Sobha Oakshire Phase 2 Wing 3,4,9 and 10

This project, on the record

The comparable facts of this project, from its own RERA registration record. Each context percentile names its exact comparison set, drawn from Quietlist’s full register store. The paid report adds drawing-read rows to this same table — what the filed plans show about the site, its edges and the unit layouts.

Values as crawled from the official K-RERA record; context percentiles name their comparison population.

Official Registry Facts

Registration-form facts from the K-RERA detail page: use these to sanity-check the builder brochure, parking allotment, and sanctioned-plan references before relying on plan-extracted approximations.

K-RERA registration tables showing the project mix and tower/wing scale. Use this to sanity-check sales claims such as "only large homes", "low density", or "plenty of parking" against the filed inventory.

K-RERA detail-page flat rows: exact unit numbers, official carpet area, UDS, and parking lots. 30 official flat/unit rows, matching the 30 registered units disclosed above. Use this as a checklist against the specific flat number in your cost sheet and draft agreement.

Legal, Approvals & Project Team

No litigation declared on this project's K-RERA filing.

7 of 84 compliance document slots are filed as Not Applicable; the remaining 77 slots have usable uploaded filings.

No completion certificate (OC) on file yet — project has not been declared complete.

Clean approvals profile: every applicable statutory NOC is on file — including pollution-control clearance (KSPCB), the clearances buyers most often find still pending. Nothing is outstanding among the statutory NOCs — which compliance documents are filed versus still under process is a separate matter, covered in Litigation & compliance above. Note Fire NOC and environmental clearance are not among the approvals K-RERA marks applicable to this project — if the named-approvals check shows them as "not found in catalog", that is why; ask the builder directly whether they apply here. Since these are developer-filed portal statuses, have your lawyer confirm them against the linked NOC copies.

7 further authority slots are marked not applicable by the regulator.

K-RERA names 5 project professional/vendor rows across Chartered accountant, Engineer, Architect, Contractor. Use this to cross-check whose certificates, drawings, and contractor commitments support the filing; final reliance still belongs with your lawyer/technical reviewer.

Sobha has 121 other K-RERA-registered projects in our records — grouped across the several project-specific entities this developer registers under (e.g. this project is filed as “Sobha”) (average reported construction progress 61%). 60 are past their declared completion deadline with no completion certificate recorded — but because K-RERA publishes OCs inconsistently, a project that has actually been finished and handed over still shows up this way, so this overstates real delays, especially for a high-volume established builder. That is a lower delayed rate than the K-RERA average across Bengaluru on the same measure.

Read this as a list to spot-check for a pattern of genuinely stalled projects, not as a delay rate — pull up a few of the builder’s other K-RERA registrations and check whether they’ve actually been delivered.

Financials & Construction Progress

Latest quarterly filing (2026-Q1): ₹8.07 Cr collected from buyers, ₹16.63 Cr withdrawn from the project's escrow account. This quarter the escrow withdrawal (₹16.63 Cr) exceeded buyer collections (₹8.07 Cr) — worth asking the builder to reconcile against certified construction milestones, which is what RERA requires escrow draws to track.

• 100% of registered units are shown as sold/booked, but no completion certificate is on file yet.
• Construction progress moved from 35% to 90% across the filed QPR window.
• The filed unit sales count did not move across the available QPR window because the project was already effectively sold out.
• Across available QPR rows, escrow withdrawals are 1.11x buyer collections. Ask the builder to reconcile this against certified project costs and prior-period balances.
• In the latest QPR, escrow withdrawal exceeds buyer collections for that quarter. This can be normal if prior balance existed, but it needs a clean explanation.

QPR figures are developer-filed quarterly disclosures. Collections and withdrawals are not a project valuation; they are a sanity check for whether sales, construction progress, and escrow draws appear directionally aligned.

Declared construction cost ÷ registered units averages to ₹242.2 lakhs per unit — the developer's own declared construction/development cost, not a sale price. K-RERA filings don't disclose what the builder is charging, so this can't tell you whether you're getting a fair deal — only you comparing your quoted price against comparable listings nearby can answer that.

RERA 70% project account is on file: Axis Bank M G Road IFSC Code : UTIB0000009 Pin Code : 560001. RERA requires 70% of buyer collections to sit in this separate, project-specific account, drawn only against certified construction milestones — confirm your payments are made to THIS account (not a general builder account) and that it appears on your allotment letter.

Location & Connectivity

The nearest major job hub is ~22 km away — well outside the job hubs — this is a value/space play, not a short-commute one; budget for the drive.

Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.