MahaRERA Property Intelligence · Mumbai Suburban
P51800008324 · KANDIVALI · promoter Rajesh Real Estate
| MahaRERA registration | P51800008324 |
| Registered on | 18 Aug 2017 |
| Promoter-declared completion | 28 Feb 2023 |
| Current status | Certificate Signed |
| Against today | about 41 months past the declared date |
MahaRERA's own defaulter/deregistration lists and the project's quarterly-progress-report filing — the regulator's view of whether this project is in good standing.
Across MahaRERA, Rajesh Real Estate is the promoter of record on 169 projects, of which 28 carry a MahaRERA regulator flag (insolvency, deregistration, completion-lapse or QPR default). Read the pattern across the portfolio, not just this project's brochure — matched on the promoter name in the MahaRERA register.
MahaRERA's cost filing puts construction at ~66.6% of the estimated project cost incurred as of the last certificate (₹91.46 Cr spent against a ₹137.34 Cr estimate). This financial % is the regulator's own proxy for how much is physically built — the closest public read on real progress, and one a brochure never shows. The declared completion date has already passed while the cost-incurred filing sits at ~66.6% — a wide gap between the promise and the money actually spent on site.
Cost-incurred % as last certified to MahaRERA; it can lag on-site reality between filings. Confirm the current stage and the latest Form 2 before you book.
Of 186 homes filed with MahaRERA, 184 are sold/booked (169 with registered agreements + 15 booked) and 2 remain available (~99% sold) — nearly sold out — little inventory left, so you're buying into an established buyer base. Buyers have committed ₹418.50 Cr in agreement value so far. Of that, ₹387.22 Cr (~93%) is already collected, ₹31.27 Cr receivable — a read on how far along these sales really are. This is the promoter's own reported inventory as at the last compliance filing; confirm current availability directly.
What buyers actually paid: across 184 registered agreements, the effective carpet rate is ₹16,880/sqft (typical range ₹14,570–₹23,958) — computed from the agreement values and carpet areas the promoter filed, not broker quotes. Compare your quote against this before negotiating.
The unsold units on the filing — if you're quoted a unit NOT on this list, ask why it shows as sold/booked on the RERA record:
| Floor | Unit | Carpet | Reckoner value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Floor 20 | 2010 | 871 sqft (80.9411 sqm) | ₹1.15 Cr |
| Floor 37 | 3710 | 871 sqft (80.9411 sqm) | ₹1.15 Cr |
No units are declared mortgaged, reserved, investor-held or not-for-sale in this inventory filing — still confirm your specific unit's status in the agreement.
The buildings and wings registered under this project, with each tower's sanctioned height and declared completion date. Here the tallest tower rises to G+45 and 186 homes are registered across the project.
| Building | Wings | Floors | Homes | Declared completion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| WHITE CITY PHASE 2 WING B | 1 | G+45 | 186 | 29 Dec 2020 |
Unit mix on the filing: 186 residential.
34 complaints are on the MahaRERA record for this project, with orders passed in 34. An adjudicated complaint is the clearest evidence of how this promoter behaves when pushed — read the orders in full.
