of India | Approved | 08-04-2014 | AAI NOC Vivienda.pdf |
| BSNL/Telecommunication Department | Approved | 11-10-2015 | BSNL NOC Vivienda.pdf |
Project team & certifications
RERA filingK-RERA names 2 project professional/vendor rows across Architect, Structural engineer. Use this to cross-check whose certificates, drawings, and contractor commitments support the filing; final reliance still belongs with your lawyer/technical reviewer.
| Role | Name | Registration / licence | Since | Locality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Architect | FHD CONSULTANTS PVT LTD | - | 2001 | SRINAGAR COLONY, HYDERABAD |
| Structural engineer | PRASAD CONSULTANTS | - | - | - |
Builder track record
RERA filingLegacy Global has 12 other K-RERA-registered projects in our records (average reported construction progress 62%). 8 are past their declared completion deadline with no completion certificate recorded — but because K-RERA publishes OCs inconsistently, a project that has actually been finished and handed over still shows up this way, so this overstates real delays, especially for a high-volume established builder.
Read this as a list to spot-check for a pattern of genuinely stalled projects, not as a delay rate — pull up a few of the builder’s other K-RERA registrations and check whether they’ve actually been delivered.
Financials & Construction Progress
Financial disclosures
RERA filingLatest quarterly filing (2026-Q1): ₹0.00 Cr collected from buyers, ₹0.00 Cr withdrawn from the project's escrow account.
| Construction progress | 44% → 46% (+2 pts) |
| Units sold/booked as registered | 20/276 (7%) |
- Construction progress moved from 44% to 46% across the filed QPR window.
QPR figures are developer-filed quarterly disclosures. Collections and withdrawals are not a project valuation; they are a sanity check for whether sales, construction progress, and escrow draws appear directionally aligned.
Declared construction cost ÷ registered units averages to ₹16.7 lakhs per unit — the developer's own declared construction/development cost, not a sale price. K-RERA filings don't disclose what the builder is charging, so this can't tell you whether you're getting a fair deal — only you comparing your quoted price against comparable listings nearby can answer that.
RERA 70% project account is on file: HDFC MILLER ROAD (IFSC HDFC0001208, a/c …7763). RERA requires 70% of buyer collections to sit in this separate, project-specific account, drawn only against certified construction milestones — confirm your payments are made to THIS account (not a general builder account) and that it appears on your allotment letter.
Construction photo filings
RERA filingK-RERA has 1 project-photo upload.
These are developer-uploaded progress photos in the official document catalog. We do not treat them as proof of current site condition; use them as a prompt to ask for newer dated photos or a site visit. Individual filings are listed in the document catalog below.
Location & Connectivity
The nearest major job hub is ~16 km away — a real but liveable commute to the nearest job hub — factor peak-hour traffic.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| Kempegowda Int'l Airport | 5 km |
| Outer Ring Road / Manyata | 16 km |
| MG Road / city centre | 24 km |
| Whitefield IT hub | 26 km |
| Bellandur–Marathahalli belt | 28 km |
| Electronic City | 38 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.