K-RERA · the public record
Prestige Elm Park
Bengaluru East · PRESTIGE ESTATES PROJECTS
Know the project.
Then choose your home.
The registration, progress and filed details in one place. Go further with an independent reading of the project’s evidence.
The record · free to read
Registration read 20 Sep 2026Progress & dates
The timeline on file.
Promoter-reported construction
K-RERA quarterly filings · Q3 2025 to Q1 2026
declared completion
14 Aug 2026
The registered date and a construction update answer different questions. Neither is a confirmation of possession.
K-RERA registration · read 20 Sep 2026
Inventory & scale
What this registration contains.
Filed categories, unchanged · K-RERA registration · read 20 Sep 2026
The whole registration
4.0registered acres
48.2registered units per acre
The average covers the registered land and all registered unit types. It does not describe the space, outlook or surroundings of an individual home.
From another project · Prestige Park Grove
A larger advertised area. Almost the same carpet area.
In Tower 14, E4 has 141 sq ft more saleable area than E2. Its carpet area is only 0.46 sq m larger. The report puts the two layouts side by side.
This illustrates the report format. These findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the sample report ↗
The source record
The details behind the headline.
K-RERA · PRM/KA/RERA/1251/446/PR/250123/005667
This project, on the record
The comparable facts of this project, from its own RERA registration record. Each context percentile names its exact comparison set, drawn from Quietlist’s full register store. The paid report adds drawing-read rows to this same table — what the filed plans show about the site, its edges and the unit layouts.
On the register
In context
Values as crawled from the official K-RERA record; context percentiles name their comparison population.
Official Registry Facts
Official project scale
RERA filingRegistration-form facts from the K-RERA detail page: use these to sanity-check the builder brochure, parking allotment, and sanctioned-plan references before relying on plan-extracted approximations.
| Disclosure | Official value | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Registered units | 192 | Total inventory registered with K-RERA. |
| Official carpet area | 24,338 sqm | Regulator-disclosed project-level carpet area, not vision-derived room sums. |
| Official built-up area | 54,529 sqm | Useful scale context when comparing density and project cost. |
| Registered land area | 16,120 sqm | The land area attached to this K-RERA registration. |
| Sanctioned FAR/FSI | 2.23 | Higher FAR generally means a denser vertical build, subject to site layout and open-space design. |
| Registered tower/wing entries | 3 | Official tower/wing count in the K-RERA detail page. |
| Parking total (reconciled) | 192 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Covered-parking field | 192 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Open-parking field | 40 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Garage field | 0 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Approved plan number | BBMP/Addl.Dir/JDNorth/0050/22 | Use this to match the sanctioned drawing set shown by the builder. |
| Plan approval date | 14-12-2022 | |
| Project start date | 15-04-2023 |
Official inventory & towers
RERA filingK-RERA registration tables showing the project mix and tower/wing scale. Use this to sanity-check sales claims such as "only large homes", "low density", or "plenty of parking" against the filed inventory.
Registered inventory mix
| Type | Units | Share | Official carpet area |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3BHK + Maid | 60 | 31% | 6,986 sqm |
| 3BHK | 48 | 25% | 4,995 sqm |
| 4 BHK + Maid | 84 | 44% | 12,356 sqm |
Registered tower / wing summary
| Tower/wing | Floors | Units | Parking | Height |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tower 1 | 17 | 72 | 72 | 55.35 m |
| Tower 2 | 11 | 48 | 48 | 37.05 m |
| Tower 3 | 17 | 72 | 72 | 55.35 m |
Official unit register
RERA filingK-RERA detail-page flat rows: exact unit numbers, official carpet area, UDS, and parking lots. 192 official flat/unit rows, matching the 192 registered units disclosed above. Use this as a checklist against the specific flat number in your cost sheet and draft agreement.