| Complaint no. | Filed | Parties | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| CC006000000110775 | 11/11/2019 | Gautam Harshe vs Rajesh Real estate developers pvt ltd. | order passed |
| CC006000000110788 | 15/09/2019 | Vineet Chhabra and Kanika Chhabra vs Rajesh Real Estate Developers Private Limited | order passed |
| CC006000000197119 | 02/07/2021 | Tarang Goyal vs Rajesh Real Estate Developers Pvt. Ltd. | order passed |
| CC006000000194026 | 29/09/2020 | Satish Sharma vs Rajesh Real Estate Developers Private Limited | order passed |
| CC006000000194830 | 06/11/2020 | Anand Shankar Nair and Bhavana Anand Nair vs Rajesh Real Estate Developers Private Limited | order passed |
| CC006000000195703 | 10/02/2021 | Mr.Vasant Sachidanand Pandit and Mrs.Gayatri Vasant Pandit vs Rajesh Real Estate Developers Private Limited | order passed |
| CC006000000195724 | 16/02/2021 | Mrs. Kavita Prabhakar and Mr. Prabhakar Varadarajan vs Rajesh Real Estate Developers Private Limited | order passed |
| CC006000000195677 | 22/05/2021 | AMIT KUMAR JHA vs RAJESH REAL ESTATE DEVELOPERS PVT LTD | order passed |
| CC006000000195813 | 01/02/2021 | PIYUSH K PATEL vs RAJESH REAL ESTATE DEVELOPER PVT LTD | order passed |
| CC006000000195815 | 01/02/2021 | KETAN DINKARRAY RAVAL vs RAJESH REAL ESTATE DEVELOPER PVT LTD | order passed |
| CC006000000195898 | 09/02/2021 | UMESH KISHANCHAND LALJANI vs RAJESH REAL ESTATE DEVELOPER PVT. LTD | order passed |
| CC006000000196282 | 08/03/2021 | Ramanik Pevekar vs Rajesh Real Estate Developers Pvt Ltd | order passed |
| CC006000000197890 | 05/08/2021 | Kamaljeet Singh vs VISHAL DOSHI | order passed |
| CC006000000197932 | 08/08/2021 | Mina Chandrakant Joshi vs Rajesh Real Estate Developers Private Limited | order passed |
| CC006000000220988 | 06/05/2022 | Inder Singh Parihar vs Rajesh Real Estate Developers Private Limited | order passed |
| CC006000000221102 | 09/05/2022 | Ketan Dinkarray Raval vs Rajesh Real Estate Developer Pvt.Ltd | order passed |
| CC006000000221109 | 07/05/2022 | sanjay Nainmal Agarwal vs RAJESH REAL ESTATE DEEVELOPERS PVT LTD | order passed |
| CC006000000221124 | 09/05/2022 | Umesh Kishanchand Laljani vs Rajesh Real Estate Developer Pvt ltd | order passed |
| CC006000000221125 | 09/05/2022 | Piyush p Patel vs Rajesh Real Estate Developer PVt. Ltd | order passed |
| CC006000000251438 | 14/06/2022 | SEEMA AGARWAL vs RAJESH REAL ESTATE DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED | order passed |
| CC006000000251439 | 14/06/2022 | BANARSILAL TIBREWAL vs RAJESH REAL ESTATE DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED | order passed |
| CC006000000251440 | 14/06/2022 | RAVI SINGHANIA vs RAJESH REAL ESTATE DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED | order passed |
| CC006000000251441 | 14/06/2022 | MEENADEVI SANGHAI vs RAJESH REAL ESTATE DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED | order passed |
| CC006000000251469 | 15/06/2022 | TEJA SINGH BASSAN vs RAJESH REAL ESTATE DEVELOPERS PVT LTD | order passed |
| CC006000000261965 | 20/07/2022 | Prakash Kumar Rameshwar Sanghai vs Rajesh Real Estate Developers Private Limited | order passed |
| CC006000000292515 | 30/08/2022 | DILIPKUMAR MEHTA vs RAJESH REAL ESTATE DEVELOPERS PVT LTD | order passed |
| CC006000000302977 | 10/10/2022 | DAMYANTI PALTA vs RAJESH REAL ESTATE DEVELOPERS PVT LTD | order passed |
| CC006000000303314 | 13/11/2022 | DR MADHUKAR SHRI KRISHNA NILMANI vs MESSERS RAJESH REAL ESTATE DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED | order passed |
| CC006000000375366 | 24/04/2023 | jaise isaac vs Pratik Patel ( Director) | order passed |
| CC006000000198653 | 12/10/2021 | Bhajan Singh Choudhary vs Rajesh Real Estate Developers Private Limited | order passed |
| CC006000000396979 | 07/08/2023 | RAJESH REAL ESTATE DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD. THROUGH AUTHORISED SIGNATORY vs KAMALJEET SINGH | order passed |
| CC006000000397046 | 11/08/2023 | Tarang Goyal vs Rajesh Real Estate Developers Pvt. Ltd. | order passed |
| CC006000000479768 | 26/03/2024 | Balbir Prasad vs RAHEJA REAL ESTATE DEVELOPERS PVT LTD | order passed |
| CC12503264 | 13/09/2025 | Girish NAROTTAMDAS Ved vs RAJESH REAL ESTATE DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED | order passed |
The promoter has had the MahaRERA completion deadline formally extended 2 times. Each extension is the regulator letting the finish line move — the clearest evidence of delivery slippage, straight from the record.
