Assetz Sun & Sanctum - Phase 2
RERA Property Intelligence Report · Preview
Lily Realty · Bengaluru East · K-RERA PRM/KA/RERA/1251/446/PR/171014/000345
Report coverage
K-RERA registry & builder-record report
What this report covers
To confirm directly with the builder
🔒 The verdict & buyer playbook · Compliance report
The paid report opens with the overall risk rating, the specific red-flag findings, exactly what I'd do as a buyer in this project, who it suits, and the questions to put to the builder before you commit.
Registration-form facts from the K-RERA detail page: use these to sanity-check the builder brochure, parking allotment, and sanctioned-plan references before relying on plan-extracted approximations.
| Disclosure | Official value | Why it matters |
|---|---|---|
| Registered units | 672 | Total inventory registered with K-RERA. |
| Official carpet area | 88,887 sqm | Regulator-disclosed project-level carpet area, not vision-derived room sums. |
| Registered land area | 31,363 sqm | The land area attached to this K-RERA registration. |
| Sanctioned FAR/FSI | 3.25 | Higher FAR generally means a denser vertical build, subject to site layout and open-space design. |
| Registered towers/wings | 5 | Official tower/wing count in the K-RERA detail page. |
| Parking disclosed | 672 total (0 open) — 1.00 spaces/unit | Confirm whether your quoted unit includes an allotted parking space and where it sits. |
| Project start date | 19-10-2012 |
K-RERA registration tables showing the project mix and tower/wing scale. Use this to sanity-check sales claims such as "only large homes", "low density", or "plenty of parking" against the filed inventory.
Registered inventory mix
| Type | Units | Share | Official carpet area |
|---|---|---|---|
| Residential 3bhk and pent house | 725 | 100% | 88,887 sqm |
Registered tower / wing summary
| Tower/wing | Floors | Units | Parking | Height |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Block A | 39 | 149 | 149 | - |
| BLOCK B | 39 | 149 | 149 | - |
| Block C | 38 | 76 | 76 | - |
| Block D | 39 | 149 | 149 | - |
| Block E | 39 | 149 | 149 | - |
K-RERA detail-page flat rows: exact unit numbers, official carpet area, UDS, and parking lots. 671 official flat/unit rows vs 672 registered units disclosed above; ask why the row count differs. Use this as a checklist against the specific flat number in your cost sheet and draft agreement.
By unit type
| Unit type | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 3BHK | 652 | 1,084.6-1,446.3 sqft | 314.8-416.4 sqft | 652 |
| 4BHK | 18 | 2,102.2-2,802.0 sqft | 659.2-851.2 sqft | 36 |
| 0 | 1 | 0.0 sqft | 0.0 sqft | 0 (1 with 0) |
By tower / wing
| Tower/wing | Rows | Carpet area | UDS | Parking lots |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| BLOCK B | 149 | 1,103.3-2,521.0 sqft | 325.0-771.4 sqft | 153 |
| Block A | 149 | 1,084.6-2,450.8 sqft | 318.0-736.2 sqft | 153 |
| Block D | 149 | 1,243.6-2,802.0 sqft | 361.6-851.2 sqft | 153 |
| Block E | 148 | 0.0-2,630.8 sqft | 0.0-813.2 sqft | 151 (1 with 0) |
| Block C | 76 | 1,166.0-2,419.5 sqft | 340.6-775.2 sqft | 78 |
| Unit | Tower | Floor | Type | Carpet | UDS | Parking |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| T0100A | Block A | 1 | 3BHK | 1,085.8 sqft | 318.0 sqft | 1 |
| T0100B | Block A | 1 | 3BHK | 1,225.8 sqft | 355.4 sqft | 1 |
| T0100C | Block A | 1 | 3BHK | 1,251.5 sqft | 351.0 sqft | 1 |
| T0100D | Block A | 1 | 3BHK | 1,101.2 sqft | 322.6 sqft | 1 |
| T0101A | Block A | 2 | 3BHK | 1,084.6 sqft | 318.0 sqft | 1 |
| T0101B | Block A | 2 | 3BHK | 1,225.8 sqft | 355.4 sqft | 1 |
What the numbers tell you
Synthesis from the official RERA scale, unit register, and land rows — the read a sales team won't volunteer.