By unit type
| Unit type | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 4 BHK + MAID’S | 84 | 145.0-149.2 sqm | 94.8-98.1 sqm | 84 |
| 3 BHK + MAID’S | 60 | 115.0-124.1 sqm | 76.3-81.7 sqm | 60 |
| 3 BHK | 48 | 104.1 sqm | 68.2-69.6 sqm | 48 |
By tower / wing
| Tower/wing | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tower 1 | 72 | 104.1-149.2 sqm | 69.6-98.1 sqm | 72 |
| Tower 3 | 72 | 104.1-149.2 sqm | 68.2-96.6 sqm | 72 |
| Tower 2 | 48 | 104.1-149.2 sqm | 68.2-95.7 sqm | 48 |
Show sample official unit rows
| Unit | Tower | Floor | Type | Carpet | UDS | Parking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1001 | Tower 1 | 0 | 3 BHK + MAID’S | 115.0 sqm | 76.3 sqm | 1 |
| 1002 | Tower 1 | 0 | 3 BHK + MAID’S | 120.2 sqm | 79.0 sqm | 1 |
| 1003 | Tower 1 | 0 | 3 BHK + MAID’S | 124.1 sqm | 81.7 sqm | 1 |
| 1004 | Tower 1 | 0 | 3 BHK | 104.1 sqm | 69.6 sqm | 1 |
| 1011 | Tower 1 | 1 | 3 BHK + MAID’S | 115.0 sqm | 76.3 sqm | 1 |
| 1012 | Tower 1 | 1 | 3 BHK + MAID’S | 120.2 sqm | 79.0 sqm | 1 |
Legal, Approvals & Project Team
Litigation & compliance
RERA filingNo litigation declared on this project's K-RERA filing.
20 of 45 compliance document slots are filed as Not Applicable; the remaining 25 slots have usable uploaded filings.
No completion certificate (OC) on file yet — project has not been declared complete.
Named utility/regulatory approvals
"Not found in catalog" can mean the approval genuinely isn't on file yet, or that it doesn't apply to this project (K-RERA doesn't tell us which). Ask the builder directly for any marked not found before relying on it.
K-RERA enforcement record (the regulator's own defaulter list & penalty orders)
⚠ Listed on K-RERA's official DEFAULTER list.
Complaints on this project's K-RERA page (61 complaints listed against this promoter)
| Complaint | Subject (as filed) | Project | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| CMP/190225/0002242 25-02-2019 | Builder not paying compensation as per agreement and no handover of apartment after deadline | PRESTIGE WESTWOODS (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190325/0002508 25-03-2019 | Delayed Interest for delayed handover | Prestige Royale Gardens Phase-I (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190330/0002539 30-03-2019 | Delay in delivery of Project | Prestige Royale Gardens Phase-I (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190419/0002630 19-04-2019 | This is to request to adjust against balance or reimburse the amount as per delay clause @ 9% till date on the amount paid. Also to adhere to agreement for handover of flat no 14011 in tower 14 | Prestige Royale Gardens Phase-I (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190519/0003075 19-05-2019 | Prestiege Royale Gardens T2147 Apartmen Dealy in possession, compensation not being pais as per agreement | Prestige Royale Gardens Phase-I (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190519/0003091 19-05-2019 | Undue delay of project completion and Monetary compensation towards that per Construction agreement | Prestige Royale Gardens Phase-I (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/190520/0003069 20-05-2019 | There is no OC 2 yrs after promised data of delivery. There is misrepresentation of the tower number scheduled apartment comparing brochure and sanctioned plan. | PRESTIGE ROYALE GARDENS PHASE 2 (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AUTHORITY FULLBENCH |
| CMP/190614/0003288 14-06-2019 | Delay in delivery and compensation not paid | PRESTIGE ROYALE GARDENS PHASE 2 (another project by this promoter) | DISPOSED AO |
Listed on the project's own K-RERA detail page (registration-exact source). Rows on the promoter's other projects are track-record context — read the subject text, it is the complainant's own filed wording.
Statutory approval status
RERA filingClean approvals profile: every applicable statutory NOC is on file — including Fire NOC, environmental clearance and pollution-control clearance (KSPCB), the clearances buyers most often find still pending. Nothing is outstanding among the statutory NOCs — which compliance documents are filed versus still under process is a separate matter, covered in Litigation & compliance above. Since these are developer-filed portal statuses, have your lawyer confirm them against the linked NOC copies.