| From (declared) | To (revised) | Stated reason |
|---|---|---|
| 28 Feb 2023 | 29 Jun 2020 | The reason for delay are as follows: 1. Majority of our customers were seeking 98% Home Loan Finance. The loans were sanctioned and / or under process for sanction majorly by NBFC |
| 28 Feb 2023 | 31 Aug 2022 | We Rajesh Real Estate Developers Private Limited the promoter / developer of the Project ‘Whitecity Phase 2 Wing B’, earlier registered vide registration no. P51800008324, under th |
Located at KANDIVALI, AKURLI ROAD, Mumbai City, Mumbai City, 400101. Per the filed land record, the plot is bounded to the north by AMENITY OPEN SPACE, to the south by AKURLI ROAD, to the east by PHASE 3 FUTURE DEVELOPMENT and to the west by RAHEJA WILLOW. Confirm these against the 7/12 extract and the sanctioned plan before you rely on them.
The nearest major job hub is ~12 km away — a real but liveable commute to the nearest job hub — factor peak-hour traffic.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| Andheri MIDC / SEEPZ | 12 km |
| Powai / Hiranandani business park | 15 km |
| Chhatrapati Shivaji Int'l Airport | 17 km |
| Bandra Kurla Complex (BKC) | 19 km |
| Lower Parel / Worli business district | 27 km |
| Nariman Point / Fort | 35 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.
🔒 The verdict & buyer playbook · Compliance report
The paid report opens with the overall risk read on this MahaRERA filing, exactly what I'd do as a buyer in this project, who it suits, and the questions to put to the promoter before you commit.
🔒 Unit-by-unit guidance · Unit Guidance report
Which building/wing and unit to prefer and the sanctioned-plan read for this project — the ₹2,999 guidance layer.
🔒 Full financial records — escrow, funding & the document catalog · Compliance report
The RERA 70% designated-escrow account activity, the declared means-of-finance, the professionals of record, and every document filed with MahaRERA — the raw records the read above is built on.
Should you buy in WHITE CITY PHASE 2 WING B?
This page is the free MahaRERA filing summary. The full RERA Property Intelligence Report gives you the full regulatory standing, declared court litigation, buyer-complaint and adjudication history, quarterly-progress-report discipline, the builder's MahaRERA-wide track record, the building/tower breakdown, and the sanctioned layout plan. See a real one first:
Sample: Lodha Kandivali – Tower 2 → · browse all sample reports →
Compliance Report · ₹999
The regulator’s filing record, read · 1 working day
Scan with any UPI app to pay · quietlist@kotak
Unit Guidance Report · ₹2,999
Everything, down to which unit · 1 working day
Not useful to your decision? Full refund — no questions asked.
Scan with any UPI app to pay · quietlist@kotak
Paying from outside India? Pay $15 (Compliance) or $39 (Unit Guidance) via PayPal, or email hello@quietlist.in for a card invoice. Prefer to talk first, or have a portfolio to check? Same address. An information aid for your own due diligence, not legal or investment advice.
Free · Watch this project
We'll email you when this project's RERA record changes.
Flags are from MahaRERA's own published problem lists — not a claim about the developer's intent. Explore every flagged project on our Mumbai, Thane & the MMR RERA red-flag register.
Last checked against the RERA register: 27 Jul 2026