RERA Property Intelligence Report · Preview
Godrej Projects North Star · · K-RERA PRM/KA/RERA/1250/303/PR/200515/003411
Report coverage
K-RERA registry & builder-record report
What this report covers
To confirm directly with the builder
🔒 The verdict & buyer playbook · Compliance report
The paid report opens with the overall risk rating, the specific red-flag findings, exactly what I'd do as a buyer in this project, who it suits, and the questions to put to the builder before you commit.
Registration-form facts from the K-RERA detail page: use these to sanity-check the builder brochure, parking allotment, and sanctioned-plan references before relying on plan-extracted approximations.
| Disclosure | Official value | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Registered units | 1,678 | Total inventory registered with K-RERA. |
| Registered land area | 52,620 sqm | The land area attached to this K-RERA registration. |
| Sanctioned FAR/FSI | 2.24 | Higher FAR generally means a denser vertical build, subject to site layout and open-space design. |
| Registered towers/wings | 6 | Official tower/wing count in the K-RERA detail page. |
| Parking disclosed | 1,105 total (203 open) — 0.66 spaces/unit | Confirm whether your quoted unit includes an allotted parking space and where it sits. |
| Project start date | 30-04-2020 |
K-RERA registration tables showing the project mix and tower/wing scale. Use this to sanity-check sales claims such as "only large homes", "low density", or "plenty of parking" against the filed inventory.
Registered tower / wing summary
| Tower/wing | Floors | Units | Parking | Height |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOWER 1 - PLUMERIA | 18 | 251 | 153 | - |
| TOWER 2 - MAHOGANY | 18 | 320 | 195 | - |
| TOWER 3 - RAINTREE | 19 | 298 | 186 | - |
| TOWER 4 - PINE | 19 | 298 | 186 | - |
| TOWER 5 - OAK | 18 | 320 | 194 | - |
| TOWER 6 - BANYAN | 16 | 191 | 191 | - |
K-RERA detail-page flat rows: exact unit numbers, official carpet area, UDS, and parking lots. 1,678 official flat/unit rows, matching the 1,678 registered units disclosed above. Use this as a checklist against the specific flat number in your cost sheet and draft agreement.
By unit type
| Unit type | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2BHK | 1,038 | 48.5-56.0 sqm | 23.6-30.8 sqm | 96 (942 with 0) |
| 3BHK | 360 | 59.6-60.0 sqm | 28.6-31.3 sqm | 343 (17 with 0) |
| STUDIO | 184 | 20.9 sqm | 10.8 sqm | 0 (184 with 0) |
| 1BHK | 96 | 39.8 sqm | 20.5 sqm | 96 |
By tower / wing
| Tower/wing | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TOWER 2 - MAHOGANY | 320 | 20.9-60.0 sqm | 10.8-31.1 sqm | 70 (250 with 0) |
| TOWER 5 - OAK | 320 | 20.9-60.0 sqm | 10.8-31.1 sqm | 70 (250 with 0) |
| TOWER 3 - RAINTREE | 298 | 20.9-60.0 sqm | 10.8-31.3 sqm | 74 (224 with 0) |
| TOWER 4 - PINE | 298 | 20.9-60.0 sqm | 10.8-31.3 sqm | 75 (223 with 0) |
| TOWER 1 - PLUMERIA | 251 | 20.9-60.0 sqm | 10.8-31.3 sqm | 55 (196 with 0) |
| TOWER 6 - BANYAN | 191 | 39.8-56.0 sqm | 20.5-30.8 sqm | 191 |
| Unit | Tower | Floor | Type | Carpet | UDS | Parking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1A-101 | TOWER 1 - PLUMERIA | 1 | 2BHK | 48.5 sqm | 26.0 sqm | 0 |
| 1A-102 | TOWER 1 - PLUMERIA | 1 | 3BHK | 59.6 sqm | 31.3 sqm | 1 |
| 1A-103 | TOWER 1 - PLUMERIA | 1 | 3BHK | 59.6 sqm | 31.3 sqm | 1 |
| 1A-104 | TOWER 1 - PLUMERIA | 1 | 2BHK | 48.5 sqm | 26.0 sqm | 0 |
| 1B-101 | TOWER 1 - PLUMERIA | 1 | STUDIO | 20.9 sqm | 10.8 sqm | 0 |
| 1B-102 | TOWER 1 - PLUMERIA | 1 | 2BHK | 48.5 sqm | 23.6 sqm | 0 |
What the numbers tell you
Synthesis from the official RERA scale, unit register, and land rows — the read a sales team won't volunteer.