4 further authority slots are marked not applicable by the regulator.
| Authority / NOC | Status | Date | File |
|---|---|---|---|
| Water supply and sewage board | Approved | 06-03-2023 | BWSSB NOC.pdf |
| KSPCB- PCB (10 Acres to 125 Acres) | Approved | 18-10-2022 | PEP - KSPCB - CFE_compressed.pdf |
| KSPCB- MOEF (Above 50 Acres) | Approved | 19-09-2022 | PEP - MOEF.pdf |
| KPTCL- BESCOM | Approved | 05-08-2022 | PEP - BESCOM.pdf |
| Fire and Safety | Approved | 29-08-2022 | PEP - FIRE NOC.PDF |
| Airport Authority of India | Approved | 24-02-2022 | PEP- AAI.pdf |
Project team & certifications
RERA filingK-RERA names 4 project professional/vendor rows across Chartered accountant, Engineer, Architect, Contractor. Use this to cross-check whose certificates, drawings, and contractor commitments support the filing; final reliance still belongs with your lawyer/technical reviewer.
| Role | Name | Registration / licence | Since | Locality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chartered accountant | M Padmanabha Bhat | 025305 | 1986 | Bengaluru Urban, Karnataka - 560093 |
| Engineer | Prasad Consultants | BCC/BL-3.6/S.E :276:18-19 | 1990 | Bengaluru Urban, Karnataka - 560001 |
| Architect | Zachariah Consultants | CA/2010/47015 | 2016 | Bengaluru Urban, Karnataka - 560025 |
| Contractor | K2K Infrastructure (I) Pvt Ltd | - | 2007 | Bengaluru Urban, Karnataka - 500050 |
Builder track record
RERA filingPrestige has 81 other K-RERA-registered projects in our records — grouped across the several project-specific entities this developer registers under (e.g. this project is filed as “Prestige Estates”) (average reported construction progress 63%). 52 are past their declared completion deadline with no completion certificate recorded — but because K-RERA publishes OCs inconsistently, a project that has actually been finished and handed over still shows up this way, so this overstates real delays, especially for a high-volume established builder.
Read this as a list to spot-check for a pattern of genuinely stalled projects, not as a delay rate — pull up a few of the builder’s other K-RERA registrations and check whether they’ve actually been delivered.
Financials & Construction Progress
Financial disclosures
RERA filingLatest quarterly filing (2026-Q1): ₹4.00 Cr collected from buyers, ₹6.29 Cr withdrawn from the project's escrow account. This quarter the escrow withdrawal (₹6.29 Cr) exceeded buyer collections (₹4.00 Cr) — worth asking the builder to reconcile against certified construction milestones, which is what RERA requires escrow draws to track.
| Construction progress | 54% → 88% (+34 pts) |
| Units sold/booked as registered | 139/192 (72%) |
| Buyer collections in available QPRs | ₹25.03 Cr |
| Escrow withdrawals in available QPRs | ₹34.03 Cr (1.36x collections) |
- Construction progress moved from 54% to 88% across the filed QPR window.
- Across available QPR rows, escrow withdrawals are 1.36x buyer collections. Ask the builder to reconcile this against certified project costs and prior-period balances.
- In the latest QPR, escrow withdrawal exceeds buyer collections for that quarter. This can be normal if prior balance existed, but it needs a clean explanation.
QPR figures are developer-filed quarterly disclosures. Collections and withdrawals are not a project valuation; they are a sanity check for whether sales, construction progress, and escrow draws appear directionally aligned.
Declared construction cost ÷ registered units averages to ₹84.0 lakhs per unit — the developer's own declared construction/development cost, not a sale price. K-RERA filings don't disclose what the builder is charging, so this can't tell you whether you're getting a fair deal — only you comparing your quoted price against comparable listings nearby can answer that.
RERA 70% project account is on file: KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK Lavelle Road, Bangalore IFSC Code : KKBK0000422 Pin Code : 566001. RERA requires 70% of buyer collections to sit in this separate, project-specific account, drawn only against certified construction milestones — confirm your payments are made to THIS account (not a general builder account) and that it appears on your allotment letter.
Location & Connectivity
The nearest major job hub is ~2 km away — walking/short-hop distance to a major employment hub — a genuine work-near-home location.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| Whitefield IT hub | 2 km |
| Bellandur–Marathahalli belt | 9 km |
| MG Road / city centre | 17 km |
| Outer Ring Road / Manyata | 17 km |
| Electronic City | 18 km |
| Kempegowda Int'l Airport | 25 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.