K-RERA · the public record
Provident Neora
Yelahanka · Provident Housing
Know the project.
Then choose your home.
The registration, progress and filed details in one place. Go further with an independent reading of the project’s evidence.
The record · free to read
Registration read 20 Sep 2026Progress & dates
The timeline on file.
Available record
No construction trend to plot.
The records used for this page do not supply a series of construction percentages. This does not establish whether possession has been given.
declared completion
31 Dec 2021
The registered date and a construction update answer different questions. Neither is a confirmation of possession.
K-RERA registration · read 20 Sep 2026
Inventory & scale
What this registration contains.
Filed categories, unchanged · K-RERA registration · read 20 Sep 2026
The whole registration
2.0registered acres
122.6registered units per acre
The average covers the registered land and all registered unit types. It does not describe the space, outlook or surroundings of an individual home.
From another project · Prestige Park Grove
A larger advertised area. Almost the same carpet area.
In Tower 14, E4 has 141 sq ft more saleable area than E2. Its carpet area is only 0.46 sq m larger. The report puts the two layouts side by side.
This illustrates the report format. These findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the sample report ↗
The source record
The details behind the headline.
K-RERA · PRM/KA/RERA/1251/472/PR/180808/001982
This project, on the record
The comparable facts of this project, from its own RERA registration record. Each context percentile names its exact comparison set, drawn from Quietlist’s full register store. The paid report adds drawing-read rows to this same table — what the filed plans show about the site, its edges and the unit layouts.
On the register
In context
Values as crawled from the official K-RERA record; context percentiles name their comparison population.
Official Registry Facts
Official project scale
RERA filingRegistration-form facts from the K-RERA detail page: use these to sanity-check the builder brochure, parking allotment, and sanctioned-plan references before relying on plan-extracted approximations.
| Disclosure | Official value | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Registered units | 249 | Total inventory registered with K-RERA. |
| Registered land area | 8,222 sqm | The land area attached to this K-RERA registration. |
| Sanctioned FAR/FSI | 1.85 | Higher FAR generally means a denser vertical build, subject to site layout and open-space design. |
| Registered tower/wing entries | 4 | Official tower/wing count in the K-RERA detail page. |
| Parking total (reconciled) | 249 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Open-parking field | 75 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Garage field | 0 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Project start date | 31-08-2018 |
Official inventory & towers
RERA filingK-RERA registration tables showing the project mix and tower/wing scale. Use this to sanity-check sales claims such as "only large homes", "low density", or "plenty of parking" against the filed inventory.
Registered tower / wing summary
| Tower/wing | Floors | Units | Parking | Height |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wing A | 9 | 72 | 72 | - |
| Wing B | 9 | 72 | 72 | - |
| Wing C | 9 | 51 | 51 | - |
| Wing D | 9 | 54 | 54 | - |
Official unit register
RERA filingK-RERA detail-page flat rows: exact unit numbers, official carpet area, UDS, and parking lots. 249 official flat/unit rows, matching the 249 registered units disclosed above. Use this as a checklist against the specific flat number in your cost sheet and draft agreement.
By unit type
| Unit type | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2BHK | 249 | 49.8-53.5 sqm | 0.0 sqm | 0 (249 with 0) |
By tower / wing
| Tower/wing | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wing A | 72 | 49.8-51.2 sqm | 0.0 sqm | 0 (72 with 0) |
| Wing B | 72 | 49.8-51.2 sqm | 0.0 sqm | 0 (72 with 0) |
| Wing D | 54 | 50.0-52.2 sqm | 0.0 sqm | 0 (54 with 0) |
| Wing C | 51 | 50.4-53.5 sqm | 0.0 sqm | 0 (51 with 0) |
Show sample official unit rows
| Unit | Tower | Floor | Type | Carpet | UDS | Parking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 101 | Wing A | 1 | 2BHK | 49.8 sqm | 0.0 sqm | 0 |
| 102 | Wing A | 1 | 2BHK | 51.1 sqm | 0.0 sqm | 0 |
| 103 | Wing A | 1 | 2BHK | 51.1 sqm | 0.0 sqm | 0 |
| 104 | Wing A | 1 | 2BHK | 49.8 sqm | 0.0 sqm | 0 |
| 105 | Wing A | 1 | 2BHK | 49.8 sqm | 0.0 sqm | 0 |
| 106 | Wing A | 1 | 2BHK | 51.2 sqm | 0.0 sqm | 0 |
Legal, Approvals & Project Team
Litigation & compliance
RERA filingNo litigation declared on this project's K-RERA filing.
