K-RERA · the public record
Godrej Royale Woods
Devanahalli · Godrej Projects North Star
Know the project.
Then choose your home.
The registration, progress and filed details in one place. Go further with an independent reading of the project’s evidence.
The record · free to read
Registration read 20 Sep 2026Progress & dates
The timeline on file.
Available record
No construction trend to plot.
The records used for this page do not supply a series of construction percentages. This does not establish whether possession has been given.
declared completion
29 Apr 2025
The registered date and a construction update answer different questions. Neither is a confirmation of possession.
K-RERA registration · read 20 Sep 2026
Inventory & scale
What this registration contains.
Filed categories, unchanged · K-RERA registration · read 20 Sep 2026
The whole registration
13.0registered acres
129.1registered units per acre
The average covers the registered land and all registered unit types. It does not describe the space, outlook or surroundings of an individual home.
From another project · Prestige Park Grove
A larger advertised area. Almost the same carpet area.
In Tower 14, E4 has 141 sq ft more saleable area than E2. Its carpet area is only 0.46 sq m larger. The report puts the two layouts side by side.
This illustrates the report format. These findings concern the named sample, not this project.
Read the sample report ↗
The source record
The details behind the headline.
K-RERA · PRM/KA/RERA/1250/303/PR/200515/003411
This project, on the record
The comparable facts of this project, from its own RERA registration record. Each context percentile names its exact comparison set, drawn from Quietlist’s full register store. The paid report adds drawing-read rows to this same table — what the filed plans show about the site, its edges and the unit layouts.
On the register
In context
Values as crawled from the official K-RERA record; context percentiles name their comparison population.
Official Registry Facts
Official project scale
RERA filingRegistration-form facts from the K-RERA detail page: use these to sanity-check the builder brochure, parking allotment, and sanctioned-plan references before relying on plan-extracted approximations.
| Disclosure | Official value | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Registered units | 1,678 | Total inventory registered with K-RERA. |
| Registered land area | 52,620 sqm | The land area attached to this K-RERA registration. |
| Sanctioned FAR/FSI | 2.24 | Higher FAR generally means a denser vertical build, subject to site layout and open-space design. |
| Registered tower/wing entries | 6 | Official tower/wing count in the K-RERA detail page. |
| Parking total (reconciled) | 1,105 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Open-parking field | 203 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Garage field | 0 | Separate filed counts; these categories may overlap and are not added together. |
| Project start date | 30-04-2020 |
Official inventory & towers
RERA filingK-RERA registration tables showing the project mix and tower/wing scale. Use this to sanity-check sales claims such as "only large homes", "low density", or "plenty of parking" against the filed inventory.
Registered tower / wing summary
| Tower/wing | Floors | Units | Parking | Height |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOWER 1 - PLUMERIA | 18 | 251 | 153 | - |
| TOWER 2 - MAHOGANY | 18 | 320 | 195 | - |
| TOWER 3 - RAINTREE | 19 | 298 | 186 | - |
| TOWER 4 - PINE | 19 | 298 | 186 | - |
| TOWER 5 - OAK | 18 | 320 | 194 | - |
| TOWER 6 - BANYAN | 16 | 191 | 191 | - |
Official unit register
RERA filingK-RERA detail-page flat rows: exact unit numbers, official carpet area, UDS, and parking lots. 1,678 official flat/unit rows, matching the 1,678 registered units disclosed above. Use this as a checklist against the specific flat number in your cost sheet and draft agreement.
By unit type
| Unit type | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2BHK | 1,038 | 48.5-56.0 sqm | 23.6-30.8 sqm | 96 (942 with 0) |
| 3BHK | 360 | 59.6-60.0 sqm | 28.6-31.3 sqm | 343 (17 with 0) |
| STUDIO | 184 | 20.9 sqm | 10.8 sqm | 0 (184 with 0) |
| 1BHK | 96 | 39.8 sqm | 20.5 sqm | 96 |
By tower / wing
| Tower/wing | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOWER 2 - MAHOGANY | 320 | 20.9-60.0 sqm | 10.8-31.1 sqm | 70 (250 with 0) |
| TOWER 5 - OAK | 320 | 20.9-60.0 sqm | 10.8-31.1 sqm | 70 (250 with 0) |
| TOWER 3 - RAINTREE | 298 | 20.9-60.0 sqm | 10.8-31.3 sqm | 74 (224 with 0) |
| TOWER 4 - PINE | 298 | 20.9-60.0 sqm | 10.8-31.3 sqm | 75 (223 with 0) |
| TOWER 1 - PLUMERIA | 251 | 20.9-60.0 sqm | 10.8-31.3 sqm | 55 (196 with 0) |
| TOWER 6 - BANYAN | 191 | 39.8-56.0 sqm | 20.5-30.8 sqm | 191 |
Show sample official unit rows
| Unit | Tower | Floor | Type | Carpet | UDS | Parking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1A-101 | TOWER 1 - PLUMERIA | 1 | 2BHK | 48.5 sqm | 26.0 sqm | 0 |
| 1A-102 | TOWER 1 - PLUMERIA | 1 | 3BHK | 59.6 sqm | 31.3 sqm | 1 |
| 1A-103 | TOWER 1 - PLUMERIA | 1 | 3BHK | 59.6 sqm | 31.3 sqm | 1 |
| 1A-104 | TOWER 1 - PLUMERIA | 1 | 2BHK | 48.5 sqm | 26.0 sqm | 0 |
| 1B-101 | TOWER 1 - PLUMERIA | 1 | STUDIO | 20.9 sqm | 10.8 sqm | 0 |
| 1B-102 | TOWER 1 - PLUMERIA | 1 | 2BHK | 48.5 sqm | 23.6 sqm | 0 |
Legal, Approvals & Project Team
Litigation & compliance
RERA filingNo litigation declared on this project's K-RERA filing.