🔒 Unit-by-unit guidance · Unit Guidance report
Which block and unit to prefer, the livability read on the filed plans, and a plan-by-plan walkthrough — the ₹2,999 guidance layer.
🔒 Full records — land title, amenities paperwork & document catalog · Compliance report
The complete land-title chain, the paperwork behind each declared amenity, and every document row on file with the regulator — the raw records the compliance read is built on.
No litigation declared on this project's K-RERA filing.
All 23 standard compliance document slots have usable uploaded filings.
No completion certificate (OC) on file yet — project has not been declared complete.
⚠ Registration validity has lapsed: originally due 31 Dec 2018, extended (an extension) to 30 Oct 2019 — both dates have passed with no OC on file. An extension application filed on 29 Dec 2018 is pending with K-RERA — until it is approved, the registration stands lapsed.
Named utility/regulatory approvals
"Not found in catalog" can mean the approval genuinely isn't on file yet, or that it doesn't apply to this project (K-RERA doesn't tell us which). Ask the builder directly for any marked not found before relying on it.
K-RERA complaint orders (24 complaints against a project of this name on K-RERA's orders register)
| Parties | Relief sought | Disposal | Order date |
|---|---|---|---|
| Pradeep Kumar Dhandania vs Lily Realty Pvt Ltd | Compensation/Interest for Delay and Execution of Sale Deed/Handing over of possession of the Flat | AUTHORITY | 28/03/2024 |
| Anand Dhariya vs LILY REALTY PRIVATE LIMITED | Refund of money with interest | AUTHORITY | 26/06/2023 |
| MR MALYADRI VALLAPUNENI & ANOTHER vs M/S.LILLY REALTY PVT LTD. | Delivery of apartment and payment of delay compensation. | AUTHORITY | 22/11/2023 |
| GANESH SHANKAR RAJ vs LILY REALTY PVT LTD. | Delay Compensation OR full refund | AUTHORITY | 22/08/2022 |
| MIHIR KUMAR PATRO vs M/s.LILY REALTY PVT LTD | Delay Compensation | AUTHORITY | 20/02/2024 |
| MR UMESH K PATEL vs LILY REALTY PVT LTD | The complainants be pleased to pass an order directing the opposite party to receive the balance amount and deliver the fully constructed flat bearing no. T0434d at in the tower name t04, 34th floor | AUTHORITY | 18/06/2025 |
| LEELA UTHAPPA vs PASHMINA WATERFRONT PHASE 1 | REIMBURSEMENT OF THE BOOKING AMOUNT OF RS.10,60,000/- WITH 24% INTEREST RATE PER ANNUM UNTIL DATE OF SUCH PAYMENT | AUTHORITY | 16/11/2023 |
| Shiladitya Patnaik vs LILY REALTY PVT LTD | Completion and handover of my flat and adequate compensation for the delay | AUTHORITY | 14/12/2024 |
| Manish Hotwani vs LILY REALTY PVT LTD | I need help from Rera to ask the builder to provide compensation as per the agreement. I am willing to take possession, if builder provides compensation. | AUTHORITY | 13/12/2022 |
| Hemant Kumar Rajput & Esha Guha vs LILY REALTY PVT LTD | Need monetary compensation for all the short comings. Also wants to get the developer team out of project, as they coerce their way on residents. Want full control of property to association | AUTHORITY | 12/01/2024 |
| Gopal Agarwal and Amit Agarwal vs LILY REALTY PVT LTD | Delay Compensation as per RERA Act & Rules | AUTHORITY | 11/10/2022 |
| Avinash Bhan vs LILY REALTY PVT.LTD | Refund with interest | AUTHORITY | 10/11/2025 |
| Vasanti D Patel vs LILY REALTY PVT LTD | Complainants above named humbly prays that this Authority be pleased to pass an order directing Respondent to receive the balance amount and deliver the fully constructed flat bearing flat no.T0433D | AUTHORITY | 10/06/2025 |
| DHANUMJAY J vs LILY REALTY PVT LTD | Full refund with Interest and additional costs incurred | AUTHORITY | 09/12/2023 |