🔒 Unit-by-unit guidance · Unit Guidance report
Which block and unit to prefer, the livability read on the filed plans, and a plan-by-plan walkthrough — the ₹2,999 guidance layer.
🔒 Full records — land title, amenities paperwork & document catalog · Compliance report
The complete land-title chain, the paperwork behind each declared amenity, and every document row on file with the regulator — the raw records the compliance read is built on.
No litigation declared on this project's K-RERA filing.
15 of 34 compliance document slots are filed as Not Applicable; the remaining 19 slots have usable uploaded filings.
No completion certificate (OC) on file yet — project has not been declared complete.
⚠ Registration validity has lapsed: originally due 29 Apr 2025, extended (Covid Extension) to 29 Jan 2026 — both dates have passed with no OC on file.
Named utility/regulatory approvals
"Not found in catalog" can mean the approval genuinely isn't on file yet, or that it doesn't apply to this project (K-RERA doesn't tell us which). Ask the builder directly for any marked not found before relying on it.
K-RERA complaint orders (5 complaints against a project of this name on K-RERA's orders register)
| Parties | Relief sought | Disposal | Order date |
|---|---|---|---|
| MADHUSUDHAN GATTAMANENI vs GODREJ PROJECTS NORTH STAR LLP | Need full refund or move me to Project Godrej Ananda | AUTHORITY | 27/12/2022 |
| T R ANAND vs M/S SAI SRUSHTI ONEHUB PROJECT LLP | Non Publication and non disclosure of details of litigation and cancellation of registration. | AUTHORITY | 19/09/2022 |
| Jagadeswara Rao vs Godrej Projects North Star LLP | Builder has to provide the same super build up area in Khata as per the saledeed. Please ressolve this Khata error. We tried to call RERA office to explain the issue better, However its not reachable | AUTHORITY | 17/05/2025 |
| DEVARAJ BAKSHI & ANJALI BHARDWAJ vs GODREJ PROJECTS NORTH STAR LLP, | Refund for delay payment charges which builder took from us by giving false updates by mentioning property is ready and post registration they are not allowing us to stay inside our apartment | AUTHORITY | 03/01/2025 |
| DEVERAJ BAKSHI & ANJALI BHARDWAJ vs GODREJ PROJECTS NORTH STAR LLP, | We request to impose strong penalty on promoters and make sure they create proper Civic Amenities for local people as per RERA guidelines and stop harassing us for our allotted parking No.T1 34 | AUTHORITY | 03/01/2025 |
⚠ Matched by PROJECT NAME (the orders register carries no registration number) — confirm the respondent above is this project's builder before relying on it.
Complaints on this project's K-RERA page (2 complaints listed against this promoter)
| Complaint | Subject (as filed) | Project | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| CMP/210322/0007815 22-03-2021 | Non Publication of details of litigation and cancellation of registration | Godrej Royale Woods | DISPOSED AUTHORITY FULLBENCH |
| CMP/210907/0008310 07-09-2021 | Fake advertisement and promotion until buyer get in the project, later preponing and torturing buyers to pay the money monthly basis | Godrej Royale Woods | DISPOSED AUTHORITY BENCH4 |
Listed on the project's own K-RERA detail page (registration-exact source). Rows on the promoter's other projects are track-record context — read the subject text, it is the complainant's own filed wording.