15 of 34 compliance document slots are filed as Not Applicable; the remaining 19 slots have usable uploaded filings.
No completion certificate (OC) on file yet — project has not been declared complete.
⚠ Registration validity has lapsed: originally due 29 Apr 2025, extended (Covid Extension) to 29 Jan 2026 — both dates have passed with no OC on file.
Named utility/regulatory approvals
"Not found in catalog" can mean the approval genuinely isn't on file yet, or that it doesn't apply to this project (K-RERA doesn't tell us which). Ask the builder directly for any marked not found before relying on it.
K-RERA complaint orders (5 complaints against a project of this name on K-RERA's orders register)
| Parties | Relief sought | Disposal | Order date |
|---|---|---|---|
| MADHUSUDHAN GATTAMANENI vs GODREJ PROJECTS NORTH STAR LLP | Need full refund or move me to Project Godrej Ananda | AUTHORITY | 27/12/2022 |
| T R ANAND vs M/S SAI SRUSHTI ONEHUB PROJECT LLP | Non Publication and non disclosure of details of litigation and cancellation of registration. | AUTHORITY | 19/09/2022 |
| Jagadeswara Rao vs Godrej Projects North Star LLP | Builder has to provide the same super build up area in Khata as per the saledeed. Please ressolve this Khata error. We tried to call RERA office to explain the issue better, However its not reachable | AUTHORITY | 17/05/2025 |
| DEVARAJ BAKSHI & ANJALI BHARDWAJ vs GODREJ PROJECTS NORTH STAR LLP, | Refund for delay payment charges which builder took from us by giving false updates by mentioning property is ready and post registration they are not allowing us to stay inside our apartment | AUTHORITY | 03/01/2025 |
| DEVERAJ BAKSHI & ANJALI BHARDWAJ vs GODREJ PROJECTS NORTH STAR LLP, | We request to impose strong penalty on promoters and make sure they create proper Civic Amenities for local people as per RERA guidelines and stop harassing us for our allotted parking No.T1 34 | AUTHORITY | 03/01/2025 |
⚠ Matched by PROJECT NAME (the orders register carries no registration number) — confirm the respondent above is this project's builder before relying on it.
Complaints on this project's K-RERA page (2 complaints listed against this promoter)
| Complaint | Subject (as filed) | Project | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| CMP/210322/0007815 22-03-2021 | Non Publication of details of litigation and cancellation of registration | Godrej Royale Woods | DISPOSED AUTHORITY FULLBENCH |
| CMP/210907/0008310 07-09-2021 | Fake advertisement and promotion until buyer get in the project, later preponing and torturing buyers to pay the money monthly basis | Godrej Royale Woods | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4 |
Listed on the project's own K-RERA detail page (registration-exact source). Rows on the promoter's other projects are track-record context — read the subject text, it is the complainant's own filed wording.
Project team & certifications
RERA filingK-RERA names 2 project professional/vendor rows across Architect, Structural engineer. Use this to cross-check whose certificates, drawings, and contractor commitments support the filing; final reliance still belongs with your lawyer/technical reviewer.
| Role | Name | Registration / licence | Since | Locality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Architect | Karl Wadia | - | 1991 | Architect Hafeez Contractor 29 Bank Street Fort, Mumbai |
| Structural engineer | Amudhalingam S | - | - | - |
Builder track record
RERA filingGodrej Properties has 29 other K-RERA-registered projects in our records — grouped across the several project-specific entities this developer registers under (e.g. this project is filed as “Godrej Projects”) (average reported construction progress 44%). 9 are past their declared completion deadline with no completion certificate recorded — but because K-RERA publishes OCs inconsistently, a project that has actually been finished and handed over still shows up this way, so this overstates real delays, especially for a high-volume established builder. That is a lower delayed rate than the K-RERA average across Bengaluru on the same measure.
Read this as a list to spot-check for a pattern of genuinely stalled projects, not as a delay rate — pull up a few of the builder’s other K-RERA registrations and check whether they’ve actually been delivered.
Financials & Construction Progress
Financial disclosures
RERA filing⚠ No quarterly financial disclosures (collections, escrow withdrawals) on record, despite no completion certificate yet — meaning we can't verify the project's cashflows against its construction progress. Worth asking the builder directly why no quarterly filings are available.
Declared construction cost ÷ registered units averages to ₹28.4 lakhs per unit — the developer's own declared construction/development cost, not a sale price. K-RERA filings don't disclose what the builder is charging, so this can't tell you whether you're getting a fair deal — only you comparing your quoted price against comparable listings nearby can answer that.
RERA 70% project account is on file: Axis Bank M G Road (IFSC UTIB0000009, a/c …2885). RERA requires 70% of buyer collections to sit in this separate, project-specific account, drawn only against certified construction milestones — confirm your payments are made to THIS account (not a general builder account) and that it appears on your allotment letter.
Construction photo filings
RERA filingK-RERA has 1 project-photo upload.
These are developer-uploaded progress photos in the official document catalog. We do not treat them as proof of current site condition; use them as a prompt to ask for newer dated photos or a site visit. Individual filings are listed in the document catalog below.
Location & Connectivity
The nearest major job hub is ~21 km away — well outside the job hubs — this is a value/space play, not a short-commute one; budget for the drive.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| Kempegowda Int'l Airport | 4 km |
| Outer Ring Road / Manyata | 21 km |
| MG Road / city centre | 29 km |
| Whitefield IT hub | 29 km |
| Bellandur–Marathahalli belt | 32 km |
| Electronic City | 42 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.