All 23 standard compliance document slots have usable uploaded filings.
No completion certificate (OC) on file yet — project has not been declared complete.
⚠ Registration validity has lapsed: originally due 31 Dec 2021, extended (Section 6 Extension) to 30 Sep 2023 — both dates have passed with no OC on file. The extension on file was granted on 16 Nov 2022 (K-RERA extension no. EX/PRM/KA/RERA/1251/472/PR/221116/001982) — it has been used, its deadline has also passed, and no further extension is recorded.
Named utility/regulatory approvals
"Not found in catalog" can mean the approval genuinely isn't on file yet, or that it doesn't apply to this project (K-RERA doesn't tell us which). Ask the builder directly for any marked not found before relying on it.
K-RERA enforcement record (the regulator's own defaulter list & penalty orders)
⚠ Listed on K-RERA's official DEFAULTER list.
K-RERA complaint orders (15 complaints against a project of this name on K-RERA's orders register)
| Parties | Relief sought | Disposal | Order date |
|---|---|---|---|
| DEEPIKA J GOWDA vs PROVIDENT NEORA | Compensation for the losses for 2 years of delay caused by RERA extension for the project | AUTHORITY | 26/12/2023 |
| Teny vs Provident Neora | Return of amount or compensation for the delay | AUTHORITY | 25/03/2025 |
| Delwin Noranha vs Provident Neora | Immediate refund from the builder for the entire payment amount made for the property, inclusive of full interest and appreciation value as compensation for not delivering the property on time. | AUTHORITY | 20/07/2024 |
| MR AMIT KUMAR vs M/S.PROVIDENT HOUSING LIMITED | We pray this authority to order for refund of all paid to builder and per month EMI paying till now total=Rs.56,31,600(fifty six lacs thirty one thousand six hundred with interest as per Rera. | AUTHORITY | 16/10/2024 |
| Feroz Ahmed Ansari vs Provident Neora | Please help me to get the amount as per RERA rules | AUTHORITY | 14/09/2023 |
| MR. DASARI NARENDRA vs M/S PROVIDENT HOUSING LIMITED | Compensation for all my interest loss from past seven years | AUTHORITY | 14/03/2024 |
| MR PRAVEEN vs M/S.PROVIDENT HOUSING LIMITED | Suitable compensation for delay or all the amount being paid by me towards the project may be reimbursed to me with all the interest and other charges included. | AUTHORITY | 09/10/2024 |
| MR BONTHU ARUN vs M/S.PROVIDENT HOUSING LIMITED | Since the Project delivery has been delayed, i am looking for the compensation | AUTHORITY | 09/10/2024 |
| MR YASH THAKKAR AND ANOTHER vs M/S.PROVIDENT HOUSING LIMITED | Compensation Request against delay in flat handover | AUTHORITY | 09/10/2024 |
| MR SHOURYA MEHTA vs M/S.PROVIDENT HOUSING LIMITED | Expedite the process of obtaining the OC for Provident Neora. Additionally, compensation is warranted for the undue delay in possession, as this has resulted in my financial implications. | AUTHORITY | 09/10/2024 |
| Debendra Kumar Kar vs Provident Neora | I would request RERA to look into this case and provide the required compensation from the builder as the builder has missed the delivery timelines by a big margin and also till now there is no hope | AUTHORITY | 08/01/2024 |
| ABHIJITH A & KEERTHANA CK vs PROVIDENT HOUSING LIMITED | Interest on Delayed period against the flat possession | AUTHORITY | 06/09/2024 |
| VIPIN DAS KUTTIPARAMBIL vs Provident Neora | INTEREST ON DELAYED PERIOD AGAINST THE FLAT POSSEISSION | AUTHORITY | 06/06/2025 |
| Vipuna Vijayan vs Provident Neora | Interest on delayed period against flat possession | AUTHORITY | 06/06/2025 |
| Mahesh Patil vs Provident Neora | Interest for the period of delay in the possession of the flat. | AUTHORITY | 06/06/2025 |
⚠ Matched by PROJECT NAME (the orders register carries no registration number) — confirm the respondent above is this project's builder before relying on it.
