RERA Property Intelligence Report · Preview

arsis green hills

ARSIS DEVELOPERS · Bengaluru East · K-RERA PRM/KA/RERA/1251/446/PR/180130/002413

Report coverage

K-RERA registry & builder-record report

What this report covers

  • Official K-RERA registry facts — units, cost, land area, towers, approvals
  • Complaint / litigation & compliance history
  • Builder delivery record across their K-RERA portfolio
  • Construction trajectory & sales pace from quarterly filings

To confirm directly with the builder

  • No dimensioned unit layouts could be confidently extracted from the filed plans.
Not yet
Completion certificate
None declared
Legal status
Other RERA projects by builder

🔒 The verdict & buyer playbook · Compliance report

The paid report opens with the overall risk rating, the specific red-flag findings, exactly what I'd do as a buyer in this project, who it suits, and the questions to put to the builder before you commit.

Unlock in the ₹999 report →

438
Registered units
₹82.2 Cr
Est. construction cost
Units profiled
44
RERA documents on file

Official Registry Facts

Official project scale

RERA filing

Registration-form facts from the K-RERA detail page: use these to sanity-check the builder brochure, parking allotment, and sanctioned-plan references before relying on plan-extracted approximations.

DisclosureOfficial valueWhy it matters
Registered units438Total inventory registered with K-RERA.
Official carpet area13,430 sqmRegulator-disclosed project-level carpet area, not vision-derived room sums.
Registered land area17,582 sqmThe land area attached to this K-RERA registration.
Sanctioned FAR/FSI3.25Higher FAR generally means a denser vertical build, subject to site layout and open-space design.
Registered towers/wings3Official tower/wing count in the K-RERA detail page.
Parking disclosed438 total (0 open) — 1.00 spaces/unitConfirm whether your quoted unit includes an allotted parking space and where it sits.
Project start date01-01-2018

Official inventory & towers

RERA filing

K-RERA registration tables showing the project mix and tower/wing scale. Use this to sanity-check sales claims such as "only large homes", "low density", or "plenty of parking" against the filed inventory.

Registered inventory mix

TypeUnitsShareOfficial carpet area
2 , 2.5 &3 bhk flats158100%13,430 sqm

Registered tower / wing summary

Tower/wingFloorsUnitsParkingHeight
MOUNT DALE31178178-
MOUNT VALLEY31178178-
MOUNT SUMMIT148282-

Official unit register

RERA filing

K-RERA detail-page flat rows: exact unit numbers, official carpet area, UDS, and parking lots. 438 official flat/unit rows, matching the 438 registered units disclosed above. Use this as a checklist against the specific flat number in your cost sheet and draft agreement.

By unit type

Unit typeRowsCarpet areaUDSParking lots
2 BHK26679.0-80.4 sqm23.1-23.5 sqm266
3 BHK142102.8-106.1 sqm29.6-30.2 sqm142
2.5 BHK3080.4 sqm23.5 sqm30

By tower / wing

Tower/wingRowsCarpet areaUDSParking lots
MOUNT DALE17879.0-106.1 sqm23.1-30.2 sqm178
MOUNT VALLEY17879.0-106.1 sqm23.1-30.2 sqm178
MOUNT SUMMIT8279.0-106.1 sqm23.1-30.2 sqm82
Show sample official unit rows
UnitTowerFloorTypeCarpetUDSParking
102MOUNT DALE12 BHK79.7 sqm23.2 sqm1
103MOUNT DALE12 BHK79.0 sqm23.1 sqm1
104MOUNT DALE12 BHK79.0 sqm23.1 sqm1
105MOUNT DALE12.5 BHK80.4 sqm23.5 sqm1
106MOUNT DALE13 BHK106.1 sqm30.2 sqm1
202MOUNT DALE22 BHK79.7 sqm23.2 sqm1

What the numbers tell you

Synthesis from the official RERA scale, unit register, and land rows — the read a sales team won't volunteer.

