Neelkanth Sadan
MahaRERA Property Intelligence · Thane
P51700000308 · Mumbai Nashik Expressway, · promoter Tata Housing
| MahaRERA registration | P51700000308 |
| Registered on | 15 Jul 2017 |
| Promoter-declared completion | 31 Mar 2018 |
| Current status | Certificate Signed |
| Against today | about 100 months past the declared date |
MahaRERA's own defaulter/deregistration lists and the project's quarterly-progress-report filing — the regulator's view of whether this project is in good standing.
Across MahaRERA, Tata Housing is the promoter of record on 5 projects, of which 1 carries a MahaRERA regulator flag (insolvency, deregistration, completion-lapse or QPR default). Read the pattern across the portfolio, not just this project's brochure — matched on the promoter name in the MahaRERA register.
The buildings and wings registered under this project, with each tower's sanctioned height and declared completion date. Here the tallest tower rises to G+37.
| Building | Wings | Floors | Declared completion |
|---|---|---|---|
| C 1 | 1 | G+37 | 31 Mar 2018 |
| D 7 | 1 | G+32 | 31 Mar 2018 |
| A 8 | 1 | G+32 | 31 Mar 2018 |
| A 9 | 1 | G+32 | 31 Mar 2018 |
| A 10 | 1 | G+32 | 31 Mar 2018 |
| A 11 | 1 | G+32 | 31 Mar 2018 |
12 complaints are on the MahaRERA record for this project, with orders passed in 11. An adjudicated complaint is the clearest evidence of how this promoter behaves when pushed — read the orders in full.
| Complaint no. | Filed | Parties | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| CC006000000044280 | 26/04/2018 | Sunder Padmanabhan vs Tata Housing Development Company Limited | order passed |
| CC006000000100336 | 04/08/2019 | Nishant Prakashchandra Bhutada vs Tata Housing Development Co. Ltd | order passed |
| CC006000000110661 | 30/08/2019 | Arunesh Bhagwan Prasad Chopra & Riddhima Chanda vs Tata Housing Development Company Ltd | order passed |
| CC006000000197654 | 20/07/2021 | Mrs.RanjanaRamchandra barge & Two Others vs Tata Housing Development company Limited | order passed |
| CC006000000195535 | 20/01/2021 | Subrata Ravindra Bhattacharya vs Tata Housing Development Company | order passed |
| CC006000000251401 | 20/06/2022 | Ashok Jokhan Pandey vs Tata Housing Development Company Limited | order passed |
| CC006000000303619 | 09/12/2022 | Bhagwan Nampelli Kodam vs Tata Housing Development Company Limited | order passed |
| CC006000000354356 | 18/02/2023 | Sangeeta Maheshwari vs Tata Housing Development Company Limited | order passed |
| CC006000000354486 | 05/03/2023 | Suresh Kumar Sharma vs Tata Housing Development Company Limited | order passed |
| CC006000000590979 | 03/07/2024 | mahadeo N bandekar vs TATA HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CO LTD | order passed |
| CC12504209 | 28/11/2025 | Sanghapal Laxman Maske vs TATA HOUSING DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LIMITED | order passed |
| CC12600185 | 11/01/2026 | DINESH MANILAL MEHTA vs TATA HOUSING DEVELOPMENT COMPANY LIMITED | pending / no order on file |
The promoter has declared 7 court cases on this project to MahaRERA. Litigation can cloud the land title or stall the build — have a lawyer pull the cause list for each and confirm whether it touches the title to your flat. This is declared by the promoter; there may be further cases not on the RERA record.
| Court | Case no. | Year | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| Civil Judge Of Junior Division | 273 | 2010 | Hearing Of Interlocutory Application |
| Civil Judge Of Junior Division | 353 | 2011 | For Filing Affidavit In Chief By The Plaintiff |
| Civil Judge Senior Division Bhiwandi | 898 | 2013 | For Filing Affidavit In Chief By The Plaintiff |
| Civil Judge Junior Division Bhiwandi | 594 | 2009 | For Compliance Of Survey Report By Plaintiff |
| Bhiwandi Third Civil Judge Of Junior Division | 668 | 2011 | Plaintiff To Amend The Plaint To Bring On Record The Legal Heirs |
| Bhiwandi Cjsd Link Court | 1021 | 2011 | For Production Of Documents But Got Adjourned Due To High Court Writ Petition |
| High Court Bombay | 5760 | 2016 | Pre Admission Stage |
Located at Mumbai Nashik Expressway,, Bhiwandi Kalyan Junction,, Mumbai City, Mumbai City, 421302. Per the filed land record, the plot is bounded to the north by Internal Drive Way, to the south by Bldg No B12, to the east by Internal Drive Way and to the west by Bldg no A3 A5 B6. Confirm these against the 7/12 extract and the sanctioned plan before you rely on them.
The nearest major job hub is ~25 km away — well outside the job hubs — this is a value/space play, not a short-commute one; budget for the drive.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| Powai / Hiranandani business park | 25 km |
| Andheri MIDC / SEEPZ | 27 km |
| Chhatrapati Shivaji Int'l Airport | 30 km |
| Bandra Kurla Complex (BKC) | 32 km |
| Lower Parel / Worli business district | 40 km |
| Nariman Point / Fort | 47 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.
🔒 The verdict & buyer playbook · Compliance report
The paid report opens with the overall risk read on this MahaRERA filing, exactly what I'd do as a buyer in this project, who it suits, and the questions to put to the promoter before you commit.
🔒 Unit-by-unit guidance · Unit Guidance report
Which building/wing and unit to prefer and the sanctioned-plan read for this project — the ₹2,999 guidance layer.
🔒 Full financial records — escrow, funding & the document catalog · Compliance report
The RERA 70% designated-escrow account activity, the declared means-of-finance, the professionals of record, and every document filed with MahaRERA — the raw records the read above is built on.
Should you buy in Amantra Phase 2?
This page is the free MahaRERA filing summary. The full RERA Property Intelligence Report gives you the full regulatory standing, declared court litigation, buyer-complaint and adjudication history, quarterly-progress-report discipline, the builder's MahaRERA-wide track record, the building/tower breakdown, and the sanctioned layout plan. See a real one first:
Sample: Lodha Kandivali – Tower 2 → · browse all sample reports →
Compliance Report · ₹999
The regulator’s filing record, read · 1 working day
Scan with any UPI app to pay · quietlist@kotak
Unit Guidance Report · ₹2,999
Everything, down to which unit · 1 working day
Not useful to your decision? Full refund — no questions asked.
Scan with any UPI app to pay · quietlist@kotak
Paying from outside India? Pay $15 (Compliance) or $39 (Unit Guidance) via PayPal, or email hello@quietlist.in for a card invoice. Prefer to talk first, or have a portfolio to check? Same address. An information aid for your own due diligence, not legal or investment advice.
Free · Watch this project
We'll email you when this project's RERA record changes.
See every Tata Housing Development Company Limited project & its RERA track record →
Flags are from MahaRERA's own published problem lists — not a claim about the developer's intent. Explore every flagged project on our Mumbai, Thane & the MMR RERA red-flag register.
Last checked against the RERA register: 27 Jul 2026