Complaints on this project's K-RERA page (11 complaints listed against this promoter)
| Complaint | Subject (as filed) | Project | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| CMP/190521/0003077 21-05-2019 | Company is not able to keep the promises and not providing refunds | Provident Skyworth Phase 2 (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190522/0003125 22-05-2019 | INTEREST PAYMENT COMPENSATION FOR DELAY IN POSSESSION | Provident Skyworth Phase 2 (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190723/0002685 23-07-2019 | The flat has not been completed within stipulated time as per the agreement | Provident Skyworth Phase 1 (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190809/0003859 09-08-2019 | Return of amount and compensation | Provident Skyworth Phase 1 (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/200311/0005691 11-03-2020 | Non completion of project in time hence asking for refund | Provident Skyworth Phase 1 (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/201202/0007206 02-12-2020 | Builder is mislead on completion date and not providing compensation | Provident Skyworth Phase 2 (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4 |
| CMP/210824/0008266 24-08-2021 | Delay Compensation and Damages | Provident Skyworth Phase 2 (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4 |
| CMP/210925/0008376 25-09-2021 | Refund of booking amount | Provident Skyworth Phase 1 (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
Listed on the project's own K-RERA detail page (registration-exact source). Rows on the promoter's other projects are track-record context — read the subject text, it is the complainant's own filed wording.
Project team & certifications
RERA filingK-RERA names 1 project professional/vendor row across Architect. Use this to cross-check whose certificates, drawings, and contractor commitments support the filing; final reliance still belongs with your lawyer/technical reviewer.
| Role | Name | Registration / licence | Since | Locality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Architect | Khan Global Design | - | 2003 | 3790 7th Main HAL 2 Stage, Indiranagar |
Builder track record
RERA filingProvident has 17 other K-RERA-registered projects in our records — grouped across the several project-specific entities this developer registers under (e.g. this project is filed as “Provident Housing”) (average reported construction progress 23%). 4 are past their declared completion deadline with no completion certificate recorded — but because K-RERA publishes OCs inconsistently, a project that has actually been finished and handed over still shows up this way, so this overstates real delays, especially for a high-volume established builder. That is a lower delayed rate than the K-RERA average across Bengaluru on the same measure.
Read this as a list to spot-check for a pattern of genuinely stalled projects, not as a delay rate — pull up a few of the builder’s other K-RERA registrations and check whether they’ve actually been delivered.
Financials & Construction Progress
Financial disclosures
RERA filing⚠ No quarterly financial disclosures (collections, escrow withdrawals) on record, despite no completion certificate yet — meaning we can't verify the project's cashflows against its construction progress. Worth asking the builder directly why no quarterly filings are available.
Declared construction cost ÷ registered units averages to ₹28.2 lakhs per unit — the developer's own declared construction/development cost, not a sale price. K-RERA filings don't disclose what the builder is charging, so this can't tell you whether you're getting a fair deal — only you comparing your quoted price against comparable listings nearby can answer that.
RERA 70% project account is on file: ICICI Bank M G ROAD. RERA requires 70% of buyer collections to sit in this separate, project-specific account, drawn only against certified construction milestones — confirm your payments are made to THIS account (not a general builder account) and that it appears on your allotment letter.
Location & Connectivity
The nearest major job hub is ~4 km away — a manageable everyday commute to a major job hub.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| Outer Ring Road / Manyata | 4 km |
| MG Road / city centre | 12 km |
| Kempegowda Int'l Airport | 16 km |
| Bellandur–Marathahalli belt | 18 km |
| Whitefield IT hub | 19 km |
| Electronic City | 27 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.