K-RERA names 2 project professional/vendor rows across Architect, Structural engineer. Use this to cross-check whose certificates, drawings, and contractor commitments support the filing; final reliance still belongs with your lawyer/technical reviewer.
| Role | Name | Registration / licence | Since | Locality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Architect | Karl Wadia | - | 1991 | Architect Hafeez Contractor 29 Bank Street Fort, Mumbai |
| Structural engineer | Amudhalingam S | - | - | - |
Godrej Properties has 29 other K-RERA-registered projects in our records — grouped across the several project-specific entities this developer registers under (e.g. this project is filed as “Godrej Projects”) (average reported construction progress 49%). 10 are past their declared completion deadline with no completion certificate recorded — but because K-RERA publishes OCs inconsistently, a project that has actually been finished and handed over still shows up this way, so this overstates real delays, especially for a high-volume established builder. That is a lower delayed rate than the K-RERA average across Bengaluru on the same measure.
Read this as a list to spot-check for a pattern of genuinely stalled projects, not as a delay rate — pull up a few of the builder’s other K-RERA registrations and check whether they’ve actually been delivered.
⚠ No quarterly financial disclosures (collections, escrow withdrawals) on record, despite no completion certificate yet — meaning we can't verify the project's cashflows against its construction progress. Worth asking the builder directly why no quarterly filings are available.
Declared construction cost ÷ registered units averages to ₹28.4 lakhs per unit — the developer's own declared construction/development cost, not a sale price. K-RERA filings don't disclose what the builder is charging, so this can't tell you whether you're getting a fair deal — only you comparing your quoted price against comparable listings nearby can answer that.
RERA 70% project account is on file: Axis Bank M G Road (IFSC UTIB0000009, a/c …2885). RERA requires 70% of buyer collections to sit in this separate, project-specific account, drawn only against certified construction milestones — confirm your payments are made to THIS account (not a general builder account) and that it appears on your allotment letter.
K-RERA has 1 project-photo upload.
These are developer-uploaded progress photos in the official document catalog. We do not treat them as proof of current site condition; use them as a prompt to ask for newer dated photos or a site visit.
The nearest major job hub is ~21 km away — well outside the job hubs — this is a value/space play, not a short-commute one; budget for the drive.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| Kempegowda Int'l Airport | 4 km |
| Outer Ring Road / Manyata | 21 km |
| MG Road / city centre | 29 km |
| Whitefield IT hub | 29 km |
| Bellandur–Marathahalli belt | 32 km |
| Electronic City | 42 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.
Should you buy in Godrej Royale Woods?
This page is the free K-RERA filing summary. The full RERA Property Intelligence Report gives you buyer-complaint history, regulatory flags, builder track record, the official unit register, land title, NOCs, and (where the sanctioned plans support it) room-by-room unit data and an annotated site plan. See a real one first:
Sample: Sobha Silicon Oasis → · browse all sample reports →
Compliance Report · ₹999
The regulator’s filing record, read · 1 working day
Scan with any UPI app to pay · quietlist@kotak
Unit Guidance Report · ₹2,999
Everything, down to which unit · 1 working day
Not useful to your decision? Full refund — no questions asked.
Scan with any UPI app to pay · quietlist@kotak
Paying from outside India? Pay $15 (Compliance) or $39 (Unit Guidance) via PayPal, or email hello@quietlist.in for a card invoice. Prefer to talk first, or have a portfolio to check? Same address. An information aid for your own due diligence, not legal or investment advice.
Free · Watch this project
We'll email you when this project's RERA record changes.
Built by Godrej Projects. View Godrej Projects's full track record →
Figures are the developer's own quarterly disclosures on the Karnataka RERA register. "Built" is the highest construction % filed; "sold" is booked units over total. Not a claim about the developer's intent. Explore every project on our Bangalore project-health tool.
Own a unit in Godrej Royale Woods?
Sell directly to Quietlist's pre-screened buyer list — flat fee, no broker commission.
Last checked against the RERA register: 4 Jul 2026