Unit formatAverage official carpet area is ~943 sqft — mid-format homes (2–3BHK territory), not compact stock. This is a mid-scale project — 438 homes across 3 towers. Carpet is the RERA-defined usable area, so compare it against the 'super built-up' a broker quotes (typically 25–35% larger).
ParkingThe project declares 438 parking spaces for 438 homes (~1.0 per home) — about one space per home — adequate but tight if you have two cars.
Your land share (UDS)Undivided land share averages ~25 sqm per home; across all 438 homes that is ~63% of the plot — on the lower side — the undivided shares sum to noticeably less than the plot, worth asking the builder why before relying on it. Low UDS relative to land can mean the builder keeps land value the flat owners think they're buying.

🔒 Unit-by-unit guidance · Unit Guidance report

Which block and unit to prefer, the livability read on the filed plans, and a plan-by-plan walkthrough — the ₹2,999 guidance layer.

Unlock in the ₹2,999 report →

🔒 Full records — land title, amenities paperwork & document catalog · Compliance report

The complete land-title chain, the paperwork behind each declared amenity, and every document row on file with the regulator — the raw records the compliance read is built on.

Unlock in the ₹999 report →

Legal, Approvals & Project Team

Litigation & compliance

RERA filing

No litigation declared on this project's K-RERA filing.

⚠ 7 of 37 compliance document slots are filed as under process / not yet usable: Commencement Certificate, Proforma For Sale Deed, Brochure of Current Project, Transfer of development rights certificate, Relinquishment Deed and more.

No completion certificate (OC) on file yet — project has not been declared complete.

Named utility/regulatory approvals

Electricity (BESCOM/ESCOM)✓ On file (BESCOM)
Water & sewage (BWSSB/KWSSB)✓ On file (BWSSB)
Fire NOC✓ On file (Fire Force Department)
Pollution control (KSPCB)✓ On file (KSPCB)
Environmental clearance✓ On file (SEIAA)
Airport Authority height clearance✓ On file (Airport Authority of India)

"Not found in catalog" can mean the approval genuinely isn't on file yet, or that it doesn't apply to this project (K-RERA doesn't tell us which). Ask the builder directly for any marked not found before relying on it.

K-RERA complaint orders (12 complaints against a project of this name on K-RERA's orders register)

PartiesRelief soughtDisposalOrder date
Dileep Pamula vs ARSIS DEVELOPERS PVT LTDThe builder should provide the possession date and the builder should pay compensation for delay as per agreementAUTHORITY25/06/2025
Venkatesh Cheemakurthy vs ARSIS DEVELOPERS PVT LTDEnsure strict adherence to the terms of the Sale Agreement and compel the builder to deliver the flat to me without further delay.AUTHORITY25/06/2025
ROHIT JAISWAL vs ARSIS DEVELOPERS PVT LTDPlease look into the matter as soon as possible so that we can get out Flat at earliest (project already delayed).AUTHORITY25/06/2025
Rimmi Kumari vs ARSIS DEVELOPERS PVT LTDRequest RERA to help for Project completion and handover along with compensation for delay based on the time defined in Sales AgreementAUTHORITY25/06/2025
Tapan Kumar Roy vs ARSIS DEVELOPERS PVT LTD1)Delay compensation. 2) Speedy completion and hand over. 3) In agreement project is 30th flr, but 31st flr is build without any information & it's impact on UDS. 4) Clarify carpet areaAUTHORITY25/06/2025
Sanidhya Srivastava vs ARSIS DEVELOPERS PVT LTDBuilder to provide the concrete date of possesion of property with proper liveable condition with OC and builder should provide compensation for the delay as per sale agreement( Page 11 - 5(d))AUTHORITY25/06/2025
Ankit Babulal Jain vs ARSIS DEVELOPERS PVT LTDPayment of rent compensation as per agreement. Provide precise timeline by when we can secure all the approvals, when project will be completed in liveable condition and confirm OC application date.AUTHORITY25/06/2025
Damarla Yagna Prakash vs ARSIS DEVELOPERS PVT LTDRequest you to take the necessary action towards Builder in honouring the sale deed agreement and giving pocession of apartment with all amenities promised in a stipulated time period.AUTHORITY25/06/2025
Sachin Chindak vs ARSIS DEVELOPERS PVT LTDNeed to look into breach of sale agreement by ARSIS & intervention from RERA to scrutinize the project progress in detail to handover the flat with all approvals, promised amenities before Nov 2023AUTHORITY25/06/2025
GOLLA HARISH vs Royaume Builders and Promoters Private LimitedRERA need to look into this issue and provide the solution. RERA should consider us while giving extension to this builderAUTHORITY22/07/2024
Vamsee krishna Srirama vs ARSIS DEVELOPERS PVT LTDTHE BUILDER SHOULD PROVIDE THE POSSESSION DATE AND THE BUILDER SHOULD PAY COMPENSATION FOR DELAY AS PER AGREEMENTAUTHORITY17/10/2025
Shanu Saseendran vs ARSIS DEVELOPERS PVT LTD(A) Request to over-sight complete project wrt Handover with OC or (B) Return back paid amount and bank interest paid in lieu of flat 1606, Mount ValleyAUTHORITY17/10/2025