| ASHWINI KUMAR vs LILY REALTY PVT LTD | Requesting refund with compensation | AUTHORITY | 09/12/2023 |
| SATHISH N PRABHU vs LILY REALTY PVT LTD | Delay compensation of Rs. 7,57,444/- and not to cause harassment until completion of apartment in accordance with Construction Agreement and direction to handover apartment within specified time limit | AUTHORITY | 09/09/2023 |
| MANISH SRIVASTAVA vs PASHMINA WATER PHASE 1 | Expecting Rera to help me getting refund of Rs. 270000 | AUTHORITY | 05/08/2024 |
| Saloni Brahmachari vs Lily Realty Pvt Ltd | Direction to the builder to either cure the deficiencies in the apartment or waive off the remaining payment so that the Complainants can get the work done themselves | AUTHORITY | 05/07/2023 |
| Arun Kumar Jain vs PASHMINA WATER FRONT PHASE 1 | refund the initial booking amount of rupees Rs.2,70,000/- (Rupees Two Lakh Seventy Thousand Only) along with the delayed interest of 18% per annum plus DAMAGES | AUTHORITY | 05/03/2025 |
| Arun Ramasubramanian vs LILY REALTY PRIVATE LIMITED | Compensation, Refund, Completion of pending works | AUTHORITY | 03/04/2023 |
| H Subramanian and Pushpa Subramanian vs LILY REALTY PRIVATE LIMITED | Compensation, Refund, Completion of pending work | AUTHORITY | 03/04/2023 |
| Gurprit Singh Johal vs Lily Realty Pvt Ltd | I am seeking possession of my flat and compensation for delay and agony caused by developer | AUTHORITY | 02/12/2023 |
| DEEPESH KHATRI & SHIVANI CHOPRA vs M/S LILY REALTY PRIVATE LIMITED | I believe & expect a fair action from RERA that results in payment of delay compensation with penalty interest from builder which I am contractually obligated to receive. | AUTHORITY | 02/08/2023 |
| SANTANU BASU MALLIK vs Pashmina Waterfront Phase 1 | Direct Respondent to pay Rs.77,02,346 to Petitioner towards damages for delay in possession, refund of Pre EMI, damages, Interest on capital paid | AUTHORITY | 01/07/2024 |
⚠ Matched by PROJECT NAME (the orders register carries no registration number) — confirm the respondent above is this project's builder before relying on it.
Complaints on this project's K-RERA page (40 complaints listed against this promoter)
| Complaint | Subject (as filed) | Project | Status |
|---|---|---|---|
| CMP/190616/0003311 16-06-2019 | Non-completion of project by promised date | Pashmina Waterfront -Phase-I | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/210805/0008213 05-08-2021 | None Provision of Amenities excess PLC charges , Flat area shortage | Pashmina Waterfront -Phase-I | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/210806/0008221 06-08-2021 | Project incomplete | Pashmina Waterfront -Phase-I | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/210428/0007933 28-04-2021 | Amenities not completed as per Agreement even after 6 years | Pashmina Waterfront -Phase-I | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/200822/0006398 22-08-2020 | RERA Order with respect to complaint 1911050004558 Not Honored By Promoter after more than 70 days | Pashmina Waterfront -Phase-I | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/201109/0005081 09-11-2020 | Flat & Project incomplete even after 6 years of delay | Pashmina Waterfront -Phase-I | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/191119/0004762 19-11-2019 | Delayed and pending for long time.request refund with interest and penalty relief | Pashmina Waterfront -Phase-I | DISPOSED AO |
| CMP/191108/0004568 08-11-2019 | Claiming damages and Compensation for the delay cost by the Promoter | PASHMINA WATERFRONT -PHASE-I | DISPOSED AO |
Listed on the project's own K-RERA detail page (registration-exact source). Rows on the promoter's other projects are track-record context — read the subject text, it is the complainant's own filed wording.