⚠ Matched by PROJECT NAME (the orders register carries no registration number) — confirm the respondent above is this project's builder before relying on it.

Statutory approval status

RERA filing

10 further authority slots are marked not applicable by the regulator.

Authority / NOCStatusDateFile

Project team & certifications

RERA filing

K-RERA names 2 project professional/vendor rows across Architect, Structural engineer. Use this to cross-check whose certificates, drawings, and contractor commitments support the filing; final reliance still belongs with your lawyer/technical reviewer.

RoleNameRegistration / licenceSinceLocality
ArchitectGenesis Planners Pvt. Ltd-1997Railway Parallel Road, Kumara Park West
Structural engineerDesign Tree Service Consultants Pvt. Ltd---

Financials & Construction Progress

Financial disclosures

RERA filing

Latest quarterly filing (2025-Q4): ₹209.89 Cr collected from buyers, ₹209.89 Cr withdrawn from the project's escrow account.

Construction progress62% → 63% (+1 pts)
Units sold/booked as registered406/438 (93%)
Buyer collections in available QPRs₹417.56 Cr
Escrow withdrawals in available QPRs₹417.56 Cr (1.00x collections)

QPR figures are developer-filed quarterly disclosures. Collections and withdrawals are not a project valuation; they are a sanity check for whether sales, construction progress, and escrow draws appear directionally aligned.

Declared construction cost ÷ registered units averages to ₹18.8 lakhs per unit — the developer's own declared construction/development cost, not a sale price. K-RERA filings don't disclose what the builder is charging, so this can't tell you whether you're getting a fair deal — only you comparing your quoted price against comparable listings nearby can answer that.

RERA 70% project account is on file: HDFC BHATTARAHALLI (IFSC HDFC0006393, a/c …1795). RERA requires 70% of buyer collections to sit in this separate, project-specific account, drawn only against certified construction milestones — confirm your payments are made to THIS account (not a general builder account) and that it appears on your allotment letter.

Location & Connectivity

The nearest major job hub is ~7 km away — a manageable everyday commute to a major job hub.

LandmarkStraight-line
Whitefield IT hub7 km
Bellandur–Marathahalli belt10 km
Outer Ring Road / Manyata10 km
MG Road / city centre12 km
Kempegowda Int'l Airport20 km
Electronic City20 km

Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.

Free · Watch this project

We'll email you when this project's RERA record changes.

Something went wrong — email hello@quietlist.in.

✓ You're watching — we'll email you if the RERA record changes.

Built by Arsis Developers.

Other RERA-registered projects in Krishnarajapuram

Trifecta Verdeen Resplandor ROW House Phase-3

Major developers building in Krishnarajapuram

Figures are the developer's own quarterly disclosures on the Karnataka RERA register. "Built" is the highest construction % filed; "sold" is booked units over total. Not a claim about the developer's intent. Explore every project on our Bangalore project-health tool.

Own a unit in Arsis Green Hills?

Sell directly to Quietlist's pre-screened buyer list — flat fee, no broker commission.

List your unit →

Last checked against the RERA register: 27 Jul 2026