K-RERA names 3 project professional/vendor rows across Architect, Contractor, Structural engineer. Use this to cross-check whose certificates, drawings, and contractor commitments support the filing; final reliance still belongs with your lawyer/technical reviewer.
| Role | Name | Registration / licence | Since | Locality |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Architect | Mr.Tilak Thomas | - | 1999 | Kasturba Road Cross, off Lavelle Road |
| Contractor | Seema Electricals Private Limited | - | 1996 | Model House 4th Street, Basavanagudi |
| Structural engineer | Mr.N.N.Nagendra kumar | - | - | - |
⚠ No quarterly financial disclosures (collections, escrow withdrawals) on record, despite no completion certificate yet — meaning we can't verify the project's cashflows against its construction progress. Worth asking the builder directly why no quarterly filings are available.
Declared construction cost ÷ registered units averages to ₹135.4 lakhs per unit — the developer's own declared construction/development cost, not a sale price. K-RERA filings don't disclose what the builder is charging, so this can't tell you whether you're getting a fair deal — only you comparing your quoted price against comparable listings nearby can answer that.
RERA 70% project account is on file: YES BANK Bandra (IFSC YESB0000134, a/c …0333). RERA requires 70% of buyer collections to sit in this separate, project-specific account, drawn only against certified construction milestones — confirm your payments are made to THIS account (not a general builder account) and that it appears on your allotment letter.
K-RERA has 1 project-photo upload.
These are developer-uploaded progress photos in the official document catalog. We do not treat them as proof of current site condition; use them as a prompt to ask for newer dated photos or a site visit.
The nearest major job hub is ~7 km away — a manageable everyday commute to a major job hub.
| Landmark | Straight-line |
|---|---|
| Whitefield IT hub | 7 km |
| Outer Ring Road / Manyata | 10 km |
| Bellandur–Marathahalli belt | 10 km |
| MG Road / city centre | 13 km |
| Kempegowda Int'l Airport | 19 km |
| Electronic City | 21 km |
Straight-line distances from the geocoded project locality (the RERA address is an area, not a door) — directional, not door-to-door drive times. Check the actual road route, the nearest metro station and daily-need shops/schools/hospitals on a site visit.
Should you buy in Pashmina Waterfront -Phase-I?
This page is the free K-RERA filing summary. The full RERA Property Intelligence Report gives you buyer-complaint history, regulatory flags, builder track record, the official unit register, land title, NOCs, and (where the sanctioned plans support it) room-by-room unit data and an annotated site plan. See a real one first:
Sample: Sobha Silicon Oasis → · browse all sample reports →
Compliance Report · ₹999
The regulator’s filing record, read · 1 working day
Scan with any UPI app to pay · quietlist@kotak
Unit Guidance Report · ₹2,999
Everything, down to which unit · 1 working day
Not useful to your decision? Full refund — no questions asked.
Scan with any UPI app to pay · quietlist@kotak
Paying from outside India? Pay $15 (Compliance) or $39 (Unit Guidance) via PayPal, or email hello@quietlist.in for a card invoice. Prefer to talk first, or have a portfolio to check? Same address. An information aid for your own due diligence, not legal or investment advice.
Free · Watch this project
We'll email you when this project's RERA record changes.
Built by Lily Realty.
Figures are the developer's own quarterly disclosures on the Karnataka RERA register. "Built" is the highest construction % filed; "sold" is booked units over total. Not a claim about the developer's intent. Explore every project on our Bangalore project-health tool.
Own a unit in Pashmina Waterfront -Phase-I?
Sell directly to Quietlist's pre-screened buyer list — flat fee, no broker commission.
Last checked against the RERA register: 27 Jul 2026